Gene

With you, it seems wrong to belong to a church. The bible from which I gave you passages from Ephesians 4: 4-16. demonstrates the opposite.
But you ignore it. YOU NEVER ANSWER QUESTIONS…
IT’S SAD.

Berean: Hi Mike

Thanks for the encouragement….But I wonder if I will continue to post anything on this thread, if no one is interested, except for one or two…

Think of it this way… This site only has six active members.  If you’re reaching two of them, you’re reaching a third of the entire population!  😅

This thread is Berean’s and a good place to ask questions that are good to ask about what he believes. The only offense that should be taken is if a person is hiding something.

Always be ready to give an answer to what you believe we are told.

And indeed  I myself am not offended by questions regarding what I believe. In fact I’m happy yo give…[Read more]

Hi Mike,

YOU: And I am unaware of any prophecy Abraham received that spoke of a single person from his seed eventually arising to be a “light” or a “ruler”. I have asked for that scripture, and you have yet to provide it. So I’m not really sure which prophecy specifically about Jesus that Abraham supposedly rejoiced over.

ME:  I have looked int…[Read more]

Berean……..your blogs are really not yours most of the time , they are someone elses , that you think are true, most of the time from your church affelations.  Your not commibg from what the Spirit of God is showibg you but from what your church, tells you. Notice how you change my last post to you from my point a out the church of Ephesuans…[Read more]

Hi Mike,

There is a lot to clear up! I want to start with this,

YOU: 4. And is that because the “origin” of an event is not normally counted as the time the event was planned for the future, but the time the event actually began to occur? Yes or No, please?

ME:

My primary stance that I have given  concerning Micah 5:2, is the truth that we r…[Read more]

Hi Mike

Thanks for the encouragement….But I wonder if I will continue to post anything on this thread, if no one is interested, except for one or two…

Prep for my question.

Here is an introductory post that will help make my following question easier to understand by providing some context.

Mike, you believe flat earthers have demonstrated that they have brought back boats when we say that they have gone over the horizon. Of course, we exposed this by explaining that the boats you guys…[Read more]

A model that came thousands of years AFTER a phenomenon that had already been witnessed by BILLIONS of people cannot possibly be said to “PREDICT” that phenomenon.

Reality check.

The heliocentric model explains it and the falt earth model doesn’t. Further, it disproves the flat earth model.

Tomorrow, the sun will set according to the hel…[Read more]

Mike, this is not a question is it.

And I agree with much of it anyway. So I am not sure of the point being made.

I cannot addresses every point ever made here can I.

So I am not sure exactly what you expect me to do with this.

Lol.

Regardless, I have debunked your arguments and you have ignored the vast majority of the points I made or…[Read more]

Gene and Proclaimer:

In the interest of a respectful dialogue about the sun “setting” (which it doesn’t actually do on a flat earth OR on a ball earth), I offer you a simple thought experiment to open things up…

Can you see an airplane above you at cruising altitude (about 7 miles up)?  Yes, we’ve all seen that.
Question:  Have you ever seen s…[Read more]

Pretender: You have been given dozens of proofs but you simply ignore them… Let’s start with the fact that the sun sets. The heliocentric model predicts it, but not the flat earth.

A model that came thousands of years AFTER a phenomenon that had already been witnessed by BILLIONS of people cannot possibly be said to “PREDICT” that phe…[Read more]

Gene:  Mike focus is indeed his “self”,  he has nothing to do with “honest” dialog.  He ignores clearly presented sound facts…

What you do is called “projection”, Gene.  It refers to a guilty party projecting the very things THEY do on onto someone else.  It is straight from Saul Alinsky’s book, “Rules for Radicals”.

Here, I’ll prove it to…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  One reason people leave is because their arguments have been defeated. 

Perhaps, although I doubt you can give a specific example and show the last posts of a person who admitted he was leaving because of defeated arguments.

In any case, we don’t have to guess about Danny’s reason, since his parting letter told you exactly why he w…[Read more]

Berean, I’m truly sorry that the thread in which you post a spiritually inspiring message each day was invaded by marauders trying to pick a fight with you.  Please carry on with your Godly endeavors and just block out the noise.

🙏

The Gospel of Christ does not speak of a flat earth or a globe. Does he do it ?
So that’s far from my concern.
I advise you the Gospel of Christ, you will be safer online than sterile and endless debates.

The gospel of Christ is accepted and not debated here by anyone as far as I know.

But people teach false things from the bible and yes, they n…[Read more]

Gene

You

Berean look at it this way, if God has given us the “Spirit of Truth”  then this scripture applies to us, …..”brethern you have “NO” need of a teacher , for the Spirit ITSELF  will teach you “All” things”, and again,  “you shall all be taught of or  (by) God”.   

Me

👇

Ephesians 4

There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye a…[Read more]

Proclaimer

The Gospel of Christ does not speak of a flat earth or a globe. Does he do it ?
So that’s far from my concern.
I advise you the Gospel of Christ, you will be safer online than sterile and endless debates.

Proclaimer……Good point to Berean,  he needs to stop believing everything his Church is telling him and start thinking for himself.

Berean look at it this way, if God has given us the “Spirit of Truth”  then this scripture applies to us, …..”brethern you have “NO” need of a teacher , for the Spirit ITSELF  will teach you “All” th…[Read more]