So you posted the math and circled the bits that were wrong or irrelevant? I will take a look back. Don’t know how I missed it. Hopefully I’m not wasting my precious time though looking for a post that is irrelevant.

As for the dementia. I only need 1 million dollars and it is fixed.

Team Globe wins so far
So far to my estimation, Team Globe has successfully challenged many Flat Earth claims. Of course not all claims have been challenged yet. But we will get there in time. And what is most amazing is this does not include any photos or videos taken from space, the best proof of all.

Here are 7 successful debunking of Flat…[Read more]

How a zoom lense can blend closer landscape into a distant mountain
Here is an experiment with a zoom lense to test my argument about different things blending in when using a zoom lense. Below are three photos I took of Ruapehu in three separate spots within a 100 metre apart, but all spots being the same distance away from the mountain . Notice…[Read more]

The math that explains how the eclipse shadow goes backward
Here you go Dig. Dig 4 truth here and let me know if there is an error. Otherwise, this is the best answer sp far.

You can use 86,400 seconds as the length of the day, that times 28 days, the time it takes for one revolution of the moon around the Earth, is about 2,400,000 seconds. Using…[Read more]

I posted the actual math that describes why and Mike wasn’t interested in addressing it. Would you be interested in taking a look?

The first point about Ohakune is its height above sea level. It is 590 metres. However, the road from there to the snow in Ruapehu first goes through dense forests that cover the lower flanks. This part of the mountain is not steep, rather level with a slight incline. I will demonstrate this with my own photos.

Here is the centre of town. As you…[Read more]

So your photo should show ONLY 3703 feet of a 6676 foot tall mountain.  The OTHER 2973 feet of the mountain is supposed to be hidden by curve.  And what percentage of the 6676 foot tall mountain is 2973?  45%  Or just about HALF of the mountain itself should be missing in your photo.

Now, if we go with the Ohakune 2000 feet figure for the base…

[Read more]

 It sits on a plateau that RANGES from 600-900 meters… not IS 900 meters period.

I see that you have addresses the point, sorry about that. I will read it now. Hopefully you address this point sufficiently though, we will see. Here is the first point from your post.

If I have taken the shot showing seal level upward, then there is a good cha…[Read more]

Mike.

I wonder if you can comment on this.

You assume that the whole mountain is in both these shots and they show the same height, and yet the top one is missing the fact that it is already up to 900 metres high as it sits upon the Taupo Plateau. The bottom one must include the Taupo Plateau because it starts at sea level, thus it is a no…[Read more]

Anthony: I would think if God told them that the Earth was round no one would believe in God.
Mike What reason would they have had to doubt Him?  Could they prove that they weren’t living on a round earth?

Where did God say the world was flat? What is your no1 Flat Earth proof verse in scripture Mike, you never seem to answer that.

God never tol…[Read more]

But either way, we are seeing a whole bunch of mountain that should be hidden behind the curve, right?  And either way, you should be able to see everything above the yellow line on the second picture every day, right?  So the fact you can only see the part above the yellow line on days when you can also see everything below it shows that my con…

[Read more]

T8, does it seem plausible and rational to you that we can watch a refracted projection of the moon slowly eclipse in the sky while the actual moon is over the horizon and directly in line with the earth and sun?  Does it seem plausible and rational that this refracted projection of the moon could be in the sky if the actual moon wasn’t pr…

[Read more]

Nick, you are clearly wrong about Jesus not being the Christ in the City of David because the scripture clearly says he was. You have some secret spirit that makes it mean he was not the Christ meaning this Spirit draws an opposite conclusion to the text.

Now here is another error you clearly make. You say that something is not true if it is not…[Read more]

The mainstream explanation for this impossible event is that the moon we see setting in the sky isn’t the real moon at all. At the very moment we’re watching this fake moon slowly set, the REAL moon has already COMPLETELY set and is directly between the earth and the sun. Do you understand the claim they are making?

In no way is anything fak…[Read more]

Your protestations that it was not necessary as he already had the Holy Spirit r in vain.

Always resorting to falsities Nick. What is the name of this spirit that guides you? Or perhaps you should just give up teaching and let judgement be a lot less harsh?

You say that Jesus partook of John’s baptism to become the Christ. Where is such a thing…[Read more]

@anthony. I do not post to convince these guys of their error but for the sake of people who read the forums. Yes it would be good to convince them too, but that is not my primary reason for refuting their doctrines as I have realised too that people protect their pet false doctrines even when scripture clearly refutes them.

Good post T8!

Thanks Edj.

Hi T8,
Still getting confused about the abilities of the prophetic Spirit?
Carnal men do.

A Spirit filled person would never teach that a man without the Spirit could be much greater than a man with the Spirit.

Back to the drawing board Nick. You took a wrong corner somewhere in the past.

Then do you actually believe the scriptures in, Act 13:22-23, and Rev 22:16, that show JESUS CAME FROM THE “SEED” of KING DAVID? Yes or no.e

It’s really simple Gene, the answer is of course I believe. So that is a yes. Have I not stressed the pint about Jesus Christ coming in the flesh? Why ask this question then?

God sent the Son into the…[Read more]