Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 11,841 through 11,860 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #266348
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 30 2011,10:59)

    Quote (terraricca @ Nov. 30 2011,10:50)
    frank

    Quote
    Father Yahweh's word was with Him just as my word is with me. I never said that I believed “God was with God”! What foolishness!  

    paid attention that it does not say WORDS  it say  THE WORD Jn 1;1 ,so if he was talking about his own words it would be plurial ,and it is totally non sens to think that John would talk about the speaking words that God may or may have not said ,

    you have an preconcieved believe and so it make it difficult to see the truth.

    Pierre


    Pierre,

    So, is it your belief that when your translation of Scripture mentions the “word of God” that it is speaking of ONLY ONE word being spoken and not several words being spoken? If so, your translation of Scripture needs a total revamping!

    You had better check your belief with the following and you will find that you are totally in error in your foolish reasoning:

    “word of God”


    Pierre,

    Note that in the KJV that there are fewer reference to “the words [plural] of God” than there are to “the word [singular] of God”. It is clear when reading the verses that contain “the word of God” that there are several words spoken and not just one single word spoken.

    “words of God”

    “the words of God”

    #266350
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:19)
    Mike,

    I have previously made known to you that I was not CREATED, but was BORN


    So then you are NOT a creation of your God, Frank?  ???

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:19)
    You believe that Yahshua created and I do not.


    The only thing Jesus is ever said to have “created” is the whip he made out of cords.  I don't believe Jesus created anything, Frank, nor have I ever claimed that he did.  We have A Creator, not Creators.

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:19)
    I believe that Father Yahweh “ALONE” and “BY HIMSELF” created the Heavens and the Earth and ALL THINGS IN THEM and that His son Yahshua never once proclaimed that he had created ANYTHING!


    I believe that exact same thing………..because it is scriptural.

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:19)
    I do not believe that Yahshua was a creating agent of his and our Father Yahweh in the beginning.


    Not a “creating agent”, Frank.  An agent THROUGH WHOM God created.

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:19)
    Now is it your position that I should also believe that Adam, Noah, and my mother were also creating agents and pre-existed with Father Yahweh in the beginning?


    Not at all.  Adam, Noah, and your mother need only pre-exist the things that were created through them.  So unless something was created through your mother BEFORE she was born as a human, then she most likely didn't pre-exist her flesh.

    On the other hand, the only way ALL THINGS IN HEAVEN AND ON EARTH could have been created through Jesus is if Jesus existed PRIOR TO the things that were created through him.

    Frank, you are foolishly trying to put claims into our mouths that we haven't made.  None of us have claimed that Jesus created anything ever.  Nor have we claimed that anyone other than Jesus pre-existed his humanity.

    Just stick to the things we HAVE ACTUALLY said, and SCRIPTURALLY refute them if you can.

    #266351
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 30 2011,10:50)

    Quote (Ed J @ Nov. 30 2011,10:35)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 30 2011,09:49)
    t8,

        WHO IS THE WORD?

    In John 1:14, this same 'word' that was God the Father (because the word was in the Father) produced His son Jesus.


    Hi Frank, you are well studied and are rightly dividing “The Word” of God.

          the glory as of the only begotten of the Father (John 1:14)
          compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. (Romans 8:18)

    The Word of the oath, which was since the law,
    maketh the Son, who is consecrated for evermore. (Hebrews 7:28)

    1Pet.1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of
    incorruptible, by “The Word” of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.

    Of his own will begat he us with “The Word” of truth,
    that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures. (James 1:18)

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Ed J,

    Great Scriptural references! Thanks!  :)


    :)

    #266353
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:30)
    I never said that I believed “God was with God”! What foolishness!


    That's right Frank,

    It is complete foolishness.  But that is exactly what YOUR preferred translation of John 1:1 says – “In the beginning, God was WITH God”.

    If the Word IS God, then 1:1 says “God was WITH God”.

    But one thing cannot be WITH itself, Frank.  That's why sane people realize that 1:1 speaks of TWO beings, one of whom was WITH the other.

    #266354
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 30 2011,11:16)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 30 2011,10:59)

    Quote (terraricca @ Nov. 30 2011,10:50)
    frank

    Quote
    Father Yahweh's word was with Him just as my word is with me. I never said that I believed “God was with God”! What foolishness!  

    paid attention that it does not say WORDS  it say  THE WORD Jn 1;1 ,so if he was talking about his own words it would be plurial ,and it is totally non sens to think that John would talk about the speaking words that God may or may have not said ,

    you have an preconcieved believe and so it make it difficult to see the truth.

    Pierre


    Pierre,

    So, is it your belief that when your translation of Scripture mentions the “word of God” that it is speaking of ONLY ONE word being spoken and not several words being spoken? If so, your translation of Scripture needs a total revamping!

    You had better check your belief with the following and you will find that you are totally in error in your foolish reasoning:

    “word of God”


    Pierre,

    Note that in the KJV that there are fewer reference to “the words [plural] of God” than there are to “the word [singular] of God”. It is clear when reading the verses that contain “the word of God” that there are several words spoken and not just one single word spoken.

    “words of God”

    “the words of God”


    Pierre,

    The second hyperlinked text in my last post should have been entitled “the word of God”.

    When I say “I believe Father Yahweh's word!”, I am certainly not given reference to one single word within His word that I believe, but I am clearly giving reference to His ENTIRE WORD (ALL of His WORDS). It is common among all religions that study translations of Father Yahweh's inspired WORD to refer to His ENTIRE WORD (ALL of His WORDS) as HIS WORD.

    No Greek “kudos” to you Pierre! You are easily shot down in your foolish reasoning! You will need a better education to deal with me! :D

    #266355
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:48)
    Mike,

    I believe that Father Yahweh's word was with Him and that His word had power, might and strength. This is the initial Hebrew meaning of the word that has been erroneously translated as “God” or “god”.


    Frank,

    I don't think “erroneously translated” is a fair claim, for John wrote what he wrote.

    I will agree wholeheartedly that the word “theos” refers to a “mighty one” – and that one is not always God Almighty. (See 2 Cor 4:4 for an example)

    The Hebrew word “el” is many times translated as “mighty” in English translations. And I would be happy with “mighty” in John 1:1……………..

    “the Word was with God, and the Word was mighty”. Moffatt's translation has “and the Word was divine”.

    Either way, this “Word” was WITH God Almighty, and also a mighty one himself. That still speaks of TWO, one of whom was WITH the other. Frank, consider the masculine forms of the Greek words. The Word is called a “he” and a “him”. The Word is never called an “it”, as it would be if you were right.

    #266356
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (terraricca @ Nov. 29 2011,17:50)
    paid attention that it does not say WORDS it say THE WORD Jn 1;1 ,so if he was talking about his own words it would be plurial


    Great point, Pierre! :)

    It says “THE WORD”, not “words”. It is a title for God's main spokesman, Jesus.

    #266357
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,11:26)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:30)
    I never said that I believed “God was with God”! What foolishness!


    That's right Frank,

    It is complete foolishness.  But that is exactly what YOUR preferred translation of John 1:1 says – “In the beginning, God was WITH God”.

    If the Word IS God, then 1:1 says “God was WITH God”.

    But one thing cannot be WITH itself, Frank.  That's why sane people realize that 1:1 speaks of TWO beings, one of whom was WITH the other.


    Mike,

    My preferred translations do not say “In the beginning, God was WITH God”. If I ever found a translation with such wording, I would quickly throw it in the trash where it belongs! In fact, I am not aware of any such translation that says “In the beginning, God was WITH God”., are you? I believe that you would treasure such an erroneous translation if there was such a translation! :D

    #266358
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,18:31)
    No Greek “kudos” to you Pierre! You are easily shot down in your foolish reasoning! You will need a better education to deal with me!


    Says the fool who can't even address most of our posts!

    Frank, what happened when you read John 1:30? What about when you read 1:29 to find out who 30 was talking about?

    Then what happened when you read 1:15? How about when you went back to 1:14 to find out who 15 was talking about?

    Please…………..fill me in on what you discovered.

    #266359
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,18:38)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,11:26)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:30)
    I never said that I believed “God was with God”! What foolishness!


    That's right Frank,

    It is complete foolishness.  But that is exactly what YOUR preferred translation of John 1:1 says – “In the beginning, God was WITH God”.

    If the Word IS God, then 1:1 says “God was WITH God”.

    But one thing cannot be WITH itself, Frank.  That's why sane people realize that 1:1 speaks of TWO beings, one of whom was WITH the other.


    Mike,

    My preferred translations do not say “In the beginning, God was WITH God”. If I ever found a translation with such wording, I would quickly throw it in the trash where it belongs! In fact, I am not aware of any such translation that says “In the beginning, God was WITH God”., are you? I believe that you would treasure such an erroneous translation if there was such a translation! :D


    Frank,

    In your opinion, WHO is the Word from John 1:1? And I say “WHO” and not “WHAT” because of the masculine words associated with HIM.

    WHO is HE, Frank?

    #266361
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,11:36)

    Quote (terraricca @ Nov. 29 2011,17:50)
    paid attention that it does not say WORDS  it say  THE WORD Jn 1;1 ,so if he was talking about his own words it would be plurial


    Great point, Pierre!  :)

    It says “THE WORD”, not “words”.  It is a title for God's main spokesman, Jesus.


    Mike,

    You are clearly uneducated as Pierre is! :D I gave you clear proof that Father Yahweh's words are referred to in translation as “His word” and you have not taken the least bit of notice to this fact.

    Here is the proof again for your consideration:

    “the word of God”

    “the words of God”

    #266364
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,11:43)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,18:38)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,11:26)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:30)
    I never said that I believed “God was with God”! What foolishness!


    That's right Frank,

    It is complete foolishness.  But that is exactly what YOUR preferred translation of John 1:1 says – “In the beginning, God was WITH God”.

    If the Word IS God, then 1:1 says “God was WITH God”.

    But one thing cannot be WITH itself, Frank.  That's why sane people realize that 1:1 speaks of TWO beings, one of whom was WITH the other.


    Mike,

    My preferred translations do not say “In the beginning, God was WITH God”. If I ever found a translation with such wording, I would quickly throw it in the trash where it belongs! In fact, I am not aware of any such translation that says “In the beginning, God was WITH God”., are you? I believe that you would treasure such an erroneous translation if there was such a translation! :D


    Frank,

    In your opinion, WHO is the Word from John 1:1?  And I say “WHO” and not “WHAT” because of the masculine words associated with HIM.

    WHO is HE, Frank?


    Mike,

    Father Yahweh's word is not a “who”, but is an “it” just as His set apart (holy, sacred) spirit is not a “who”, but an “it”.

    The Holy Spirit Is An It!
    The Holy Spirit Is Not A Person!

    #266365
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,11:40)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,18:31)
    No Greek “kudos” to you Pierre! You are easily shot down in your foolish reasoning! You will need a better education to deal with me!


    Says the fool who can't even address most of our posts!

    Frank, what happened when you read John 1:30?  What about when you read 1:29 to find out who 30 was talking about?

    Then what happened when you read 1:15?  How about when you went back to 1:14 to find out who 15 was talking about?

    Please…………..fill me in on what you discovered.


    Mike,

    #266366
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    John 1
    29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! 30 This is the one I meant when I said, ‘A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’

    1.  Frank, is it clear to you, based on the word “Jesus” in verse 29, that John says these bolded words about Jesus?

    14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.

    15 John testifies concerning him and he cries out, saying, This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’”

    2.  Frank, is it equally clear to you, based on the words “The Word” in verse 14, that John says these bolded words about the Word?

    Frank, I would like YOU to address these two questions DIRECTLY, and in YOUR OWN words, please.

    You posting a bunch of scripturally flawed crap from others who aren't here to defend their crap against our questions doesn't do anyone any good.

    I'm trying to show YOU something here, using the very words of scripture.  PLEASE ADDRESS THIS POST.

    #266367
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,11:33)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 29 2011,17:48)
    Mike,

    I believe that Father Yahweh's word was with Him and that His word had power, might and strength. This is the initial Hebrew meaning of the word that has been erroneously translated as “God” or “god”.


    Frank,

    I don't think “erroneously translated” is a fair claim, for John wrote what he wrote.

    I will agree wholeheartedly that the word “theos” refers to a “mighty one” – and that one is not always God Almighty.  (See 2 Cor 4:4 for an example)

    The Hebrew word “el” is many times translated as “mighty” in English translations.  And I would be happy with “mighty” in John 1:1……………..

    “the Word was with God, and the Word was mighty”.  Moffatt's translation has “and the Word was divine”.

    Either way, this “Word” was WITH God Almighty, and also a mighty one himself.  That still speaks of TWO, one of whom was WITH the other.  Frank, consider the masculine forms of the Greek words.  The Word is called a “he” and a “him”.  The Word is never called an “it”, as it would be if you were right.


    Mike,

    Yahchanan did not write or translate the translations that are available to us in this time period. In fact, his writings as he originally penned them as with all other writers of all other Scripture are not even in existence in this time period! All we have are copies upon copies and translations upon translations of those copies. To take this even a step further, we also have edited versions upon edited version of translations.

    #266368
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Then where will you stop, Frank? Will you make the “erroneously translated” accusation on any scripture that doesn't meet the approval of your doctrine?

    Either accept the scriptures as the inspired word of God………or don't. But you can't just pick and choose the ones that fit into your doctrine and call the ones that don't fake.

    Please address my previous post.

    #266376
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,12:03)
    John 1
    29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! 30 This is the one I meant when I said, ‘A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’

    1.  Frank, is it clear to you, based on the word “Jesus” in verse 29, that John says these bolded words about Jesus?

    14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.

    15 John testifies concerning him and he cries out, saying, This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’”

    2.  Frank, is it equally clear to you, based on the words “The Word” in verse 14, that John says these bolded words about the Word?

    Frank, I would like YOU to address these two questions DIRECTLY, and in YOUR OWN words, please.

    You posting a bunch of scripturally flawed crap from others who aren't here to defend their crap against our questions doesn't do anyone any good.

    I'm trying to show YOU something here, using the very words of scripture.  PLEASE ADDRESS THIS POST.


    Mike,

    Yes, I see that you are trying to show me something here and it certainly is not Scripture rightly divided, but wrested (twisted and perverted). You have shown me nothing but worthless crap from the very beginning. The fact is, I am already quite aware of the Scripture that Trinitarians and those who believe Yahshua pre-existed his birth twist (“wrest”) to their own destruction. See the leading links on my web page for full poof of this:

    Did Yahshua Create Or Pre-exist His Birth?

    #266378
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Frank,

    What is your direct answer to question #1?

    How about question #2?

    #266380
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 30 2011,12:47)
    Frank,

    What is your direct answer to question #1?

    How about question #2?


    Mike,

    I have previously given answers to both of these questions in my previous posts which you have conveniently chose to ignore. I am also quite aware that others here who believe as I do have also answered both of these questions which you have also chose to ignore.

    #266383
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Frank……………….I have told them what you have brought out over and over, They just do not get it. God and His word or Words are one and the Same. Mike think a man and his word or words are not the same . I would like to see him separate his word or words from himself, if he could do that it that would prove his point, his words are an exaction expression of who and what he is they are him  We know and man and his word are the same representation and mans words carry his Power,  God's words carry his power and He spoke all thing into creation by His Own words. These people just don't understand if a man quotes someone else those words are not HIS Word but is the One he is quoting. Jesus plainly said in three places the words he spoke were not His word, so how could he be the Word or Words  he said were not his. If He was the Word then the Word would be HIM, but he said he was not the Word becasue he said those words were not HIS.  Thy think because Jesus was a spokesmen speaking God word to us that some how makes him the word or words he was speaking. The can't understand John was speaking about the Beginning of all thing in creation, and it was God who Spoke and carried out His Words in creation. God  plainly says he created all the world and everything in to by   himself and alone These people just reject those scriptures as if they are not even in the bible along with hundreds of other scriptures that also backs that up. They take one word that is translated 70/80 different way and they base their whole dogmas on that and other scriptures they take totally out of context forcing the text to say what in fact it is not truly saying. God does not create anything “THROUGH” any one He does it all Himself and he give that Glory to no man . God was (IN) Christ Jesus reconciling the words to him , they see it as GOD was working “THROUGH” Jesus the man , but scripture say He was (IN) Christ Jesus speaking to us.  Where it say destory this temple and in three days I (God) , shall raise (IT) up. That was not Jesus speaking it was God the Father first person speaking through Jesus' mouth. and Where it says  Mat 23:37…….> O Jerusalem, Jerusalem you that kill the prophets, and stone them which are sent unto you, how often would I have gathered your childern together, even as a hen gathers he chicks under her wings and you would not!,.

    That was God the Father speaking first person in and through Jesus' mouth by his own spirit Logos, but none of that makes Jesus the LOGOS HIMSELF.  Even if God Spoke directly through his mouth. God spoke directly through a Jack ASS to Balm that did not make the Jack ass GOD nor His word . God spoke through the Prophets His word but that did  not Make them his Word either , God now Spoke through His Son but that does not makes His SON his word or words either.

    Bottom line is GOD and His word or words are one and the Same. God's word was in the beginning with GOD and WAS GOD, Just that simple.

    Peace and love to you and yours Frank………………gene

Viewing 20 posts - 11,841 through 11,860 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account