Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,861 through 5,880 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #163055

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ

    #163056

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:51)
    secondly  WJ  just where did Peter get his credentials or James or John. You swear by their words yet they had no formal training. Now you will probably say they were anointed by God to write the scriptures or that they were taught by Jesus himself.    Has  all of that stopped. Can God not anoint others to write or has Jesus stopped teaching people about his word?


    Martian

    I noticed you didn't mention the Apostle Paul who was a Hebrew of the Hebrews and trained by the very best of his day and wrote 2 thirds of the NT.

    Yes God is still speaking, but what he is speaking will never contradict the inspired scriptures that we have. If you believe that then you need to become a Muslim or something like that!

    WJ

    #163179
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    wj……Do you even understand what the term “an Hebrew of the Hebrews” means, I'll tell you, Paul's was of the tribe of Benjamin , if you look up the history of the Hebrews you will find at one time the tribe of Benjamin was destroyed except for 600 males and in order to save the tribe because they had no Benjamin women left after their Hebrew brother attack and kill but 600 males of their tribe, the rest of the tribes gave them women from their tribes to continue the tribe . Hence the term used by Paul, “an Hebrew of the Hebrews”. So really him saying that had nothing to do with you point you were trying to make brother.

    Another point i would like to bring out here is that all scripture was (ORIGINALLY) HEBREW or Aramaic, the Greeks came along later and their language is (NOT) the same . The Breans searched to OLD Testament (Hebrew) to see if what they hear was true or not. Any time you changes (ANY) language problems will occur in terms and phrases of the dialect being translated into. I have found what is in the New testament, if it does not conform with the old testament in intent, then a problem in transliteration exists. The OLD (HEBREW) text is most accurate i think , i tend to agree with the Breans on this. As far as Jeff Benner goes i like His (HEBREW) (MECHANICAL) explanations given of the ancient Hebrew language He is well versed IMO. I have no idea of his Greek ties whatsoever, I don't think he claims to be a Greek Scholar either, as far as i know. You should check out his Book on the Mechanical translation of Genesis . i think you would find it very interesting…. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours………………gene

    #163198
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    WJ……….Here is some interesting things Jeff Benner has brought out, for instance there is NO Hebrew word for CREATE did you know that?, the word used in Genesis is (FATTING THE EARTH) THEY UNDERSTOOD IT AS GOD WAS FILLING IT UP much like fattening a cow or animal. We look at it like GOD was filling the earth up by creating things in it. Another interesting point he brought out was the Word for GOD in the original language the pictorial language of the Hebrew's, there was the Ox head with a walking cane next to it. This was the first Pictorial word for GOD, it meant the Ox was a strong Power and the cane was what you leaned on or trusted in for support. That is how they described GOD. I think you would find His research very interesting. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours…………….gene

    #163205
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,05:38)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ


    Ephesians 3:14-15(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,

    #163206
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi all

    Pr 8:22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works,
    before his deeds of old;
    Pr 8:23 I was appointed from eternity,
    from the beginning, before the world began.
    Pr 8:24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth,
    when there were no springs abounding with water;
    Pr 8:25 before the mountains were settled in place,
    before the hills, I was given birth,
    Pr 8:26 before he made the earth or its fields
    or any of the dust of the world.
    Pr 8:27 I was there when he set the heavens in place,
    when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
    Pr 8:28 when he established the clouds above
    and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
    Pr 8:29 when he gave the sea its boundary
    so the waters would not overstep his command,
    and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
    Pr 8:30 Then I was the craftsman at his side.
    I was filled with delight day after day,
    rejoicing always in his presence,
    Pr 8:31 rejoicing in his whole world
    and delighting in mankind

    #163214
    banana
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 09 2009,17:55)
    hi all

    Pr 8:22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works,
    before his deeds of old;
    Pr 8:23 I was appointed from eternity,
    from the beginning, before the world began.
    Pr 8:24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth,
    when there were no springs abounding with water;
    Pr 8:25 before the mountains were settled in place,
    before the hills, I was given birth,
    Pr 8:26 before he made the earth or its fields
    or any of the dust of the world.
    Pr 8:27 I was there when he set the heavens in place,
    when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
    Pr 8:28 when he established the clouds above
    and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
    Pr 8:29 when he gave the sea its boundary
    so the waters would not overstep his command,
    and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
    Pr 8:30 Then I was the craftsman at his side.
    I was filled with delight day after day,
    rejoicing always in his presence,
    Pr 8:31 rejoicing in his whole world
    and delighting in mankind


    Yes, I have been puting these Scriptures and others up and Gene and Martian just ignore them. I believe that God has to revela all the truths to you otherwise one will not believe them.
    Irene

    #163226
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 09 2009,06:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    What Bible “dictionaries” are you reading? Strong's# 3056 says that the Logos is “Divine expression (i.e., Christ).” Vine's Expository Dictionary says that the logos is “the personal word, a title of the Son of God” (p. 229).

    The Analytical Greek Lexicon says that “logos” is from “legoo” which means “to speak.”

    What is “silly” is your notion that impersonal speech can create and become flesh and exegete God.

    thinker

    #163270

    Quote (banana @ Dec. 08 2009,23:27)

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 09 2009,17:55)
    hi all

    Pr 8:22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works,
    before his deeds of old;
    Pr 8:23 I was appointed from eternity,
    from the beginning, before the world began.
    Pr 8:24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth,
    when there were no springs abounding with water;
    Pr 8:25 before the mountains were settled in place,
    before the hills, I was given birth,
    Pr 8:26 before he made the earth or its fields
    or any of the dust of the world.
    Pr 8:27 I was there when he set the heavens in place,
    when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
    Pr 8:28 when he established the clouds above
    and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
    Pr 8:29 when he gave the sea its boundary
    so the waters would not overstep his command,
    and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
    Pr 8:30 Then I was the craftsman at his side.
    I was filled with delight day after day,
    rejoicing always in his presence,
    Pr 8:31 rejoicing in his whole world
    and delighting in mankind


    Yes, I have been puting these Scriptures and others up and Gene and Martian just ignore them.  I believe that God has to revela all the truths to you otherwise one will not believe them.
    Irene


    The whole chapter is about “WISDOM”! Every verse in Proverbs 8 is about “WISDOM”!

    Too bad you make it out to be more than it is.

    #163271

    Pro 8:1-36 . Contrasted with sensual allurements are the advantages of divine wisdom, which publicly invites men, offers the best principles of life, and the most valuable benefits resulting from receiving her counsels.

    Her relation to the divine plans and acts is introduced, as in Pro 3:19, 20 , though more fully, to commend her desirableness for men, and the whole is closed by an assurance that those finding her find God's favor, and those neglecting ruin themselves.

    Many regard the passage as a description of the Son of God by the title, Wisdom, which the older Jews used (and by which He is called in Luk 11:49 ), as Jhn 1:1 , &c., describes Him by that of Logos, the Word.

    But the passage may be taken as a personification of wisdom: for, (1) Though described as with God, wisdom is not asserted to be God. (2) The use of personal attributes is equally consistent with a personification, as with the description of a real person. (3) The personal pronouns used accord with the gender (feminine) of wisdom constantly, and are never changed to that of the person meant, as sometimes occurs in a corresponding use of spirit, which is neuter in Greek, but to which masculine pronouns are often applied ( Jhn 16:14 ), when the acts of the Holy Spirit are described. (4) Such a personification is agreeable to the style of this book (compare Pro 1:20 3:16, 17 4:8 6:20-22 9:1-4 ), whereas no prophetical or other allusions to the Saviour or the new dispensation are found among the quotations of this book in the New Testament, and unless this be such, none exist. (5) Nothing is lost as to the importance of this passage, which still remains a most ornate and also solemn and impressive teaching of inspiration on the value of wisdom.

    1-4. The publicity and universality of the call contrast with the secrecy and intrigues of the wicked ( Pro 7:8 , &c.).

    5. wisdom–literally, “subtilty” in a good sense, or, “prudence.”
    fools–as Pro 1:22 .

    6. excellent things–or, “plain,” “manifest.”
    opening . . . things–upright words.

    7. For . . . truth–literally, “My palate shall meditate,” or (as Orientals did) “mutter,” my thoughts expressed only to myself are truth.
    wickedness–specially falsehood, as opposed to truth.

    8. in righteousness–or, “righteous” ( Psa 9:8 11:7 ).
    froward–literally, “twisted,” or contradictory, that is, to truth.

    9. plain . . . understandeth–easily seen by those who apply their minds.
    that find–implying search.

    10. not silver–preferable to it, so last clause implies comparison.

    11. (Compare Pro 3:14, 15 ).

    12. prudence–as in Pro 8:5 . The connection of “wisdom” and “prudence” is that of the dictates of sound wisdom and its application.
    find . . . inventions–or, “devices,” “discreet ways” ( Pro 1:4 ).

    13. For such is the effect of the fear of God, by which hatred to evil preserves from it.
    froward mouth–or, “speech” ( Pro 2:12 6:14 ).

    14. It also gives the elements of good character in counsel.
    sound wisdom– ( Pro 2:7 ).
    I . . . strength–or, “As for me, understanding is strength to me,” the source of power ( Ecc 9:16 ); good judgment gives more efficiency to actions;

    15, 16. of which a wisely conducted government is an example.

    17. early–or, “diligently,” which may include the usual sense of early in life.

    18. durable riches . . . righteousness–Such are the “riches,” enduring sources of happiness in moral possessions (compare Pro 3:16 ).

    19. (Compare Pro 8:11 3:16 ).

    20, 21. The courses in which wisdom leads conduct to a true present prosperity ( Pro 23:5 ).

    22-31. Strictly, God's attributes are part of Himself. Yet, to the poetical structure of the whole passage, this commendation of wisdom is entirely consonant. In order of time all His attributes are coincident and eternal as Himself. But to set forth the importance of wisdom as devising the products of benevolence and power, it is here assigned a precedence. As it has such in divine, so should it be desired in human, affairs (compare Pro 3:19 ).
    possessed–or, “created”; in either sense, the idea of precedence.
    in the beginning–or simply, “beginning,” in apposition with “me.”
    before . . . of old–preceding the most ancient deeds.

    23. I was set up–ordained, or inaugurated ( Psa 2:6 ). The other terms carry out the idea of the earliest antiquity, and illustrate it by the details of creation ( Pro 8:24-29 ).

    24. brought forth–(Compare Psa 90:2 ).
    abounding–or, “laden with water.”

    25. settled–that is, sunk in foundations.

    26. fields–or, “out places,” “deserts,” as opposite to (habitable) “world.”
    highest part–or, “sum,” all particles together,

    27. when he set . . . depth–marked out the circle, according to the popular idea of the earth, as circular, surrounded by depths on which the visible concave heavens rested.

    28. established . . . deep–that is, so as to sustain the waters above and repress those below the firmament ( Gen 1:7-11 Job 26:8 ).

    29. commandment–better, the shore, that is, of the sea.
    foundations–figuratively denotes the solid structure ( Job 38:4 Psa 24:2 ).

    30, 31. one brought up–an object of special and pleasing regard. The bestowal of wisdom on men is represented by its finding a delightful residence and pleasing God.

    32-36. Such an attribute men are urged to seek.

    34. watching . . . waiting–literally, “so as to watch”; wait, denoting a most sedulous attention.

    35. (Compare Luk 13:23, 24 ).

    36. sinneth . . . me–or better, “missing me,” as opposed to “finding” ( Pro 8:35 ).
    love death–act as if they did (compare Pro 17:9 ).

    Jamieson, Fausset & Brown
    Commentary on Proverbs 8
    http://www.blueletterbible.org/comment….Pro_8_1

    :cool:

    #163304
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Constitutionalist said:

    Quote
    But the passage may be taken as a personification of wisdom:


    Con,
    We agree on something. Proverbs 8 is referring to wisdom personified. Chapter 9:1-3 substantiates this. It is one continuous thought.

    thinker

    #163306
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,10:41)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:51)
    secondly  WJ  just where did Peter get his credentials or James or John. You swear by their words yet they had no formal training. Now you will probably say they were anointed by God to write the scriptures or that they were taught by Jesus himself.    Has  all of that stopped. Can God not anoint others to write or has Jesus stopped teaching people about his word?


    Martian

    I noticed you didn't mention the Apostle Paul who was a Hebrew of the Hebrews and trained by the very best of his day and wrote 2 thirds of the NT.

    Yes God is still speaking, but what he is speaking will never contradict the inspired scriptures that we have. If you believe that then you need to become a Muslim or something like that!

    WJ


    WJ,
    Good point. Two thirds of the new testament was written by Paul a Hebrew scholar. Peter seems to acknowledge his own inferiority to Paul (2 Peter 3). And it was Paul who corrected the churches when they erred and it was Paul who set the rules for those who had the gifts of knowledge and prophecy.

    Even those apostles who were not “educated” were inspired by God when they wrote the scriptures. So they were in no way novices like Martian.

    thinker

    #163308
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Con……> Yes wisdom is the chief of all of GOD'S attributes, it's is much to be desired. An interesting thing is it was exactly what Adam and Eve were after, a fruit much to be desired to make one wise. Is brought about by the (KNOWLEDGE) of good and evil, and this knowledge is gained by experiencing them (good and evil) and it does produce wisdom. Even GOD said “look the man has become as we are to Know (experience) good and evil. It may be a hard way to learn but who knows it may be the best way too, as said “experience is the best teacher”.

    Dear Irene gets wisdom confused with Jesus, while it is true Jesus certainly had wisdom, this is not what Ps 8:22-31 was talking about.

    Con …> another interesting thing i was thinking about is even the serpent was described as wise, we are told to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves. This came to my attention when you brought out the seductiveness of wisdom. It is said the serpent seduced Eve, in to disobeying GOD. What he said was not wrong per say because the experience of good and evil does make you wiser, but in this alluring of truth, she was also decieved into disobeying GOD at the same time. So it does appear wisdom can be used for good, but also can be used for evil by alluring us what seems good. “there is a way that (seems) good but the end is sin and death”, Good post brother, IMO

    peace and love to you and yours…………………gene

    #163313
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    thinker…..> i believe you would qualify more as a Novice then Martian by far, seeing you have yet to understand Jesus' prayer “FOR THOU ARE THE (ONLY) TRUE GOD> And again Jesus quoting “HEAR O ISREAL THE LORD (OUR) GOD IS ONE LORD”> Jesus fully understood that GOD was ONE,not two or three triune anythings. How can you belittle another when you don't even understand the simple truth's. IMO

    gene

    #163315
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi ron
    it is sad to read your comment on pro 8;22 i did not know that wisdom lives that long,and was created the first of all things.
    how blind could someone be,?????

    #163323
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,10:41)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:51)
    secondly  WJ  just where did Peter get his credentials or James or John. You swear by their words yet they had no formal training. Now you will probably say they were anointed by God to write the scriptures or that they were taught by Jesus himself.    Has  all of that stopped. Can God not anoint others to write or has Jesus stopped teaching people about his word?


    Martian

    I noticed you didn't mention the Apostle Paul who was a Hebrew of the Hebrews and trained by the very best of his day and wrote 2 thirds of the NT.

    Yes God is still speaking, but what he is speaking will never contradict the inspired scriptures that we have. If you believe that then you need to become a Muslim or something like that!

    WJ


    No I did not mention Paul because he was educated in the Word. Do you put more stock in Paul then in James. John or Peter? To follow your logic paul because of formal education should be listened to more and those with no formal education should be ignored.

    My point is that you cannot ignore Jeff Benner's work because he may not agree with your stance. Actually I do not know if Benner is a Trinitarian or not, but I do appreciate his work in Hebrew.

    #163324
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 09 2009,20:03)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 09 2009,06:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    What Bible “dictionaries” are you reading? Strong's# 3056 says that the Logos is “Divine expression (i.e., Christ).” Vine's Expository Dictionary says that the logos is “the personal word, a title of the Son of God” (p. 229).

    The Analytical Greek Lexicon says that “logos” is from “legoo” which means “to speak.”

    What is “silly” is your notion that impersonal speech can create and become flesh and exegete God.

    thinker


    Do you need to in essence lie to support your doctrine?
    You post the secondary meaning of logos and fail to post the primary meaning.

    #163325
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 10 2009,04:27)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 09 2009,20:03)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 09 2009,06:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    What Bible “dictionaries” are you reading? Strong's# 3056 says that the Logos is “Divine expression (i.e., Christ).” Vine's Expository Dictionary says that the logos is “the personal word, a title of the Son of God” (p. 229).

    The Analytical Greek Lexicon says that “logos” is from “legoo” which means “to speak.”

    What is “silly” is your notion that impersonal speech can create and become flesh and exegete God.

    thinker


    Do you need to in essence lie to support your doctrine?
    You post the secondary meaning of logos and fail to post the primary meaning.


    strongs Concordance gives the primary definition as statement or speech and includes later “divine expression” (ie Christ) but this is a doctrinal definition and not a definition derived from the word itself.

    As I thought. You have taken the secondary meaning listed in Vines and made it the primary meaning to fit your doctrine.

    From vines — Notice all the scripture references denoting statement speech or idea and the few denoting person.
    Two rules of interpretation.
    1. Always take the primary definition of the word first unless denoted by strong argument against such. Proving your doctrine is not strong argument.
    2. Always fall on the majority of uses in scripture unless denoted by strong argument against such. Again proving your doctrine is not a strong argument.

    1. Word logos denotes

    (I)
    “the expression of thought,” not the mere name of an object,
    (a) as embodying a conception or idea, e.g., Luke 7:7; 1 Cor 14:9,19;
    (b) a saying or statement,

    by God, e.g., John 15:25; Rom 9:9; Rom 9:28, RV, “word” (AV, “work”); Gal 5:14; Heb 4:12;
    by Christ, e.g., Matt 24:35 (plur.); John 2:22; John 4:41; John 14:23 (plur.); John 15:20.
    In connection with 1(1) and 1(2) the phrase “the word of the Lord,” i.e., the revealed will of God (very frequent in the OT), is used of a direct revelation given by Christ, 1 Thess 4:15; of the gospel, Acts 8:25; Acts 13:49; Acts 15:35,36; Acts 16:32; Acts 19:10; 1 Thess 1:8; 2 Thess 3:1; in this respect it is the message from the Lord, delivered with His authority and made effective by His power (cp. Acts 10:36); for other instances relating to the gospel see Acts 13:26; Acts 14:3; Acts 15:7; 1 Cor 1:18, RV; 2 Cor 2:17; 2 Cor 4:2; 2 Cor 5:19; 2 Cor 6:7; Gal 6:6; Eph 1:13; Php 2:16; Col 1:5; Heb 5:13; sometimes it is used as the sum of God's utterances, e.g., Mark 7:13; John 10:35; Rev 1:2,9;
    Â discourse, speech, of instruction, etc., e.g., Acts 2:40; 1 Cor 2:13; 1 Cor 12:8; 2 Cor 1:18; 1 Thess 1:5; 2 Thess 2:15; Heb 6:1, RV, marg.; doctrine, e.g., Matt 13:20; Col 3:16; 1 Tim 4:6; 2 Tim 1:13; Titus 1:9; 1 John 2:7;

    (II)
    “The Personal Word,” a title of the Son of God; this identification is substantiated by the statements of doctrine in John 1:1-18, declaring in verses John 1:1,2

    His distinct and superfinite Personality,
    His relation in the Godhead (pros, “with,” not mere company, but the most intimate communion),
    His deity; in John 1:3 His creative power; in John 1:14 His incarnation (“became flesh,” expressing His voluntary act; not as AV, “was made”), the reality and totality of His human nature, and His glory “as of the only begotten from the Father,” RV (marg., “an only begotten from a father”), the absence of the article in each place lending stress to the nature and character of the relationship; His was the shekinah glory in open manifestation; John 1:18 consummates the identification: “the only-begotten Son (RV marg., many ancient authorities read “God only begotten,”), which is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him,” thus fulfilling the significance of the title “Logos,” the “Word,” the personal manifestation, not of a part of the Divine nature, but of the whole Deity (see IMAGE)
    The title is used also in 1 John 1:1,
    “the Word of life” combining the two declarations in John 1:1,4 and Rev 19:13 (for 1 John 5:7 see THREE).

    The New American Exhaustive concordance of the bible lists Logos a
    s statement or speech. From the word Lego which means the act of speaking.

    The King James Dictionary
    Listed by importance or usage. Notice that definition as Christ ranks 13th.
    WORD, n. G., L., to speak. A word is that which is uttered or thrown out.
    1. An articulate or vocal sound, or a combination of articulate and vocal sounds, uttered by the human voice, and by custom expressing an idea or ideas; a single component part of human speech or language. Thus a in English is a word; but few words consist of one letter only. Most words consist of two or more letters, as go, do, shall, called monosyllables, or of two or more syllables, as honor, goodness, amiable.
    2. The letter or letters, written or printed, which represent a sound or combination of sounds.
    3. A short discourse.
    Shall I vouchsafe your worship a word or two?
    4. Talk; discourse.
    Why should calamity be full of words?
    Be thy words severe.
    5. Dispute; verbal contention; as, some words grew between us.
    6. Language; living speech; oral expression. The message was delivered by word of mouth.
    7. Promise. He gave me his word he would pay me.
    Obey they parents; keep thy word justly.
    8. Signal; order; command.
    Give the word through.
    9. Account; tidings; message. Bring me word what is the issue of the contest.
    10. Declaration; purpose expressed.
    I know you brave, and take you at your word.
    11. Declaration; affirmation.
    I desire not the reader should take my word.
    12. The Scripture; divine revelation, or any part of it. This is called the word of God.
    13. Christ. John 1.

    All dictionaries include first in likelihood the definition as statement speech or expressed idea.

    The use as “Christ” is listed from a doctrinal aspect and not from a language reason. Not even the context does it demand a definition of Christ. Expressed idea works as well WITH the rest of the Greek words.

    #163343

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 09 2009,01:50)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,05:38)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ


    Ephesians 3:14-15(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,


    Yes Kerwin

    And who else is every knee going to bow to?

    Thats another one of those “hey Arians, you will never be like Jesus in that way”?

    WJ

    #163346

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 09 2009,12:22)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,10:41)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:51)
    secondly  WJ  just where did Peter get his credentials or James or John. You swear by their words yet they had no formal training. Now you will probably say they were anointed by God to write the scriptures or that they were taught by Jesus himself.    Has  all of that stopped. Can God not anoint others to write or has Jesus stopped teaching people about his word?


    Martian

    I noticed you didn't mention the Apostle Paul who was a Hebrew of the Hebrews and trained by the very best of his day and wrote 2 thirds of the NT.

    Yes God is still speaking, but what he is speaking will never contradict the inspired scriptures that we have. If you believe that then you need to become a Muslim or something like that!

    WJ


    No I did not mention Paul because he was educated in the Word.  Do you put more stock in Paul then in James. John or Peter? To follow your logic paul because of formal education should be listened to more and those with no formal education should be ignored.

    My point is that you cannot ignore Jeff Benner's work because he may not agree with your stance. Actually I do not know if Benner is a Trinitarian or not, but I do appreciate his work in Hebrew.


    My point is that because men are educated does not disqualify them for having the Spirit or as being used of God.

    God can use a donkey if he wants.

    But, if I am going to accept the translating of Greek and Hebrew I am going to look at the majority of experts that translated the scriptures and their commentary, rather than some isolated individual like Benner whos credentials are not even in the Greek.

    But to follow your logic it seems I would just accept whatever agrees with my theolgy regardless of what the credentialed and learned scholars or translators who are skilled in Greek and Hebrew grammer believe.

    WJ

Viewing 20 posts - 5,861 through 5,880 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account