That test post went thru, but my reply to Gene I receive a message that my response was “a potentially unsafe operation has been detected in your request to this site”

So much for being a place to freely express one’s thoughts. All done! Good luck to all and enjoy your religion.

DT, you said…..”Me: I’m sorry your statement really ticks me off as you doubled down on the 3:00pm time frame, insisting that is when Jesus was raised up; and you now “meant to say” it was really “at sunset”?!?!?!?? In all the places I have traveled around the world 3:00pm and sunset have never been the same, including Israel. Is your new “claim”…[Read more]

@Berean,

Wow! You can’t even defend what you believe! You remind me of a Jehovah’s Witness repeating what you have been told to say and anything beyond that, you’re lost. You can’t explain Isa 53 since all you know are a few verses you have been told mean the Jesus. You cited Ps 22:16, but are unable to explain the context of the chapter. I laugh…[Read more]

@DD
YOU
JESUS 👎
ME
JESUS 👍
 

@Carmel,

You can explain it away all you want, but the words written are the words written and you cannot change them. Luke claimed the lineage to Jesus came thru David’s son Nathan and not thru David’s son Solomon. That alone throws Luke’s account into the trash because Heli is a descendant of Nathan AND it was God who told David HE was estab…[Read more]

@Berean,

You quote Ps 22:16 as “proof” to who the “our” is in Isa 53:1 and the “message” no one would believe?!?! That makes zero sense! Or were you just spouting off verses again without explanation?

How exactly does Isa 53:5 explain the pronoun in verse one?

You then quote Zech 13:6; recommend you read verses 1-5 to put 6 into perspective…[Read more]

Hi DT,

Me: “when there were no sons to preserve the inheritance, the husband (son-in-law) would become the son upon marriage to keep up the family name.”

You: I haven’t found this verse that says when marrying the daughter of a son less man the man being married becomes

the “son” of that man…..

 ME: Back to square one!

Luke is following…[Read more]

@Gene,

You: “I meant to say was he was resurrected Saturday evening at sunset”

Me: I’m sorry your statement really ticks me off as you doubled down on the 3:00pm time frame, insisting that is when Jesus was raised up; and you now “meant to say” it was really “at sunset”?!?!?!?? In all the places I have traveled around the world 3:00pm and su…[Read more]

Berean…….A most “excellent ” post.

peace and love to you and yours Berean……..gene

 

 

Psalm 22:16

For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.

ISAIAH 53 :5] But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

Zechariah 13:6“

And one shall say unto him, What…

[Read more]

@desiretruth

You: I would recommend you back up your claim with scripture

Me: Isaiah 53:12 …he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

DT……You are right about where I said “Jesus was resurrected on Saturday afternoon” , what I meant to say was he was resurrected Saturday evening at sunset, my mistake, but non the less he was not resurrected on Sunday morning,  as you falsely present it.  You very clearly left out the rest of the sentence,  to conceal the fact that,  that sentenc…[Read more]

@Carmel,

You: “when there were no sons to preserve the inheritance, the husband (son-in-law) would become the son upon marriage to keep up the family name.”

Me: I haven’t found this verse that says when marrying the daughter of a son less man the man being married becomes the “son” of that man. The only thing I found was when a man only has…[Read more]

@Berean,

Who do you think the “our” is in verse one and what message are they speaking that is so unbelievable? Who is speaking here? Please don’t stop at one verse, explain them all and what’s happening. Singling out a few verses and saying it’s Jesus is nonsensical and proves nothing but cherry picking, place all the verses in context and expla…[Read more]

Hi DT,

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>You: Me: Lineage ran through the father and NOT the mother.</span>

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>The mother has NOTHING to do with lineage,</span>

Me: NOT QUITE PRECISE:

Luke gives the name Heli (the father of Mary) but then doesn’t list Mary but mentions Joseph. Why?

LET’S SEE HOW VITAL THE WOMAN IS, C…[Read more]

@ DT
…..he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
 
Who do you think is the “he”?
 

@Danny,

What an intellectual response to questions asked in post# 946186. You really don’t know how to respond; except with what you have been told to believe and even then your grasping at thin air, you believe something you can’t explain.

Still need to know who is speaking where in this dialog and what pronouns reference who. Lead me; bri…[Read more]

SO TRUE DD

@desiretruth

You are a liar.
The Suffering Servant pictured in Isaiah 53 is a Sin-bearer.
Only Jesus the Messiah is ‘the Lamb of God Who takes away the sin of the world.’

@ Gene

DT is right about the day of Christ’s resurrection.
If you want/if anyone wants a complete study on the subject go to:
https://www.wednesdaycrucifixion.com/

God bless