• Profile picture of gadam123

    Adam…….Remember Jesus spoke in parables to them, so they could not understand what he was really saying,

    When Jesus said, “he called them  God’s unto whom,  the word of God came”, you need to understand that,  as him meanning that,  in a possessive sence, they were God’s people , to whom the word of God came.  get it brother? , Jesus was not eve…

    [Read more]

  • Profile picture of gadam123

    Origin of worship of Yahweh…(continued)

    The Mosaic theory:- In lack of sufficient evidence in support of the theory of J that Yahweh was the primitive deity of Israel, we turn to a consideration of the rival theory of E and P that he first became the god of Israel at the time of the exodus. This tradition has been accepted by Riehm, Dillmann,…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Thanks for that commentary, Berean!  Let’s scrutinize it together and see which parts hold water and which ones don’t.

    a. Jesus answered them: The religious leaders surrounded Jesus (John 10:24) and now held rocks to stone Him to death (John 10:31). Jesus didn’t panic and didn’t run; He stopped them with the power of His word. He answered them…

    [Read more]

  • Profile picture of GeneBalthrop

    Adam…….Remember Jesus spoke in parables to them, so they could not understand what he was really saying,

    When Jesus said, “he called them  God’s unto whom,  the word of God came”, you need to understand that,  as him meanning that,  in a possessive sence, they were God’s people , to whom the word of God came.  get it brother? , Jesus was n…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of GeneBalthrop

    Mike…….simple answer, because the word of God “was and is” always God, Just as your words was and alway is you.  God’s words is how he expresses himself, just as your words do you. 

    The word simply means (intellegent utterance)  and it “was,” in the beginning (existing) with God and was God, in the beginning. JUST AS YOUR WORDS (int…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Proclaimer

    Proclaimer wrote a new post 4 years ago

    Billionaire Elon Musk has made the headlines a lot lately with his purchase of Twitter. His reason for the transaction is to change the microblogging app into a free speech platform for the good of humanity. Why?

  • Profile picture of gadam123

    If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came: Jesus reasoned, “If God gave these unjust judges the title ‘gods’ because of their office, why do you consider it blasphemy that I call Myself the ‘Son of God’ in light of the testimony of Me and My works?”

    Hi Berean, our Mike will not agree with interpretation of Jesus, the so called Mess…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of Berean

    To all

    (34-39) Jesus reasons from Psalm 82, and from His works.
    Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I said, “You are gods”’? If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Anyone else notice that Proclaimer has been absent for 3 weeks?  He’s posted a couple of links and memes, but he hasn’t engaged in any discussions here in a long time.  I believe it’s because he is stuck.  He can’t answer my questions from our private thread, but he also knows that I will continue to call him out for dishonorably breaking his ow…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Okay, here’s where we are…

    This is my previous Must Answer question from 3 weeks ago that still remains unanswered…
    PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCE THAT THE SUN, MOON AND STARS ALREADY EXISTED BEFORE GOD MADE THEM ON DAY FOUR… OR OPENLY ACNKOWLEDGE THAT NO SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCE FOR YOUR CLAIMS EXISTS.
    Here’s my next oldest “Must Answer”…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Okay, back to the actual REASON for this thread…

    We’ve all agreed that “angels” are called gods in scripture.  We’ve all come to know that when Yahweh says there is no god besides Him, it is an emphatical statement and not meant to be taken literally – since He Himself calls others gods all throughout the scriptures.  Likewise, when Yahweh s…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Danny: Hi Adam,

    I’m afraid you will never find the truth based on the historians and
    archaeologist’s arguments through critical analysis.

    If you want the truth, then read the Bible!
    The Bible clearly says that Yahweh is EL!

    These liberal scholars that speak contrary to the Bible are wrong.
    The Bible is our source for all truth even hist…

    [Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Adam: The theological position of the Tanakh is that the names Ēl and ‘Ĕlōhîm, when used in the singular to mean the supreme god, refer to Yahweh, beside whom other gods are supposed to be either nonexistent or insignificant.

    The plural “elohim” is used in the singular to refer to many gods in the Bible, including Beelzebul, Chemosh, Molek, an…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Mike:  Show me in the Hebrew texts the latter word “worship”. 

     

    Adam:  Again your comment on my post mentioning Deut 4:19 is also ignorance of my arguments.

    The text of Deut 4:19 (GNT) reads…

    19 Do not be tempted to worship and serve what you see in the sky—the sun, the moon, and the stars. The Lord your God has given these to all other pe…

    [Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Adam, how did the “story” of Jesus, the Son of God who was sent down to the earth from heaven, come about?

    Let’s start with the most obvious…  Did the man Jesus of Nazareth actually exist on earth?

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Adam: Hi Mike, Yes Hebrew religion which is based on their Bible had evolved and developed from Polytheism to Monotheism as per the historians. If you don’t accept it’s your problem.

    What does “as per the historians” actually mean, Adam?  What PROOF to “the historians” offer?  And do all “historians” agree with the conclusion at which YOUR histor…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Mike: But Jesus could have also used the singular “day”(back in the day of Noah) to make his point.

     

    Carmel:  Mike, NO HE COULDN’T! Jesus was specifically talking about Noah’s days, and He couldn’t use the singular form day…

    First of all, you’re blatantly wrong…

    Let’s begin by pointing out that the phrase “back in the day” has been around s…

    [Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Gene: Mike……here is anotger honest answer for you,

    JOHN 1V1……“in the beginning (was) the word  (intellegent utterance), and the word,  (intellegent uterance ) was with God, and the word (intellegent utterance)  was God. 

    Point 0ne…

    Point two…

    Point three…

    Point four…

    Hi Gene.  The points that you addressed have nothing to do with why…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Carmel: Jeremiah1:5Before I FORMED thee in the bowels of thy mother, I knew thee: and before thou camest forth out of the womb, I sanctified thee, and MADE thee a prophet unto the nations.

    Philippians 2:7  But emptied himself, taking the FORM of a servant, being MADE in the likeness of men, and in habit found as a man.

    In the above two verses, t…

    [Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Adam:  I am finding many answers to my life long queries on these ancient Biblical texts.

    Are you really?  Perhaps you’d highlight the best “answers” you’ve found, so we can evaluate the crux of your position without having to read huge volumes of ignorant people spouting off about things they couldn’t possibly prove.  Here, I’ll get you st…[Read more]

  • Load More

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account