Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 12,521 through 12,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #272685
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 15 2012,01:35)
    No, somebody recently posted their own chart of Hebrew letters and the sounds they make.  In that chart, there was a “w” sound listed.

    Do you remember what I'm talking about?


    Shalom Mike, I vaguely remember; but it really doesn’t matter, because he was wrong!

                                               Yahweh? (Link to a Hebrew site)

    “It was later speculated that perhaps the Masoretes reversed the vowels for Adonai
    when applied to the letters יהוה in the running text, so some attempted to “correct”
    the pronunciation by pronouncing the name “Yahoveh” or “Yahveh”, This. too, is
    incorrect (though the construct “Yah” probably is part of the original pronunciation
    (e.g.,see Psalm 68:4)). Note that Yahweh is most likely also an incorrect translation, since there is no “w” sound in Hebrew.”

                                               YÄ-hä-vā!

    “In hebrew, the name that we are using for our creator is changing according to the context .
    The most common name is : יהוה (YAHAVA) and i guess that's the name you mentioned.
    we also use ” ADONAY” for the creator , and both of these names are considered holy and
    sacred and one cannot use these names in vain. Other less formal and holy  names are :
    “HASHEM” (“the name”), “elohim” (God), “el-shaday” (from the bible) and some more.
    The name in hebrew for Jesus Christ is : “yeshu” or “yeshuah” (ישוע) but not YAHUSHUA  
    as you mentioned, because this name (YAHUSHUA) in hebrew means  “Joshua” (book of the Bible).
    Hope you'll find this answer satisfactory,
    Roy” (Link to another Hebrew site)

    Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17)
    יהוה האלהים=117  (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm!
    Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16)

    #272686
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Pastry @ Jan. 16 2012,22:25)
    Hi all!  the reason why the translators used LORD for Almighty God, and not Jehovah, is because they didn't want o mispronounce His name, and used either Almighty God or LORD instead…in all capital letters….. While Lord in the New Testament was used for Jesus…..all titles….Yaweh is the Hebrew word for Jehovah, so using Jehovah is not wrong to use, as far as I understand….The definition for His name is
    The everlasting one
    The self-existing one
    The immortal one
    What makes me wonder why one man comes on hee an knows it better then some tranlstors do,,, I for one do not go what He says….Irene


    Hi Irene,

    Substitute titles such as ADONAY(LORD), HASHEM(The Name),
    and including all mispronunciations were done by the Jews in an
    attempt to keep others from using God's name in vain. (Exodus 20:7)

    Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for
    the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. (Ex 20:7)

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #272801
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 16 2012,06:35)
    Note that Yahweh is most likely also an incorrect translation, since there is no “w” sound in Hebrew.”


    If your source is CERTAIN that the Hebrew has no “w” sound, then why do they say “most likely”? ???

    #272859
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 17 2012,10:46)

    Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 16 2012,06:35)
    Note that Yahweh is most likely also an incorrect translation, since there is no “w” sound in Hebrew.”


    If your source is CERTAIN that the Hebrew has no “w” sound, then why do they say “most likely”?  ???


    Hi Mike,

    Because modern Hebrew has no “W” sound. I challenge
    anyone to post some Hebrew words “with” a “W” sound.
    If there are not any than how can that possibly be right?

    Did you not see the other Hebrew link, where consensus
    has God's name pronounced (YÄ-hä-vā) as I suggest?

    Dr. J. Strong: Hebrew #3069 yeh-ho-vee' ;
    P-R-E-T-T-Y  CLOSE,  don't you agree?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #272864
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    For what it is worth.

    Many years ago, I asked a Jewish friend what the numerical value of W was in Hebrew. . He said something like this: “There is no W, but that letter was actually V (Vav). He then told me that Vav also represented the number 6. So I said to him that it meant that WWW had the value of 666 and he agreed that this was so given that W become Vs.

    Like I said, “for what it is worth”.

    YHWH or YHVH. I suppose it is like comparing Yeshua with Joshua.

    #272868
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Jan. 17 2012,20:24)
    For what it is worth.

    Many years ago, I asked a Jewish friend what the numerical value of W was in Hebrew. . He said something like this: “There is no W, but that letter was actually V (Vav). He then told me that Vav also represented the number 6. So I said to him that it meant that WWW had the value of 666 and he agreed that this was so given that W become Vs.

    Like I said, “for what it is worth”.

    YHWH or YHVH. I suppose it is like comparing Yeshua with Joshua.


    Hi T8,

    Comparing  YHWH to YHVH  is like comparing  “Yəsh-yü-ă”  to  “YÄ-shü-ă”

    The Hebrew word [ישוע] Yəsh-yü-ă merely means ‘He will save’.
    Distancing [יה]’s salvation from the man Jesus is a rejection of
    YÄ-shü-ă as Messiah. This subtle distinction of [ישוע] Yəsh-yü-ă
    purposely substituted for [יהשוע] YÄ-shü-ă usually goes unnoticed
    when heard by a non Hebrew-speaking person; nevertheless, this
    wholly implies a specific denial of Jesus as their Lord and Savior.

    Jesus’ authentic name [יהשוע] YÄ-shü-ă has a direct connection to GOD’s name [יה] in that YÄ
    is the first part of Jesus’ Hebrew name. GOD’s name is not vocalized in the English translation
    of the name Jesus and therefore misses the precise exactness and direct authentic connection
    to God’s Hebrew name [יה] YÄ. Jesus’ Name in Hebrew means: (“YÄ is salvation” [יה]+[ישע]=[יהשוע])
    or the salvation of “GOD the Father”. Therefore [יהשוע] “Jesus” name authentically establishes [יהוה] “JEHOVAH” as the Highest Name.

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #272939
    Ed J
    Participant

    Hi T8,

    It is like reading the many corrupted versions of the bible,
    sure can get truth out of them, but you can also learn error.

             YHVH wants us to come out of confusion.

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #273085
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    To ALL,

    There is the MODERN Hebrew and there is the BIBLICAL (or ANCIENT) Hebrew pronunciation. Pronunciations change from one language to another and one must also take into consideration diverse dialectical changes in any specific language which in turn produce various pronunciations. 'YHWH' is merely a transliteration/transcription of our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name into our English language. 'Yahweh' is simply one of various transliterations/transcriptions of our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name into our English language with vowel letters added. Whether the vowels used in 'Yahweh' are accurate is also heavily debated among those who seek the most accurate pronunciation that they believe that was used by the saints and prophets of old and as originally pronounced to them. My stance is that no one knows EXACTLY how our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name was pronounced to the saints and prophets of old since, all we have are the written records and not actual audio records as to ascertain how words and names were pronounced by them. There is also no instruction whatsoever in Scripture as to how we are to transliterate/transcribe our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name into our English language or any other language. I simply use 'Yahweh' because most scholars of the Hebrew language agree with this rendition of His Name into our English language. I do not proclaim that this rendition is EXACTLY how the saints and prophets of old ACTUALLY pronounced our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name. As to whether His Name should be pronounced/transliterated/transcribed with an English letter 'v' or 'w', the following article might be of some help:

    The Sacred Name:
    Yahveh or Yahweh?

    WHETHER to pronounce Yahweh’s Name with a “v” or “w” hinges on which letter accurately transliterates the sound of the Hebrew letter W or “waw” in the Tetragrammaton, YHWH.

    We must take into consideration the ancient pronunciation of the waw and whether “v”, “w” or “u” as we know them accurately reflect that ancient pronunciation.  The following information is derived from a number of sources, including G.B. Palatino’s Lettere Romane (1545). ‘U’ and ‘W’ are variants of ‘V’ which was being used for two different sounds in medieval England. ‘U’ was introduced to give a soft vowel sound as opposed to the harder consonant sound of ‘V’. ‘W’ began as a ligature. Two ‘V’ letter forms were joined into ‘VV’ to represent ‘double U’ in 12th-century England.  Those who use the “v” form of Yahweh’s Name (Yahveh) should note that the Name is spelled “Yahweh” in almost all academic publications, many by people well-studied in the Hebrew language, including Hebrew speakers. Hebrew linguists believe the third letter waw was in ancient times pronounced as “w” (hence it is named “waw”).

    In later Hebrew its pronunciation, influenced by European languages, was changed to “v” and the letter was later called “vav,” according to the Encyclopædia Judaica. The Judaica shows that the semitic languages nearest Israel use the “w” pronunciation as opposed to the “v” pronunciation found in those speakers of Hebrew living in or closer to Europe. Those using the “w” sound include Jews of Babylonia, Yemeni, Morocco, Samaria, the Sephardi (Temple Hebrew) and Portuguese. Those using the “v” sound of “waw” include Hebrew-speaking communities in Italy, Poland, Germany, and Lithuania. These Europeans picked up the Germanic “v” and transferred it to the waw.                                                    
    The change from W to V is very well known, for example, in most of the continental languages like German (also the descendants of Latin). We know from historical comparisons that direction of change in Latin was from W to V. English has remained faithful to an old W sound for over six thousand years, while it changed to V in Late Latin almost two thousand years ago (but had not yet changed in Classical Latin).  The “w” is formed by putting two “v” letters together, but it is called a double-u because it is made up of two letters originally pronounced as we do the “u.” One needs only to look at old government building architecture with inscriptions bearing a “v” but pronounced like a “u” to see that the “v” was originally a vowel sound like “u” (e.g. bvilding, Jvly).            

    It was not until the dictionary was published that a decided difference was made between the “v” and the “u.” It is more than coincidence that the U, V, and W occur together in our alphabet; it shows a common relationship that these letters had in derivation and similar pronunciation.                    

    The v is a consonant that some have used for the sound of the Hebrew waw in Yahweh’s Name (Yahveh). The problem is, the waw in His Name was considered a vowel anciently. In fact, all the letters of the Tetragrammaton are called vowels by Josephus (Wars of the Jews, 5.5.556) as well as by Hebrew grammars. Bagster’s Helps to Bible Study also says these are vowel-letters in the sacred Name, “as having been originally used to represent vowels, and they still frequently serve as vowels in combination with the points.” Bagster's says the waw represents the letters o or u.

    Another authority says, “The sound of waw a long time ago wasn’t ‘vav’ at all but ‘w’ and ‘w’ is weak. The Yemenite Jews of Arabia who retain an ancient, correct, and pure pronunciation of Hebrew still pronounce the waw as ‘w,’ as does Arabic, the close sister language of Hebrew,” How the Hebrew Language Grew, Edward Horowitz, pp. 29-30. As the online Wikipedia notes:  “There was no ‘U’; instead, there was the semi-vowel ‘V’. There was no ‘W’, although ‘V’ was pronounced as the modern English ‘W’.” As for the “j” in “Jehovah,” the letter J is the last letter to be added to our alphabet. ‘J’ was an ‘outgrowth’ of ‘I’ and was used to give a sound of greater consonant force, particularly as the first letter of some words. It was used interchangeably with the letter “I” at first, showing that its original pronunciation stemmed from the vowel sound of “I” and only later got its “juh” sound through French influence.                                                    

    The English name “Jehovah” was invented by Roman Catholics sometime in the Middle Ages, based on a misunderstanding of Masoretic Hebrew texts. It is a hybrid word consisting of the Tetragrammaton YHWH (“J” used to be pronounced as “Y”) and the vowels for the word “Adonai.” Though “Jehovah” is used a few times in the 1611 King James Version (e.g., Gen 22:14; Exod 6:3; Isa 12:2; Ps 83:18) and is found in many older Christian hymns, it is not the authentic biblical pronunciation of the sacred Name (For a discussion of the “Jehovah or Yahweh” question see “God, Names of” in Encyclopædia Judaica, vol. 7, col. 680, or George F. Moore, Judaism in the First Centuries of the Christian Era: The Age of the Tannaim (3 vols., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1927-30), vol. 1, p. 219 and note 1, p. 427. Most modern Bible translations have notes on this issue in their introductions, agreeing that the true Name of the Heavenly Father is Yahweh.

    SOURCE

    For more information on the diverse pronunciations of our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name that are proposed, please see my following web pages:

    The Name Yahweh

    YHWH – Consonants Or Vowels

    YHWH

    YHWH 600 B.C.E.

    #273093
    Ed J
    Participant

    Shalom Frank,

    Show us all some Hebrew words with a “W” sound.
    Surely you can find at least “three” little words,
    that is, if what you said is true of course!

    “at the mouth of three witnesses,
    shall the matter be established.” (Deut.19:15)

    B'shem
    YHVH

    #273097
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 19 2012,04:08)
    Shalom Frank,

    Show us all some Hebrew words with a “W” sound.
    Surely you can find at least “three” little words,
    that is, if what you said is true of course!

    “at the mouth of three witnesses,
    shall the matter be established.” (Deut.19:15)

    B'shem
    YHVH


    Ed J,

    Say the sound oo (or 'uu') and the sound eh (or ay) together and what you will hear is a w sound being more prominent in between these two sounds. One can also pronounce the oo sound with a 'w' sound at the end. Following is our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name transliterated/transcribed into our English language as vowels:

    IAUA

    Vocalizing this you will find that there is a 'w' (double u) sound when saying 'U', 'OO', or 'UU'.

    U = oow sound

    OO = oow sound

    UU = oow sound

    Again, 'Yahweh' is simply a transliteration/transcription of our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name into our English language.

    Please refer to the following:

    Waw (Vav)
    By Jeff A. Benner
    http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/3_waw.html

    #273099
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Jan. 19 2012,04:46)

    Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 19 2012,04:08)
    Shalom Frank,

    Show us all some Hebrew words with a “W” sound.
    Surely you can find at least “three” little words,
    that is, if what you said is true of course!

    “at the mouth of three witnesses,
    shall the matter be established.” (Deut.19:15)

    B'shem
    YHVH


    Ed J,

    Say the sound oo (or 'uu') and the sound eh (or ay) together and what you will hear is a w sound being more prominent in between these two sounds. One can also pronounce the oo sound with a 'w' sound at the end. Following is our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name transliterated/transcribed into our English language as vowels:

    IAUA

    Vocalizing this you will find that there is a 'w' (double u) sound when saying 'U', 'OO', or 'UU'.

    U = oow sound

    OO = oow sound

    UU = oow sound

    Again, 'Yahweh' is simply a transliteration/transcription of our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name into our English language.

    Please refer to the following:

    Waw (Vav)
    By Jeff A. Benner
    http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/3_waw.html


    Ed j,

    Since we are off topic here in discussing this, I made a new post on this topic at: https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….131;r=1

    #273101
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Jan. 19 2012,04:46)

    Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 19 2012,04:08)
    Shalom Frank,

    Show us all some Hebrew words with a “W” sound.
    Surely you can find at least “three” little words,
    that is, if what you said is true of course!

    “at the mouth of three witnesses,
    shall the matter be established.” (Deut.19:15)

    B'shem
    YHVH


    Ed J,

    Say the sound oo (or 'uu') and the sound eh (or ay) together and what you will hear is a w sound being more prominent in between these two sounds. One can also pronounce the oo sound with a 'w' sound at the end. Following is our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name transliterated/transcribed into our English language as vowels:

    IAUA

    Vocalizing this you will find that there is a 'w' (double u) sound when saying 'U', 'OO', or 'UU'.

    U = oow sound

    OO = oow sound

    UU = oow sound

    Again, 'Yahweh' is simply a transliteration/transcription of our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name into our English language.

    Please refer to the following:

    Waw (Vav)
    By Jeff A. Benner
    http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/3_waw.html


    Hi Frank,

    Are you now suggesting his name is Ya-oo-a?

    B'shem
    YÄ-hä-vā

    #273108
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 19 2012,05:17)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Jan. 19 2012,04:46)

    Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 19 2012,04:08)
    Shalom Frank,

    Show us all some Hebrew words with a “W” sound.
    Surely you can find at least “three” little words,
    that is, if what you said is true of course!

    “at the mouth of three witnesses,
    shall the matter be established.” (Deut.19:15)

    B'shem
    YHVH


    Ed J,

    Say the sound oo (or 'uu') and the sound eh (or ay) together and what you will hear is a w sound being more prominent in between these two sounds. One can also pronounce the oo sound with a 'w' sound at the end. Following is our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name transliterated/transcribed into our English language as vowels:

    IAUA

    Vocalizing this you will find that there is a 'w' (double u) sound when saying 'U', 'OO', or 'UU'.

    U = oow sound

    OO = oow sound

    UU = oow sound

    Again, 'Yahweh' is simply a transliteration/transcription of our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name into our English language.

    Please refer to the following:

    Waw (Vav)
    By Jeff A. Benner
    http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/3_waw.html


    Hi Frank,

    Are you now suggesting his name is Ya-oo-a?

    B'shem
    YÄ-hä-vā


    Ed J,

    No, I am suggesting that you please not get off topic in accordance with this thread and take the topic on the SUPPOSED CORRECT pronunciation of our Heavenly Father and Creator's Name to:

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….131;r=1

    #273115
    Ed J
    Participant

    Hi Frank,

    Thank you; I'll be posting on your new thread soon.

    Your brother
    in Christ, Jesus.
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    holycitybiblecode.org

    #273128
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Frank,

    Thanks for the info about the pronunciation of YHWH!  :)  And thank you for making a thread to continue that discussion somewhere other than here.

    Unfortunately, that leaves us right here where we left off:

    Frank, please give a VALID, SCRIPTURAL reason why the Word of God in John 1:1 and 14 cannot possibly be the same person as the Word of God in Rev 19:13.

    #273195
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    John Chapter One

    John 1:1 in the Greek reads “God was the word,” but most if not all English versions read, “the Word was God.” This reverses the phrase, and changes the meaning. To say “God was the word” is not the same as, “the Word was God.”

    In the Greek, the letter l in logos is not capitalized, even tho when proper, some Greek words are capitalized. But in English versions, the l is capitalized – improperly. Why? To enhance the doctrine of the Trinity, which gave birth to the theory of the Pre-existence of Yahshua.

    In verse 3 & 10, the Greek word dia is translated “through.” Since Scriptures both in the O.T. and the N.T. tell us that Yahweh (the Supreme Being) (1) created all things, (2) with no help from anyone, and (3) that no Deity was with him in the act of creating, then John 1:3 must agree with these Scriptures, especially with those in the O.T. (since the Messiah and the Apostles proved their doctrine by the O.T.). After all, The N.T. depends on the O.T. for its reason to exist. Please see the paper “Who Is the Creator?

    “Through” is not technically a wrong translation of the word dia, if the message of the sentence indicates this. But just as Hebrews 1:1-2, and Col. 1:15-17, the word dia should be translated “on account of,” or “because of.” Reason? The message in the sentence demands this. The word dia is often translated “on account of,” or “because of.”

    Thanks,

    Voy

    SOURCE

    Also see:

    YAHSHUA: Did He Pre-exist?
    An Explanation Of Our Views
    By Voy Wilks
    10/23/90

    #273198
    terraricca
    Participant

    frank

    Quote
    In the Greek, the letter l in logos is not capitalized, even tho when proper, some Greek words are capitalized. But in English versions, the l is capitalized – improperly. Why? To enhance the doctrine of the Trinity, which gave birth to the theory of the Pre-existence of Yahshua.

    so the trinity must have been in place right after Christ left to heaven ,and before Paul written his letter to the Colossians ,and John written his gospel and Revelation ,right ???

    Pierre

    #273211
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Good point, Pierre.

    And Frank, I'm still waiting for a SCRIPTURAL reason.  

    He who creates is one, and he through whom the thing is created is another. – Tertullian

    God creating THROUGH Jesus doesn't change one scripture.  Just like me sending you this message THROUGH the internet doesn't mean the internet was somehow involved in the message itself.

    Your source brings up Hebrews 1, which says God created the universe THROUGH the Son.

    And it mentions Col 1, which say all things in heaven and on earth were created through the Son.

    You can also add in 1 Cor 8:6, which says all things came FROM God and THROUGH Jesus.

    And then combine all those thoughts together with John 1:3, which says all things came THROUGH the Word of God.

    How can you not see this, Frank?

    Anyway, I'll wait for your SCRIPTURAL reason in your own words, instead of the unsubstantiated claim of some man that the word “dia” means “on account of”. He says the context demands this translation, but doesn't say why. (Unless the “God created alone” was suppose to be the reason. If so, then it has been solidly debunked by me in this post.)

    #273215
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Yahweh Is Creator
    10/20/91

    “And Elohim spake all these words, saying, I am YAHWEH, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, … For in six days YAHWEH MADE HEAVEN and EARTH, the sea, and all that in them is, …” (Ex. 20:1,2,11).

    This was Yahweh the Father, not Yahshua the Son, as some believe. The Creator and the Law Giver is one and the same person (Ex. 20:6). *There is only ONE law giver (Isa. 33:22; James 4:12). To extend this thought a little further: Yahshua did not accept credit as Creator when the rich young ruler came to him asking how to gain eternal life. Instead, he indicated that the Father is Creator (Mt. 19:17). Only ONE is good – the Father, who gave the commandments:

    “Here is the patience of the Saints: those who KEEP the COMMANDMENTS OF YAHWEH and the FAITH OF YAHSHUA” (Rev. 14:12).

    Yahshua only spoke what his Father directed.

    Proof that is was Yahweh the Father

    (1)   Who spoke to Abraham, and
    (2)   Who gave the Decalogue on Mount Horeb

    Is revealed in the following Scripture:

    “For when Yahweh made promise to Abraham, since he could swear by no one greater, he swore by himself, saying, Surely blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply you. … For men swear by the greater …” (Hebrews 6:13,14, 16, TSS).

    If Yahshua in a pre-existent state (a second Yahweh) was the one who spoke to Abraham, he could have sworn by a greater than himself. He could have sworn by his Father (Yahweh). But he did not. The Yahweh who spoke to Abraham claimed there was no one greater than himself. Only Yahweh the Father can truthfully make this statement.

    Therefore the one who spoke to Abraham and who gave the Decalogue was Yahweh the Father; the only true Yahweh who exists. Only He can swear by no one greater.

    SOURCE[URL=Yahweh Is Creator 10/20/91  “And Elohim spake all these words, saying, I am YAHWEH, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, … For in six days YAHWEH MADE HEAVEN and EARTH, the sea, and all that in them is, …” (Ex. 20:1,2,11).  This was Yahweh the Father, not Yahshua the Son, as some believe. The Creator and the Law Giver is one and the same person (Ex. 20:6). * There is only ONE law giver (Isa. 33:22; James 4:12). To extend this thought a little further: Yahshua did not accept credit as Creator when the rich young ruler came to him asking how to gain eternal life. Instead, he indicated that the Father is Creator (Mt. 19:17). Only ONE is good – the Father, who gave the commandments:  “Here is the patience of the Saints: those who KEEP the COMMANDMENTS OF YAHWEH and the FAITH OF YAHSHUA” (Rev. 14:12).  Yahshua only spoke what his Father directed.  Proof that is was Yahweh the Father  (1)   Who spoke to Abraham, and (2)   Who gave the Decalogue on Mount Horeb  Is revealed in the following Scripture:  “For when Yahweh made promise to Abraham, since he could swear by no one greater, he swore by himself, saying, Surely blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply you. … For men swear by the greater …” (Hebrews 6:13,14, 16, TSS).  If Yahshua in a pre-existent state (a second Yahweh) was the one who spoke to Abraham, he could have sworn by a greater than himself. He could have sworn by his Father (Yahweh). But he did not. The Yahweh who spoke to Abraham claimed there was no one greater than himself. Only Yahweh the Father can truthfully make this statement.  Therefore the one who spoke to Abraham and who gave the Decalogue was Yahweh the Father; the only true Yahweh who exists. Only He can swear by no one greater.

    <a href="http://frank4yahweh.xanga.com/755309610/hear-o-israel-yahweh-our-elohim-is-two-yahwehs—this-is-never-found-in-scriptures-9112001
    ” target=”_blank”>SOURCE

    *Yahshua Was Not A Lawgiver
    By Voy Wilks
    1975

    #273217
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    I agree that Yahweh IS the Creator AND the Lawgiver, Frank.

    But Yahweh gave His laws to the Israelites THROUGH various vice regents. He also created the same way, for scripture says so.

    Frank, if you can't address my points in your own words, just say so.

Viewing 20 posts - 12,521 through 12,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account