Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,541 through 5,560 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #157029

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,18:37)
    Hi CON,
    Take care you do not put coals on your head.
    If you have been given knowledge does it glorify you?


    1Peter 4:11 If any man speak, as the oracles of 'Elohim; if any man minister, as of the ability which 'Elohim giveth: that 'Elohim in all things may be glorified through Yeshua HaMoshiac, to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever. Amein.

    The Father receives the glory.

    :cool:

    #157030

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,18:42)
    Hi CON,
    Isaac and Jacob are alive to God.
    God is the God of the living, not the dead.


    Isaac and Jacob are alive to God.

    They are dead awaiting the resurrection!

    God is the God of the living, not the dead.

    Correct! He is the 'Elohim of the resurrection!

    :cool:

    #157031

    THE PROLOGUE TO JOHN'S GOSPEL

    We now come to the passage above all which Trinitarians claim teaches the pre-existence of Yeshua from eternity and supports unquestionably the concept of the incarnation: “In the beginning was the Word,

    and the Word was with 'Elohim,
    and the Word was 'Elohim.
    He was in the beginning with 'Elohim;
    all things were made through him,
    and without him was not anything made that was made.
    And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth;
    We have beheld his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father” (John 1.1-3,14).

    From this passage Trinitarians deduce the following about Jesus:

    1. The Word was Yeshua in person

    2. He personally existed from the beginning.

    3. He was 'Elohim, i.e. the second person of the Trinity.

    4. He was the creator of all things, confirming that he was

    'Elohim existing from the beginning.

    5. He came down to earth to be clothed in human flesh.

    It is important to bear at least two points in mind as this passage is considered.

    First, it needs to be viewed from the standpoint of the first century Christian, untrammelled as he was with all the later arguments and discussions that were based upon these verses.

    By the fourth century, after seemingly interminable conferences and thousands of closely reasoned manuscripts, a whole edifice of doctrine had been built upon these few words.

    But what would first century people make of them?

    Secondly, John must not be interpreted in such a way as to disagree with or contradict the rest of the New Testament writers.

    There are some who maintain that whilst the earliest Christian writers had no place for the pre-existence of the Messiah or the incarnation, these ideas were even then being formulated in the early church and toward the end of the first century were expressed by John.

    To this view the present writers cannot subscribe.

    The Christian message was “once for all (time) delivered to the saints” (Jude 3) and any subsequent variations were examples of the false doctrine that the apostles predicted would develop in their midst.

    Development in Christian belief certainly did occur towards the end of the first century and during the two centuries that followed, but this was at the expense of the purity of the original message and was roundly condemned and combated by the apostles and their immediate successors.

    In the writings of the New Testament the apostles speak with an original single voice.

    If, as we believe, and the church today claims to believe, all the New Testament writers were inspired by the Holy Spirit, to guide them into “all truth” (John 16:13), then the message must be unanimous.

    One inspired writer cannot be interpreted so as to contradict another.

    Thus in view of the absence of proof of the doctrine of the trinity in the rest of the New Testament John's introduction needs to be examined very closely before accepting that it is a departure from the then universally held belief in the unity of 'Elohim and the subordination of His Son.

    :cool:

    #157033
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    No argument.
    You may be right about some things.
    I will give your positive offerings some consideration.

    #157039
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Nick………If Jesus is the (FIRSTBORN) FROM THE GRAVE, then Moses and the rest could not have actually been on the mountain of transfiguration, It was a (vision) they were seeing, as John also saw visions of the throne of GOD. Because they would have preexisted Jesus' resurrection, but scripture says Jesus was (first) to rise from the dead and recieve eternal life. Scripture also says David is both dead and Buried his grave remained unto that day and went on to say David is (NOT) risen, You belief in a resurrection from the dead before Jesus is in error, or Jesus would not be the Firstborn from the DEAD would he? Why does the scripture say the dead Know not nothing, in the day they die their thoughts parish. If their thoughts (PARISH) then how could they continue to think or speak?

    gene

    #157040
    NickHassan
    Participant

    G,
    They were yet unborn, just woken, like Samuel?

    #157042

    'LOGOS' IN FIRST CENTURY CHRISTIAN THOUGHT

    It is fortunate for our understanding of this word that we have the writings of Philo, a Jew who was contemporary with the early Christians.

    We learn from him that the logos, and especially the divine logos, was the subject of much discussion throughout the non-Christian world of the first century.

    He refers extensively to it in his writings and so we can gain the sense in which it was used in apostolic times.

    In one passage Philo writes:

    “… 'logos' has two aspects, one resembling a spring, the other its outflow; 'logos' in the understanding resembles a spring, and is called 'reason', while utterance by mouth and tongue is like its outflow, and is called 'speech' (Migr. 70-85).

    But, as this analogy suggests, the two meanings can merge into each other and the distinction between thought and speech can become blurred.

    Thus a comprehensive definition of logos is thought coming to expression in speech.

    Philo also shows that the idea of the logos was developed further to include not only expression of thoughts by speech but by action as well.

    He expresses the idea that all created things were originally in the mind of 'Elohim only, and this logos or plan was then put into effect by His creative acts.

    Because man (unaided by revelation) can see 'Elohim only in a limited sense by viewing creation, the logos makes up the deficiency by describing what man can know of 'Elohim.

    He uses another analogy from nature:

    “.. to use Philo's favourite sun and light symbolism, the Logos is to 'Elohim as the corona is to the sun, the sun's halo which man can look upon when he cannot look directly on the sun itself. That is not to say that the logos is 'Elohim as such, any more than the corona is the sun as such, but the Logos is that alone which may be seen of 'Elohim”.

    The same writer goes on to summarise Philo's understanding (and therefore probably the first century Jewish understanding) of the Logos:

    “'Elohim is unknowable by man, except in a small degree by the creation, but the Logos expresses 'Elohim's ideas to man. There is no idea of personality attached to the Logos.” “The Logos seems to be nothing more for Philo than 'Elohim himself in his approach to man, 'Elohim himself insofar as he may be known by man”.

    :cool:

    #157044

    Quote (Gene @ Nov. 15 2009,19:27)
    Nick………If Jesus is the (FIRSTBORN) FROM THE GRAVE, then Moses and the rest could not have actually been on the mountain of transfiguration, It was a (vision) they were seeing, as John also saw visions of the throne of GOD.  Because they would have preexisted Jesus' resurrection, but scripture says Jesus was (first) to rise from the dead and recieve eternal life. Scripture also says David is both dead and Buried his grave remained unto that day and went on to say David is (NOT) risen, You belief in a resurrection from the dead before Jesus is in error, or Jesus would not be the Firstborn from the DEAD would he? Why does the scripture say the dead Know not nothing, in the day they die their thoughts parish. If their thoughts (PARISH) then how could they continue to think or speak?  

    gene


    I totally agree.

    :cool:

    #157046

    'LOGOS' AND THE OLD TESTAMENT

    Philo was a Jew with an inevitably strict adherence to the monotheism of 'Elohim and a devout belief in the Jewish scriptures, our Old Testament.

    It is far from surprising therefore that his views on the Logos, together with those of his Jewish contemporaries, are clearly based on that authority.

    There the Word of 'Elohim is continually used to describe the inspired prophetic utterances by which 'Elohim's thoughts were conveyed to His people.

    “The word of the Lord came unto me” is the almost standard introduction to the prophets' messages.

    The Word of 'Elohim is also frequently equated not only with 'Elohim's thoughts and speech, but also with the acts that follow from them.

    So we find that His creative acts, His control of creation, His purpose in creation, and His declaration of that purpose to man are all attributed to the Word.

    It is significant that in many of these instances when the Hebrew was translated into Greek Logos was used as the equivalent to word.

    Thus it was the Word or Logos, the plan of 'Elohim in action, that was instrumental in creation:

    “By the word of the Lord the heavens were made, and all their host by the breath of his mouth”. “For he spoke, and it came to be; he commanded, and it stood forth.” (Psalm 33:6,9).

    The same Word controls the elements:

    “He sends forth his command to the earth; his word runs swiftly. He casts forth his ice like morsels; who can stand before his cold? He sends forth his word and melts them; he makes his wind to blow, and the waters flow” (Psalm 147:15,17-18).

    Isaiah expresses the relationship between the Word of 'Elohim and His plan for the earth:

    “For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven, and return not thither but water the earth, making it bring forth and sprout, giving seed to the sower and bread to the eater, so shall my word be that goes forth from my mouth; it shall not return to me empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose, and prosper in the thing for which I sent it” (Isaiah 55:10-11).

    The Word, then, is the thoughts and purpose of 'Elohim in action, either by direct revelation through His prophets or in creating and maintaining the earth to achieve that purpose.

    Although at first sight it might be thought that the references above give the idea of a separate existence for the Word, closer examination shows that personality is in no way suggested; it is only an idiom of speech that speaks of the Word being sent or doing something.

    :cool:

    #157048
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Peter and John both felt blessed by what they SAW on the mountain.
    Jesus was there and spoke with others

    #157050

    THE SPIRIT OF GOD AND THE WISDOM OF 'ELOHIM

    Alongside the use of Word in the Old Testament to describe 'Elohim's activity in creation or revelation are two other equivalent words: Spirit and Wisdom.

    These too are described as being the agents of creation. The Spirit is another term for the power of 'Elohim, the 'power of the Most High' as it is called in Luke 1:35.

    In the Genesis record of the creation it was “the Spirit of 'Elohim” that moved over the face of the waters, and then 'Elohim's Word brought things into being:

    “Darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the Spirit of 'Elohim was moving over the face of the waters. And 'Elohim said, 'Let there be light'; and there was light” (Genesis 1:2-3).

    This equivalence of Word and Spirit is seen in many instances.

    Whilst the psalmist could say “by the word of the Lord the heavens were made” (33:6), another psalm says “When thou sendest forth thy Spirit they are created; and thou renewest the face of the ground” (104:30).

    So the Spirit of 'Elohim and the Word of 'Elohim are often alternative terms.

    The same can be said of the Wisdom of 'Elohim.

    It was also termed the instrument of creation: “The Lord by wisdom founded the earth” (Proverbs 3:19).

    And this same Wisdom (or Spirit or Word) is personified in Proverbs and shown to be 'Elohim's agent of creation.

    In Greek and Hebrew the words for wisdom are feminine, and so in personification is represented as a woman (on the other hand logos is masculine, hence the NT pronoun 'he'):

    “Does not wisdom call, does not understanding raise her voice? … I, wisdom, dwell in prudence …
    The Lord created me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of old. …
    When he established the heavens, I was there .. when he marked out the foundations of the earth,
    then I was beside him, like a master workman,
    and I was daily his delight,
    rejoicing before him always,
    rejoicing in his inhabited world, and delighting in the sons of men” (Proverbs 8:1,12,22).

    The language here is clearly personification, a figure of speech in which an abstract idea is given the attributes of a person.

    None would suggest that there was a female deity called Wisdom who was formed by 'Elohim in the beginning and who then created the world.

    It is important not to confuse personification with personalisation.

    Barclay, one of the most respected Greek scholars of our generation, sums up the first century relationship of logos, Word and Spirit in Jewish thought that formed the background to John's use of logos in his gospel:

    “First, 'Elohim's Word is not only speech; it is power.

    Second, it is impossible to separate the ideas of Word and Wisdom; and it was 'Elohim's Wisdom which created and permeated the world which 'Elohim made”.

    To sum up so far.

    We have seen that the Word of 'Elohim or Logos is a term used in scripture and by Jewish writers living in the first century to describe the thoughts and plan of 'Elohim being put into action.

    It was applied to the original acts of creation and also to the redemptive purpose God has with the earth.

    The Logos through the ministry of the prophets supplied the essential understanding of 'Elohim that was not available simply from perusal of his creative acts.

    The term is used alternatively with Spirit and Wisdom, and in no case is there a suggestion that any of these had a separate personality, i.e. were an actual person.

    This is the essential setting of the prologue of John's gospel record.

    Any interpretation of the prologue must be incorrect if it fails to acknowledge this background and attempts to impose on John's words a meaning that his original readers probably would not have readily understood.

    To divorce the prologue from its Old Testament roots, let alone its New Testament contemporaries, is to set off on the wrong path to its understanding.

    :cool:

    #157051

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,19:35)
    Hi CON,
    Peter and John both felt blessed by what they SAW on the mountain.
    Jesus was there and spoke with others


    I would feel blessed as well, to have a “Vision” of the future, especially a glorified state.

    :cool:

    #157052

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,19:25)
    G,
    They were yet unborn, just woken, like Samuel?


    Could you explain that statement?

    :cool:

    #157053

    THE 'WORD' OF JOHN'S PROLOGUE

    It is into this background of Old Testament teaching on the Word of 'Elohim, and the first century Jewish understanding of it based on those sacred writings, that the prologue to John's gospel fits neatly into place:

    “In the beginning was the Word,
    and the Word was with 'Elohim,
    and the Word was 'Elohim.
    He was in the beginning with 'Elohim;
    All things were made through him, and
    without him was not anything made that was made”
    (John 1:1-3)

    We can see how John draws on all the Old Testament teaching we have just considered.

    Wisdom is personified in Proverbs 8 (see above) as saying that she was in the beginning, that she was with 'Elohim, and that she was His instrument in creation.

    The Word of 'Elohim created the heavens (Psalm 33:6), so did the Spirit as described in Job 26:13.

    The language clearly is of figure and metaphor, of personification, not actual personality.

    And John is saying exactly the same of the Logos or Word.

    No Jewish reader brought up on the writings of the prophets would have deduced from John's introduction that he was alluding to a person who had existed with God from all time.

    They would see it instead as a continuation of the imagery by which the Word or Wisdom or the Spirit those manifestations of 'Elohim which are inseparable from Him are described as putting 'Elohim's intentions into effect.

    Bearing in mind the meaning of Logos as the thoughts and intentions of 'Elohim translated into action, we can see that what John is saying is that from the beginning 'Elohim had a plan a plan that was as inseparable from Him as is a thought from the person thinking it thus, 'the Word was 'Elohim'.

    That plan necessitated the creation of the world, and so it could be said, in line with the language of the Old Testament, that the Logos was the original creative force.

    To some readers of the English translations the use of the pronoun 'he' in referring to the Logos indicates that a person is intended.

    But this is only a quirk of translation.

    Along with some modern languages ancient Greek and Hebrew had masculine or feminine nouns, with the pronoun being literally 'he' or 'she' respectively.

    In the majority of cases these pronouns are translated by the neuter 'it'.

    When Tyndale translated the passage in 1525 he used “it” rather than “he”, but the translators of the AV did not follow him in this respect, as was their usual custom (about 90% of the AV is Tyndale's translation).

    It is understandable that translators with a trinitarian bias should have taken the opportunity to render the pronoun as 'he' in the case of the masculine Word of John 1 and of the Comforter or Counsellor in John 14, but there is clearly no such intention in the original language.

    On this Dunn says of what he terms the 'poem' of the John 1 prologue:

    “.. we are dealing with personifications rather than persons, personified actions of 'Elohim rather than an individual divine being as such. The point is obscured by the fact that we have to translate the masculine Logos as 'he' throughout the poem. But if we translated logos as 'Elohim's utterance' instead, it would become clearer that the poem did not necessarily intend the Logos in vv1-13 to be thought of as a personal divine being”.

    :cool:

    #157057
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,14:40)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,19:35)
    Hi CON,
    Peter and John both felt blessed by what they SAW on the mountain.
    Jesus was there and spoke with others


    I would feel blessed as well, to have a “Vision” of the future, especially a glorified state.

    :cool:


    Hi CON,
    Yes they saw Jesus speaking with Elijah and Moses and it greatly impacted on them.

    At the same time they heard the voice of God.

    Or did they??

    #157058

    “THE WORD BECAME FLESH”

    Until the time of Jesus the word of 'Elohim had been revealed through 'Elohim's prophets.

    But this was essentially an intermittent activity.

    The prophets were often raised up to meet an express need at the time and each concentrated on 'Elohim's message of guidance or reproof, whilst at the same time looking to the future and giving glimpses of the overall plan of 'Elohim with mankind.

    In this sense their ministry was fragmentary and partial.

    In none of the prophets could it be said that the word became flesh, but was rather manifested through flesh.

    But in Yeshua the Word became flesh 'Elohim's plan materialised in all its fulness.

    Originally His plan to create a race of mighty beings in whom He could be perfectly manifested had only been an idea, a concept in his mind.

    Then He put the first stages of this plan into action by creating the world and everything in it.

    But his plan necessitated a redeemer to come in the likeness of humanity.

    So the Plan, the Word, became flesh in the person of Yeshua.

    Yeshua is the very centre of 'Elohim's plan for the earth.

    All 'Elohim's intentions come to a focus in him.

    There was no question with him of a partial manifestation of Yeshua's word as had occurred through the prophets, but Yeshua became a complete manifestation of his Father's thoughts and intentions: the “Logos became flesh”.

    Note the use of 'became' Yeshua was not the word from the beginning in the sense that he pre-existed as a person, but he was the 'word made flesh'.

    He was 'Elohim's Plan coming into action.

    He was the complete expression of all the saving attributes of the Father “full of grace and truth”.

    Looked at in this way the way of the first century Jew or Gentile to whom John was writing there was no hint of the personal pre-existence of Yeshua, no suggestion that he was Very 'Elohim clothed in human flesh.

    The simplest and most straightforward view of Yeshua that such a reader would gain from this introduction was that Yeshua was the realisation of 'Elohim's plan for the earth.

    He would see that the Messiah's being the Word made flesh is no reason for suggesting his personal divinity any more than it would be correct to say that the prophets were 'Elohim because the Logos was revealed through them.

    This understanding of the Word made Flesh becomes all the more acceptable because it is completely in harmony with the rest of the early Apostolic writings about Yeshua.

    The greatest apparent anomaly is removed and all the apostles are seen to speak with one voice.

    It was only later, when influences outside of original Christianity began to obtrude that John 1:1-18 began to be taken as evidence of the personal pre-existence of the Messiah and the incarnation.

    Barclay confirms this understanding in passages in which he expounds John's use of logos without giving it the trinitarian slant that for centuries has been attached to its meaning:

    “Logos has two meanings, which no one English word can express. Logos means word, and Logos means mind. A word is the expression of thought. Therefore Yeshua is the expression of the thought of 'Elohim. Or to take the other meaning, in Yeshua we see the mind of 'Elohim … In Yeshua the mind of 'Elohim becomes a person”.

    “In Greek logos means two things it means word and it means reason … The Logos of 'Elohim, the mind of 'Elohim, is responsible for the majestic order of the world …. He (John) said to the Greeks, “All your lives you have been fascinated by this great, guiding, controlling mind of 'Elohim. The mind of 'Elohim has come to earth in the man Yeshua. Look at him and you will see what the mind and thought of 'Elohim are like”.

    “By calling Yeshua the logos, John said two things about Yeshua.

    (A) Yeshua is the creating power of 'Elohim come to men. He does not only speak the word of knowledge; he is the word of power. He did not come so much to say things to us, as to do things for us.

    (B) Yeshua is the incarnate mind of 'Elohim. We might well translate John's words, 'The mind of 'Elohim became a man'. A word is always 'the expression of a thought' and Yeshua is the perfect expression of 'Elohim's thoughts for men.

    He then makes a plea that the present writers heartily endorse:

    We should do well to rediscover and to preach again Yeshua HaMoshiach as the logos, the Word of 'Elohim”!

    :cool:

    #157060
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,14:41)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,19:25)
    G,
    They were yet unborn, just woken, like Samuel?


    Could you explain that statement?

    :cool:


    Hi CON.
    The witch of Endor woke Samuel.

    #157062

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,20:06)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,14:41)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,19:25)
    G,
    They were yet unborn, just woken, like Samuel?


    Could you explain that statement?

    :cool:


    Hi CON.
    The witch of Endor woke Samuel.


    You buy into that? There is absolutly no proof that was even Samuel.

    Quote
    Eccl 9:5 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.
    Eccl 9:6 Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.

    Eccl 9:10 Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.

    Quote
    Psa 6:5 For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?

    Psa 146:3 Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.
    Psa 146:4 His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.

    Quote
    Acts 2:29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. …

    Acts 2:34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,

    King David is still in the grave. He is still asleep, still dead, not in heaven.

    So let's examine what happened regarding King Saul and the Witch of Endor.

    King Saul was given very explicit instructions by 'Elohim through the prophet Samuel::

    1 Sam 15:1 Samuel also said unto Saul, The LORD sent me to anoint thee to be king over his people, over Israel: now therefore hearken thou unto the voice of the words of the LORD.
    1 Sam 15:2 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
    1 Sam 15:3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.

    So, just what did King Saul do?

    Did he follow 'Elohim's instructions?

    1 Sam 15:7 And Saul smote the Amalekites from Havilah until thou comest to Shur, that is over against Egypt.
    1 Sam 15:8 And he took Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, and utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword.
    1 Sam 15:9 But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep, and of the oxen, and of the fatlings, and the lambs, and all that was good, and would not utterly destroy them: but every thing that was vile and refuse, that they destroyed utterly.
    1 Sam 15:10 Then came the word of the LORD unto Samuel, saying,
    1 Sam 15:11 It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king: for he is turned back from following me, and hath not performed my commandments. And it grieved Samuel; and he cried unto the LORD all night.

    King Saul disobeyed 'Elohim.

    He spared the King of the Amalekites and the finest of the animals in direct opposition to the command of 'Elohim.

    Now when Samuel confronted Saul, note what Saul said:

    1 Sam 15:13 And Samuel came to Saul: and Saul said unto him, Blessed be thou of the LORD: I have performed the commandment of the LORD.

    Saul had the temerity to tell Samuel that he had done exactly as commanded by 'Elohim!

    But Samuel knew better than that, after all, he had give Saul the instructions from 'Elohim in the first place.

    So Samuel asks:

    1 Sam 15:14 And Samuel said, What meaneth then this bleating of the sheep in mine ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?

    1 Sam 15:19 Wherefore then didst thou not obey the voice of the LORD, but didst fly upon the spoil, and didst evil in the sight of the LORD?

    Saul, his disobedience now exposed, actually tries to blame the people for his actions:

    1 Sam 15:20 And Saul said unto Samuel, Yea, I have obeyed the voice of the LORD, and have gone the way which the LORD sent me, and have brought Agag the king of Amalek, and have utterly destroyed the Amalekites.
    1 Sam 15:21 But the people took of the spoil, sheep and oxen, the chief of the things which should have been utterly destroyed, to sacrifice unto the LORD thy 'Elohim in Gilgal.

    Note how Samuel characterizes Saul's disobedience:

    1 Sam 15:22 And Samuel said, Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.
    1 Sam 15:23 For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king.

    Saul's transgression was of so great a magnitude that 'Elohim was removing him as King of Israel, even though Saul then admitted his sin:

    1 Sam 15:24 And Saul said unto Samuel, I have sinned: for I have transgressed the commandment of the LORD, and thy words: because I feared the people, and obeyed their voice.
    1 Sam 15:25 Now therefore, I pray thee, pardon my sin, and turn again with me, that I may worship the LORD.
    1 Sam 15:26 And Samuel said unto Saul, I will not return with thee: for thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, and the LORD hath rejected thee from being king over Israel.
    1 Sam 15:27 And as Samuel turned about to go away, he laid hold upon the skirt of his mantle, and it rent.
    1 Sam 15:28 And Samuel said unto him, The LORD hath rent the kingdom of Israel from thee this day, and hath given it to a neighbour of thine, that is better than thou.

    After slaying Agag, Samuel departed from Saul, and never returned, even to the day Samuel died:

    1 Sam 15:35 And Samuel came no more to see Saul until the day of his death: nevertheless Samuel mourned for Saul: and the LORD repented that he had made Saul king over Israel.

    In fact, the spirit of 'Elohim departed from Saul completely.

    'Elohim no longer spoke to Saul:

    1 Sam 16:14 But the spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him.

    Then later, the elderly Samuel died:

    1 Sam 25:1 And Samuel died; and all the Israelites were gathered together, and lamented him, and buried him in his house at Ramah.

    So, now when faced by an enemy, Saul was no longer hearing from 'Elohim or his prophets:

    1 Sam 28:4 And the Philistines gathered themselves together, and came and pitched in Shunem: and Saul gathered all Israel together, and they pitched in Gilboa.
    1 Sam 28:5 And when Saul saw the host of the Philistines, he was afraid, and his heart greatly trembled.
    1 Sam 28:6 And when Saul inquired of the LORD, the LORD answered him not, neither by dreams, nor by Urim, nor by prophets.

    So who does Saul seek council from?

    Who does he seek to tell him what he must do?

    Seeking After A Familiar Spirit

    1 Sam 28:7 Then said Saul unto his servants, Seek me a woman that hath a familiar spirit, that I may go to her, and inquire of her. And his servants said to him, Behold, there is a woman that hath a familiar spirit at Endor.

    'Elohim strongly condemned in scripture what Saul was going to do:

    Lev 20:27 A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them.

    Deu 18:10 There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
    Deu 18:11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.
    Deu 18:12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee.
    Deu 18:13 Thou shalt be perfect with the LORD thy 'Elohim.
    Deu 18:14 For these nations, which thou shalt possess, hearkened unto observers of times, and unto diviners: but as for thee, the LORD thy God hath not suffered thee so to do.

    So, knowing that 'Elohim condemned it, Saul still went to consult with a witch, a spirit medium and a necromancer (one who claims to consult with the dead).

    1 Sam 28:8 And Saul disguised himself, and put on other raiment, and he went, and two men with him, and they came to the woman by night: and he said, I pray thee, divine unto me by the familiar spirit, and bring me him up, whom I shall name unto thee.
    1 Sam 28:9 And the woman said unto him, Behold, thou knowest what Saul hath done, how he hath cut off those that have familiar spirits, and the wizards, out of the land: wherefore then layest thou a snare for my life, to cause me to die?
    1 Sam 28:10 And Saul sware to her by the LORD, saying, As the LORD liveth, there shall no punishment happen to thee for this thing.
    1 Sam 28:11 Then said the woman, Whom shall I bring up unto thee? And he said, Bring me up Samuel.

    Now, consider an important point.

    Was the witch to summon the spirit of Samuel down from heaven?

    No.

    Saul knew the state of the dead, that Samuel was dead in the grave.

    He was actually asking the witch to call Samuel up from the grave, not down from heaven.

    Note also that 'Elohim was no longer speaking to Saul, and 'Elohim's prophets were not speaking with Saul (1 Sam 28:6).

    So now, are we to believe that a witch was going to thwart the will of 'Elohim by conjuring up Samuel from the grave, so that Saul could speak with a prophet of 'Elohim, against the explicit will of 'Elohim?

    No witch could do such a thing.

    Remember also, the witch at Endor was known for having a familiar spirit.

    What is a familiar spirit anyway?

    It is not an angel of 'Elohim, surely, because of 'Elohim's strong condemnation against consulting with them.

    A familiar spirit is a demonic spirit, a fallen angel in league with Satan.

    This is what the woman at Endor had, communication with a demon, a demon who was quite capable of impersonating Samuel.

    It was NOT Samuel who appeared at her summons, it was a demon masquerading as Samuel.

    The first thing that the demon did was expose Saul's masquerade to the witch:

    1 Sam 28:12 And when the woman saw Samuel, she cried with a loud voice: and the woman spake to Saul, saying, Why hast thou deceived me? for thou art Saul.

    Now exposed to the witch, Saul continues to consult her:

    1 Sam 28:13 And the king said unto her, Be not afraid: for what sawest thou? And the woman said unto Saul, I saw gods ascending out of the earth.
    1 Sam 28:14 And he said unto her, What form is he of? And she said, An old man cometh up; and he is covered with a mantle. And Saul perceived that it was Samuel, and he stooped with his face to the ground, and bowed himself.

    Note that Saul did not actually see anything himself, he had to ask the witch who is was that she saw.

    So based on what the witch said, Saul presumed it was Samuel who he was communicating with, that Samuel had been summoned from the grave to speak with him, since the witch said she could see Samuel coming up from out of the earth (not down from heaven).

    King Saul was putting his trust completely in a spirit medium, a witch, a necromancer, against the expressed will of 'Elohim.

    So the following conversation was not between Saul and Samuel, but between Saul and a witch with a familiar (demonic) spirit:

    1 Sam 28:15 And Samuel said to Saul, Why hast thou disquieted me, to bring me up? And Saul answered, I am sore distressed; for the Philistines make war against me, and God is departed from me, and answereth me no more, neither by prophets, nor by dreams: therefore I have called thee, that thou mayest make known unto me what I shall do.

    Again, note that Samuel is represented as coming up from the grave, not down from heaven.

    Saul also affirms that he knows that 'Elohim refuses to communicate with him any more by any means, yet he expected to get guidance from a dead prophet of 'Elohim via a familiar (demonic) spirit.

    The counsel Saul gets predicts the defeat of Israel and his imminent death, along with his sons:

    1 Sam 28:16 Then said Samuel, Wherefore then dost thou ask of me, seeing the LORD is departed from thee, and is become thine enemy?
    1 Sam 28:17 And the LORD hath done to him, as he spake by me: for the LORD hath rent the kingdom out of thine hand, and given it to thy neighbour, even to David:
    1 Sam 28:18 Because thou obeyedst not the voice of the LORD, nor executedst his fierce wrath upon Amalek, therefore hath the LORD done this thing unto thee this day.
    1 Sam 28:19 Moreover the LORD will also deliver Israel with thee into the hand of the Philistines: and to morrow shalt thou and thy sons be with me: the LORD also shall deliver the host of Israel into the hand of the Philistines.
    1 Sam 28:20 Then Saul fell straightway all along on the earth, and was sore afraid, because of the words of Samuel: and there was no strength in him; for he had eaten no bread all the day, nor all the night.

    Conclusion

    King Saul was looking for help from the witch of Endor, to contact someone in the grave, a dead Samuel, so that he could know from 'Elohim how he could gain a victory over the Philistines.

    But 'Elohim was not talking to Saul any more.

    By knowing what the Bible teaches about the state of the dead, and the circumstances regarding Saul's relationship with 'Elohim at the time, we can be quite certain that it was not actually Samuel raised from the dead speaking to him, but a fallen angel, a demonic spirit.

    That Saul even attempted this séance with a spirit medium (witch) was an abomination, a further rebellion against 'Elohim, and Saul paid for his rebellion with his life.

    1 Chr 10:13 So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the LORD, even against the word of the LORD, which he kept not, and also for asking counsel of one that had a familiar spirit, to inquire of it;
    1 Chr 10:14 And inquired not of the LORD: therefore he slew him, and turned the kingdom unto David the son of Jesse.

    The words in italics in verse 13 are supplied by the translat
    or, as they are not in the original text.

    So if you drop those words, it reads:

    So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the LORD, even against the word of the LORD, which he kept not, and also for asking of a familiar spirit, to inquire;

    So the passage above clearly states, Saul communicated with a demonic spirit, not Samuel.

    :cool:

    #157063

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,19:58)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,14:40)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,19:35)
    Hi CON,
    Peter and John both felt blessed by what they SAW on the mountain.
    Jesus was there and spoke with others


    I would feel blessed as well, to have a “Vision” of the future, especially a glorified state.

    :cool:


    Hi CON,
    Yes they saw Jesus speaking with Elijah and Moses and it greatly impacted on them.

    At the same time they heard the voice of God.  

    Or did they??


    :cool: I am sure Yahweh can speak in or through a vision. :cool:

    #157065
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    So you have to deny what is written?

Viewing 20 posts - 5,541 through 5,560 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account