Gene

In 1 Thessalonians, believers were in danger of losing hope in the Second Coming. In 2 Thessalonians, Paul faced the opposite extreme, the idea that the Second Coming was either very imminent or already present in some spiritual way. 

Paul writes, however, that before Jesus returns a ‘man of sin’ must be revealed (2 Thess. 2 : 3), whose com…[Read more]

Berean……2 The 2….. is talking about the False Christ that sits in the temple  of God “the true temple of God”. Not a false temple, but the true temple,  now, who do you know that is a “MAN”  and is “NOW” being presented as a God? ,  is it not Jesus Christ himself that has taken a site in the “true” temple of God and being preached as a God?
[Read more]

To all……Here is a good example of how adding a definite article, can change the meaning of our text.

Paul said ……”By works of “the” law shall no flesh be Justified before God” , that on the surface seems like a contradiction  of scripture, right because  aren’t we told to keep the Law, didn’t Jesus tell the rich man to keep the commandments of…[Read more]

Proclaimer,  I agree , there is   “Only” one true God”,  and the Trinity is a lie, fostered on mankind by Satan himself and his deceived ministers.

Good post.

peace and love to you and yours Proclaimer…………gene

 
FOLLOWING 
Jesus’ Second Coming and the Counterfeit!

This is the work which the prophet Isaiah describes when he says, “Is it not to deal thy bread to
the hungry, and that thou bring the poor that are cast out to thy house? when thou seest the
naked, that thou cover him; and that thou hide not thyself from thine own flesh? Then shall
thy li…[Read more]

John 1:18 calls Jesus the begotten God. Therefore he must be God Almighty right?

“No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.”

Seems pretty clear doesn’t it. Jesus is God, the only begotten God.

Case closed……………….Not so fast.

John 1:18 is actually rendered in two…[Read more]

Hi Mike,

YOU: Hi Carmel,

Job 38:7 doesn’t say the morning stars and the sons of God MADE the earth. 

OK Mike,

So if we take what it says literally we can conclude that the morning stars and the sons of God simply watched God creating the world RIGHT?

SO THEY NEVER PARTICIPATED AT ALL IN CREATION!

GOD, INVISIBLE AND MYSTERIOUS SIMPLY CR…[Read more]

LU……Better Question,  Do you believe any of the hundreds if not thousand of scriptures that say Jesus was the “Son of God” , or are you going to hang on to One scripture over hundreds if not thousand that say the opposite?   You must then believe the whole Bible  is a lie then,  except for the “ONE” scripture you believing in.

Being hard heade…[Read more]

Hi to all

Daily Devotional

JEWISH AFRICANS

AN AMAZING FACT: For as long as anyone can remember the Lemba tribe in Africa has claimed to descend from Hebrew ancestors. The Lemba people look like regular Africans but have some very Jewish customs. For example they abstain from eating pork and other unclean foods. They are monotheistic, keep…[Read more]

@Proclaimer

Do you believe that John 1:18 in the NASB 1995  refers to Jesus as the only begotten God?

NASB 1995
No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.

If not, who do you believe John is referring to as “the only begotten God?”

Mike, if I don’t think that Australia exists and others are not allowed to show photos, videos, or audios, then what?

Let’s imagine that getting to Australia was as hard as getting to the moon.

Then I guess that Australia wouldn’t exist because there would be no proof.

Lol. #5yearoldmentality

Now listen up… In the future, please refrain from posting images of the earth as a ball (with or without volcanoes erupting) as if it proves we live on a ball – because, as we both agree, it clearly doesn’t. Comprehend?

In return I promise to never post an image of the earth as a ball to prove that we don’t live on a ball.

Lol. You want photo e…[Read more]

It seems that you agree with MY point that an image of a ball doesn’t mean we live on a ball. Clap clap.

Dude, a two year old knows that.

What you do not seem to comprehend is that photoshopping an image doesn’t mean the place you took the photo is fake.

I have a couple of photo websites and have enhanced nearly all the photos. In many c…[Read more]

It seems that you agree with MY point that an image of a ball doesn’t mean we live on a ball. Clap clap. Well done.

Now listen up… In the future, please refrain from posting images of the earth as a ball (with or without volcanoes erupting) as if it proves anything – because as we now both agree, it clearly doesn’t. Comprehend?

I’ll get to…[Read more]

The word “likewise” is the equivalent of you acknowledging my point that an image of a ball doesn’t mean we live on that ball.  Thank you.

Exactly. Clap clap Mike. Now listen up.

It doesn’t mean that the ball doesn’t exist. The same thing applies if I photoshopped a photo of some kangaroos. That wouldn’t mean Australia doesn’t exist.

Comprehend?

Why Did Scientists Suppress The Lab-Leak Theory?
In private, they said it was plausible. In public, they called it a conspiracy theory.

https://breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com/2022/01/matt-ridley-why-did-scientists-suppress.html

Mike:  The point was to show you that just because you see an image of a ball earth doesn’t mean the image is a real photograph – and therefore doesn’t prove that we live on a ball.

 

Proclaimer:  Likewise, when I post a photo of kangaroos jumping, that doesn’t prove that Australia exists.

The word “likewise” is the equivalent of you acknowled…[Read more]

LU:  Mike,

You said: but where did the water come from?

Perhaps this river of the water of life supplied the water that covered the earth.

We’re just moving the problem further into the past. 🙂  And what was the river of life made FROM?  Kathi, I believe that God is the only thing that is from eternity.  Do you also believe that?  Or do you beli…[Read more]

Berean:  For by him (Jesus)were all things created…

Okay… but is the Bible correct that (Jesus) created the earth from water?  Or is BIG SCIENCE correct that the earth began as molten magma derived from a swirling cloud of space dust?

That’s the question I’m asking here, Berean.  What do you think?  Who is correct?  The Bible?  Or BIG SCIENCE?