Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,881 through 5,900 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #163347
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Martian said:

    Quote
    strongs Concordance gives the primary definition as statement or speech and includes later “divine expression” (ie Christ) but this is a doctrinal definition and not a definition derived from the word itself.


    The idea of “speech” is present because “logos” is the noun form of the root “legoo.” The root refers to one who speaks. So the idea of the Logos being personal is derived from the word in is root form.

    Martian:

    Quote
    As I thought. You have taken the secondary meaning listed in Vines and made it the primary meaning to fit your doctrine.


    Just as I thought. You read the dictionaries as you read the Bible. Read Vine's again. He does NOT say that the word “logos” as the “Personal title of the Son of God” is a secondary meaning. That he lists it as second does not infer he means that it is a secondary meaning. In fact, Vine asserts that the Logos as the “Personal Word” is THE meaning in John 1:1. You even cited what he said and still missed it.

    Give it up dude! It is intellectual suicide to say that an impersonal “expression of thought” created and became flesh. You appear foolish. Your conclusions are self refuting because they are absurd.
    Your views are Platonic and not Christian.

    thinker

    #163348
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Martian said:

    Quote
    Do you need to in essence lie to support your doctrine?
    You post the secondary meaning of logos and fail to post the primary meaning.


    First, it is you who says “secondary” meaning. I don't see the dictionaries saying that. Second, I have not denied that “logos” means speech. I have said that it is not mere speech because its root is “legoo” which refers to one who speaks.

    Note the change you have made. Up until now you have denied that “logos” has any personal reference to Christ. Now you acknowledge this as a “secondary” meaning weakening your own case.

    thinker

    #163350

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 09 2009,12:28)
    The use as “Christ” is listed from a doctrinal aspect and not from a language reason. Not even the context does it demand a definition of Christ. Expressed idea works as well WITH the rest of the Greek words.

    Why not let John who was inspired to write John 1:1 define the meaning of the word [logos] in the verse…?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    But, of course your doctrine is more important than Johns own words!

    A thought or plan did not come in the flesh for God is not a “thought or plan”, but the Word that was with God and was God did come in the flesh and we beheld his glory the same glory that he shared with the Father before the foundation of the world. John 1:14 John 17:5

    It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see it but only pure hearts that let the scriptures speak for themselves!

    WJ

    #163351
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 10 2009,03:36)
    thinker…..> i believe you would qualify  more as a Novice then Martian by far, seeing you have yet to understand Jesus' prayer “FOR THOU ARE THE (ONLY) TRUE GOD> And again Jesus quoting “HEAR O ISREAL THE LORD (OUR) GOD IS ONE LORD”> Jesus fully understood that GOD was ONE,not two or three triune anythings. How can you belittle another when you don't even understand the simple truth's. IMO

    gene


    Gene,
    Is Stephen Charnock a novice?

    The FATHER is called likewise, the “true GOD,” in opposition to idols; for when CHRIST says all power was given to him, that he might give eternal life to as many as were given to him, those that were given to him were among the Gentiles as well as the Jews; he here respects them both. The Gentiles worshipped many gods, the Jews worshipped one GOD, but rejected CHRIST as Medi­ator. Now the knowledge of both is necessary to salva­tion. In the first clause he respects the multiplicity of heathen gods, in the other the Jewish contempt of the Mediator. So, then, the expression excludes only the heathen idols. In 1 Thess. 1: 9: “How you turned to God from idols, to serve the living and true God.” God is called the true God in opposition to idols.

    http://wesley.nnu.edu/john_we….rt8.htm

    thinker

    #163353
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Martian said;

    Quote
    The use as “Christ” is listed from a doctrinal aspect and not from a language reason. Not even the context does it demand a definition of Christ. Expressed idea works as well WITH the rest of the Greek words.


    It has already been shown you that the word “logos” is a reference to Christ. Verse 14 says that the Word became flesh and that He is the Father's “begotten.” Verse 18 says that the “begotten” is the “Son.” Ergo….

    The Logos = the Begotten = the Son = Christ.

    No degree in rocket science is needed my friend.

    thinker

    #163358
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    thinker……..if all power was (GIVEN) to him obviously He did not originally have it right?.

    gene

    #163360
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 10 2009,06:15)
    thinker……..if all power was (GIVEN) to him obviously He did not originally have it right?.  

    gene


    He did not have it because He voluntarily gave it up (Philippians 2). Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

    thinker

    #163444
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    thinker……..So he gave it up and then GOD Gave it back to Him, right> But no scripture say He gave it up and GOD gave it Back to him (AGAIN) that is an assumption on you part. In fact no scripture even say he ever had all power before his berth into existence here on earth. Please show us where any scriptures say Jesus had all power in heaven and earth before he came to earth and was resurrected, as you suppose. No where does scripture say He was given (BACK) his POWER as far as i KNOW. But then no scripture say many things you Trinitarians come up with, but that does not seem to slow you people down any. IMO

    gene

    #163508
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,00:25)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 09 2009,01:50)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,05:38)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ


    Ephesians 3:14-15(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,


    Yes Kerwin

    And who else is every knee going to bow to?

    Thats another one of those “hey Arians, you will never be like Jesus in that way”?

    WJ


    I am not sure the point you are trying to make as I assure you that I believe Jesus is King of everything in heaven and on earth.   My point is that all believers bear the same name as the one you mentioned in Revelations.

    #163511

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 10 2009,01:33)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,00:25)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 09 2009,01:50)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,05:38)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ


    Ephesians 3:14-15(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,


    Yes Kerwin

    And who else is every knee going to bow to?

    Thats another one of those “hey Arians, you will never be like Jesus in that way”?

    WJ


    I am not sure the point you are trying to make as I assure you that I believe Jesus is King of everything in heaven and on earth.   My point is that all believers bear the same name as the one you mentioned in Revelations.


    Kerwin

    How do you figure? The name “Lord Jesus Christ” does not equate to “The Word of God”.

    His name is also Emmanuel, Wonderful, counselor, the mighty God, everlasting Father, prince of peace, Lord of Lords, King of Kings.

    Can you say any of those are “your” name?

    We bear his name as ambassadors much like US Ambassadors bear the Presidents name, but we would be imposters and traders if we claimed to be the President!

    John tells us who the Word is by personifying the word “logos” in Revealation 19:13 to being Jesus.

    WJ

    #163517
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,12:48)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 10 2009,01:33)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,00:25)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 09 2009,01:50)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,05:38)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ


    Ephesians 3:14-15(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,


    Yes Kerwin

    And who else is every knee going to bow to?

    Thats another one of those “hey Arians, you will never be like Jesus in that way”?

    WJ


    I am not sure the point you are trying to make as I assure you that I believe Jesus is King of everything in heaven and on earth.   My point is that all believers bear the same name as the one you mentioned in Revelations.


    Kerwin

    How do you figure? The name “Lord Jesus Christ” does not equate to “The Word of God”.

    His name is also Emmanuel, Wonderful, counselor, the mighty God, everlasting Father, prince of peace, Lord of Lords, King of Kings.

    Can you say any of those are “your” name?

    We bear his name as ambassadors much like US Ambassadors bear the Presidents name, but we would be imposters and traders if we claimed to be the President!

    John tells us who the Word is by personifying the word “logos” in Revealation 19:13 to being Jesus.

    WJ


    Anyone who walks according to the ways of the Spirit is the personification of God's Word. If you do not walk according to the ways of the Spirit then you will not inherit the kingdom of heaven.

    #163566

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 10 2009,02:05)
    [Anyone who walks according to the ways of the Spirit is the personification of God's Word.  If you do not walk according to the ways of the Spirit then you will not inherit the kingdom of heaven.


    Kerwin

    You mean the personification of Jesus who is the “Word” right?

    Are we not supposed to bear “His, Jesus Image”?

    Now we are getting somewhere!

    WJ

    #163579
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 10 2009,13:18)
    thinker……..So he gave it up and then GOD Gave it back to Him, right>  But no scripture say He gave it up and GOD gave it Back to him (AGAIN) that is an assumption on you part. In fact no scripture even say he ever had all power before his berth into existence here on earth.  Please show us where any scriptures say Jesus had all power in heaven and earth before he came to earth and was resurrected, as you suppose. No where does scripture say He was given (BACK) his POWER as far as i KNOW. But then no scripture say many things you Trinitarians come up with, but that does not seem to slow you people down any. IMO

    gene


    Gene,
    Jesus asked that He be glorified with the glory that He had with the Father before the world began. The “glory” is all encompassing for His power and majesty. Therefore, He shared power and majesty with the Father before the world began.

    Jude verses 4-5 say that it was Jesus who saved the people out of Egypt and punished those who did not believe:

    ESV:
    4For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. 5Now I want to remind you, although you once fully knew it, that Jesus, who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe.

    NASB:
    4For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. 5Now I desire to remind you, though you know all things once for all, that the Lord, after saving a people out of the land of Egypt, subsequently destroyed those who did not believe.

    Choose one of the translations above. The ESV says that it was Jesus who delivered the people from Egypt. The NASB says it was the Lord who saved them. It does not matter which you choose because both translations agree that Jesus Christ is the ONLY Master and Lord (verse 4). So either way it was Jesus who saved the people from Egypt.

    Does this not prove that Jesus had power before He came into the world but gave it up?

    As the term “only Lord” in reference to Jesus does not exclude the Father so the term “only God” in reference to the Father does not exclude Jesus as Stephen Charnock has aptly shown.

    thinker

    #163582

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 10 2009,11:28)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 10 2009,13:18)
    thinker……..So he gave it up and then GOD Gave it back to Him, right>  But no scripture say He gave it up and GOD gave it Back to him (AGAIN) that is an assumption on you part. In fact no scripture even say he ever had all power before his berth into existence here on earth.  Please show us where any scriptures say Jesus had all power in heaven and earth before he came to earth and was resurrected, as you suppose. No where does scripture say He was given (BACK) his POWER as far as i KNOW. But then no scripture say many things you Trinitarians come up with, but that does not seem to slow you people down any. IMO

    gene


    Gene,
    Jesus asked that He be glorified with the glory that He had with the Father before the world began. The “glory” is all encompassing for His power and majesty. Therefore, He shared power and majesty with the Father before the world began.

    Jude verses 4-5 say that it was Jesus who saved the people out of Egypt and punished those who did not believe:

    ESV:
    4For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. 5Now I want to remind you, although you once fully knew it, that Jesus, who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe.

    NASB:
    4For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. 5Now I desire to remind you, though you know all things once for all, that the Lord, after saving a people out of the land of Egypt, subsequently destroyed those who did not believe.

    Choose one of the translations above. The ESV says that it was Jesus who delivered the people from Egypt. The NASB says it was the Lord who saved them. It does not matter which you choose because both translations agree that Jesus Christ is the ONLY Master and Lord (verse 4). So either way it was Jesus who saved the people from Egypt.

    Does this not prove that Jesus had power before He came into the world but gave it up?

    As the term “only Lord” in reference to Jesus does not exclude the Father so the term “only God” in reference to the Father does not exclude Jesus as Stephen Charnock has aptly shown.

    thinker


    Jack

    Good points, but somehow I think that if Jesus himself were standing here and said this they still wouldn't believe.

    Truly Jesus did save them for he was the “Rock” that followed them in the wilderness as the scriptures clearly teach.

    They are afraid of the thought that if he preexisted that he must be more than a mere man.

    They are right!

    WJ

    #163583
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Thinker………YOU are saying Glory includes all encompassing Power, but where does Scripture say that, that is the meaning of Glory. And again that glory was a (PREDESTINED GLORY) scriptures says that Jesus would recieve, it existed only in the plan of GOD , that He would take from (MAN) and (MAN) and (PERFECT) HIM and bring HIM to this (PREPLANNED) GLORY, we to are to recieve this GLORY as joint heirs of Jesus it is a shared glory given from (ONE) TRUE GOD, “for the kingdom shall eb given to the Saints of the MOST HIGH.< from the Father of ALL CREATION, including Jesus. IMO

    peace and love……………….gene

    #163587
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,05:25)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 09 2009,01:50)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,05:38)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ


    Ephesians 3:14-15(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,


    Yes Kerwin

    And who else is every knee going to bow to?

    Thats another one of those “hey Arians, you will never be like Jesus in that way”?

    WJ


    Are you still tying the same old trick?
    You are taking an attribute of Christ after his resurrection and comparing it to what we are to follow before his resurrection.
    YHWH gives Christ all power in heaven and Earth.
    Yhwh puts everything under subjection to the man Christ. this makes him Lord of Lord (master of masters) and King of Kings (king of all earthly kings)
    When all is done Christ puts himself and the kingdom back under subjection of the father. (co-equal?)

    #163591
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 11 2009,03:51)
    Thinker………YOU are saying Glory includes all encompassing Power, but where does Scripture say that, that is the meaning of Glory. And again that glory was a (PREDESTINED GLORY) scriptures says that Jesus would recieve, it existed only in the plan of GOD , that He would take from (MAN) and (MAN) and (PERFECT) HIM and bring HIM to this (PREPLANNED) GLORY, we to are to recieve this GLORY as joint heirs of Jesus it is a shared glory given from (ONE) TRUE GOD, “for the kingdom shall eb given to the Saints of the MOST HIGH.< from the Father of ALL CREATION, including Jesus.  IMO

    peace and love……………….gene


    Gene,
    This is getting ridiculous. John 2 says that Christ's changing the water into wine was a manifestation of His glory:

    “This beginning of signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him.”

    What aspect of His glory did He manifest if not His power? Again, what aspect of His glory did Jesus manifest if not His power?

    Are you going to reply to Jude verses 4-5 which say that it was Jesus who delivered the people out of Egypt? Or do you have your bottle of white out ready? And what about Jude's statement that Jesus is the “ONLY Lord and Master?” If you admit that the Father is not excluded then you must reconsider John 17:3.

    You're backed in a corner Gene.

    thinker

    #163592
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 11 2009,03:45)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 10 2009,11:28)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 10 2009,13:18)
    thinker……..So he gave it up and then GOD Gave it back to Him, right>  But no scripture say He gave it up and GOD gave it Back to him (AGAIN) that is an assumption on you part. In fact no scripture even say he ever had all power before his berth into existence here on earth.  Please show us where any scriptures say Jesus had all power in heaven and earth before he came to earth and was resurrected, as you suppose. No where does scripture say He was given (BACK) his POWER as far as i KNOW. But then no scripture say many things you Trinitarians come up with, but that does not seem to slow you people down any. IMO

    gene


    Gene,
    Jesus asked that He be glorified with the glory that He had with the Father before the world began. The “glory” is all encompassing for His power and majesty. Therefore, He shared power and majesty with the Father before the world began.

    Jude verses 4-5 say that it was Jesus who saved the people out of Egypt and punished those who did not believe:

    ESV:
    4For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. 5Now I want to remind you, although you once fully knew it, that Jesus, who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe.

    NASB:
    4For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. 5Now I desire to remind you, though you know all things once for all, that the Lord, after saving a people out of the land of Egypt, subsequently destroyed those who did not believe.

    Choose one of the translations above. The ESV says that it was Jesus who delivered the people from Egypt. The NASB says it was the Lord who saved them. It does not matter which you choose because both translations agree that Jesus Christ is the ONLY Master and Lord (verse 4). So either way it was Jesus who saved the people from Egypt.

    Does this not prove that Jesus had power before He came into the world but gave it up?

    As the term “only Lord” in reference to Jesus does not exclude the Father so the term “only God” in reference to the Father does not exclude Jesus as Stephen Charnock has aptly shown.

    thinker


    Jack

    Good points, but somehow I think that if Jesus himself were standing here and said this they still wouldn't believe.

    Truly Jesus did save them for he was the “Rock” that followed them in the wilderness as the scriptures clearly teach.

    They are afraid of the thought that if he preexisted that he must be more than a mere man.

    They are right!

    WJ


    Keith,

    We already know that they believe that it was a literal rock who followed the people. They would rather have a literal rock as Savior than Jesus as Savior.

    thinker

    #163596

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 10 2009,12:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,05:25)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 09 2009,01:50)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,05:38)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ


    Ephesians 3:14-15(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,


    Yes Kerwin

    And who else is every knee going to bow to?

    Thats another one of those “hey Arians, you will never be like Jesus in that way”?

    WJ


    Are you still tying the same old trick?
    You are taking an attribute of Christ after his resurrection and comparing it to what we are to follow before his resurrection.
    YHWH gives Christ all power in heaven and Earth.
    Yhwh puts everything under subjection to the man Christ. this makes him Lord of Lord (master of masters) and King of Kings (king of all earthly kings)
    When all is done Christ puts himself and the kingdom back under subjection of the father. (co-equal?)


    Martian

    Are you still following the same fallacious line of reasoning?

    How about when you are resurrected and become like him will you be like him in that way?

    Will the Angels worship you? Will the Spirit proceed from you and the Father to all of Creation? Rev 22:1

    Jesus had the Spirit “without measure”, do you know what that means?

    Only God could have the Spirit without measure. Therefore your logic fails for no man singularly has or ever had or ever will have that. That was before his resurrection and gave him an advantage over us. So much for that straw man!

    Are you only serving another anointed man in the flesh or a resurrected Jesus?

    Another point is if Jesus puts himself and the Kingdom into subjection to the Father so that God can be all in all,
    then that would mean that Jesus and the Kingdom at this time is not subject to the Father!!!  :D

    Hello, that means that he is equal to the Father! Remember he is on the right hand of the Father, not beneath him nor above him but at his right hand!

    So much for that straw man too.

    WJ

    #163606
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 11 2009,04:52)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 10 2009,12:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,05:25)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 09 2009,01:50)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2009,05:38)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:47)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.


    Exactly, and who else is personifying the Word [logos]?

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    WJ


    Ephesians 3:14-15(KJV) reads:

    Quote

    For this cause I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named,


    Yes Kerwin

    And who else is every knee going to bow to?

    Thats another one of those “hey Arians, you will never be like Jesus in that way”?

    WJ


    Are you still tying the same old trick?
    You are taking an attribute of Christ after his resurrection and comparing it to what we are to follow before his resurrection.
    YHWH gives Christ all power in heaven and Earth.
    Yhwh puts everything under subjection to the man Christ. this makes him Lord of Lord (master of masters) and King of Kings (king of all earthly kings)
    When all is done Christ puts himself and the kingdom back under subjection of the father. (co-equal?)


    Martian

    Are you still following the same fallacious line of reasoning?

    How about when you are resurrected and become like him will you be like him in that way?

    Will the Angels worship you? Will the Spirit proceed from you and the Father to all of Creation? Rev 22:1

    Jesus had the Spirit “without measure”, do you know what that means?

    Only God could have the Spirit without measure. Therefore your logic fails for no man singularly has or ever had or ever will have that. That was before his resurrection and gave him an advantage over us. So much for that straw man!

    Are you only serving another anointed man in the flesh or a resurrected Jesus?

    Another point is if Jesus puts himself and the Kingdom into subjection to the Father so that God can be all in all,
    then that would mean that Jesus and the Kingdom at this time is not subject to the Father!!!  :D

    Hello, that means that he is equal to the Father! Remember he is on the right hand of the Father, not beneath him nor above him but at his right hand!

    So much for that straw man too.

    WJ


    TALK ABOUT GAMES. YOU AGAIN TAKE THINGS THAT ARE AFTER HIS RESURRECTION AND PUT THEM BEFORE.

    Can God give authority to a man if He wishes?
    Did God Give Christ all authority in heaven and earth?

    You know what I give up. You are thinker are right.God is triune and Jesus is God.
    NOW WHAT?
    HOW DOES THAT HELP ME?
    HOW DOES THAT EDIFY ME?
    HOW DOES SHOW CHRIST TO ME AS AN EXAMPLE?
    HOW DO I KNOW WHICH OF THE THINGS CHRIST DID I CAN DO?
    HOW CAN I TRUST IN A GOD WHOSE CHARACTER CAN CHANGE TO BE TEMPTABLE OR CAPABLE OF SIN?

    IS THAT AL YOU HAVE IS GREEK TENSES AND PHILOSOPHY GOOD FOR NOTHING BUT DEBATE ON A FORUM? WHAT A WASTE FOR EVERYONE!!!

    Is all you are lookin
    g for is some intellectual understanding to flaunt about? Even realizing that all of our intellects can be fooled and deceived. (even those that teach tenses in Greek)

    IF FLAUNTING YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF GREEK GETS YOU KUDOS FROM THINKER AND OTHERS, HAVE AT IT.  ENJOY YOURSELF.

    As for me I will take a Christ that is a perfect example for me and a gospel truth that actually does something in my life.

    In the end you have nothing but a supposed intellectual understanding that produces nothing. Your doctrine is a philosophical joke!!!

    It makes no difference what you or your supposed experts say. If it produces no fruit, it is worthless except as a philosophy.

Viewing 20 posts - 5,881 through 5,900 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account