And why is the AKJV anointed when it didn't have access to the oldest manuscripts and it includes obvious additions such as the Comma Johanneum.Surely, the logical reason why you think this translation is anointed is to support your many hours (perhaps years) of work in Old English Gematria. Admitting that the translation is not even the best one…[Read more]

So this leads to the next question.If the AKJV is annointed and is wrong about its usage of the definite article (as you say), and you by your own words correct the AKJV where it has erred, then how can it be an annointed version and yet needs you to come along and correct the annointing it has.

Ed J, you could have wrapped this up much earlier had you said that the AKJV is not perfect, rather imperfect and anointed.

If it is not perfect, then using it as a trusted foundation for your numerics means we cannot trust your gematria. And if your numerics do not work with other translations that are not perfect as well, then all the more why your gematria is Pseudomathematics.

That is a good question. Sorry I haven’t addressed this earlier, but I just noticed it.

You can be baptized by any true Believer into the name of Jesus. If you cannot find any willing and they insist on being baptized into the Trinity, then make sure that you are baptized in the Spirit of God which is the important one and you can do this…[Read more]

Okay, tile will be removed in the next 5 minutes.Next (must answer) question.Because the AKJV incorrectly (according to your view) adds in an indefinite article, does this mean that this translation is not perfect?1) Yes, it is not perfect.2) It is still perfect despite this.

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 21 2014,12:09)Quote (t8 @ Jan. 26 2014,19:37)Edited James Version (EDJV interpretation):Jesus was NOT calling Judas 'the devil' nor was Jesus even calling Judas 'a devil'Authorised King James Version (AKJV):Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?Obviously both your interpretation and…[Read more]

Been so long that I have removed a tile, I cannot remember the exact procedure. Mike, do you want the honour?

Quote (Ed J @ April 22 2014,01:47)1now please remove the tile1) Your interpretation of John 6:70;2) The AKJV translation of this verse.Hooray. For the record, Ed J says that his interpretation of John 6:70 is correct while the AKJV is not. Therefore, by his own admission, the AKJV is not a perfect translation. Wow two giants go head to head and Ed…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 21 2014,12:09)Quote (t8 @ Jan. 26 2014,19:37)Edited James Version (EDJV interpretation):Jesus was NOT calling Judas 'the devil' nor was Jesus even calling Judas 'a devil'Authorised King James Version (AKJV):Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?Obviously both your interpretation and…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 21 2014,11:38)Quote (Ed J @ April 20 2014,16:28)Mike, it seems you are now getting cold feet to speak out against YOUR BOSS.Mike's boss is God and his son.

Agreed Mike. That would clear up the contradiction and then we can all move on.

Yes, Mike, technically not the exact same question, but a good answer would wrap the whole thing up because the essence of what we are asking is not being addressed. We are asking the same question in different ways so that he understands what it is we are trying to get him to answer.

Quote (Ed J @ April 21 2014,11:23)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 21 2014,05:06)There is your new question, Ed:Was the TEACHING of the AKJV in John 6:70 RIGHT or WRONG?Btw, this is the SAME EXACT thing t8 has been asking you from the beginning.  Then it's not a new question is it?Your learning.The question is not new. But you haven't answered it…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ April 21 2014,10:29)as you continue to attempt to bully me with “the-tile-punishment-stick” for not agreeing with your doctrine.Ed J, I have told you before that I am not tiling anyone for disagreeing with me. That is simply not the case. Worse for your statement here is that I actually agree that Jesus did not call Judas A devil. So…[Read more]

David, regarding LUKE 12:47,48, Jesus is teaching that we are all slaves. We are all indebted to God, and we are all disciplined. Is that not the meaning of what it is to be a disciple.When we knowingly do evil, then the price we pay is bigger than if we do it unknowingly. We are living with sin and sin is being dealt with. Sure sin and this world…[Read more]

Okay a lot of stuff to wade through here, but for now, I would say that not all slavery is bad as I have said, such as being a bond-servant of Christ by choice. But it is bad to enslave someone because you can. i.e., give them a horrible life so you can have an easier one. I don't see that as a loving thing for me to do. That said, God lets men be…[Read more]