Carmel: OK, Mike, THE PROPHET/GOD CHOSE DEFINITELY THE SAME TERMS USED IN GENESIS 1:2 ATTENTION PLEASE:

IN ORDER TO MAKE THINGS CLEAR, THAT  WHAT DID OCCUR IN GENESIS 1:2  IS GOING TO HAPPEN AGAIN TO THE LAND OF ISRAEL.

I see.  So then when God made a PROMISE to Noah that He would never again destroy the earth by water, God was lying?

And for…[Read more]

How the World Economic Forum Controls the World
The World Economic Forum is an NGO with a lot of influence. Among the alumni of its Young Global Leaders program are leaders in tech, government, business, advocacy and other fields.

LU:  <span style=”color: #ff0000;”>Jesus is the only begotten God, the Lord of lords…</span>

Is the Father also the Lord of lords?

LU:  <span style=”color: #ff0000;”> was sent from the Yahweh Unity to serve this Unity as He emptied Himself and became man, the promised Messiah.</span>

So the unity of Jesus and the Father sent Jesus as Jesus’ an…[Read more]

Very easy “Yes or No” questions that were ignored by Proclaimer (as usual)…
PROCLAIMER, DO YOU NOW UNDERSTAND THAT BIG BANG, DEEP TIME UNIFORMITARIANISM, AND COMMON DESCENT EVOLUTION ARE NOT EVEN A PART OF SCIENCE, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT OBSERVABLE, TESTABLE, AND REPEATABLE?
DO YOU FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT SCIENCE IS THE COLLECTION OF DATA – W…[Read more]

LU:  Speaking of being our righteousness, show me where the verb “is” in the Hebrew, to be fair, if you don’t see them, you should back off of claiming that it is there and accusing me of mistranslating. Go ahead show me, I’ll wait.

I didn’t accuse you of mistranslating.  As far as I know, you have never translated the Bible before.  Nor did I…[Read more]

Hi Mike,

You: Carmel, the two scriptures are not “opposite” – just completely unrelated. 

ME: WRONG Mike, THEY ARE!

Like I said, if your theory is correct, then Jeremiah lived on the “perfect earth”, prophesied about the subsequent creation of the “very good but not perfect” earth,

ME: NO I’M AFRAID! THAT’S YOUR MISUNDERSTANDI…[Read more]

Thanks Proclaimer, you are probably right.

But my post was to show that the forthcoming end time events will commence with signs in the sun and moon.   They will be very dramatic and world changing.

Mike another thing playing the upper case GOD, and the lower case god thing,  is not true because there no little god’s   ALL OF OUR SCRIPTURES WERE WRITTEN ORIGINALLY IN “UPPER” CASE LETTERS ,  UNTIL about 900 years ago, as I recall. 

You have not yet come to the true MEANING of the word GOD.   READ , “THE MACHANICAL TRANSLATION OF Genesi…[Read more]

Hi Adam,

Have I asked you if you have read the Jewish Targums? Do you know about them?

Hi sis Kathi, yes you had asked on Targums in other thread  “Jewish Messiah”.

Ok, what do you want from them on this new thread on “Many Gods of the Bible”?

Mike…….by God saying the man would become as “we are”, does not mean the,  “WE”, are other Gods, or he would have said , as we “God’s are”.  You have inserted the word God’s there, but scripture doe not say “we God’s”  now does it?, so that is a assumption on you part,  but consider this,  that simply “knowing” or experiencing ,  Good and ev…[Read more]

Proclaimer, your rules state that you are not allowed to post on the site until you answer the hot seat questions. But you are posting all over the place without once directly answering any of the questions I’ve asked on the hot seat thread. You refused to answer if there is any reason to assume that any of the sun – Earth day/night cycles were…[Read more]

Finally; after the Millennium, there will no longer be a sun or moon for Eternity. Isaiah 60:19-20, Revelation 22:5

I don’t think it says that there will be no sun or moon. Rather, we won’t need the sun or moon. Why? Because the light from the sun and moon will be like a candle compared to the light of God.

You’ll have no more need of the sun by…[Read more]

What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Seriously, not controversial at all. Just ask those active on HN if they agree that being the Son means that he was born of the Father.

I wouldn’t judge most believers by the active members at this time as they differ substantially. Most understand that the Son has the nature of his Father, but this leads them into fabricated doctrines which is a…[Read more]

Not so gadam. If a bible verse can be interpreted say 3 different ways, you ignore the ways that fit with observation or compatibility with other scriptures. You have an agenda to debunk the bible, so of course it is logical that you are anything but neutral.

You may say I am the opposite and not neutral and that is true too. But I am honest…

[Read more]

Proclaimer,

You said:

After all, being the Son means that he was born of the Father and from that, you can easily derive what nature he would have. Further, it wouldn’t be controversial at all.

Seriously, not controversial at all. Just ask those active on HN if they agree that being the Son means that he was born of the Father.

Mike says the S…[Read more]

Hey Mike. So many errors in your answer. I cannot wait to address them when I have time.

Hi Proclaimer, in fact it’s the other way round the logic. I am on neutral ground and without any bias on the ancient texts than most of the religious people. And I make statements based on certain evidences from the historical documents than the biased religious conceptions.

Not so gadam. If a bible verse can be interpreted say 3 different w…[Read more]

Mike,

Regarding this post:

LU:  Then the Father (the God no one has seen of John 1:18) said to the Son (the only begotten God of John 1:18), “Let Us make man in Our image (the only begotten God who is the image of the God no one has seen, Col 1:15)…
How do you know?  Why couldn’t it have been the Son saying, “Let us make man in our image”?

A…

[Read more]