• mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 day, 19 hours ago

    You video appeals to gravity holding gas molecules to the earth.  Of course gravity is a theory that has never been verified – and has actually been refuted by light gases such as helium.  And consider that air pressure at sea level is about 15 psi.  So not only is gravity attracting gas molecules to earth, but it is attracting them with such fo…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 3 days, 11 hours ago

    Hmm… still no PRO flat earth videos you’d like to present and discuss, huh?  You mentioned Newton’s 1st Law – which I’ve already told you is destroyed by light slowing down in water, but then picking right back up to it’s “constant” speed upon exiting the water.  What force acted upon that light to speed it back up?  You also mentioned the ba…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 4 days, 11 hours ago

    Hey T8, I’m still waiting for answers to my post with the sun, moon and earth artwork I did, and my latest one concerning Mt. Ruapehu.  I’ve asked some simple questions in both of those posts, but haven’t heard any response from you yet.

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 4 days, 11 hours ago

    T8:  A lesson in Newton’s first law…

    What was the lesson?

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 4 days, 11 hours ago

    T8:  Mike, I often work with JPGs in Photoshop…  This FE point is done for me.

    About the time you were making this post, I was watching this live stream…

    I’m sure you won’t spend an hour and ten minutes learning some truth, so I’m going to snip out some relevant parts and package it into a 1 or 2 minute video fo…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 4 days, 11 hours ago

    T8:  But they are being debunked one at a time.

    You have yet to debunk even one of them.

    T8:  And you ignore all experiments that lead to the realisation of globe earth.

    I wasn’t aware such a thing existed.  Please enlighten me.

    T8:  And that doesn’t even include sending up craft to photograph and video what the earth really looks like.

    D4T alread…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 6 days, 12 hours ago

    Mike:  …when I’ve repeatedly stated that refraction is a very real thing. It’s been many months now that you keep making that claim, despite me repeatedly talking about the effects of refraction. Time for you to learn a new song, T8.

    T8:  Fantastic. So you understand that Ruapehu can be explained by Taupo Plateau and refraction alone. Good…

    [Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 6 days, 12 hours ago

    T8:  See Mike. If we are patient, each FE argument will be debunked…

    Yes, the old “jpeg compression” argument again.  It might interest you to know that when Rob Skiba first increased the levels on that earth (and other NASA official images), he did it during a LIVE stream.  You can still find it online, and watch his computer AS he goes to the…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 6 days, 13 hours ago

    T8:  So eclipses are caused by objects unknown or the moon creating the effect on its own and that is a good enough explanation to debunk the idea that the Solar System model can explain it all perfectly and visually. That sounds like scientism to me Mike. I would find it hard to ignore the fact that the SS model works like clockwork and v…

    [Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week ago

    T8:  The Flat Earth produces eclipses how? And the curved shadow on the moon, what is that?

    Solid questions.  Let me begin my answer by asking you how you know the darkened part of the moon during a so-called eclipse is a “shadow” of something else at all, let alone that the “shadow” is caused by the earth.  Some ancient cultures believed in a dar…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    T8:  And many things like this that supposedly puts the globe earth to bed, is actually worse for the Flat Earth. Eclipses being one of them.

    Please tell us why eclipses are “worse for the Flat Earth”… especially in light of the impossibility of a selenelion eclipse in the globe model.

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    T8:  I just watched this and thought I would pot it here as it debunks points you made earlier in this topic.

    Which points?  And how exactly were they debunked in the video?

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    T8:  So it was absurd and the solution was to not only double down on absurd, but to double down the double down x 1 million, that is throw out all the evidence we have for the globe earth because we sometimes see things that do not ordinarily happen.

    The solution for me was to investigate further, to see if there were any other similarly absurd e…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 4 days ago

    T8:  As for Ruapehu, My honest opinion on that is a portion of the mountain in the shot is behind the curve…  I can’t think of any other reason at this stage to explain it. But let me be clear, I am happy with refraction…

    Another brilliant response!  We both agree that refraction/distortion is a real thing.  But this is what I was just talkin…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 4 days ago

    T8:  Hey Mike, this stuff is way harder than I thought. It seems hard to find info on these questions, I guess because people do not really look into things like this. I’ve read a whole lotta stuff and one comment I saw said the moon travels the other way. Only saw it once and when I google it, nothing comes up. Who knows at this stage. I will kee…

    [Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 5 days ago

    T8, I’m waiting on your mathematical review so we can put the Ruapehu thing to rest.  And speaking of mountains people have photographed from 123 miles away, check this baby out…

    Probably just refraction again.  🙂

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 5 days ago

    I don’t know if I’m right on this solar eclipse shadow, but for me it all comes down to this…  If a shadow passes over you from your right to your left, then the thing that caused the shadow must have also passed over you from your right to your left.  So the way I see it, if the moon’s shadow goes west to east across the earth, then the moon i…[Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 5 days ago

    T8:  I call BS on that Mike.

    You haven’t addressed the math I posted at all.

    T8, your math post amounted to this:  “So the moon is going in it’s orbit twice as fast as the Earth spins on it’s axis.”

    And this was me addressing the math:

    “You couldn’t have possibly watched the entire video.  If you did, you’d know this:

    1. Yes, the official scie…

    [Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 6 days ago

    D4T: Oh boy, talk about not listening. T8, you’re not listening which is important unless you just want to post the same thing over and over and over.

    I’m sorry but I’m not as patient as Mike. You’ll have to just walk away thinking you’ve made a valid point without even understanding the counter point to your position. Now go and celebrate.…

    [Read more]

  • mikeboll64 replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 6 days ago

    T8:  Mike, here is my post with the math.

    https://heavennet.net/forums/topic/flat-earth/page/128/#post-839443

    You haven’t answered it. 

    I addressed it on the very next page.  In posts 2, 6, 9, 11, 14, 15, 19 and 20 of that page.  Almost half of that entire page was filled with posts from me addressing your math post.  And that’s what pisses…[Read more]

  • Load More