Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 11,701 through 11,720 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #262689
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 18 2011,09:45)
    Micah 5:2 NIV
    2 “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
         though you are small among the clans of Judah,
         out of you will come for me
         one who will be ruler over Israel,
         whose origins are from of old,
         from ancient times.”

    Frank, what does it mean that Jesus' origins are “from of old, from ancient times”?  Remember that this statement was made during the lifetime of Micah.


    Frank was unable to address my point about Ps 90:2.  So on to the rest of his copied post:

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 18 2011,07:57)
    The New American Bible study notes explain Micah 5:2 as a reference to the Messiah's descent from the ancient Davidic dynasty : “The tiny city and clan of Bethlehem-Ephrathah, from which comes the ancient Davidic dynasty (whose origin is from old, from ancient times) with its messianic king, one who is to be ruler in Israel”


    Wrong.  Micah 5:2 refers to a RULER whose origins were from ancient times – not a dynasty.   But this is how the non-preexisters work.  They try to twist the scriptures into complete nonsense and hope no one will notice.  Frank is one of those who didn't notice.  :)

    There is no way from the words of Micah 5:2 that you could construe “the dynasty from which Jesus would eventually come had origins in the distant past”.

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 18 2011,07:57)
    Additionally, the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges says: “origins” in Micah 5:2 refers to his (the Messiah's) descent from the ancient Davidic family.


    This statement flies in the face of the next statement:

    Quote
    If 'origin' in Micah 5:2 referred to that of Jesus' coming into existence it would be in contradiction of Matthew 1:18 which details the 'origin' of Jesus as his ‘begetting by holy spirit’.

    ONE CANNOT HAVE 2 POINTS OF ORIGIN. .”.


    So if Matthew 1:18 truly details the ORIGIN of Jesus, and “one cannot have 2 points of origin”, then Micah 5:2 couldn't possibly refer to the ORIGINS of Jesus as “his descent from the ancient Davidic family”, right?

    Frank, don't you see how one point in your copied post works against the point you listed directly above it?  ???

    Fortunately for us we have the scriptures, which teach of being “born AGAIN“.  So we know that we can have more than one point of origin.  We have John speaking about our begetting as sons of God.  I wonder if any of the Apostles, upon being begotten by God as part of the firstfruits said, “Sorry God, you cannot beget me as your son, because I have already had a point of origin before”.  :)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 18 2011,07:57)
    Yet logically Jesus only comes into actual existence at the end of that line –his conception.


    So then Jesus' existence before this was what?  An “inactual existence”?  ???

    The rest of the post is just more of the same.  It displays a person who doesn't WANT Jesus to have pre-existed his flesh twisting various scriptures in nonsensical ways.

    I wonder if Micah 5:2 actually means exactly what it says?  Do you think that could be, Frank?  Could the God inspired words of Micah mean exactly what they say?  Could it mean that the coming ruler of God's people actually originated a long time ago?  Could that be why Jesus is both the Root AND the Branch of David?  Could that be why Jesus explained to the Pharisees that the Messiah couldn't LITERALLY be the son of David in Matthew 22:41-46?

    Something to think about Frank.  Of course I know you will just bury your head in the sand, hide behind these copied words of people who obviously haven't thought this thing all the way through, and sling more insults at us.  :)

    #262690
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike………Frank answered all your questions by what he presented, It not his fault if you and Your Co-hart cant understand what is presented and follow the logic there. So you after starting you usual games of “HE DIDN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION AGAIN. And this is the way you and Pierre sling your insults at people , by trying to desperately belittle them but never answering what they post as fact or not , nor able to dispute what they are saying is true or not , just us ignorant insults to desperately try to justify your own ignorance. Produce your fact with scripture and Scholarship not stupid insults. Frank has produce his with Scholarship , just like Paladin has but you two tare down all understand of truth here to meet you dogmas . What Frank has said i also have told you way back about the different translations of the word For or By, If you can remember i told you they are translated over 70 different way and even Posted ALL OF THEM for you to SEE, But again you just ignored them Just as you have Franks Posting showing the same thing. Truth is you and Pierre have absolutely No desire for the truth of God at all, your pride is blocking both of you from seen the truth. But worse you are hindering others from growing into the truth and God will hold you both accountable IMO.

    peace and love…………………………………………………………..gene

    #262691
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 18 2011,15:37)
    I believe that Father Yahweh's word was manifest (MADE KNOWN or REVEALED) in the flesh THROUGH (BY WAY OF) His son Yahshua. I believe that Father Yahweh's son Yahshua is the spokesman of his and our Father Yahweh word in his last time period as Hebrews 1:1-2 makes perfectly clear. As this passage also makes clear, the prophets of old were the spokesmen of Father Yahweh's word before Yahshua came into existence (or was born) in this last time period. Yahshua later died and was raised from the dead by his and our Father Yahweh and became “the firstborn of all creation”.


    Okay Frank,

    If Jesus was the spokesman of God in these last days, and that means the Word of God was manifest through Jesus, then it also means that same Word of God was manifest through those who were God's spokesman in the former days, right?

    So then Isaiah, David, Moses, and all the others were also “the Word of God” in their respective time periods on earth, right?

    And all of these men also died, right?  So what made the death of Jesus so special?  Did God decide that out of all of these “Words of God”, that He would zero in on Jesus and only his death would heal us?

    You need to read the parable of the tenants, Frank.  Only after the owner sent many other representatives did He send His very own Son, thinking, “Surely they will listen to him“.

    So what made Jesus “the one God set apart as His very own and sent into the world”?  What made Jesus the SON that God sent into the world as atonement?  Couldn't the same have been said of ALL the former prophets as well if your theory is correct?

    You list Hebrews 1:1-2, but that passage clearly distinguishes Jesus from the prophets of old by calling him God's Son, and saying that the ages were created through him.  How can the ages be created through someone who didn't exist until many ages had already been created?  (Actually, “ages” refers to the universe, as is made clear by many other scriptures.  So how could the universe be created through someone who didn't even exist?)

    And finally, “firstborn of EVERY CREATURE” sensibly refers to the first creature ever brought forth into existence.  And you apparently forget the part where Jesus is the firstborn of all creation BECAUSE all other things in heaven and on earth were subsequently created THROUGH him.

    Frank, you are a victim of the great deceiver.  The words of the scriptures are right there in front of you – and still you can't see.  “Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.” (Matthew 13:13)

    #262692
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Frank………..Good Job Brother , don't let the ignorance of these two discourage you brother, there both as blind as bats and have no true desire to learn the truth of God at all. Your work you are doing for the truth of God, is good and remember none of these brain washed TRINITARIANS WHO ARE ALSO PREEXISTENCES HAVE THE spirit OF truth in them or they could easily understand what you have posted IMO.

    peace and love to you and yours………………………………………………………..gene

    #262693
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Nov. 19 2011,08:50)
    Mike………Frank answered all your questions by what he presented……….


    Frank is a coward, Gene.  Just like you.  Here, I'll PROVE it to you:

    Frank quoted some dude named Fairchild, right?  And YOU jumped on the bandwagon agreeing with everthing Fairchild wrote, because his writing told your itching ears what they wanted to hear, right?

    Okay, Fairchild implied that “from ancient times” couldn't be referring to “before the world was” because other scriptures use similar wording to describe ancient things in the history of the world.

    But I pointed out that the same wording that is used in Micah 5:2 to describe the origins of Jesus is used in Psalm 90:2 to describe the duration of Jehovah's existence.

    So Fairchild's implication that it coudn't refer to “before the world was” has been solidly refuted by one simple scripture.  

    Gene, will YOU acknowledge what Frank was too cowardly to acknowledge?  Will YOU acknowledge that Fairchild's implication was flawed?  Or will you also show yourself to be a coward like Frank – spouting nonsensical fluff about how you're right, despite what the scriptures actually say about it?

    You see Gene, that is why I rarely even address your posts anymore.  You have proved yourself to be a parrot who only repeats things he's heard from others – never being able to defend or even fully explain those things.  Frank is also like you in that manner.  And I will eventually get to the point that I don't respond to him too.  But right now, I'm having too much fun driving his lame claims into the dirt.  :)

    Gene, what about Psalm 90:2?  Either comment about that point I made, or direct your comments to someone else.  Because we've all grown very weary of your parrot comments around here.

    Will you actually respond to my point about 90:2?  I highly doubt it.  :)

    #262710
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike……… Mike, there is hardly nothing Frank has said or posted I haven't said here time and time again for over 6 yrs here little man. And about itching ears your have then more then anyone here as has been proven many times here if Pierre or Irene or T8 say any thing that itches your ears you ju mp right in and agree with then also, so don't give us this itching ears stuff when you are the biggest person here who look to have his ears itched. Your biggest problem Mike is you slanderous MOUTH, i knew it was a mistake letting a NOVICE like YOU be a Monitor here in the first place .

    My Question to T8 is why cant he see what your are doing Here, your simple cause offense and drive people off the site with you stupid and ignorant insults. time and time again.

    You called me a Coward, O really I have PERSONALLY BEAT IN A REAL FIST FIGHT THE PERSON WHO STILL HOLDS THE WORLDS CONSECUTIVE HEAVY WAIT KNOCK OUT RECORD, 28 STRAIGHT KO'S, I'll bet you can't even name Him, here is a Hint he fought Mohammad Allie in Japan and Allie won on a split decision. Trust me little man I nor Frank is afraid of a little imp like you, not now or ever will be. IMO

    GENE

    #262733
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Nov. 19 2011,11:02)
    Mike……… Mike, there is hardly nothing Frank has said or posted I haven't said here time and time again for over 6 yrs here little man. And about itching ears your have then more then anyone here as has been proven many times here if Pierre or Irene or T8 say any thing that itches your ears you ju mp right in and agree with then also, so don't give us this itching ears stuff when you are the biggest person here who look to have his ears itched. Your biggest problem Mike is you slanderous MOUTH, i knew it was a mistake letting a NOVICE like YOU be  a Monitor here in the first place .

    My Question to T8 is why cant he see what your are doing Here, your simple cause offense and drive people off the site with you stupid and ignorant insults. time and time again.

    You called me a Coward, O really I have PERSONALLY BEAT IN A REAL FIST FIGHT THE PERSON WHO STILL HOLDS THE WORLDS CONSECUTIVE HEAVY WAIT KNOCK OUT RECORD, 28 STRAIGHT KO'S,  I'll bet you can't even name Him, here is a Hint he fought Mohammad Allie in Japan and Allie won on a split decision.  Trust me little man I nor Frank is afraid  of a little imp like you,  not now or ever will be. IMO

    GENE


    Quote
    Mike, there is hardly nothing Frank has said or posted I haven't said here time and time again for over 6 yrs here………..


    That's what I said, Gene.  You just keep saying the same thing time and time again for over 6 years.  But you REFUSE to address our points that REFUTE the same things you've been saying for 6 years.  Get it?  That's why I called you a PARROT and a COWARD.

    What about Ps 90:2 Gene?  That was the ONLY point you needed to address here.  But instead you chose to tell me how you can beat people up!   :D

    One of the few things my drug-addled brain remembers from my youth is my Dad telling me at a very young age, “Any idiot can fight.  It takes a wise man to settle disputes non-violently.”  So I guess that once again, my Dad knew what he was talking about, because your post proves that any idiot can fight.  :)

    Hey Gene, why not address the Ps 90:2 point that this NOVICE brought up to you?  Or would you feel justified by beating me up physically because you CAN'T address my point? :)  Maybe that would make you be “right” if you could kick my butt?  ???

    (Btw, my PROOF about you being a coward was that I KNEW you wouldn't address the 90:2 point. You have once again proved ME right.)

    #262745
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike………… When you call a person a coward you don't even know that only show how Ignorant your are and if anyone is an Idiot here i is you and i well know it is better to settle a matter without violence but some times you do have to stand up for what you believe in even if it brings violence upon you, Your dad was indeed talking to a “drug-Addled brain “and a coward IMO, perhaps he was one too and never stood up for anything just run off at the mouth much like your do, not even knowing what he was inserting as truth. I suppose you think Jesus and the Apostles were cowards also when they stood up to ignorant people also. You called me a coward but you have not proven that at all by my word or deeds , Just a bunch of trash talk coming out of your fowl mouth. IMO

    #262748
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Nov. 20 2011,04:02)
    You called me a Coward, O really I have PERSONALLY BEAT IN A REAL FIST FIGHT THE PERSON WHO STILL HOLDS THE WORLDS CONSECUTIVE HEAVY WAIT KNOCK OUT RECORD, 28 STRAIGHT KO'S, I'll bet you can't even name Him, here is a Hint he fought Mohammad Allie in Japan and Allie won on a split decision. Trust me little man I nor Frank is afraid of a little imp like you, not now or ever will be. IMO


    Gene.

    Would you be interested in a knockout title fight for the World Heaven Net Championship of the Word in Las Vegas? First KO wins. Could call it Rumble in the Desert or something similar.

    #262750
    terraricca
    Participant

    Frank

    Quote
    Pierre,

    I see that you can not communicate in the English language very well anyway, so you would be hard-pressed in understanding anyway.

    I understand you are not Christ ,he came down from heaven to save us ,but you could not bend down to my level of English ,it must be because you are sitting on the high chair ??

    Pierre

    #262782
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Gene,

    I see you have STILL not addressed Ps 90:2. It is for THAT reason I call you a coward. So why not prove me wrong by addressing my point?

    Or, you could prove me right by refusing to address it like you have been.

    The choice is yours, of course. But until you make the first choice, you'll continue to be a coward in my eyes – no matter how many people you can physically beat up.

    #262786
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Nov. 18 2011,16:55)
    Following is an excerpt from Voy Wilks' study entitled: “YAHSHUA: DID HE PRE-EXIST? that I have on my web page at: http://frank4yahweh.tripod.com/ByAndThrough.html . If you are truly interested in what it is that we believe on this matter of Yahshua pre-existing his birth, I would suggest that you please go there and read the entire study article for a better understanding:

    The Word “By”

    Yahweh created the world “by” (through) the Son (Heb. 1:2 KJV). The Diaglott says Yahweh created the world “on account of” the Son. Any one of the three (“by,” “through,” or “on account of”) is, technically, a correct translation of the Greek word Di' or Dia. Dia is in the KJV translated several ways, but usually is translated as follows:

    By – 243 times; through – 100 times; for – 106 times; because – 24 times; because of – 29 times; for the sake of – 32 times; etc.

    The King's Men did not translate the WORD di' incorrectly in Heb. 1:2. By or through is a correct translation of the WORD, but ONLY IF THE MESSAGE in the sentence agrees, or allows it. But alas, in this case the message of the sentence will not allow this translation.

    Reason #1. Heb 1:2a reveals Yahshua to be the heir of what was created.

    Reason #2. More than 100 Scriptures show it was Yahweh (not Yahshua) who created the heavens and the earth. Heb. 1:2 must agree with the 100 other Scriptures. For a list of these see our paper, “Who Is the Creator?”

    For these reasons, the sentence in Heb. 1:2b must have
    originally read like the Diaglott reads today, Yahweh “… in the last of these days spoke to us by a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, ON ACCOUNT OF whom also he constituted the ages; …”

    Another acceptable translation would be, “… a Son, FOR whom he created the world.”

    Many times the King James Version as well as more modern versions translate dia as “for,” “because of,” “therefore” (meaning “for this reason”). For a more detailed layout of the word di' (dia), ask for our paper, “Hebrews 1:2 – Berry.”

    This is not to say the the King's Men purposely mistranslated, nor is this to say they were dishonest. Not at all. On the contrary, they no doubt delivered what they believed to be the correct translation of Heb. 1:2. We must realize, however, that all of the King's Men believed the doctrine of the Trinity (one is three, and three are one). Believing this, they saw no contradiction between this Scripture (as they translated it) and the 100 Scriptures which show that Yahweh the Father is truly and personally the Creator of the heaven and earth.

    There are at least two other Scriptures in which di' should have been translated for, or on account of. These are Col. 1:16-17 and John 1:10. Let us review these Scriptures, then return to our study in the book of Hebrews.

    Colossians 1:16,17

    “For by him [Yahshua] were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, … all things were created by him and for him” (Col. 1:16,17 KJV).

    Just as in Heb. 1:2, di' can be translated for, and on account of, as well as by or through. As indicated above, either way is technically correct for this WORD. However, the MESSAGE in this text must decide which is the proper translation. The same is true of the Greek word en (= the English in).

    Since Yahweh is the Creator (Heb. 3:4; Ex. 20:11; Mt. 21:33; Mk. 12:7; Lk. 20:14), and Yahshua is the heir, then Col. 1:16,17 SHOULD TELL THE SAME STORY. Dozens of Scriptures in both Testaments tell us plainly that Yahweh is the Creator, and there is no other El but but him. He alone is the only true El, Eloah, Elohim, and Creator.

    Yahshua and the New Testament writers proved everything by Old Testament Scriptures, therefore New Testament Scriptures should (and originally did) agree with Old Testament Scriptures. The New Testament Scriptures are based on the older ones. This being true, it seems that a more exact reading of Col. 1:16,17, and one which is agreeable to the Greek text, is as follows:

    “For in [en = in, to, unto, as well as by] him were all things created, that are in [en] heaven, and that are on earth, … all things were created on account of [di'] him and for him.”

    “Jesus IS God!”?


    I acknowledge the many meanings of “dia”.  But your source leaves a couple unanswered points:

    1.  How was the original Garden of Eden created FOR Jesus, if he wasn't even around to enjoy it?  How were dinosaurs created FOR Jesus if he didn't exist until they were extinct?

    2.  How does the word “FOR” work in 1 Cor 8:6, where Jesus is distinguished from the God “FOR whom we live”?

    3.  Your version of Col 1:16, “……all things were created on account of [di'] him and for him”, is redundant, seeing how “on account of” and “for” mean the same basic thing.  Your source wisely points out that the message in the sentence must agree with the translation of the word “dia”.  And saying that all things were created FOR Jesus and FOR Jesus doesn't seem like agreement with the spirit of the message to me.

    If the word in the last part of 1:16 (eis) means “FOR Jesus”, then the word “dia” must have one of the other definitions, such as “by” or “through”.  And since your source is correct that over 100 scriptures tell us that all things were created “by” Jehovah, we know that “by” is not the correct choice.  Therefore, it must be “through”.

    It cannot be “FOR”, because the sentence would be redundant and make no sense.  It cannot be “BY”, because that would contradict many other scriptures.  Therefore, it must be “THROUGH” in 1:16.

    4.  All of this can be solved with John 1:3.  The words “without him nothing was made that has been made” solve the whole dilemma.  But unfortunately, you non-preexisters have been blinded by the god of this world, and are unable to see that the ONLY choice for someone called “the Word” (Rev 19:13) who was with God in the beginning before emptying himself and becoming flesh, and dwelling amoung us with the glory of God's only begotten Son, is Jesus Christ.

    Frank, what do these sources you copy have to say about John 1?  How do they get around the fact that only one being in existence could fit the bill of “the Word” in 1:1?

    #262810
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 20 2011,17:41)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Nov. 20 2011,04:02)
    You called me a Coward, O really I have PERSONALLY BEAT IN A REAL FIST FIGHT THE PERSON WHO STILL HOLDS THE WORLDS CONSECUTIVE HEAVY WAIT KNOCK OUT RECORD, 28 STRAIGHT KO'S,  I'll bet you can't even name Him, here is a Hint he fought Mohammad Allie in Japan and Allie won on a split decision.  Trust me little man I nor Frank is afraid  of a little imp like you,  not now or ever will be. IMO


    Gene.

    Would you be interested in a knockout title fight for the World Heaven Net Championship of the Word in Las Vegas? First KO wins. Could call it Rumble in the Desert or something similar.


    T8……….Now that is funny, i am old but i still think i could hold my own brother, specially with these light weights here. :D :D

    peace and love to you and yours T8………………………………..gene

    #262812
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 21 2011,01:52)
    Gene,

    I see you have STILL not addressed Ps 90:2.  It is for THAT reason I call you a coward.  So why not prove me wrong by addressing my point?

    Or, you could prove me right by refusing to address it like you have been.

    The choice is yours, of course.  But until you make the first choice, you'll continue to be a coward in my eyes – no matter how many people you can physically beat up.


    Mike………..So who care what fits your eyes, what make you trash talk anything.

    Psa 90:2…..> Before the mountains were brought forth, or even you have formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting you are GOD

    Whats to address that is a simple straight forward scripture Moses was speak to GOD , what is your prob;em with it. How does that make anyone a “COWARD”.?.

    peace and love…………………………………………..gene

    #262813
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Ding ding. Bring it on.

    :laugh:

    #262823
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Nov. 20 2011,14:09)
    Psa 90:2…..> Before the mountains were brought forth, or even you have formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting you are GOD

    Whats to address that is a simple straight forward scripture Moses was speak to GOD , what is your prob;em with it. How does that make anyone a “COWARD”.?.


    I'll tell you what, Mister Mouth:

    Why don't you go back to the post by Frank where he quoted some dude named Fairchild.  Look at what Fairchild says about the phrase “from ancient times” in Micah 5:2.

    Then look at my responding post to Frank.

    If that doesn't work, try looking at my first post to you where I called you a coward.

    If you do any of those things Gene, then you'll actually know what it is your mouthing off about for once.

    Do those things and get back to me when you know what point I'm even making about Ps 90:2, okay?  THEN you'll be able to answer YOUR OWN questions.

    #262838
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Let me speak clearly.

    Jesus came from the Father and entered the world and then left the world to go back to the Father.

    Who disagrees with this?

    #262861
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 20 2011,01:50)
    Okay Frank,

    If Jesus was the spokesman of God in these last days, and that means the Word of God was manifest through Jesus, then it also means that same Word of God was manifest through those who were God's spokesman in the former days, right?

    So then Isaiah, David, Moses, and all the others were also “the Word of God” in their respective time periods on earth, right?


    Hi Mike,

    Once you've realized that “The Word” of God is the “HolySpirit',
    then this problem disappears; right? (Note: I'm asking questions the way you do)

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #262864
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    T8………..No one disputes that, Jesus had his “Origins” from the Father so do we, It was God's Plan to For Jesus from the beginning of creation, remember, from the seed of the woman would come one the would bruise the serpents head Notice he said FROM THE (SEED) OF THE WOMEN HE WOULD COME question T8 did he say from the seed of a preexistent state could come someone who would bruise the serpents head as you and the rest of the preexistences assume?

    Also let consider this what Moses said ,

    Deu 18:15….> The Lord thy God will raise up unto you a Prophet from the midst of you, OF or FROM thy brethren, like unto me; unto him shall you hearken;

    Do you see the word a “preexisting being” of any kind there T8, i think not. But there is more T8 let see what God himself said.

    Dut 18:17……> And the LORD said unto me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken. verse18, I (God) will raise them up a PROPHET FROM AMONG THEIR BRETHREN, like unto (YOU) and He shall speak unto them all that I Shall command him. verse 19….> And it shall come to pass that whosoever will not hearken unto (now notice T8) (MY WORDS) which he shall speak in (MY) name I shall require it of him.

    T8 did you notice (MY WORDS) in (MY NAME). Also did you notice where he would come from “from among their brethren” , but you say from some where else He came, but God said he would raise him up from among his brethren and God said he would be the seed of a women , but you say no, from a preexisting (SEED) why does not scripture agree with you on that T8, where o where is there (ANY) scripture the says Jesus was a “preexisting” being of any kind Just one scripture will suffice,

    What is interesting to me is how you people blow these scriptures away like the simply do not exist in our bibles. None of these scripturs show a tie in to any preexisting being. So you people move to the New testament and find scriptures that can be taken all kinds of way and try to make a your case from them While all the time ignoring the old testaments words. But yet Paul said we need to look at the OLD TESTAMENT to see if what was being said was true or not, but you people ignore it altogether in favor of translations produced by Trinitarians who are preexistences just like yourselves. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours T8……………………………………………gene

    #262902
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Nov. 22 2011,01:43)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Nov. 20 2011,01:50)
    Okay Frank,

    If Jesus was the spokesman of God in these last days, and that means the Word of God was manifest through Jesus, then it also means that same Word of God was manifest through those who were God's spokesman in the former days, right?

    So then Isaiah, David, Moses, and all the others were also “the Word of God” in their respective time periods on earth, right?


    Hi Mike,

    Once you've realized that “The Word” of God is the “HolySpirit',
    then this problem disappears; right? (Note: I'm asking questions the way you do)

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Was not Jesus anointed with the Holy Ghost.
    Does that mean he was he anointed with himself?

    How does this work?

Viewing 20 posts - 11,701 through 11,720 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account