Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 10,141 through 10,160 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #227240
    kerwin
    Participant

    Irene,

    You state some of the 45 scripture you believe support the theory of Jesus’ preexistence are plainly written.  Your examples are Revelations 19:13-16 and John 1:1-11.  

    Revelations 19:13-16 does not even name the individual in chapter 19:13-16 so the best we can do is infer the name.  You like me appear to infer the individual is Jesus.  We then can say that “Jesus” is called the Word of God as the person is explicitly called that.

    John 1:1-11 explicitly states that the Word was with God in the beginning.  It does not tell what beginning it speaks of though I conjecture it is before the beginning of creation.  I cannot say I have any evidence to support that conjecture.  We know Jesus is called the Word so we could use that to infer that Jesus is the Word mentioned in these verses thee problem with that logic is that Jesus is not the only Word of God.

    So neither verse is clear though you seem to believe they are.  To get the true understanding of them you must be led by God.

    #227244
    Baker
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 01 2010,20:21)
    Irene,

    You state some of the 45 scripture you believe support the theory of Jesus’ preexistence are plainly written.  Your examples are Revelations 19:13-16 and John 1:1-11.  

    Revelations 19:13-16 does not even name the individual in chapter 19:13-16 so the best we can do is infer the name.  You like me appear to infer the individual is Jesus.  We then can say that “Jesus” is called the Word of God as the person is explicitly called that.

    John 1:1-11 explicitly states that the Word was with God in the beginning.  It does not tell what beginning it speaks of though I conjecture it is before the beginning of creation.  I cannot say I have any evidence to support that conjecture.  We know Jesus is called the Word so we could use that to infer that Jesus is the Word mentioned in these verses thee problem with that logic is that Jesus is not the only Word of God.

    So neither verse is clear though you seem to believe they are.  To get the true understanding of them you must be led by God.


    Kerwin, then you are for certain blind.  There is no other being that descripes Rev. 19:13-16 but Jesus.  Tell me who else is there who is called KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS????No other then Jesus…..and who else has a robe on dipped in blood????  But Jesus….You have to do away with a loot of Scriptures, and interpret them your way….Jesus said that He came down from Heaven….And how do you see that????He didn't??????

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.  ………….

    Since Jesus existed before He became a man, we have to look at some other Scripture to see when Hiis beginning was.

    Col 1:15   Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:  

    Col 1:16   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:  

    along with

    Rev 3:14 ¶ And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;  

    shows us that Jesus was created before all creation. Through Jesus God created the world.  Also

    Jhn 17:5   And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.  

    Of course you can deny theses Scriptures and say that they mean something else, but truth is truth, and truth will prevail…..

    Irene

    #227255
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Dec. 01 2010,14:04)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Nov. 28 2010,04:23)
    T8……..Yes Jesus existed (past tense) in the Nature of GOD because he had the fullness of the Spirit (IN) Him WHILE HE WAS (ON) EARTH. Paul was drawing their attention to when Jesus was walking on the earth, not before that time. He did not say Jesus existed before he came to earth with that nature as you suppose he did, You are reading that into the text by taking it out of context. T8 come on surely you can see that right?


    You see that because you want it to be that way.
    But it says he existed in the form of God, then emptied himself and existed in human flesh.

    Now if it is true what you say, then explain the bit about existing in flesh after the emptying of himself which was after him existing in the form of God/divine nature?


    T8…….> Jesus existed in the (FORM) of GOD, Just what is that FORM of GOD T8, Does GOD have a Form? or is he Spirit like Jesus said He was. That should be with the (NATURE) of GOD , Meaning He had GOD'S NATURE (because he recieved it at the Jordan River GOD was (TRULY) IN HIM T8 By the Spirit he recieved, and he never emptied himslef of that nature either, while on earth, but he did not think (IT) something to grasp for and rob GOD by trying to make himself (EQUAL) with GOD, NO he took on the nature of a Servant and humbled himself while he was on earth , that is when he did that < Paul was not talking about a pre-earth existence at all. You derived that from you trinitarian past .

    T8……………Jesus plainly said he was the Root (AND) Offspring of King David. Many scripture show Jesus had his origins on earth not in heaven. Mike separates the Root as one thing as you do and the offspring as another , so he builds doctrine on that as the trinitarians do with the Thomas thing ” My Lord (and) my GOD” saying it means Jesus is both Lord and GOD.

    But what doe scripture say?…..Isa 11:10…….> And in that day there shall be a ROOT OF JESSE, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles seek: and His rest shall be Glorious verse 12…> And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcast of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.

    Rev 5:5 And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, THE ROOT OF DAVID, hath prevailed to pen the book ….,

    Rev 22:16…> I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches, I AM THE ROOT AND OFFSPRING OF DAVID , and the bright and morning star.

    Now T8 , who is that ROOT of JESSE?, Answer DAVID (AND) Jesus both have their roots from Jesse then to David then to Jesus.

    But Mike and you both twist that up to mean something completely different, making Jesus the Root of DAVID by forcing the texts to fit his preexistence dogmas. Not real sure you do T8, but Mike and others sure do.

    T8………Just think about it, why would GOD even begin to deal with man kind by Morphing or incarnating some preexisting being of some kind . Tt simply doe not make sense for him to even think to do that,When dealing with mankind, what would it prove (NOTHING) GOD is concerned with Mankind not angles or other creatures So he took a MAN brought forth from a Women the exact same as all men are brought into existence so was Jesus and He grow up with GOD with him and GOD perfected Him by his Holy Spirit and gave him his words to tell us and instruct us . Sin can into the world by man and it was by a Man it is overcame. You must see Jesus as one of US Human Being not some Morphed being of any Kind, This separation of our Identities is the Spirit (intellect) of Antichrist having it origin with the Gnostic's, it is Wrong T8!. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………………..gene

    #227257
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Dec. 01 2010,12:45)
    Kerwin:

    Quote
    Could you also point out a scripture that implicitly states Jesus is or was an immaterial being as I have yet to read one of those either.

    1 Cor 10 NIV
    3 They all ate the same spiritual food 4 and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ.

    1 Cor 15 NIV
    45 So it is written: “The first man Adam became a living being”; the last Adam, a life-giving spirit.

    So Christ was a SPIRITUAL rock.  And Christ BECAME a life-giving SPIRIT.  Are those things “immaterial” enough for ya?

    Kerwin:

    Quote
    Now my challenge to you is for you to reasonably explain why you believe those scriptures imply or infer that Jesus preexisted his conception as I have not yet heard one scripture that implicitly states Jesus did.


    Oh, you've heard them alright Kerwin.  You just won't accept them.  But okay, if you don't want to go through the 45 scriptures, I'll do it with you…..one at a time.  

    Notice as we do this how far you have to bend over backwards to TRY and make it seem like it DOESN'T speak about the pre-existence of Jesus.  I will be the one taking the words as they are written.  You will be the one trying to make up a different meaning to those words.  Ready?

    Micah 5:2 NIV
    2 “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
         though you are small among the clans of Judah,
         out of you will come for me
         one who will be ruler over Israel,
         whose origins are from of old,
         from ancient times.”

    Kerwin, I take this to mean that the origin of Jesus was from ancient times from the viewpoint of Micah, who lived hundreds of years before Jesus came in the flesh.

    What do YOU take it to mean?

    mike


    Mike….> do you see word Jesus there, NO, truth is it say CHRIST That means the CHRISTOS or ANOINTING was the ROCK that followed them on the Wilderness , the Anointing of GOD was on all the Leader He chose , Moses , Joshuah , the seventy elders, the angel of the Lord and many. Your again confusing up the Word CHRISTOS with the MAN Jesus. The ONLY TRUE ROCK IS GOD, Do i need to dig out all the scriptures that say that ? Jesus is not the ROCK , nor PETER, in fact the is NO ROCK Besides GOD HIMSELF.

    Deu 32:1….> Give ear, O ye heavens, and i will speak; and hear, O earth, the words of my mouth. 2…..> My doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distill as the dew, as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as te showers upon the grass: 3…> Because I will Publish the name of the LORD: ascribe ye greatness (UNTO OUR GOD) 4….> He is (THE ROCK), his worked is perfect: for all His way are Judgment: a GOD of truth and without iniquity, just and right is HE>

    Mike you continue to twist scriptures to meet you false teachings and dogmas, forcing the text as usual to say what it in fact does not say. IMO

    peace and love………………………………….gene

    #227307
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Dec. 02 2010,01:20)
    Your again confusing up the Word CHRISTOS with the MAN Jesus.


    Hi Gene,

    You may be on to something here……….let's do some research into it.  The following is from NETNotes:

    Christos Christ = “anointed” 1) Christ was the Messiah, the Son of God 2) anointed

    Translated in NETBible as (569) : Christ 471, of Christ 35, Christ's 7, Messiah 3, with Christ 3, of Christ's 2, to Christ 2, belongs to Christ 1, you Christ 1

    Now the NETBible doesn't ever translate “christ” as “anointed one” or “anointing”, but that's just one Bible.  The KJV likewise only translates it as a capital Christ.  Can you find the Greek word “christ” in any other Bible that clearly does NOT refer to Jesus Christ?  I've never looked into it myself.

    Oh, and you bypassed my second point to Kerwin.  The scripture that says “the last Adam [became] a life-giving SPIRIT”.   No comment on that one Gene?

    peace and love,
    mike

    #227314
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Kerwin:

    Quote
    As regards 1 Corinthians 10:3, Scripture declares the Prophets such as Mosses were carried along by the Spirit of Christ, 1 Peter 1:11.


    That would indicate to me that Jesus was a spiritual being way before he became flesh, died, and became a spiritual being AGAIN.  He was “existing in the form of God, then emptied himself………..and was made in the likeness of a human being” Kerwin.  Now, the “last Adam” has become a life-giving spirit………….AGAIN.

    Kerwin:

    Quote
    “Origins” is a tricky word as it can mean source, parentage, or existence.


    The Hebrew actually has “goings forth”.  Their term for being begotten is “brought forth”.  I understand it to mean, “his being brought forth happened a long time ago”.  But the early church fathers always used the LXX as the final word in any dispute about the Hebrew texts Kerwin.  And the LXX says, “and his goings forth were from the beginning”.

    Most translations now use “origins” because, like me, that's what they understand “goings forth” to refer to.  But while it does mean “origins”, the “goings forth” language precludes it from meaning “source” or “parentage”, don't you think?

    peace and love,
    mike

    #227315
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Dec. 02 2010,00:57)
    That should be with the (NATURE) of GOD , Meaning He had GOD'S NATURE (because he recieved it at the Jordan River GOD was (TRULY) IN HIM T8 By the Spirit he recieved, and he never emptied himslef of that nature either,


    Then why did Paul say he did Gene? ???

    mike

    #227316
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    :D   Isaiah 11:10 – Root OF Jesse
    Rev 5:5 – Root OF David
    Rev 22:16 – Root and Offspring OF David

    Then Gene correctly asks – Now T8 , who is that ROOT of JESSE?

    But in his answer, somehow the “OF” disappears and the word “FROM” takes it's place.  And the singular word “root” becomes the plural word “roots”.

    Gene – Answer  DAVID (AND) Jesus both have their roots from Jesse then to David then to Jesus.

    Gene, you can't just change the words of scripture as you see fit to make the scriptures say what you want them to.  You know that, right?  ???

    mike

    #227342
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike………..From and Of are synonymous in Greek. They come from the same root wording as i recall. Like the king James say (FOR) he went which means (Because) He went. You should have been able to put to all together by the scriptures i posted easily and Jesus in Rev was Saying he was the root and offprint (of) or (FROM) David is clear and simple to anyone with out predisposed ideologies. The context should have told you that. You should notice there is not trick wording there Jesus simply meant His origins were through King David He was the root and offspring (both) of David who was the Root and offspring of Jesse, Not trick contextual meanings need there. No twisting or changing the overall meanings need. IMO

    peace and love………………………………………….gene

    #227343
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike…………So who is this ROOT of Jesse spoke of by Isiah then? You failed to answere that Surely Jesus according to you must have been before Jesse also right?

    peace and love………………………………….gene

    #227352
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike Boll,

    I hope to look into what you state about “going forth” as it is the first I remember hearing about it.

    Do you believe the Spirit of Christ is the hypothetic Spiritual being Christ?

    #227377
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Kerwin…………The GNB Adam quoted has it right, brother, Jesus was foretold to come into existence from the Garden of Eden (from the seed of the women) that was Jesus. IMO

    peace and love…………………………gene

    #227378
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike…………Ther is a lot of places where CHRIST Should be translated as The Anointing SPIRIT of GOD , that what it means by if Christ be in you, that is not talking about Jesus the man, That is the Spirit Jesus had also in him. The CHRISTOS is the common denominator (IN) all true Christians or Anointed ones. These are those born of GOD and His (GODS) Seed abides (IN) them the same SEED of GOD that is (IN) Jesus or Lord and Brother the KING> IMO

    peace and love……………………………………….gene

    #227379
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike………Another thing i looked at NETBible and they are slanted to trinitarian thinking and also force text to meet their preconceived ideologies of preexistence and divinity of Jesus. They are biased in their opinions. eSword may be a better source but some of their commentaries can lean toward trinitarians concepts also A good Greek linear can help but even they can be misleading depends on who wrote it. A good unbiased book is (Miss Quoting of Jesus) which can be purchased at any book store. I believe critical reading is always the best its more judgmental, but it can cause one to check out in more detail what has been written or said, its a spirit(intellect) of the Bereans i believe. That is what i like about Kerwin Adam and Shimmer, they are critical readers and tend to not buy everything they hear or read. IMO

    peace and love…………………………………..gene

    peace and love……………………………..gene

    #227425
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Dec. 02 2010,15:27)
    Mike………..From and Of are synonymous in Greek.


    OH……….sorry Gene.  Let's try out your theory:

    1.  Jehovah is the God OF Jesus.

    2.  Jehovah is the God FROM Jesus.

    Hmmmm…………something seems a little off here. :)

    I hear what you're saying, and it can sometimes be as you say……but the example above is not one of those times.  Nor is the “Root of David” thing.  Besides, you're even rearranging the words and making “root” plural in order for this scripture to fit around your doctrine.  

    You're not claiming “Root FROM David”, you're claiming “FROM David's Roots”.  

    Gene:

    Quote
    You should notice there is not trick wording there Jesus simply meant His origins were through King David He was the root and offspring  (both) of David who was the Root and offspring of Jesse, Not trick contextual meanings need there.  


    No Gene.  David is ONLY the offspring of Jesse.  He is NOT the Root of Jesse.  Jesus, on the other hand, is both the ROOT and the BRANCH/OFFSPRING of Jesse and David.

    Like I said Gene, you can't just change whatever scriptures you want to make them come out your way. :)

    peace and love,
    mike

    #227426
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Dec. 02 2010,15:31)
    Mike…………So who is this ROOT of Jesse spoke of by Isiah then?  You failed to answere that Surely Jesus according to you must have been before Jesse also right?

    peace and love………………………………….gene


    I guess I didn't think it was an actual question Gene. Of course Jesus is the Root and Branch of Jesse and the Root, Branch and Offspring of David.

    mike

    #227427
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 02 2010,18:29)
    Mike Boll,

    I hope to look into what you state about “going forth” as it is the first I remember hearing about it.

    Do you believe the Spirit of Christ is the hypothetic Spiritual being Christ?


    Hi Kerwin,

    No.

    mike

    #227428
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Dec. 03 2010,01:10)
    Mike…………Ther is a lot of places where CHRIST Should be translated as The Anointing SPIRIT of GOD


    Hi Gene,

    I'm not doubting you, but I asked for scriptures. Can you give any that are CLEARLY not about Jesus Christ?

    mike

    #227432
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Dec. 03 2010,01:27)
    Mike………Another thing i looked at NETBible and they are slanted to trinitarian thinking and also force text to meet their preconceived ideologies of preexistence and divinity of Jesus.


    Yes, NETNotes IS a trinitarian site.  You just have to read between the lines Gene.  The Greek, Hebrew and the LXX are right there for you to see.  If you think they are “forcing the text” like you so often do, then check out the actual Greek, Aramaic and Hebrew words that are printed right there in plain sight.  That's what I do.  Then I make my decision based on them, not based on how NETBible translates them.  It's just that more times than not, I agree with how the NETBible translates the words.  I don't necessarily always agree with their “explanations” of what those words mean, but I usually do agree with their words over the other Bibles.

    And I have a Greek to English Interlinear sitting right here on my desk.

    mike

    #227487
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike…………There still even exists a problem with hose Greek translations because they nearly all have been Produced by biased translators and they tend to support the Trinity conclusions also. It is better to go with a critical text translator who has no religious ties and conviction to any religion but just just translates the pure original text and its words. Here is an example , Jesus said “it is harder for a “Camel” to go through the eye of a needle that for a rich man to enter the kingdom of GOD” , Nearly all Greek texts translates it that way, but if you go to an Aramaic text (which was the language spoken in that day) it cone out this way , ” it is easer for a “ROPE” to go through the eye of a needle than fro a rich man to go into the kingdom of GOD”. Now which makes the most common sense (the rope) does. Get my point. The text must be associated in a Logical manor of some kind, God is not illogical and does not want us to be either His words should make sense to us all, so we can properly understand them. IMO

    When you reading a text like Jesus saying he is the root and offspring of David we should not have to try to separate that statement into two different meanings , the word And there means both thing are related to each other . Root is where some comes from and Offspring s also where something came from , they both are relating the exact same thing , not some secret MYSTERY combination we have to try to get our minds around to properly understand it as You do when you force the text to be understood from your perspective of Preexistence. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours………………………………….gene

Viewing 20 posts - 10,141 through 10,160 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account