Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,841 through 5,860 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #162877
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.

    Rom 1:4…..> And (DECLARED) to be the Son of GOD with Power, according to the Spirit of holiness, (HOW) by the resurrection from the dead.
    Notice it does not say by a prior existence but by the resurrection from the dead.

    Hope this helps Irene.

    peace and love to you and Georg………..gene

    #162882
    banana
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,15:24)
    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.

    Rom 1:4…..> And (DECLARED) to be the Son of GOD with Power, according to the Spirit of holiness, (HOW) by the resurrection from the dead.
    Notice it does not say by a prior existence but by the resurrection from the dead.

    Hope this helps Irene.

    peace and love to you and Georg………..gene


    We are talking about the man Jesus here in the flesh.. You grasp at anything, that is so ridiculous. I didn't think you would show what these Scriptures say. Just asking me over and over again to produce one Scripture that says that He preexisted. What do you think firstborn means? Firstborn of all creation that is? Preexisting is a title just like God is. But then you don't want to understand John 1:1 either so I am not surprised. That's all, Gene No more debating this subject, there is no sense in it.
    Irene

    #162888

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,19:25)
    WJ………..Is Greek and Hebrew Scholarship replaced the Spirit of the LIVING GOD NOW. Does it not say “Brethren you have (NO NEED) of a teacher for the Spirit (ITSELF) will teach you (ALL THINGS)”. Tell us what degrees of Greek and Hebrew did the apostles have or Jesus for that matter. Is your religion based on you 200 scholars , then who in you flock is qualified are you. Scholars my friend have been proven wrong many, many, many times because of the Biases in their teachings. Jesus said to me and all, “know you Not you shall (ALL) be taught (BY) GOD. I just stay with that, lest i put my trust in man and wind up stumbling. The Greatest Teacher is the (REVELATION) of GOD in the minds and Heart of HIs Childern, NO SCHOLAR GREEK OR HEBREW, can compare to that. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………….gene


    Gene

    Like I said, will the Spirit go against the Apostles inspired written words?

    I base my doctrine on the scriptures, how about you?

    WJ

    #162892

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,23:24)

    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.

    Rom 1:4…..> And (DECLARED) to be the Son of GOD with Power, according to the Spirit of holiness, (HOW) by the resurrection from the dead.
    Notice it does not say by a prior existence but by the resurrection from the dead.

    Hope this helps Irene.

    peace and love to you and Georg………..gene


    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,23:24)
    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.


    That scripture sounds just like these…

    In the beginning was the Word, and “the Word was with God“, and the Word was God. “The same was in the beginning with God“. John 1:1, 2

    And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us“, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John 1:14

    Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and “was made in the likeness of men: And **being found in fashion as a man**, he humbled himself“, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. Phil 2:6-8

    WJ

    #162896
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 07 2009,21:56)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 06 2009,08:52)
    thethinker wrote:

    Quote

    But the prophets were not sent into the world FROM HEAVEN.

    I do not believe you stated that.  I assure you the one who sent the true prophets is in heaven.  In other words since they were sent from God they were sent from heaven.


    Kerwin,
    The prophets did not come down from heaven. Come on! Paul was a prophet. Show where he likened his apostleship and his calling to being sent from heaven.

    thinker


    Galatians 1:1-2(NIV) reads

    Quote

    Paul, an apostle—sent not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead— 2and all the brothers with me,
         To the churches in Galatia:

    and

    2 Corinthians 2:17(NIV) reads

    Quote

    Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, like men sent from God.

    I am assuming that you understand the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God are one and the same.

    #162900

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 08 2009,01:41)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 07 2009,21:56)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 06 2009,08:52)
    thethinker wrote:

    Quote

    But the prophets were not sent into the world FROM HEAVEN.

    I do not believe you stated that.  I assure you the one who sent the true prophets is in heaven.  In other words since they were sent from God they were sent from heaven.


    Kerwin,
    The prophets did not come down from heaven. Come on! Paul was a prophet. Show where he likened his apostleship and his calling to being sent from heaven.

    thinker


    Galatians 1:1-2(NIV) reads

    Quote

    Paul, an apostle—sent not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead— 2and all the brothers with me,
         To the churches in Galatia:

    and

    2 Corinthians 2:17(NIV) reads

    Quote

    Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, like men sent from God.

    I am assuming that you understand the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God are one and the same.


    Kerwin

    Weak!

    There is nothing in those scriptures that says they came down from heaven!

    We are ambassodors for Christ, but can we say that we came down from heaven or that we are going to ascend up where we were before?

    WJ

    #162905

    Quote (banana @ Dec. 07 2009,21:25)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,15:24)
    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.

    Rom 1:4…..> And (DECLARED) to be the Son of GOD with Power, according to the Spirit of holiness, (HOW) by the resurrection from the dead.
    Notice it does not say by a prior existence but by the resurrection from the dead.

    Hope this helps Irene.

    peace and love to you and Georg………..gene


    We are talking about the man Jesus here in the flesh..  You grasp at anything, that is so ridiculous.  I didn't think you would show what these Scriptures say.  Just asking me over and over again to produce one Scripture that says that He preexisted.  What do you think firstborn means?  Firstborn of all creation that is?  Preexisting is a title just like God is.  But then you don't want to understand John 1:1 either so I am not surprised.  That's all, Gene No more debating this subject, there is no sense in it.
    Irene


    FIRSTBORN

    Matthew 1:25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn [prōtotokos] son: and he called his name Yĕhowshuwa`[Jesus].

    Prōtotokos:
    1) The firstborn.

    From:

    Prōtos:
    1) First in time or place.
    2) First in rank, a) influence, honour, b) chief, c) principal.

    Luke 2:7 And she brought forth her firstborn [prōtotokos] son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn.

    NOTE: THE NEXT VERSE IS VERY IMPORTANT TO SEE WHAT HE IS TRULY FIRSTBORN OF: I PUT VERSE IN QUOTE FORM:

    Quote
    Romans 8:29 For whom he did foreknow [proginōskō], he also did predestinate [proorizō] conformed [symmorphos] to the image [eikōn] of his Son, that he might be the firstborn [prōtotokos] among many brethren [adelphos].

    Proginōskō:

    1) To have knowledge before hand, foreordain.
    2) To foreknow, a) of those whom 'elohim elected to salvation.
    3) To predestinate.

    Proorizō:

    1) To predetermine, decide beforehand.
    2) To foreordain, appoint beforehand.

    Symmorphos:

    1) Having the same form as another, similar, conformed to. [Strong's -G4832] – Describes what is the essence in character and thus complete or durable, not merely a form or outline.

    Eikōn:

    1) An image, figure, likeness.
    1a) Used of the moral likeness of renewed men to 'elohim.
    1b) The image of the Son of 'elohim, into which true Christians are transformed, is likeness not only to the heavenly body, but also to the most holy and blessed state of mind, which theMessiah possesses.
    2) One in whom the likeness of any one is seen.
    3) Applied to man on account of his power of command.
    4) To the Messiah on account of his nature and absolute moral excellence.

    Adelphos:

    1) A brother, whether born of the same two parents or only of the same father or mother.
    2) Having the same national ancestor, belonging to the same people, or countryman.
    3) Any fellow or man.
    4) A fellow believer, united to another by the bond of affection.
    5) An associate in employment or office.
    6) Brethren in the Messiah. a) His brothers by blood, b) All men, c) Apostles, d) Christians, as those who are exalted to the same heavenly place.

    Colossians 1:15 Who is the image [eikōn] of the invisible [aoratos] G-d [theos/'elohim], the firstborn [prōtotokos] of every creature [ktisis]:

    Aoratos: 1) Unseen, or that which can not be seen, e.g. invisible.

    Theos: G-d:

    (A) In the polytheism of the Greeks, denoted “a god or deity,” e.g., Act 14:11; 19:26; 28:6; 1Cr 8:5; Gal 4:8.

    (B) Hence the word was appropriated by Jews and retained by Christians to denote “the one true G-d.” In the Sept. theos translates (with few exceptions) the Hebrew words 'Elohim and Jehovah, the former indicating His power and preeminence, the latter His unoriginated, immutable, eternal and self-sustained existence.

    NOTE: DO YOU FIND IT ODD THAT WITH TWO EXPLANATIONS THAT CHRISTIANS TODAY SOMEHOW CAME UP WITH THE MONISM BELIEF? FROM THE GREEKS BELIEVING IN NUMEROUS G-DS, AND THE HEBREWS BELIEVING IN ONE, CHRISTIANS COMBINED IT INTO MONISM. TRAGIC REALLY IT IS. WHEN A MAN HAS G-D GIVEN ATTRIBUTES AND HIS BRETHREN MAKE HIM INTO A GOLDEN CALF.

    ktisis:

    1) The act of founding, establishing, building etc.
    a) The act of creating, creation, b) creation i.e. thing created.

    1) Of individual things, beings, a creature, a creation.
    a) Anything created, b) after a rabbinical usage (by which a man converted from idolatry to Judaism was called), c) the sum or aggregate of things created.
    1a) Institution, ordinance.

    Colossians 1:18 And he is the head [kephalē] of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn [prōtotokos] from the dead [nekros]; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence [prōteuō].

    Kephalē:

    1) Anything supreme, chief, prominent, a) of persons, master lord: of a husband in relation to his wife. b) of the Messiah: the Lord of the husband and of the Church, c) of things: the corner stone.

    From the primary kapto (in the sense of seizing).

    Nekros:

    1) Properly, a) one that has breathed his last, lifeless, b) deceased, departed, c) destitute of life, without life, inanimate, dead, the death of the body, cp. Jam 2:26, its most frequent sense.

    Nekro: ‘Est itaque fides et malarum rerum et bonarum: quia et bona creduntur et mala; et hoc fide bonâ, non malâ. Est etiam fides et praeteritarum rerum, et praesentium, et futurarum. Credimus enim Christurn mortuum; quod jam praeteriit: credimus sedere ad dexteram Patris; quod nunc est: credimus venturum ad judicandum; quod futurum est. Item fides et suarum rerum est et alienarum. Nam et se quisque credit aliquando esse coepisse, nec fuisse utique sempiternum; et alios, atque alia; nec solum de aliis hominibus multa, quae ad religionem pertinent, verum etiam de angelis credimus. Spes autem non nisi bonarum rerum est, nec nisi futurarum, et ad eum pertinentium qui earum spem gerere perhibetur. Quae cum ita sint, propter has caussas distinguenda erit fides ab spe, sicut vocabulo, ita et rationabili differentiâ, Nam quod adtinet ad non videre sive quae creduntur, sire quae sperantur, fidei speique commune est.’ ‘τεθεμελιωμένοι, affixi fundamento; ἑδραῖοι, stablies, firmi intus. Illud metaphoricum est, hoc magis proprium: illud importat majorem respectum ad fundamentum quo sustentantur fideles; sed ἑδραῖοι, stabiles, dicit internum robur, quod fideles ipsi habent; quemadmodum aedificium primo quidem fundamento recte solidequ
    e inniti, deinde veto suâ etiam mole probe cohaerere et firmiter consistere debet.’

    Prōteuō:

    1) To be first, hold the first place. Preeminence (To Have The):

    “to be first” (protos), “to be preeminent,” is used of the Messiah in relation to the Church, Col 1:18.

    From:

    Prōtos:

    1) First in time or place, a) in any succession of things or persons.
    2) First in rank, a) influence, honour, b) chief, c) principal, 3) first, at the first.

    :cool:

    #162906

    Quote (banana @ Dec. 07 2009,21:25)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,15:24)
    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.

    Rom 1:4…..> And (DECLARED) to be the Son of GOD with Power, according to the Spirit of holiness, (HOW) by the resurrection from the dead.
    Notice it does not say by a prior existence but by the resurrection from the dead.

    Hope this helps Irene.

    peace and love to you and Georg………..gene


    We are talking about the man Jesus here in the flesh..  You grasp at anything, that is so ridiculous.  I didn't think you would show what these Scriptures say.  Just asking me over and over again to produce one Scripture that says that He preexisted.  What do you think firstborn means?  Firstborn of all creation that is?  Preexisting is a title just like God is.  But then you don't want to understand John 1:1 either so I am not surprised.  That's all, Gene No more debating this subject, there is no sense in it.
    Irene


    You twist

    :cool:

    #162907

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 07 2009,22:07)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,19:25)
    WJ………..Is Greek and Hebrew Scholarship replaced the Spirit of the LIVING GOD NOW. Does it not say “Brethren you have (NO NEED) of a teacher for the Spirit (ITSELF) will teach you (ALL THINGS)”. Tell us what degrees of Greek and Hebrew did the apostles have or Jesus for that matter. Is your religion based on you 200 scholars , then who in you flock is qualified are you. Scholars my friend have been proven wrong many, many, many times because of the Biases in their teachings. Jesus said to me and all, “know you Not you shall (ALL) be taught (BY) GOD. I just stay with that, lest i put my trust in man and wind up stumbling. The Greatest Teacher is the (REVELATION) of GOD in the minds and Heart of HIs Childern, NO SCHOLAR GREEK OR HEBREW, can compare to that. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………….gene


    Gene

    Like I said, will the Spirit go against the Apostles inspired written words?

    I base my doctrine on the scriptures, how about you?

    WJ


    You twist

    :cool:

    #162910

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 07 2009,22:20)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,23:24)

    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.

    Rom 1:4…..> And (DECLARED) to be the Son of GOD with Power, according to the Spirit of holiness, (HOW) by the resurrection from the dead.
    Notice it does not say by a prior existence but by the resurrection from the dead.

    Hope this helps Irene.

    peace and love to you and Georg………..gene


    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,23:24)
    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.


    That scripture sounds just like these…

    In the beginning was the Word, and “the Word was with God“, and the Word was God. “The same was in the beginning with God“. John 1:1, 2

    And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us“, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John 1:14

    Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and “was made in the likeness of men: And **being found in fashion as a man**, he humbled himself“, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. Phil 2:6-8

    WJ


    Why is that portion of John 1:14 in parenthesis?

    The word: “Elohims voice became man.

    To Proclaim! To Sound! To Cry! To Thunder!

    Isaiah 40:6 The voice said, Cry. And he said, What shall I cry? All flesh [is] grass, and all the goodliness thereof [is] as the flower of the field:

    The word was made flesh.

    Forasmuch as the children, who were to become the sons of 'elohim, were partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same, Heb. 2:14.

    The Socinians agree that the Messiah is both 'elohim and man, but they say that he was man, and was made a 'elohim, as Moses (Ex. 7:1).

    :cool:

    #162920
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 08 2009,12:55)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 08 2009,01:41)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 07 2009,21:56)

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 06 2009,08:52)
    thethinker wrote:

    Quote

    But the prophets were not sent into the world FROM HEAVEN.

    I do not believe you stated that.  I assure you the one who sent the true prophets is in heaven.  In other words since they were sent from God they were sent from heaven.


    Kerwin,
    The prophets did not come down from heaven. Come on! Paul was a prophet. Show where he likened his apostleship and his calling to being sent from heaven.

    thinker


    Galatians 1:1-2(NIV) reads

    Quote

    Paul, an apostle—sent not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead— 2and all the brothers with me,
         To the churches in Galatia:

    and

    2 Corinthians 2:17(NIV) reads

    Quote

    Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, like men sent from God.

    I am assuming that you understand the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God are one and the same.


    Kerwin

    Weak!

    There is nothing in those scriptures that says they came down from heaven!

    We are ambassodors for Christ, but can we say that we came down from heaven or that we are going to ascend up where we were before?

    WJ


    So according to you the apostles and prophets are not ambassadors of the Kingdom of Heaven?

    1 Peter 2:!1(NIV) reads

    Quote

    Dear friends, I urge you, as aliens and strangers in the world, to abstain from sinful desires, which war against your soul.

    #162922

    Every believer is an ambassador for the Messiah. (2Co 5:18-20)

    And all things [are] of 'elohim, who hath reconciled us to himself by Yeshua HaMoshiach, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; To wit, that 'elohim was in the Messiah, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. Now then we are ambassadors for the Messiah, as though 'elohim did beseech [you] by us: we pray [you] in the Messiah's stead, be ye reconciled to 'elohim. For he hath made him [to be] sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of 'elohim in him.

    #162928
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker

    #162952

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 08 2009,03:16)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 07 2009,22:07)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,19:25)
    WJ………..Is Greek and Hebrew Scholarship replaced the Spirit of the LIVING GOD NOW. Does it not say “Brethren you have (NO NEED) of a teacher for the Spirit (ITSELF) will teach you (ALL THINGS)”. Tell us what degrees of Greek and Hebrew did the apostles have or Jesus for that matter. Is your religion based on you 200 scholars , then who in you flock is qualified are you. Scholars my friend have been proven wrong many, many, many times because of the Biases in their teachings. Jesus said to me and all, “know you Not you shall (ALL) be taught (BY) GOD. I just stay with that, lest i put my trust in man and wind up stumbling. The Greatest Teacher is the (REVELATION) of GOD in the minds and Heart of HIs Childern, NO SCHOLAR GREEK OR HEBREW, can compare to that. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………….gene


    Gene

    Like I said, will the Spirit go against the Apostles inspired written words?

    I base my doctrine on the scriptures, how about you?

    WJ


    You twist

    :cool:


    Con

    Really, then instead of spouting off at the mouth accusations against me of being dishonest then why don't you show me in my post on John chapter 6 where I twist!

    WJ

    #162954

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 08 2009,03:32)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 07 2009,22:20)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,23:24)

    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.

    Rom 1:4…..> And (DECLARED) to be the Son of GOD with Power, according to the Spirit of holiness, (HOW) by the resurrection from the dead.
    Notice it does not say by a prior existence but by the resurrection from the dead.

    Hope this helps Irene.

    peace and love to you and Georg………..gene


    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 07 2009,23:24)
    Irene………Here is something that might cause you to think more about this subject.

    Rom 1:3 …> Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was MADE OF THE SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH.
    Notice it does no say (remade)or reincarnated as the seed of David.


    That scripture sounds just like these…

    In the beginning was the Word, and “the Word was with God“, and the Word was God. “The same was in the beginning with God“. John 1:1, 2

    And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us“, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John 1:14

    Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and “was made in the likeness of men: And **being found in fashion as a man**, he humbled himself“, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. Phil 2:6-8

    WJ


    Why is that portion of John 1:14 in parenthesis?

    The word: “Elohims voice became man.

    To Proclaim! To Sound! To Cry! To Thunder!

    Isaiah 40:6 The voice said, Cry. And he said, What shall I cry? All flesh [is] grass, and all the goodliness thereof [is] as the flower of the field:

    The word was made flesh.

    Forasmuch as the children, who were to become the sons of 'elohim, were partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same, Heb. 2:14.

    The Socinians agree that the Messiah is both 'elohim and man, but they say that he was man, and was made a 'elohim, as Moses (Ex. 7:1).

    :cool:


    Con

    So according to you, John 1:1, 2 should read…

    In the beginning was (Gods voice), and “(Gods voice) was with God, “AND (GODS VOICE) WAS GOD“. The same (Gods voice) was in the beginning with God. John 1:1, 2

    So God is a “Voice” and not a Spirit!

    Not so, if you follow the pronouns all the way down to verse 14 you will find out who the Word is that was with God!

    Who is twisting the text and changing it?

    John even tells us in another place who this Word [logos] is…

    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called “The Word [logos] of God. Rev 19:13 Also 1 John 1:1-3.

    It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see this, but only deaf ears and a turning away from the truth!

    But they refused to hearken, and pulled away the shoulder, and stopped their ears, that they should not hear. Zech 7:11

    WJ

    #162956
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    AMEN, AMEN!!!

    #162988
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,22:00)

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,06:07)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 08 2009,05:00)

    Quote (Gene @ Dec. 08 2009,04:07)
    WJ…………Why go to the Greeks to learn, why not let the Spirit of GOD TEACH YOU the TRUTH> “Brethern you have (NO) need of a teacher , for the Spirit (ITSELF) shall teach you all things”. The Spirit (intellect) to recognize truth is the guiding light.  Surely not the Greeks and your 200 scholars who run you around a thousand rabbit trails and causing you to ever learn but never coming into the true Knowledge of GOD. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………..gene


    Uh Gene,
    It is your man Martian who goes to the Greeks to learn. Martian believes that the Logos means “speech.” This was the view of Plato a Greek philosopher. Plato taught that the Logos of John 1:1 was “verbal expression or thought.” So it is you and Martian who “go to the Greeks to learn.”

    Plato 's views were based in a mixture of mystery religions. Yet you guys acccuse trinitarians of believing in a mystery religion.

    Take the log out of your own eye Gene!

    thinker


    Yep I went to the greek language as explained in Bible dictionaries.  just like WJ does.


    Martian,
    You are twisting what Gene said about not going to the Greeks. He was saying that we should not base our views on their philosophies which is what you are doing. Plato taught your nonsense that “logos” means “speech.” Your inference that “speech” created all things (vs. 3) and then became flesh is intellectual suicide.

    If you are paying attention to the dictionaries you would be aware that the word “logos” comes from the root “legoo” which means “to speak.” The “logos” therefore is one who speaks. It was one who speaks that created all things and who became flesh. Verse 18 substantiates this by saying that the Son “exegeted” God. Give it up dude!

    The “Logos” is not about mere speech. It is about one who speaks.

    thinker


    That's silly. I have read at least a dozen Bible Dictionaries and none of them say it is about the person speaking. It is the action of expressing a thought or idea. You are personifying the word.

    #162990
    martian
    Participant

    WJ
    If I understand the straw man argument correctly it would seem you are posting one.
    Wikipedia says: “A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To ‘set up a straw man’ or ‘set up a straw-man argument’ is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. A straw-man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact a misleading fallacy, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted.
    You have brought up the argument about Jeff Benner before. You create a position that Jeff Benner is not a source to be considered and then refute his points on that basis without ever dealing with them. Since when does having a degree in theology define the accuracy of ones conclusions. Gerhard Kittel, Paul Althaus, and Emanual Hirsch were very well educated and respected theologians who gave support to the NAZI party and to Adolf Hitler. In fact Benner being self taught would help him to avoid the predjudices often taught in Theological schools. secondly his honoary degree would speak of the depth of his study.

    Another point to consider is the fact that many reference works still in wide use are very dated.
    Matthew Henry’s Commentary was first published in 1706. That’s fifty years before the Declaration of Independence! Certainly you must agree that understanding of the Greek and Hebrew language has changed since that time. Just the discovery of the Dead sea scrolls has revolutionized the understanding of Hebrew.
    Thayer’s Greek English Lexicon was published 1886 and revised 1889. Ten years later Gustov Deissmann published his work which completely changed the manner in which scholars study Greek and made Thayer’s work obsolete.
    These two works are still in common use. An exegesis using these works will not have the benefit of more recent archeological and linguistic research. The simple use of computers has enhanced the ability of researchers to come to more complete understandings.
    From a personal standpoint I remember that in my years of Bible college I believed everything I was told and was sure they were right about everything. The one thing they did teach me that I still agree with is the use of proper principles of study. Once I got out of school I discovered several mistakes in the doctrine of my Bible college.

    It seems that your doctrinal bias is not going to allow you to consider any evidence but what supports your doctrine.

    #162991
    martian
    Participant

    secondly WJ just where did Peter get his credentials or James or John. You swear by their words yet they had no formal training. Now you will probably say they were anointed by God to write the scriptures or that they were taught by Jesus himself. Has all of that stopped. Can God not anoint others to write or has Jesus stopped teaching people about his word?

    #163052

    Quote (martian @ Dec. 08 2009,14:48)
    You have brought up the argument about Jeff Benner before. You create a position that Jeff Benner is not a source to be considered and then refute his points on that basis without ever dealing with them.


    Martian

    The problem that you and Gene have is that Benner is not a reliable source for Greek, for even his Honorary isn't for his  Greek studies. He seems to be the only so-called source that supports yours and Genes opinions.

    The post that you made about the use of the word heaven by Benner does not reflect on its use in John 6 and in fact Benner doesn't touch on Greek tenses, voice, or moods at all.

    He is simply an experienced oppologist that cannot read either Greek or Hebrew!

    I do not care if you quote sources that is your right, but your source is alone and cannot began to stack up against the Greek and Hebrew credentialed scholars like Strongs and AT Robertson that gave their lives to bring us the Greek and Hebrew understanding of the text.

    Why hasn't anyone come out with a Modern translation that reflects your “Unitarian slants”? Its because it wouldn't get of the ground because they would have to distort the meaning of the Text and violate Greek grammer to support their views.

    You still refuse to address the Greek and the rules of grammer that is used in translating John 6 in my post which totally refutes the interpretation of the “Unitarians” and the “Arians” concerning the preexistence of Jesus.

    Every major translation renders the text the same.

    Its only oppologist that seek to refute the truth and twist the scriptures.

    WJ

Viewing 20 posts - 5,841 through 5,860 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account