Mike,

Who is El Elyon or El Shaddai ?

Mike,

You asked:

Does the fact that Jesus (in Rev 17:44), Nebuchadnezzar (in Daniel 2:37), and Artaxerxes (in Ezra 7:12) are all called King of kings NECESSARILY mean that they are part of some “Unity Entity” comprised of three persons?  Yes or No?

No

Does the fact that Yahweh (in Deut 10:17) and Jesus (in Rev 17:14) are both called the Lord of l…

[Read more]

Mike,

You said:

So your argument that Jesus came to earth to say, “Hey, btw, your God’s name is Yahweh” is ridiculous,

That is not my argument. Jesus is saying that the God, that is the God of Israel, that specific God who’s name is YHVH, is His biological Father, He is YHVH’s only begotten Son and that His Father gave Him His name, YHVH.

Mike,

You asked:

Kathi, do you REALLY believe that “their belly is their belly” is the the correct meaning?  REALLY?  Come on, now.

No, I believe that their god is their belly and their belly is their god.

Proclaimer,

You Saïd:There are a lot of holes in your understanding.

Because God had already created the heavens and the earth before Day 1 concluded.

You do realise that the Sun, Moon, and Stars are the heavens right? 

Me

My understanding is that God created the heavens and the earth IN 6 STEPS + THE SABBATH DAY

STEP 1
GOD CREATES AN E…[Read more]

Mike,

You said:

 the point is that EVERYONE knew that Jesus was referring to Yahweh as both his own God and heavenly Father and our God and heavenly Father.

They knew it after He mentioned it for sure.

For example…in this passage Jesus kept talking about “my Father” this and “My Father” that, referring to God and the Pharisees basically…[Read more]

Hi Mike,

You said:

 Unfortunately, one of us is apparently oblivious to the FACT that the Son OF God cannot very well BE the very God that he is the Son OF – and therefore, if the son of God in question is a god at all, he must NECESSARILY be a DIFFERENT god.

The Son of God can very well be a member of a unity that consists of a Father and a Son.…[Read more]

Danny: Well, some pilots or maybe some explorer pilots in all our history must have flown to the edge or even beyond the edge.

Explorers have indeed made it to the edge.

Danny:  I will take a look at it. (200 Proofs the Earth is Not a Spinning Ball: http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html )…

[Read more]

Proclaimer: Are you saying that there is the heavens and earth and the sun, moon, and stars are not part of that description?

Interestingly, that is the very subject of two of my three questions to you today, which expose how your premise is faulty.  I can’t wait to see your answers.

The questions are in posts #932642, #932643, and #932644.  Th…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  Yourself and Mike have no explanation.

Let’s see how you do with those first three questions that turn your theory against itself. Then we can continue.

Berean:  LIKE MANY, I CONSIDERED IT COULD BE SUNLIGHT…

It can’t very well be sunlight if the sun didn’t exist until 3 days later.

Proclaimer: So the heavens, earth, light, day, and night were already established. Can you see that?

If so, then what is Day 4 about?

If your premise is flawed, so will be your conclusion.  But we’ll get to that after I see how you address those first three points I made to you today.  (I don’t want to overwhelm you.)

Berean:  I don’t agree on everything with Mike, far from it…

Really Berean?  You had to add “far from it”?  😅😂

Just messing with you.  I believe that we agree on many more things than we disagree on. 🙏

Proclaimer:  Your moon theory is easy to explain. I took a video of the moon with feathered edges, so that debunks you.

Your video shows no feathering whatsoever.  Nor does it show a specular highlight.  Both are REQUIRED on a rock in outer space that is lit up by a single light source.  But neither can be seen on any photo or video of the moo…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  God’s own description say The Day he created the heavens and earth. And this including light took place BEFORE the conclusion of Day 1. 

You have argued that Gen 1:1 means that the creation of heaven and earth were already completed (and what follows is how God “terraformed” the earth), right?  And you seem to think that the crea…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  The sun is both part of the heavens and is also light. Maybe you are unaware of that.

You like to imagine that the creation of “heaven” INCLUDES all the things IN heaven, like the sun, moon, and stars.  Why do you do that?  You don’t conflate “the day God created the earth” with “the day God created the earth, the sea, vegetation, fi…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  Nope. God’s own description say The Day he created the heavens and earth. And this including light took place BEFORE the conclusion of Day 1.

You are already aware that the word “day” can be used idiomatically to refer to an unspecified general period of time, so we don’t have to go over that again.  Unfortunately for you, the plu…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  If people can be pillars, then there is no reason to believe that the earth sits on stilts just as people are not stilts. Spiritually minded people will understand what it means. Carnal men will only see a physical pillar. Likewise, when Jesus returns  he will have a samurai coming out of his mouth rather than understanding what it m…

[Read more]

Hi Mike,

You: If you didn’t think pilots could see the curve, then why did you ask specifically about pilots?

Me: Well, some pilots or maybe some explorer pilots in all our history must have flown to the edge or even beyond the edge.

You: The above is one of the many great facts contained in “200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball”. They are a…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  The first problem is that you need to come up with a complicated answer whereas the heliocentric model is really simple and this one single model makes all phenomena simple like the orbits of wandering stars for example.

Are you under the impression that the current heliocentric model just popped into existence and explained…[Read more]