Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,521 through 5,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #157002
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    We know there are times when God's Spirit spoke in the first person through Jesus -as in Jn2.19.
    Do you think there were other occasions when God did this?

    #157004

    LITERAL OR FIGURATIVE?

    There is no doubt that many of the Messiah's sayings recorded by John were not intended to be taken literally, although sometimes his hearers did just that.

    When Yeshua told Nicodemus that he needed to be “born anew”, he first took a literal interpretation” How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother's womb and be born?” (John 3:3-4)and had to be led gently by Yeshua to see rebirth as a spiritual process.

    When Yeshua described himself as the “bread from heaven” that a believer had to “eat” (6:50,51), so that “out of his heart shall flow rivers of living water” (7:38) no one would ever think of taking the words at their face value.

    Yeshua himself acknowledged this on one occasion when he said to his disciples “I have said this to you in figures” (John 16:25).

    We use figurative speech today almost without thinking about it.

    We know that a 'heaven sent gift' has not literally come down from heaven, but expresses the belief that it has been supplied by divine providence.

    We suggest that many of the references to the Messiah's descent from heaven were intended to be understood in the same way.

    For example, the conversation with the Jews about the bread of life is a reference to the 'Elohim provided manna that fed the Israelites in the wilderness (John 6:31-33).

    Everybody understood the sense in which manna came down from heaven not literally dropping from the throne of 'Elohim, but being 'Elohim provided.

    Why should not the parallel allusion to Jesus descending from heaven be taken in a similar way?

    Yeshua came down from heaven in the sense that he was provided by 'Elohim to be the source of life for the world.

    The actual body of Yeshua was conceived by the Holy Spirit in Mary's womb, and thus was 'from 'Elohim'.

    Other references make it clear that the body of Yeshua came from 'Elohim in this sense:

    “Consequently, when the Messiah came into the world, he said Sacrifices and offerings thou hast not desired, but a body hast thou prepared for me…. Then I said, Lo, I have come to do thy will, O 'Elohim … And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Yeshua the Messiah once for all” (Hebrews 10:5,7,10).

    In addition it should be noted that it was the Son of Man that came down an unexpected expression if a pre-existent deity was intended; for none suggest that Yeshua pre-existed as a man.

    Yeshua couples his coming from 'Elohim with his ascent to heaven after the resurrection.

    The way in which he came down has already been established: not a mature figure descending, but a body gradually developed by the Holy Spirit in Mary's womb.

    But the way in which he ascended is clearly described in the Gospels and Acts.

    It was with a body and by a bodily ascent that he 'left the world and went to the Father' (Mark 16.19, Luke 24:51, Acts 1:9-11).

    Does not this mixture of meaning suggest that we should not press the words too literally?

    :cool:

    #157005

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,17:39)
    Hi CON,
    We know there are times when God's Spirit spoke in the first person through Jesus -as in Jn2.19.
    Do you think there were other occasions when God did this?


    Absolutly

    :cool:

    #157006
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    When were they?

    #157010

    “BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS I AM”

    The reference to Abrahamis another key passage for Trinitarians, although, as with the majority of such passages, the doctrine has to be read into it rather than deduced from it.

    It is claimed that when Yeshua said to the Jews “Before Abraham was (Gk. came into being), I am” he was stating that he existed in Abraham's day, and he could apply to himself the personal name of 'Elohim revealed in Exodus.

    It is not disputed that Yeshua had some kind of existence before Abraham was born, but was it a personal existence, or one in the mind and purpose of 'Elohim?

    The early Christian view was stated by Peter in the passage already considered in detail above (p. 229):

    “He was destined before the foundation of the world but was made manifest at the end of the times for your sake” (1 Peter 1:20).

    The word translated 'destined' means known beforehand, and from what has already been considered about the promises relating to the coming Messiah it is quite clear that 'Elohim had marked out beforehand with absolute precision the mission he would accomplish.

    Thus it is true that before Abraham was born the Messiah 'was' in the sense that he was envisaged as the one through whom 'Elohim and estranged man would become reconciled.

    A glance at the context of the words shows that this was in the Messiah's mind.

    The Jews were claiming the privileges of descent from Abraham, whilst Yeshua replied that if they were his children they would do what Abraham did (John 8:39).

    And one of the things Abraham did, in contrast to his unbelieving descendants, was that he 'rejoiced to see my day; he saw it and was glad' (v.56), whereas the Jews who actually were living in the 'day' of the Messiah did not recognise it.

    We are specifically told in what sense Abraham saw the Messiah's day.

    It was in prospect, as an expression of his faith in the coming of Abraham's seed:

    “And the scripture, foreseeing that 'Elohim would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, In thee shall all the nations be blessed”

    “Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring.

    It does not say, And to offsprings, referring to many; but, referring to one, And to your offspring, which is the Messiah” (Galatians 3:8,16).

    We are told that Abraham, on receipt of this promise that he would be the father of the Messiah “believed the Lord; and he reckoned it to him as righteousness” (Genesis 15:6). Through this belief Abraham foresaw the coming day of the Messiah.

    He foresaw his death and resurrection after the pattern of his own offering of Isaac, and he foresaw the world wide blessings that would come from that act.

    But it was all in prospect: Abraham did not believe that his future son was already in existence in heaven.

    And this too is what Yeshua was saying in his reply to the Jews.

    He re-affirms the fact that he was 'present' in the plan of 'Elohim even before the time of Abraham.

    He could say this without any suggestion of his personal pre-existence.

    The second claim, that the Messiah apparently applied to himself the divine name I AM, is not as straightforward as appears at first sight.

    Despite the bias of many translations, there is no textual justification at all for the capital letters.

    The words I am are simply the usual translation of the present tense of the verb 'to be' (Gk. ego eimi).

    In similar grammatical constructions to the phrase under consideration the translators have added 'he' after the 'I am' to give the sense.

    For example, the identical phrase was used by the healed blind man to identify himself (John 9.9), translated “I am the man”.

    If this translation is consistently applied to the Messiah's use of the phrase any trinitarian inference disappears.

    Thus on a rare occasion when Yeshua volunteered that he was the Messiah he used an identical construction (ego eimi, translated 'I am he') without any hint of pre-existence:

    “The woman said to him, I know that Messiah is coming (he who is called the Messiah); when he comes, he will show us all things. Yeshua said to her, I who speak to you am he” (literally “I am he speaking to you”. John 4:25-26).

    Similarly in two other passages in John 8, just prior to where Yeshua made the alleged I AM statement, the translators have rendered ego eimi as 'I am he”, with no suggestion that it represents a personal name:

    “You will die in your sins unless you believe that I am he” (v24).

    “When you have lifted up the Son of man, then you will know that I am he” (v28. Other similar examples in John 18:5,8; Luke 22:70).

    By stating “I am he” in these three passages Yeshua is obviously identifying himself as the Messiah and saying that belief of this fact is essential.

    If the translators had been consistent they would also have translated John 8:58 as “Before Abraham was, I am he”, and no one would have thought it a reference to the divine name.

    Yeshua was not suggesting that he was 'Elohim, but claiming that he was the Messiah to whose day Abraham looked forward in faith and hope.

    But even if this is not admitted, there is no proof that by the use of 'I am' Yeshua is claiming to be 'very 'Elohim'.

    In fact 'I am' is almost certainly a defective translation of the name of 'Elohim announced in Exodus:

    “Moses said to 'Elohim … If … they ask me, What is his name? what shall I say to them? 'Elohim said to Moses, I AM WHO I AM. And he said, Say this to the people of Israel, I AM has sent me to you” Exodus 3:13-14).

    It has already been shown that this name is really in the future tense 'I WILL BE', and that it can be seen as a statement of 'Elohim's intention to become manifested in 'mighty ones' of whom Yeshua is the first.

    But if the divine name is 'I WILL BE' it will readily be seen that the whole point of the supposed connection with the 'I AM' of John is lost.

    :cool:

    #157011
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Of course Abraham is yet alive with Moses and Isaac and Jacob and the men of old and the brothers.
    Some are awoken unto specific tasks as with Moses and Elijah on the mountain.

    #157014
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,11:51)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,16:47)
    Hi CON,
    You this scientific idea be applied over what scripture says?


    It doesn't take science to understand the egg must be fertilized to grow, whether by mans doing or Yahwehs.

    If you think Yeshua existed before Mary's conception what was he?

    You might as well call yourself a trinitarian.


    CT……..They remind me of Catholics and Protestants, the say their different but in actual fact believe all but a few things differently. Same thing with TRINITY AND PREEXISTENCES Some deny the trinity and believe in preexistence, The doctrine of preexistence supports the doctrine of the Trinity. And you are right they might as well call themselves trinitarians and Protestants might as well call themselves Catholics, because there is little if any difference. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………gene

    #157015
    NickHassan
    Participant

    G,
    We believe in scripture and try to understand it without addition.
    You should try doing so.

    #157016

    “THE GLORY WHICH I HAD WITH THEE BEFORE THE WORLD WAS MADE”

    Here is yet another passage that at first sight appears to suggest that Yeshua had a personal existence with 'Elohim from the beginning.

    But as with so many sayings of Yeshua recorded by John, we need to establish if that is what he really meant.

    Every time we read 'glory' should we refer it exclusively to literal glory and radiance?

    This prayer of the Messiah to his Father as recorded in John 17 contains several references to 'glory', and it is important to have a consistent view of them:

    “Father, the hour has come; glorify thy Son that the Son may glorify thee” (v1)

    “And now, Father, glorify thou me in thy own presence with the glory which I had with thee before the world was made” (v5).

    “All mine are thine, and thine are mine, and I am glorified in them” (V10).

    “The glory which thou hast given me I have given to them, that they may be one even as we are one” (v22).

    “Father, I desire that they also, whom thou hast given me, may be with me where I am, to behold my glory which thou hast given me in thy love for me before the foundation of the world” (v24).

    The first thing to notice from these words of the Messiah is that the glory was something received by Yeshua and later by the disciples.

    It was not an inherent possession.

    'Elohim glorifies the Son (v1), and 'gives' glory to him' (vv22,24).

    Only if Yeshua was subordinate to 'Elohim could he have received glory from Him (using 'glory' in the usual sense of the word).

    “It is beyond dispute that the inferior is blessed by the superior” (Hebrews 7:7).

    But does the 'glory' refer only to the physical glory of 'Elohim who “dwells in unapproachable light” (1 Timothy 6:16), and is it this glory only which is shared from eternity by a second person of the trinity?

    Clearly not, is the answer to both these questions.

    For that glory had already been manifested to the Jews (John 1:14) and by the time of Yeshua' prayer had already been given to the disciples (v.22).

    And no one would suggest that they displayed the Father's physical glory.

    In what sense then was Yeshua the glory of 'Elohim even before the creation?

    We need to understand the way in which John uses the word glory.

    In many New Testament passages the 'glory of 'Elohim' refers not primarily to physical glory but describes the whole of 'Elohim's redemptive purpose manifested in Yeshua.

    Although Yeshua outwardly was an ordinary man, by his character and mission people saw him as different; they “beheld his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father” (1:14).

    What glory did they behold?

    When he did the miracle at Cana it “manifested his glory” (2:11) and when Lazarus died and so gave Yeshua the opportunity to raise him from the dead, it was “for the glory of 'Elohim, so that the Son of 'Elohim may be glorified by means of it” (11.4).

    When he was about to perform that miracle Yeshua said to the sorrowing sisters “Did I not tell you that if you believe you would see the glory of 'Elohim?” (11.40).

    In a similar sense the death of the Messiah himself was an expression of 'Elohim's glory, for in anticipation of it Yeshua said “Father, the hour has come; glorify thy Son that the Son may glorify thee” (John 17:1).

    His resurrection was a further exhibition of the glory of 'Elohim, for as Paul says, he was raised from the dead “by the glory of the Father” (Romans 6:4).

    So the same writer could describe his message as “the gospel of the glory of the Messiah” (2 Corinthians 4:4) and say that the process of believing the gospel is 'Elohim shining “in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of 'Elohim in the face of Yeshua HaMoshiach” (v6).

    Thus the glory of 'Elohim is the gospel the power and character of 'Elohim revealed in all that Yeshua does for man's salvation.

    It describes the process by which Yeshua will bring “many sons to glory” (Hebrews 2:10), even those whom he has “prepared beforehand for glory” (Romans 9:23).

    Now this purpose of 'Elohim, as has been so frequently remarked in this section, has been devised and known by 'Elohim since the beginning.

    Yeshua was to be the pivot of this gospel plan, and therefore he had glory in the beginning in a prospective sense rather than literally.

    When his disciples believed on Yeshua they too partook of this 'glory of 'Elohim' “The glory which thou hast given me I have given to them” (John 17:22).

    So when 'Elohim prayed that he might now experience the glory which he had with 'Elohim from the beginning, he was not asserting his pre-existence but asking that 'Elohim's original purpose with him might now be completed.

    But possession of this spiritual and as yet intangible glory leads on to sharing the physical glory of 'Elohim.

    Yeshua appeared to Paul on the road to Damascus as a “light from heaven brighter than the sun” (Acts 26:13), and to John on Patmos as “the sun shining in full strength” (Revelation 1:16).

    Likewise the Messiah's promise to the righteous is that they too will “shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father” (Matthew 13:43).

    :cool:

    #157017

    Quote (Gene @ Nov. 15 2009,18:15)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,11:51)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,16:47)
    Hi CON,
    You this scientific idea be applied over what scripture says?


    It doesn't take science to understand the egg must be fertilized to grow, whether by mans doing or Yahwehs.

    If you think Yeshua existed before Mary's conception what was he?

    You might as well call yourself a trinitarian.


    CT……..They remind me of Catholics and Protestants, the say their different but in actual fact believe all but a few things differently. Same thing with TRINITY AND PREEXISTENCES Some deny the trinity and believe in preexistence, The doctrine of preexistence supports the doctrine of the Trinity. And you are right they might as well call themselves trinitarians and Protestants  might as well call themselves Catholics, because there is little if any difference.  IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………gene


    Agreed!

    #157018

    Quote (Gene @ Nov. 15 2009,18:15)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,11:51)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,16:47)
    Hi CON,
    You this scientific idea be applied over what scripture says?


    It doesn't take science to understand the egg must be fertilized to grow, whether by mans doing or Yahwehs.

    If you think Yeshua existed before Mary's conception what was he?

    You might as well call yourself a trinitarian.


    CT……..They remind me of Catholics and Protestants, the say their different but in actual fact believe all but a few things differently. Same thing with TRINITY AND PREEXISTENCES Some deny the trinity and believe in preexistence, The doctrine of preexistence supports the doctrine of the Trinity. And you are right they might as well call themselves trinitarians and Protestants  might as well call themselves Catholics, because there is little if any difference.  IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………gene


    They don't see it.

    :cool:

    #157019
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Would you threaten your plantings with such cynicism?
    Planting in judgement is unlikely to bear fruit.

    #157020

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 15 2009,18:28)

    Quote (Gene @ Nov. 15 2009,18:15)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,11:51)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,16:47)
    Hi CON,
    You this scientific idea be applied over what scripture says?


    It doesn't take science to understand the egg must be fertilized to grow, whether by mans doing or Yahwehs.

    If you think Yeshua existed before Mary's conception what was he?

    You might as well call yourself a trinitarian.


    CT……..They remind me of Catholics and Protestants, the say their different but in actual fact believe all but a few things differently. Same thing with TRINITY AND PREEXISTENCES Some deny the trinity and believe in preexistence, The doctrine of preexistence supports the doctrine of the Trinity. And you are right they might as well call themselves trinitarians and Protestants  might as well call themselves Catholics, because there is little if any difference.  IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………gene


    They don't see it.

    :cool:


    Pre-existers claim he was in some sort of a divine form, but they cannot tack down what form.

    They say he was not G-d, but yet he was divine.

    Angels are divine, but they say he was not an angel.

    Yahweh is divine, but they say he was not Yahweh.

    If he was a spirit, then what kind of spirit is he? Are their other spirits like him, Bible seems to be silent on such a notion.

    I wonder which is more corrupt? A trinitarian or half a trinitarian?

    :cool:

    #157021

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,18:10)
    Hi CON,
    Of course Abraham is yet alive with Moses and Isaac and Jacob and the men of old and the brothers.
    Some are awoken unto specific tasks as with Moses and Elijah on the mountain.


    They are all dead and buried.

    :cool:

    #157022

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,18:10)
    Hi CON,
    Of course Abraham is yet alive with Moses and Isaac and Jacob and the men of old and the brothers.
    Some are awoken unto specific tasks as with Moses and Elijah on the mountain.


    The spirit [intellect] of there teachings still live, but they are dead.

    :cool:

    #157023
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Take care you do not put coals on your head.
    If you have been given knowledge does it glorify you?

    #157024
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    So the one speaking with Moses was not the one they went up the mountain with?

    #157025

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 15 2009,18:36)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,18:10)
    Hi CON,
    Of course Abraham is yet alive with Moses and Isaac and Jacob and the men of old and the brothers.
    Some are awoken unto specific tasks as with Moses and Elijah on the mountain.


    The spirit [intellect] of there teachings still live, but they are dead.

    :cool:


    No different than John the Baptist having the spirit [intellect] of Elijah.

    :cool:

    #157026
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Elijah has indeed come, the Spirit of the Prophets is One

    #157027
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Isaac and Jacob are alive to God.
    God is the God of the living, not the dead.

Viewing 20 posts - 5,521 through 5,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account