Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 5,501 through 5,520 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #156899
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Katjo….> you have presented it right, but those who do not understand the truth of GOD'S word will continue to deny it. Jesus did not preexist His berth on earth and is the Firstborn , of all creation into the kingdom of GOD. It's just that simple, not to even mention many scriptures that show GOD (ALONE and by HIMSELF) created every thing that exists in heaven and earth.

    peace and love to you and yours……………………gene

    #156917
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (Gene @ Nov. 16 2009,00:54)
    Katjo….> you have presented it right, but those who do not understand the truth of GOD'S word will continue to deny it. Jesus did not preexist His berth on earth and is the Firstborn , of all creation into the kingdom of GOD.  It's just that simple, not to even mention many scriptures that show GOD (ALONE and by HIMSELF) created every thing that exists in heaven and earth.

    peace and love to you and yours……………………gene


    I believe you misunderstand as Katjo appears to be a Trinitarian in that he assumes the words “I Am” translates to Yahweeh as in “before Abraham, God”.  

    The statement is not even grammatically correct but that does not stop those that are biased from making it.

    #156919
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 14 2009,17:13)

    Quote (kerwin @ Nov. 14 2009,00:53)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 14 2009,13:35)
    Psalm 139:15 My frame was not hidden from You, When I was made in secret, And skillfully wrought in the depths of the earth;
    ——————————————————————————–
    Psalm 139:16 Your eyes have seen my unformed substance; And in Your book were all written The days that were ordained for me, When as yet there was not one of them.
    ——————————————————————————–
    Isaiah 49:1 Listen to Me, O islands, And pay attention, you peoples from afar. The LORD called Me from the womb; From the body of My mother He named Me.
    ——————————————————————————–
    Isaiah 49:5 And now says the LORD, who formed Me from the womb to be His Servant, To bring Jacob back to Him, so that Israel might be gathered to Him (For I am honored in the sight of the LORD, And My God is My strength),

    :cool:


    Does Isaiah 49:1 have anything to do with Matthew 1:21?

    Matthew 1:21(NIV) reads:

    Quote

    She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”


    Sure it does, that in the fact that the Father knew all before the womb, all these verse prove that Yahweh knows who is to be born, and what their lives are going to be.

    :cool:


    So is seems logical to conclude that Jesus did not have a name until his mother named him as per God's instructions?

    #156925

    Quote (kerwin @ Nov. 15 2009,11:59)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 14 2009,17:13)

    Quote (kerwin @ Nov. 14 2009,00:53)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 14 2009,13:35)
    Psalm 139:15 My frame was not hidden from You, When I was made in secret, And skillfully wrought in the depths of the earth;
    ——————————————————————————–
    Psalm 139:16 Your eyes have seen my unformed substance; And in Your book were all written The days that were ordained for me, When as yet there was not one of them.
    ——————————————————————————–
    Isaiah 49:1 Listen to Me, O islands, And pay attention, you peoples from afar. The LORD called Me from the womb; From the body of My mother He named Me.
    ——————————————————————————–
    Isaiah 49:5 And now says the LORD, who formed Me from the womb to be His Servant, To bring Jacob back to Him, so that Israel might be gathered to Him (For I am honored in the sight of the LORD, And My God is My strength),

    :cool:


    Does Isaiah 49:1 have anything to do with Matthew 1:21?

    Matthew 1:21(NIV) reads:

    Quote

    She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”


    Sure it does, that in the fact that the Father knew all before the womb, all these verse prove that Yahweh knows who is to be born, and what their lives are going to be.

    :cool:


    So is seems logical to conclude that Jesus did not have a name until his mother named him as per God's instructions?


    Absolutly, considering he did not exist until his mother berthed him. :cool:

    #156926
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Is birth the beginning of life?

    #156929

    Acts 14:11-15

    11 And when the people saw what Paul had done, they lifted up their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia, The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men.
    12 And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he was the chief speaker.
    13 Then the priest of Jupiter, which was before their city, brought oxen and garlands unto the gates, and would have done sacrifice with the people.
    14 Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out,
    15 And saying, Sirs, why do ye these things? We also are men of like passions with you, and preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities unto the living 'Elohim, which made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein: The King James Version, (Cambridge: Cambridge) 1769.

    These verses are particularly revealing and illustrate an enormously important fact to consider when studying Scripture.

    Why would I say this?

    One of THE strongest proofs against the Trinity or deity of Messiah is not what the Scriptures say.

    But what they do NOT say.

    In fact, what is NOT said in Scripture is probably THE most irrefutable evidence proving Yeshua is NOT 'Elohim.

    Let me say this again so that it will sink in.

    THE strongest evidence against the deity of Yeshua the Messiah, evidence Trinitarians and counterfeit Messianics hope you fail to notice, is what is NOT said in the Scriptures!

    The Tanakh AND the New Testament are literally FULL of things NOT said that prove Yeshua is NOT 'Elohim.

    Once the sincere Bible student becomes aware of this fact and doesn't allow Trinitarian and Kabbalistic Messianic false teachers to bully them into “seeing” what is not there, the truth of Yeshua's NOT being 'Elohim becomes blatantly obvious.

    This may not even be the best example, and I point out numerous times throughout the New Testament commentary how what Paul or others do NOT say proves Yeshua is NOT 'Elohim.

    Ok, note 3 points about the verses quoted above.

    1] The citizens of Lystra witnessed miracles at the hand of Paul.

    2]After witnessing these miracles they began to exclaim, “The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men. ” The New Revised Standard Version better renders the words as, “The gods have come down to us in human form!” They were expressing a “god in the flesh” or “god incarnate” belief. Sound familiar?

    2] When Paul and Barnabas witnessed this they became incensed at such a thought, “rent their clothes and ran in among the people,” and begged them to turn from such “vanities.” The “vanity” to which Paul and Barnabas referred was the concept that god can come down in human form, which is exactly what the Traditional Christian Trinity and counterfeit Messianic mystic “Ayn Sof” distortions teach!

    The Greek word rendered “vanities” means “worthless”, “profitless”, “useless”, “futile”, “to no purpose”, etc. Paul and Barnabas considered the “god in the flesh” idea expressed by the citizens to be a useless and futile belief!

    First, and foremost, consider what Paul and Barnabas did NOT say.

    Since the citizens were claiming “god” can take human form, why didn't the apostles explain how they were correct but that the “god in the flesh” was Yeshua and not them?

    Notice there is NOTHING SAID AT ALL that would even hint that the concept of “gods in human form” was acceptable to Paul and Barnabas!

    Yet, if Trinitarians and counterfeit Messianics are correct, there is absolutely nothing wrong with such a concept.

    Do you see Paul or Barnabas agreeing with the Trinitarians?

    I certainly don't.

    Is there something here that would suggest Paul and Barnabas considered the “god in the flesh” concept even remotely acceptable?

    NO!

    There is not even a hint.

    This is an example of how what is NOT said provides strong evidence against the concept of a “god in the flesh” Messiah.

    Paul's and Barnabas' silence in the face of a chance to clarify this issue to those ripe for acceptance of the concept should not be missed.

    This episode also provides good evidence of the pagan origins of the Trinity since those that so readily accepted such a revolting concept were involved in the pagan religions of the Roman empire, the same pagan religions and same empire from which the Trinity “mystery” originated.

    Additionally, since the counterfeit Messianic movement is Traditional Christianity dressed in Jewish garments, this is also the origins of the distorted Messianic “mystic Trinity”.

    Some might argue that Paul's and Barnabas' revulsion was limited to the specific references to pagan gods; however, if this were true, Paul and Barnabas missed a golden opportunity to preach the Christian Trinity and Christianized Messianic “god in the flesh” versions of the idea the citizens were expressing.

    They could have explained to the citizens that they were correct in their idea but that instead of Jupiter and Mercurius the true god was the one that had manifested Himself “in the human form” of Yeshua.

    But they did not do so.

    They did NOT say anything in support of the false “god in the flesh” concept; thus, providing evidence, one of countless examples, of how what was NOT said proves what IS said by the majority of Christian and Messianic leaders is incorrect.

    In fact, the actions of the apostles reveal utter revulsion at the notion God can take “human form” and live as a man!

    :cool:

    #156932
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 16 2009,02:15)
    Hi CON,
    Is birth the beginning of life?


    Conception is the beginning of human life.  That is why is called “conception”

    Entry for “conceive” at thefreedictionary.com on November 15, 2009 reads:

    Quote

    5. To begin or originate in a specific way: a political movement conceived in the ferment of the 1960s.

    #156965

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,12:15)
    Hi CON,
    Is birth the beginning of life?


    conception is

    #156979
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    You this scientific idea be applied over what scripture says?

    #156981

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,16:47)
    Hi CON,
    You this scientific idea be applied over what scripture says?


    It doesn't take science to understand the egg must be fertilized to grow, whether by mans doing or Yahwehs.

    If you think Yeshua existed before Mary's conception what was he?

    You might as well call yourself a trinitarian.

    #156982
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    Interesting reaction to a simple question.

    There are many unexplained things Jesus said about himself that make us consider these things.

    His origins, however different, do not make him any more or less than an ordinary man do they?

    #156985

    One thing is sure: the personal pre-existence of the Messiah is fundamental to the doctrine of the Trinity.

    If the concept is doubtful the whole basis of the traditional view of God is put in jeopardy.

    It is undeniable that a few passages, almost all in the gospel of John, use language that suggests that the Messiah existed in heaven before his earthly ministry.

    But what needs to be determined is whether that pre-existence was as a person or as an idea or plan in the mind of God.

    OLD TESTAMENT ALLUSIONS

    In predicting the coming of the Messiah the Old Testament gives no hint that the promised Saviour was already in existence.

    In almost every case the future tense is used:

    “I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brethren; and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I command him” (Deuteronomy 18:18).

    “I will raise up your son … I will be his father, and he shall be my son” (2 Samuel 7:12,14).

    “His name will be called Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty God …” (Isaiah 9:6).

    In each case the Messiah is seen as a person yet to be born, not a being already existing in heaven who later would assume human form.

    This is true even when describing the relationship that would exist between 'Elohim and His promised Son:

    “He shall cry unto me, Thou art my Father, my 'Elohim, and the rock of my salvation. And I will make him the firstborn, the highest of the kings of the earth” (Psalm 89:26-27).

    It is difficult to reconcile these statements with the concept that the Son was already in heaven as the co-equal of 'Elohim.

    “WHOSE GOINGS FORTH HAVE BEEN FROM EVERLASTING”

    The well known passage that identifies Bethlehem as the birthplace of the Messiah is frequently quoted in support of the pre-existence of Jesus:

    “But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting” (Micah 5:2, AV).

    It is alleged that the final phrase indicates the eternal pre-existence of Yeshua.

    But did the prophet really intend that?

    There are three significant words here: the Hebrew mikedem which is expressed as 'old', olahm which is rendered 'everlasting', and motsaah which in the plural is translated 'goings forth'.

    The first of these, mikedem is from kedem, a common word meaning 'old, afore, before in time or in location, past, aforetime' and is often translated as 'ancient times'.

    Olahm is basically an indefinite period of time, and is derived from alam 'to conceal'.

    It is frequently translated 'ever' or 'everlasting' but also as 'old' and 'ancient times'.

    Neither of the two latter terms necessarily conveys the idea of eternity.

    Isaiah uses both of these words in a passage that directs Israel to remember their past history clearly something that did not stretch back into infinite time:

    “Remember this and consider, … remember the former things of old (olahm); for I am 'Elohim, and there is no other, … declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times (mikedem) things not yet done” (Isaiah 46:8-10).

    Similarly both words are used in describing the events of the Exodus, where to translate them so as to mean 'from eternity' would obviously be inappropriate:

    “Awake, put on strength, O arm of the Lord; awake, as in days of old (kedem), the generations of long ago (olahm)” (Isaiah 51:9).

    Thus mikedem and olahm in scriptural usage do not necessarily indicate an eternal past.

    Those who use this passage to support the trinity assume the third word under discussion, the AV “goings forth”, to mean the Messiah's eternal activity in heaven prior to his incarnation.

    But the word motsaah is a word that simply means 'to proceed from'.

    Here are some of the ways it is translated:

    'spring of water' (2 Kings2:21),

    'the ground put forth grass' (Job 38:27)

    'that which came out of my lips' (Jeremiah 17:16).

    Of particular interest is the use of the word to describe the son of Abraham who, 'Elohim said, was to 'come forth (motsaah) out of thine own bowels' (Genesis 15:4, AV), implying birth or physical descent from a forefather.

    Here we have the clue to the meaning of Micah's words.

    The Messiah was to come as the 'seed of the woman', as the 'seed of Abraham' and as the 'son of David' a series of descendants or 'comings forth' that would lead to His appearing.

    And this purpose had been foretold by 'Elohim from 'ancient times', even at the very beginning in Eden.

    These 'comings forth' (i.e. a series of descendants) had certainly been from earliest times, as the Messiah's genealogies in the gospel records demonstrate.

    It may be significant that in the Micah passage motsaah is in the feminine form of the noun, indicating the female origin of the Messiah, the 'seed of the woman'.

    Thus it was absolutely true to say of him 'His goings forth have been from old, from everlasting'; or as the RSV more accurately puts it 'whose origin is from old, from ancient days'.

    It is just another way of saying that his ancestry extended back to Adam via David and Abraham.

    By no rules of biblical interpretation can the personal pre-existence of the Messiah be legitimately read into the passage.

    :cool:

    #156987

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Nov. 15 2009,16:59)
    Hi CON,
    Interesting reaction to a simple question.

    There are many unexplained things Jesus said about himself that make us consider these things.

    His origins, however different,  do not make him any more or less than an ordinary man do they?


    What is unexplained?

    Ordinary with the exception of his divine mission to live a sin free life and die upon the cross for all those who come to him.

    :cool:

    #156988
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Con,
    His ability to remain sinfree was that his real Father was with him.[Acts 10, Heb12 ]

    The reason for so doing was to prove the truth of the Law and to make him a suitable vessel for the Spirit of God [2Tim2]

    The first begotten, the first fruits from above, we now can follow him by rebirth of water and the Spirit.

    #156991

    THE CONCEPTION, BIRTH AND EARLY LIFE OF JESUS

    Turning to the record of the Messiah's birth there is a similar silence about his personal pre-existence.

    Gabriel announced the impending event in the terms of 'Elohim's Old Testament promises:

    “You will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Yeshua. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord 'Elohim will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there will be no end” (Luke 1:31-33).

    In view of her unmarried state Mary asked for information as to how this would happen, and was told:

    “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of 'Elohim” (verse 35).

    There was clearly not even a hint in the angel's message that Yeshua already existed, and that the babe was to be 'Elohim coming in human form.

    Why was this information withheld if it were true?

    Mary, no doubt because of her godly disposition and outstanding character, had been chosen by 'Elohim to be the vehicle for the birth of His Son.

    Would He have concealed any relevant information from her concerning her child?

    Yet in outlining the Son's work, there is not the slightest intimation that he was already existing as 'Elohim's co-equal in heaven.

    Instead the future tense is still used as it was in the Old Testament he will be called the Son of the Most High, etc.

    As Yeshua grew up he “increased in wisdom and in stature, and in favour with 'Elohim and man” (Luke 2:52).

    This statement presents a difficulty for those who believe Yeshua had a personal pre-existence.

    It prompts the question as to what he brought with him when he descended from heaven to earth and assumed human nature.

    Did he divest himself of all the wisdom and knowledge inherently associated with his divinity and start with a clean slate?

    Did he so completely relinquish all his perfect attributes that he had to build again from scratch a character that enabled him to re-establish himself in 'Elohim's favour?

    The Trinitarians in effect must assume that he did.

    Yet without irreverence we can surely ask if it were possible for a divine being, one who knows all things and is perfect in every sense, to ever 'forget' everything about his divinity and start again the process of learning and character building?

    This dilemma is increased by the generally accepted view that Yeshua did not relinquish any aspect of his deity when he became man:

    “When the Word 'became flesh' His deity was not abandoned, or reduced, or contracted, nor did He cease to exercise the divine functions which had been His before.

    It is He, we are told, who sustains the creation in ordered existence, and who gives and upholds all life, and these functions were certainly not in abeyance during His time on earth. … The New Testament stresses that the Son's deity was not reduced through the incarnation”.

    If this is true how did Yeshua 'increase in wisdom and in favour with 'Elohim' if all the time he had never relinquished a divinity that possessed these attributes to perfection?

    :cool:

    #156992

    THE TEMPTATION OF YESHUA

    The same problem arises with the Messiah's temptation, both in the specific series of temptations in the wilderness and in his whole life.

    We read that he 'in every respect has been tempted as we are' (Hebrews 4:15).

    If Yeshua had indeed a personal pre-existence in heaven before his birth to Mary, any recollection of his previous life would have rendered his temptation almost futile.

    A perfect mind cannot be tempted with evil.

    A mind that 'knows all things from the beginning' could have foreseen the result of the conflict so as to make it no conflict at all.

    But could Yeshua, as pre-existent and omniscient 'Elohim the Son have blanked out from his mind all the divine thoughts and feelings that had been his from eternity?

    We have already seen that Trinitarians believe that Yeshua did have a recollection of a life in heaven.

    Indeed according to their view of John 17:5 Yeshua could recall the glory he had shared with Yeshua before the world was made.

    So why should he not recall the other aspects of his divinity?

    Yet if that were so how did he increase in wisdom, and why did he need to learn to overcome the 'temptations common to man'(1 Corinthians 10:13) and so be pleasing and obedient to his heavenly Father?

    Yeshua continued to learn obedience right to the end of his earthly ministry.

    A most revealing passage in Hebrews reads:

    “Although he were a Son, he learned obedience through what he suffered; and being made perfect he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him” (Hebrews 5:8).

    Again the question must be faced.

    If Yeshua was pre-existent 'Elohim with an infinite life of perfection behind him how could he 'learn obedience' and as a result of this be 'made perfect'.

    At what point did the perfect member of the eternal trinity become less than perfect?

    What form did that deficiency take?

    These are legitimate questions that Trinitarians seldom, if ever, address.

    It is continually alleged that the uniqueness of the Christian message lies in the fact that 'Elohim became man for the salvation of the human race.

    It is said that only by this incarnation could man's redemption be achieved.

    Yet the clear scriptural teaching, as was shown particularly in section 2 of the present chapter and will be emphasised again in a later section, is that Yeshua was a man whose physical nature was identical in every respect to ours.

    And we can now add that this included the need to develop mind and character by a process of normal growth.

    It is reasonable therefore to query even the relevance of a previous existence.

    Why is it that the eternal almighty 'Elohim should deem it necessary to reveal Himself as a man, that is, to become incarnate?

    How did it help the redemption process?

    A previous existence in heaven seems in no way an aid to or a preparation for the work he had to do on earth.

    On the other hand if it is said that it was only through being 'Elohim that he could triumph in the way that he did, then his personal achievement seems greatly lessened, for 'Elohim can do anything.

    :cool:

    #156993
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CON,
    God has no equal and Jesus never attempted to to try to claim such.[Phil2]
    There are many gods and many lords but for us One God, the Father.[1Cor8]

    #156996
    georg
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Nov. 16 2009,12:17)
    THE CONCEPTION, BIRTH AND EARLY LIFE OF JESUS

    Turning to the record of the Messiah's birth there is a similar silence about his personal pre-existence.

    Gabriel announced the impending event in the terms of 'Elohim's Old Testament promises:

    “You will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Yeshua. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord 'Elohim will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there will be no end” (Luke 1:31-33).

    In view of her unmarried state Mary asked for information as to how this would happen, and was told:

    “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of 'Elohim” (verse 35).

    There was clearly not even a hint in the angel's message that Yeshua already existed, and that the babe was to be 'Elohim coming in human form.

    Why was this information withheld if it were true?

    Mary, no doubt because of her godly disposition and outstanding character, had been chosen by 'Elohim to be the vehicle for the birth of His Son.

    Would He have concealed any relevant information from her concerning her child?

    Yet in outlining the Son's work, there is not the slightest intimation that he was already existing as 'Elohim's co-equal in heaven.

    Instead the future tense is still used as it was in the Old Testament he will be called the Son of the Most High, etc.

    As Yeshua grew up he “increased in wisdom and in stature, and in favour with 'Elohim and man” (Luke 2:52).

    This statement presents a difficulty for those who believe Yeshua had a personal pre-existence.

    It prompts the question as to what he brought with him when he descended from heaven to earth and assumed human nature.

    Did he divest himself of all the wisdom and knowledge inherently associated with his divinity and start with a clean slate?

    Did he so completely relinquish all his perfect attributes that he had to build again from scratch a character that enabled him to re-establish himself in 'Elohim's favour?

    The Trinitarians in effect must assume that he did.

    Yet without irreverence we can surely ask if it were possible for a divine being, one who knows all things and is perfect in every sense, to ever 'forget' everything about his divinity and start again the process of learning and character building?

    This dilemma is increased by the generally accepted view that Yeshua did not relinquish any aspect of his deity when he became man:

    “When the Word 'became flesh' His deity was not abandoned, or reduced, or contracted, nor did He cease to exercise the divine functions which had been His before.

    It is He, we are told, who sustains the creation in ordered existence, and who gives and upholds all life, and these functions were certainly not in abeyance during His time on earth. … The New Testament stresses that the Son's deity was not reduced through the incarnation”.

    If this is true how did Yeshua 'increase in wisdom and in favour with 'Elohim' if all the time he had never relinquished a divinity that possessed these attributes to perfection?

    :cool:


    There are other Scriptures that talk about th preexisting of Jesus.
    Rev. 3:14
    Col. 1:15-17
    And by Jesus own words He said this in
    John 17:5 ” And now O Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was.”
    He was there in Heaven with the Father as a Spirit being, were He returned. God send His only begotten Son into the world not to condemn the world, but that through Him we might be saveth. So where did God send Him from?
    Peace and Love Irene

    #156999

    “HE CALLS THINGS THAT ARE NOT AS THOUGH THEY ARE”

    The key to understanding the biblical sense in which Yeshua pre-existed is the foreknowledge of 'Elohim.

    His control of future events is so absolute that nothing can prevent His decisions coming into effect.

    Once He has decided anything it is as good as done:

    “I work and who can hinder it?” (Isaiah 43:13).

    “I am 'Elohim, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will accomplish all my purpose … I have spoken, and I will bring it to pass; I have purposed, and I will do it.” (Isaiah 46:9-11).

    Because of the impossibility of His plans failing 'Elohim often speaks of future events as if they had actually happened.

    This is important to keep in mind. Paul says that 'Elohim:

    “Calls things that are not as though they were”. (Romans 4:17, NIV).

    There are several Scriptural examples of this that are very relevant to this study.

    For example, when 'Elohim commissioned Jeremiah to be a prophet He said to him:

    “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you” (Jeremiah 1:5).

    Here is an example of a man being 'known' by 'Elohim long before he was born.

    In this sense it could be said that Jeremiah 'pre-existed' obviously not as a person but in 'Elohim's mind and purpose.

    This is not the only example.

    All those who are finally redeemed by Yeshua have been 'known' to 'Elohim since before the creation.

    This point is made many times:

    “For those whom he foreknew he also predestined (Gk pro-orizo, to 'mark out in advance') to be conformed to the image of his Son” (Romans 8:29).

    “Even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world (Ephesians 1:4).

    “'Elohim chose you from the beginning” (2 Thessalonians 2:13).

    “Who saved us and called us with a holy calling … which he gave us in the Messiah ages ago” (2 Timothy 1:9).

    Note carefully the language used by Paul in these passages.

    The believers were 'foreknown' and 'chosen in the Messiah' before the creation of the world.

    None would deduce from this that the believers had a personal existence from eternity.

    Rather that they existed in the mind and purpose of 'Elohim and because His purpose is inflexible they could be regarded as real although they had not yet come into existence.

    Why then should not the reference to the Messiah's pre-existence be taken in the same way?

    Dunn, himself a Trinitarian, has a significant comment on how the early Christians would have understood the Ephesians passage quoted above:

    “Here too it is the divine choice or election which was made 'before the foundation of the world' the pre-determination of the Messiah as redeemer and of those who would be redeemed in and through the Messiah.

    We may speak of an ideal pre-existence at this point, but of real pre-existence of the Messiah or of believers once again there is no thought”.

    Here the distinction is made between the idea of the Messiah's redemptive work ('ideal pre-existence') and the actual reality of his existence ('real pre-existence').

    The first truly was there from the beginning, and the second patently was not.

    In confirmation of this we turn to an important statement about the Messiah made by Peter:

    “He was destined before the foundation of the world but was made manifest at the end of the times for your sake” (1 Peter 1:20).

    The word translated 'destined' literally means 'to know beforehand'.

    It is the word from which we get our word prognosis meaning known in advance, usually used by doctors in predicting the course of an illness.

    On the basis of his foreknowledge the doctor can offer a good or bad prognosis about the outcome of the disease.

    Thus in this passage Peter is telling us that Yeshua was known in advance by 'Elohim in the sense that His plan for him was predetermined; and then at the appropriate time Yeshua was born.

    Clearly there was no thought in Peter's mind that Yeshua had personally existed before he was born.

    Confirmation of this view is found in the opening salutation of this epistle, where Peter describes his readers in identical words:

    “Chosen and destined by 'Elohim the Father” (1 Peter 1:2).

    None take this to mean the believers' personal previous existence.

    'Elohim's foreknowledge of his purpose in the Messiah is often likened to an architect's mental picture of a new building.

    Long before any construction work has started he 'sees' the edifice in his mind's eye.

    Every detail is planned and recorded so that he knows exactly how the completed building will appear.

    He could speak of its magnificence and splendour when in fact it did not yet exist.

    It was in prospect, not in reality.

    'Elohim too has a plan for a house that has not yet been built.

    Not a literal building but an edifice composed of the redeemed.

    And the corner stone of this building is Yeshua.

    With an insight greater than any human architect, 'Elohim can visualise this building in all its glory, and because He is so sure that it will be constructed He can speak of it as already done.

    It is in this way that it can be said that Yeshua had glory with 'Elohim in the beginning, and that the redeemed were chosen and 'marked out' before the foundation of the world.

    :cool:

    #157001

    THE SON OF MAN'S DESCENT FROM HEAVEN

    With these comments about the general Scriptural teaching concerning the sense in which the Messiah pre-existed we come to the passages, exclusive to the gospel record of John, which seem to suggest the Messiah's personal pre-existence in heaven.

    In addition to the classic understanding of the Logos in the prologue (1:1-18), which will be considered later, there are the following passages:

    1. “He who descended from heaven, the Son of Man” (John 3:13).

    2. “He who comes from above is above all” (John 3:31)

    3. “He whom 'Elohim has sent” (John 3:34).

    4. “For the bread of 'Elohim is that which comes down from heaven, and gives life to the world. … I am the bread of life” (John 6:33-35).

    5. “I have come down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him who sent me” (John 6:38).

    6. “What if you were to see the Son of man ascending where he was before?” (John 6:62).

    7. “I am from above” (John 8:23).

    8. “I proceeded and came forth from 'Elohim” (John 8:42).

    9. “Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58).

    10. “I came from the Father and have come into the world; again, I am leaving the world and going to the Father” (John 16:28).

    11. “Father, glorify me in thy own presence with the glory which I had with thee before the world was made” (John 17:5).

    The fact that all these allusions to the Messiah coming down from heaven are found only in the gospel record of John should make us pause.

    Did the other gospel writers know of the pre-existence of the Messiah but did not mention it?

    It certainly could be said that their silence suggests they did not believe and teach it.

    Or could it be that John had a distinctive way of looking at the words of Yeshua that bids us look beneath their apparent meaning?

    :cool:

Viewing 20 posts - 5,501 through 5,520 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account