Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 13,641 through 13,660 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #283226
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 05 2012,19:29)
    Mike,

    Yes, I agree with you on this point that there are two separate wills that Yahshua was speaking of here, his own will and that of his and our Father Yahweh.


    There is no other logical way to understand it, Frank. Nick is grasping at nonsense to make his doctrine appear to hold water, IMO.

    #283228
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 07 2012,11:49)
    Hi t8,
    The WORD did not speak for God but spoke as the servant Son.
    WE will come to you[Jn14]


    You make it sound like the Word is a person that is not Jesus and doesn't always speak for God.

    We will come to you is different to “Not my will but your will”.
    And I myself can say WE are discussing something in this thread. What does that prove though?

    I am not really following what you are saying Nick. It is confusing.

    #283231
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 05 2012,19:35)
    Mike,

    What do you propose the proper translation of the verse to be if you are not in agreement with the translation Nick has posted?


    Frank,

    There are three legitimate possibilities for the translation of John 1:1c……………..

    1.  Colwell's Rule allows for the addition of the definite article in certain cases, allowing for “the word was THE god” – which we would translate in English as “the word was God”.

    2.  The Hebrew and Greek languages did not use the indefinite article, but our language does.  Any of the over 7000 times you read the word “a” in scripture, it has been added by an English translator so the sentence makes sense to us in English.  So “the word was a god” is likewise grammatically correct.

    (Note that the Coptic language was the first indefinite article using language into which the scriptures were translated.  And in the Coptic Bible, 1:1c reads, “and the Word was a god”.)

    3.  The third possibility is a qualitative “god”.  I'm sure you know that the Hebrew word “adam” means “man”, or “mankind”, right?  If 1:1c was qualitative, it would be like saying, “In the beginning, Cain was with THE Adam, and Cain was adam” – meaning he was with THE one known properly as Adam, and he too was a member of mankind.  The thing with the qualitative stance is that “a god” would work equally well, if not better.  For instance, in my example above, we are more likely to say “and Cain was a man” than we are to say “and Cain was man” – although they both deliver the same meaning.

    Because obviously, if you are man (of mankind), then you are equally “a man”.

    Frank, many translations offer “and the Word was divine”, or “the Word was godlike”, or something to effect of those two.  But these translations are not possible because the word “theos” in 1:1c is not written in the adjectival form.  

    So basically, it all boils down to one of two translations.  Either the word was THE God he was WITH – which doesn't make any sense to me; or the word was A god who was WITH THE God in the beginning.

    The only sensible translation is “the Word was with THE God, and the Word was a god”.

    (Keep in mind the word “theos” didn't refer only to God Almighty, but to many different “mighty ones” – as you yourself have pointed out in a previous post.)

    #283232
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 06 2012,00:07)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 06 2012,14:56)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 05 2012,18:27)
    This concept occurred to me and I submit it to see if it finds favour among the spiritual.


    Wouldn't it have been better for you to check if there were scriptures to support the concept before submitting it?

    Wouldn't it have been better for you to make sure it didn't blatantly contradict many scriptures?


    I think it is good to submit ideas to see what others think. To the right people this is a good thing.

    Submitting ideas or concepts that have no scriptural backing yet, and teaching it as truth is another thing of course.


    Of course you are right, t8. I should have worded that better.

    My point was if scriptures have showed your concept to be in error, it's time to let it go.

    #283233
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 06 2012,02:30)
    Hi Mike,

    The Bible doesn't say 'God was with God'?
    The Bible says “The Word” was with God.


    That's too funny, Ed! :D

    Isn't it you who tries to tell us all that the Word IS the Holy Spirit which IS God Himself? ???

    According to YOUR understanding, it would most definitely be saying that God was WITH God.

    #283235
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 06 2012,13:01)
    Mike,

    “Heaven Net” only knows where you got the idea that the translation that Nick submitted says “God was with God”!  :D


    Frank, pay attention.  Nick believes the Word was the spirit of Christ, which is of God and also God.

    So it is his reasoning that makes God be with God, not mine.  I was merely pointing out that God cannot be WITH God.

    In fact Frank, anyone who believes in a literal translation of “and the Word was THE God” apparently believes that God can be WITH God.

    #283236
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 07 2012,09:07)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 07 2012,11:49)
    Hi t8,
    The WORD did not speak for God but spoke as the servant Son.
    WE will come to you[Jn14]


    You make it sound like the Word is a person that is not Jesus and doesn't always speak for God.

    We will come to you is different to “Not my will but your will”.
    And I myself can say WE are discussing something in this thread. What does that prove though?

    I am not really following what you are saying Nick. It is confusing.


    T8………What Nick is saying is the word was GOD (IN) Jesus speaking directly through HIM. That is Just what Paladin and I have been saying all along. The LOGOS was (IN) Jesus , but that does not Make Jesus the LOGOS himself .

    GOD who at different time spoke to us “Thought” the Prophets has spoken to us “THROUGH” a Son. It still was GOD Speaking via his SPIRIT.

    Thomas clearly said  my Lord “AND” my GOD That was who was present there. It was the Lord Jesus Christ “AND” GOD . What is stopping you people from understanding that?

    T8 it sounds confusing because your don't seem to understand the concept that GOD can and Does (INDWELL) His creation by his Spirit, he is omni-PRESENT. can be inside of you or outside of you at any time he wants to.  

    Remember where it say “It is GOD who Works (IN) us both to WILL and do of His good Pleasure.” That is a true statement T8.

    peace and love………………………………………..gene

    #283242
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 07 2012,08:56)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 05 2012,19:29)
    Mike,

    Yes, I agree with you on this point that there are two separate wills that Yahshua was speaking of here, his own will and that of his and our Father Yahweh.


    There is no other logical way to understand it, Frank.  Nick is grasping at nonsense to make his doctrine appear to hold water, IMO.


    Mike,

    I was thinking maybe Nick was reasoning that since he came to the knowledge that Yahshua was the spokesman of Yahweh's word that he then erroneously concluded that EVERY WORD that Yahshua spoke was in actuality Father Yahweh speaking through him, and that he had no words that he spoke concerning himself directly. Yahshua would have been nothing more than a programmed robot without it's own will if this were true. I believe Nick was trapped in his error by someone and in turn continues to try and defend his error not wanting to appear that he himself is not directly inspired by the “God” that he worships. Many are like this in not wanting to admit that they are wrong after going through so many doctrinal changes in their lifetime. It is like they came to a conclusion at some point in their lifetime that they are finally being directly inspired by their “God” and will say anything to defend the “God” that they believe that they are finally directly inspired by. I have heard many proclaim that they have finally come to the knowledge of the truth after someone has shown them the error in what they had previously believed. I'm not saying that I am right about how I feel about Nick defending such an illogical error, but it certainly seems that way to me. I myself hold to changing my stance on certain things that I believe in light of Father Yahweh's word as it is revealed to me for the rest of my life, because I believe that in the future Kingdom of Yahweh that we will be directly guided into what is truth and what is not by Father Yahweh Himself. At this point in time, I simply believe what it is that I believe until I change what it is that I believe when Father Yahweh directly communicates to me what it is that I should believe. Father Yahweh has never directly communicated to me and until then I can only believe what it is that I believe and change what it is that I believe from my studying the diverse translations of what is supposedly to be His inspired word.

    #283244
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Good post, Frank. I agree with all of it.

    #283250
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Mar. 07 2012,09:39)

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 07 2012,09:07)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 07 2012,11:49)
    Hi t8,
    The WORD did not speak for God but spoke as the servant Son.
    WE will come to you[Jn14]


    You make it sound like the Word is a person that is not Jesus and doesn't always speak for God.

    We will come to you is different to “Not my will but your will”.
    And I myself can say WE are discussing something in this thread. What does that prove though?

    I am not really following what you are saying Nick. It is confusing.


    T8………What Nick is saying is the word was GOD (IN) Jesus speaking directly through HIM. That is Just what Paladin and I have been saying all along. The LOGOS was (IN) Jesus , but that does not Make Jesus the LOGOS himself .

    GOD who at different time spoke to us “Thought” the Prophets has spoken to us “THROUGH” a Son. It still was GOD Speaking via his SPIRIT.

    Thomas clearly said  my Lord “AND” my GOD That was who was present there. It was the Lord Jesus Christ “AND” GOD . What is stopping you people from understanding that?

    T8 it sounds confusing because your don't seem to understand the concept that GOD can and Does (INDWELL) His creation by his Spirit, he is omni-PRESENT. can be inside of you or outside of you at any time he wants to.  

    Remember where it say “It is GOD who Works (IN) us both to WILL and do of His good Pleasure.”  That is a true statement T8.

    peace and love………………………………………..gene


    Gene,

    I also hold to the belief that when Thomas is said to say in translation “My Lord and my God!” that he was speaking of two district beings with one being Yahshua as his Master (“Lord”) and the other being Father Yahweh as his Almighty One (“God”). I believe that he was saying this in exclamation as many translators translate what he said with the particular punctuation “!”. I believe Thomas reacted in this manner to his finally seeing the evidence of Yahshua being resurrected from the dead that he previously said wanted to see Yahshua's wounds and then he would believe. I had thought that this was not what was being reference to though. I had thought that it was initially being directed to Yahshua's “I am” statement. I had thought that Nick had concluded that Father Yahweh was directly speaking through Yahshua saying that He was “I AM” as in giving reference to Himself as the “The Great I Am” or “I Am That I Am”. I myself believe that Yahshua was simply saying “I am” in reference to himself just as anyone else would say “I am” in reference to themselves. Please correct me if I am wrong concerning this.

    #283252
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 07 2012,10:23)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Mar. 07 2012,09:39)

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 07 2012,09:07)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 07 2012,11:49)
    Hi t8,
    The WORD did not speak for God but spoke as the servant Son.
    WE will come to you[Jn14]


    You make it sound like the Word is a person that is not Jesus and doesn't always speak for God.

    We will come to you is different to “Not my will but your will”.
    And I myself can say WE are discussing something in this thread. What does that prove though?

    I am not really following what you are saying Nick. It is confusing.


    T8………What Nick is saying is the word was GOD (IN) Jesus speaking directly through HIM. That is Just what Paladin and I have been saying all along. The LOGOS was (IN) Jesus , but that does not Make Jesus the LOGOS himself .

    GOD who at different time spoke to us “Thought” the Prophets has spoken to us “THROUGH” a Son. It still was GOD Speaking via his SPIRIT.

    Thomas clearly said  my Lord “AND” my GOD That was who was present there. It was the Lord Jesus Christ “AND” GOD . What is stopping you people from understanding that?

    T8 it sounds confusing because your don't seem to understand the concept that GOD can and Does (INDWELL) His creation by his Spirit, he is omni-PRESENT. can be inside of you or outside of you at any time he wants to.  

    Remember where it say “It is GOD who Works (IN) us both to WILL and do of His good Pleasure.”  That is a true statement T8.

    peace and love………………………………………..gene


    Gene,

    I also hold to the belief that when Thomas is said to say in translation “My Lord and my God!” that he was speaking of two district beings with one being Yahshua as his Master (“Lord”) and the other being Father Yahweh as his Almighty One (“God”). I believe that he was saying this in exclamation as many translators translate what he said with the particular punctuation “!”. I believe Thomas reacted in this manner to his finally seeing the evidence of Yahshua being resurrected from the dead that he previously said wanted to see Yahshua's wounds and then he would believe. I had thought that this was not what was being reference to though. I had thought that it was initially being directed to Yahshua's “I am” statement. I had thought that Nick had concluded that Father Yahweh was directly speaking through Yahshua saying that He was “I AM” as in giving reference to Himself as the “The Great I Am” or “I Am That I Am”. I myself believe that Yahshua was simply saying “I am” in reference to himself just as anyone else would say “I am” in reference to themselves. Please correct me if I am wrong concerning this.


    CORRECTION:

    “… he previously said *he wanted to see Yahshua's wounds …”

    #283254
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 07 2012,09:37)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 06 2012,13:01)
    Mike,

    “Heaven Net” only knows where you got the idea that the translation that Nick submitted says “God was with God”!  :D


    Frank, pay attention.  Nick believes the Word was the spirit of Christ, which is of God and also God.

    So it is his reasoning that makes God be with God, not mine.  I was merely pointing out that God cannot be WITH God.

    In fact Frank, anyone who believes in a literal translation of “and the Word was THE God” apparently believes that God can be WITH God.


    Mike,

    I also believe as Nick that the word of Father Yahweh is the spirit of Messiah, which is of Yahweh and also Yahweh.

    No, I believe it is your reasoning that makes “God be with God”, since Nick has never said “God is with God.” to my knowledge. I believe it is your erroneous interpretation of what Nick actually said in his posting the translation that he posted. Still you have not given me how you believe this verse should be translated as opposed to the translation Nick has submitted. his is what I had initially asked you for.

    #283256
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 06 2012,17:41)
    Mike,

    I also believe as Nick that the word of Father Yahweh is the spirit of Messiah, which is of Yahweh and also Yahweh.


    Examine your own words above, Frank.  Let me repost it with some of them struck through:

    I also believe as Nick that the word of Father Yahweh is the spirit of Messiah, which is of Yahweh and also Yahweh.

    If you believe the Word IS Yahweh, then in your understanding, John 1:1 speaks of Yahweh being WITH Yahweh.  There is no way around it.

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 06 2012,17:41)
    Still you have not given me how you believe this verse should be translated as opposed to the translation Nick has submitted. his is what I had initially asked you for.


    2nd post on the previous page.

    #283257
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 07 2012,09:32)

    Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 06 2012,02:30)
    Hi Mike,

    The Bible doesn't say 'God was with God'?
    The Bible says “The Word” was with God.


    That's too funny, Ed!  :D

    Isn't it you who tries to tell us all that the Word IS the Holy Spirit which IS God Himself?  ???

    According to YOUR understanding, it would most definitely be saying that God was WITH God.


    Mike,

    Then let me ask Ed J what it is that he believes …

    Ed J,

    Do you believe “The Bible … say[s] 'God was with God'? or do you believe 'The Bible says “The Word” was with God.' or do you believe both?

    #283261
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Like I said Frank, you guys can't have your cake and eat it too. If you are of the understanding that the Word was LITERALLY THE GOD, then there is no choice but for John 1:1 to be saying that God was WITH God.

    #283263
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 07 2012,10:55)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 06 2012,17:41)
    Mike,

    I also believe as Nick that the word of Father Yahweh is the spirit of Messiah, which is of Yahweh and also Yahweh.


    Examine your own words above, Frank.  Let me repost it with some of them struck through:

    I also believe as Nick that the word of Father Yahweh is the spirit of Messiah, which is of Yahweh and also Yahweh.

    If you believe the Word IS Yahweh, then in your understanding, John 1:1 speaks of Yahweh being WITH Yahweh.  There is no way around it.

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Mar. 06 2012,17:41)
    Still you have not given me how you believe this verse should be translated as opposed to the translation Nick has submitted. his is what I had initially asked you for.


    2nd post on the previous page.


    Mike,

    No, my understanding is not that Yahchanan [John] 1:1 speaks of Yahweh being WITH Yahweh. I have never said 'Yahchanan 1:1 speaks of Yahweh being WITH Yahweh.' If you believe that I have actually said this, please feel free to copy and paste such a foolish quote as this that you believe that I have said in your next response to me.

    #283266
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 07 2012,11:04)
    Like I said Frank, you guys can't have your cake and eat it too.  If you are of the understanding that the Word was LITERALLY THE GOD, then there is no choice but for John 1:1 to be saying that God was WITH God.


    Mike,

    I am not of the understanding 'that the Word was LITERALLY THE GOD”.' I have never said such foolishness as this! In fact, I have never personally addressed our Heavenly Father and Creator Yahweh as a mere “God”.

    I am also not aware of ANY translation of Yahchanan 1:1 that is worded “God was WITH God.”

    #283267
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 07 2012,11:04)
    Like I said Frank, you guys can't have your cake and eat it too.  If you are of the understanding that the Word was LITERALLY THE GOD, then there is no choice but for John 1:1 to be saying that God was WITH God.


    Mike,

    BTW, when I have a cake that belongs to me, I am most certainly going to have it and eat it too! I love cake, and especially with icing! :D

    #283269
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Mar. 07 2012,02:31)
    To All….> You can not separate GOD from His words no more then you can be separated from you Words, God who is Spirit was (IN) Jesus , if you can come to Just see that it will correct much of your confusions.  WE are all to be Judged by our words and God is judged and Justified by His words. If you just understood what a WORD (IS) that along should explain  things to you , a WORD (IS) intelligent utterance  That is all a word is and it is produced by the SPIRIT working (IN) a Person, rather God or Man. God who (IS) SPIRIT was (IN) Jesus.  Why is this so simple truth so hard for anyone to understand is amazing to me.

    peace and love to you all ……………………………………………….Gene


    Hi Gene,

    They can't understand because of what
    the systems of religion has taught them. (Col.2:22)

    Your brother
    in Christ, Jesus.
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    holycitybiblecode.org

    #283270
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Mar. 07 2012,02:45)
    Terricca…………….Just read the scriptures start with Genesis and see what GOD SPOKE it is just that simple are you so confused by false religions you can't even figure that out? Jesus even said they were not “HIS” words. I just cant believe how confused you people are here.

    peace and love…………………………………………………gene


    Hi Gene,

    They have to ignore much Scripture to hold onto the traditions of men.

    Your brother
    in Christ, Jesus.
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    holycitybiblecode.org

Viewing 20 posts - 13,641 through 13,660 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account