Okay Mike, I will play around with the words a bit more to suit.
The moon is literally a light, but not the source of that light.

Are you the light of the world? Is Jesus the light of the world? Are either the source of light?

God is light.

Obviously you can be light, while still not being the source of that light.

The moon is a…[Read more]

Mike said:

Allow me to stop you right there… before you go off on yet another long diatribe of things you keep repeating or post yet another “everything flat earth debunked” video.  In the first of my posts that you ignored on page 117, I presented you with a GIF of what is called the “lunar wave”, or “lunar pulse”.  Did you see it?  What do you…

[Read more]

Part II

Part III

Part IV

Part V

Southern Ocean objections to Flat Earth and other facts
This video conveniently speaks about objections I have made in this topic. Glad to see these Flat Earth objections raised and debunked.

Please ignore the insulting language and concentrate on the points being made. I disagree with the tone of the video, but agree that it is factual regarding…[Read more]

Mike, I cannot answer everything right away. Obviously it takes time to accumulate knowledge right? So I answer what I can and from what I have read. If the answer comes easy, I tick that box first. I know there have been a few questions asked multiple times. I probably have not answered them fully because I don’t know the full answer, but I have…[Read more]

But that all changed when a man showed up teaching that Jesus wasn’t born the Christ?

Nick, this man Jesus you speak of, is he a different person to the Spirit?
That is, when he was born, (NOT as the Christ as you say), is that person still alive and what is his relationship with the Spirit.
Is the being Jesus, more Jesus and less Spirit. more Spirit and less Jesus, 50/50 or is he like us with regards to the Spirit.
Is Jesus…[Read more]

Stumbling blocks
Let’s imagine that the Flat Earth movement convinced all Christians that scripture taught a Flat Earth and they believed it and preached it.

How many people do you think would believe in God thereafter and how many would stop believing. The world would then have the proof that the Bible was wrong and I think Satan would love this…[Read more]

Mike, you go on about how the current understanding of the universe removes God.

In actual fact, it is the opposite. The latest discoveries have unravelled the existence of God.

https://heavennet.net/the-signs-of-gods-existence/

Romans 1:20
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities–his eternal power and divine nature–have…[Read more]

Globe Earth video
I thought it would be good to have a sort of video competition where I or others post good examples of Globe Earth videos and Mike and Dig could post videos of  the Flat Earth disk.

I will start with this one. Mike/Dig, you turn to post a video. I’m getting all excited now wondering what the disk and dome looks…[Read more]

The circuit of the sun and the going down of the sun
Mike believes when King David talks about the circuit of the sun, he says that supports the geocentric model and is proof that the heliocentric model is wrong, even though the heliocentric model gives us the perspective of the sun circuiting. It is the perspective nature of the description that…[Read more]

That the moon is its own light is a desperate answer?  Rather, it is the scriptural answer.  And top-down eclipses (and selenelions) are all the proof anyone needs to know it’s not the earth causing the shadow on the moon… at least on those occasions.  And if not on those occasions, what valid reason do we have to believe the earth causes the sh…

[Read more]

Really? You should stick to what you are good at Mike.

Q: Would it be possible to throw a ball in the air and catch it if I were travelling at 100mph on a motorbike?
A: Probably not.

Q: Would it be possible to throw a ball in the air and catch it if I were travelling at 100mph in  a car?
A: Most likely yes.

The Earth is like that car, not t…[Read more]

Dig. There you go posting more videos or photos of globe earth proofs. You can clearly see the bottom is being cut off and we know refraction changes the calculation somewhat as the calculations are based on zero moisture in the atmosphere.

Again, I see lots of water in the image/video, so that would suggest slightly more than zero moisture I…[Read more]

Do you listen to “The Flat Earth Podcast”?  If not, you should.  The guys not only bring up excellent common sense points, but they are hilarious.  Anyway, they interviewed the son of an astronaut on the most recent one.  He was a great guy, and it was a kind and friendly discussion.  But when Jeran brought up the NASA image of the dark side of…

[Read more]

T8: “and often we are talking about rare conditions right?”

Mike: No, not really. As long as seeing conditions are ok, meaning that atmospheric conditions allow the distant object to be seen at all, then it will be visable every time. What is very telling is that a part of the bottom may be cut off by refraction at times and not at other tim…

[Read more]

Can you tell that it is not the original tv screen? Does it look the same or different? If they were side by side could you tell them apart?

Yes, you can tell. But to be honest, much better quality than my Mount Ruapehu photo compared to a photo taken close up.