Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 9,821 through 9,840 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #224235
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Nov. 12 2010,19:02)
    Terricca………No one gives a rip about your two bt “chances” , In the post above i ask you for you Proof that the Catholic and the Protestant Churches , did  not believe in PREEXISTENCE of Jesus , You completely ignored it, and then proceed to  called me a Lier so i ask for proof of that lie , now you come back  without proving me wrong and then start saying i have never produced any scriptures to show that Jesus did not preexist His berth which is another LIE. I and Many other Have Produce Many, Many,Many Scriptures and sound reasoning to go along with them.  I do not chose to go around and around with you and Having you continue to completely ignore what i have said to try to twist it some how, Dialogging with you is chaotic and ignorant. Do us both a favor and don't respond to any of my Post's OK>

    gene


    gene

    here again you are confirm that you are not to teach truth but the catholics believes and protestant as well.

    sorry fellow i am not in those in any way can not help you but if it is scriptures those i know very well,

    but it seem those are the ones you do not know,

    so that should be the end i guess

    Pierre

    #224244
    Baker
    Participant

    Pierre, tomorrow I will call the Archdioceses of our City, and a Priest where we went to Church a long time ago. When we belonged there they did not teach the preexisting of Jesus. Since Gene insist that they do I want to find out from them…Gene also said that even back then that they did, and I say that is a lie….we'll see……Irene..

    #224248
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Nov. 11 2010,14:55)
    Mike………..So now you are saying GOD Plans and Purposes are not in His Presence right?


    No Gene,

    God's plans and purposes are in His mind.  They are not physical things that can be sitting there “in His presence”.  And also, Jesus would not have said I HAD glory if he meant God's “plans and purposes” had the glory in His presence before the world – whatever that would mean. ???

    You didn't choose between bread and light Gene.  So I will start with light.

    John 3:19 NIV
    19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.

    John 8:12 NWT
    12 Therefore Jesus spoke again to them, saying: “I am the light of the world. He that follows me will by no means walk in darkness, but will possess the light of life.”

    John 9:5 NWT
    5 As long as I am in the world, I am the world’s light.”

    John 12:35-36 NIV
    35 Then Jesus told them, “You are going to have the light just a little while longer. Walk while you have the light, before darkness overtakes you. Whoever walks in the dark does not know where they are going. 36 Believe in the light while you have the light, so that you may become children of light.”  

    John 12:44-46 NIV
    44 Then Jesus cried out, “Whoever believes in me does not believe in me only, but in the one who sent me. 45 The one who looks at me is seeing the one who sent me. 46 I have come into the world as a light, so that no one who believes in me should stay in darkness.

    Now Gene, is there any doubt in your mind that these scriptures CLEARLY describe Jesus as the “Light of the World”?

    And what else do we know about this “Light of the World”?

    John 1:6-12 NIV
    6 There was a man sent from God whose name was John. 7 He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. 8 He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light.

    9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God.

    Let me walk you through this Gene.  

    1.  Jesus IS the Light of the world, for he specifically says so in John 8:12 and 9:5, right?  

    2.  John the Baptist came to testify about this light – and we all know who John testified about, right?

    3.  This “Light” was coming into the world.

    4.  The world was actually made through him, but the world didn't recognize him.

    5.  All who believed in this “Light” were given the right to become children of God.  

    Gene, this “Light” is the “Word” spoken of in John 1:1.  It is the same Word who became flesh and dwelled among us and had the glory of an only begotten Son from the Father.  It is Jesus.

    I'll wait to see how you butcher these scriptures before giving you bread.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #224255
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Please for God's sake don't abuse one another in this forum. Please come back to decensy. This is the reason why I am becoming skeptic these days. Our Bible can not answer our queries on any doctrine. It is disputing and contradicting on any concept of Christ. Our history of Christianity is full of such notorious crimes on makind who were critical in exposing the controversies in our Bible. I could not see even one agreement on any topic here. The reason is our Bible which is variant in its concepts and doctrines. I can not blame Sis Irene, brothers like Pierre, Mike or Gene for arguing here for years together. It is the fate of my religion. I am sorry my brothers and sisters to say that.
    Please be human and compassionate what even Jesus taught us.

    Love and peace to all
    Adam

    #224258
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 12 2010,21:30)
    Please for God's sake don't abuse one another in this forum. Please come back to decensy. This is the reason why I am becoming skeptic these days. Our Bible can not answer our queries on any doctrine. It is disputing and contradicting on any concept of Christ. Our history of Christianity is full of such notorious crimes on makind who were critical in exposing the controversies in our Bible. I could not see even one agreement on any topic here. The reason is our Bible which is variant in its concepts and doctrines. I can not blame Sis Irene, brothers like Pierre, Mike or Gene for arguing here for years together. It is the fate of my religion. I am sorry my brothers and sisters to say that.
    Please be human and compassionate what even Jesus taught us.

    Love and peace to all
    Adam


    Adam

    could please explain this;The reason is our Bible which is variant in its concepts and doctrines,

    thanks

    Pierre

    #224268
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Nov. 12 2010,15:11)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 12 2010,21:30)
    Please for God's sake don't abuse one another in this forum. Please come back to decensy. This is the reason why I am becoming skeptic these days. Our Bible can not answer our queries on any doctrine. It is disputing and contradicting on any concept of Christ. Our history of Christianity is full of such notorious crimes on makind who were critical in exposing the controversies in our Bible. I could not see even one agreement on any topic here. The reason is our Bible which is variant in its concepts and doctrines. I can not blame Sis Irene, brothers like Pierre, Mike or Gene for arguing here for years together. It is the fate of my religion. I am sorry my brothers and sisters to say that.
    Please be human and compassionate what even Jesus taught us.

    Love and peace to all
    Adam


    Adam

    could please explain this;The reason is our Bible which is variant in its concepts and doctrines,

    thanks

    Pierre


    Hi brother Pierre,
    Thanks for your response. I am sorry to comment that way on our Bible. You know we have been debating on various topics like Trinity, Pre-existence, divinity of Jesus for the past few years here in this forum that it self shows some thing wrong with us or with source of our discussion, the Bible. I can not blame all of us here for such uneding debates. At least few of us are true believers even they could not clarify the queries raised here on various topics. For example Trinity is supported by the same Bible by some of the members of this forum but the same was refuted by many of us with the same Bible. Pre-existence is being supported vigorously by some of us by the same Bible but it is being refuted by few of us yet with same Bible. So where is the fault for all these confusions except our very source, the Bible? For the pat few years I have been searching all Christian doctrines through their websites by comparing with our Bible with honest and without any bias. I found most of them are true as per the Bible if they take the verses individually. But they are wrong when compared with other verses from the same Bible. Hebrew Bible (our O.T) does not claim that the Jewish Messiah was preexisting but certain verses seem to support preexistence like Mica 5. New Testament claim divinity of Jesus in some passages where the Lordship of God was shared by Jesus himself. But certain passages negate this divinity like those of Acts 2 & 3.

    This is the fate my Bible.I just quoted few examples. You yourself can see them if you are frank enough.
    Love and peace
    Adam

    #224273
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 12 2010,23:40)

    Quote (terraricca @ Nov. 12 2010,15:11)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 12 2010,21:30)
    Please for God's sake don't abuse one another in this forum. Please come back to decensy. This is the reason why I am becoming skeptic these days. Our Bible can not answer our queries on any doctrine. It is disputing and contradicting on any concept of Christ. Our history of Christianity is full of such notorious crimes on makind who were critical in exposing the controversies in our Bible. I could not see even one agreement on any topic here. The reason is our Bible which is variant in its concepts and doctrines. I can not blame Sis Irene, brothers like Pierre, Mike or Gene for arguing here for years together. It is the fate of my religion. I am sorry my brothers and sisters to say that.
    Please be human and compassionate what even Jesus taught us.

    Love and peace to all
    Adam


    Adam

    could please explain this;The reason is our Bible which is variant in its concepts and doctrines,

    thanks

    Pierre


    Hi brother Pierre,
    Thanks for your response. I am sorry to comment that way on our Bible. You know we have been debating on various topics like Trinity, Pre-existence, divinity of Jesus for the past few years here in this forum that it self shows some thing wrong with us or with source of discussion the Bible. I can not blame all of us here for such uneding debates. At least few of us are true believers even they could not clarify the queries raised here on various topics. For example Trinity is supported by the same Bible by many of the members of this forum but the same was refuted by some of us with the same Bible. Pre-existence is being supported vigorously by some of us by the same Bible but it is being refuted by few of us yet with same Bible. So where is the fault for all these confusions except our very source the Bible? For the pat few years I searched all Christian doctrines through their websites by comparing with our Bible with honest and without any bias. I found most of them are true as per the Bible if they take the verses individually. But they are wrong when compared with other verses from the same Bible. Hebrew Bible (our O.T) does not claim that the Jewish Messiah was preexisting but certain verses seem to support preexistence like Mica 5. New Testament claim divinity of Jesus in some passages where the Lordship of God was shared by Jesus himself. But certain passages negate this divinity like those of Acts 2 & 3.
    This is the fate my Bible.I just quoted few examples. You yourself can see them if you are frank enough.
    Love and peace
    Adam


    Adam

    i like your comment and you are right on most;
    but the reasons why we are so a part, it is not the scriptures that dividing us,it is what some believe deep in them self to be true or not,some like to argue ,some do not have enough knowledge ,some have been brain Wash and so can not see truth,some believe what others are saying,
    all this is going on since the beginning ,Paul as well felt that pinch,
    but wen we come up with many scriptures like in preexistence
    if someone believe it is not true why is it that they do not pick up the bible and say ,here it is fellows this and this in scriptures is this and not this;;but no one came forward to do just that, of cause they would have to explain all the other scriptures,this no one challenge our scriptures and keep on arguing and that is totally wrong.

    so this is more of not accepting scriptures ,and so rejecting God s word.

    there is one more thing i would like to say to you,it is very important to understand the spirit of Christ,this would include “the reasons for Christ to be “

    Pierre

    #224281
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Thanks for your agreement brother Pierre. There lies the problem. Every one of us claim for her or himself that he or she is led by the spirit of Christ. But at the same time they argue negatively and can not give proper reasons for their convictions. This I am seeing here from the beginnin. But the sad thing is God is silent on these issues He never interferes our debates and discussion. His silence is killing me. What to do brother there is my frustration.

    Sorry once again
    Adam

    #224282
    shimmer
    Participant

    Hi Adam.

    I have found the same problem, with confusion, people debating, not only debating but often they get angry, it's like some people have an agenda, and want to take others with them, in the way they see it, and when they dont get that, then they get angry, and also get angry at anyone who disagrees with them. Not caring at all.

    One thing I think is true, understanding the scriptures can only be done with the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is obvious in a person, because they will have love and they will not be selfish,  there are ways to tell.

    So without the true spirit, people can read scripture yes,….they can come up with AMAZING ideas and insights yes, but, all  they have is an earthly spirit not he spirit of truth, and as they learn, they take others with them, the others also get misled, thats how it goes. That is how iv seen it.

    #224288
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi Sis,
    Thanks for your observations. I know no one can blame the Bible for these confruntations leaving me alone. I like your positive spirit and loving heart.

    May God continue to fill you with such comforting spirit.
    Love and peace to you
    Adam

    #224299
    Baker
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 12 2010,14:30)
    Please for God's sake don't abuse one another in this forum. Please come back to decensy. This is the reason why I am becoming skeptic these days. Our Bible can not answer our queries on any doctrine. It is disputing and contradicting on any concept of Christ. Our history of Christianity is full of such notorious crimes on makind who were critical in exposing the controversies in our Bible. I could not see even one agreement on any topic here. The reason is our Bible which is variant in its concepts and doctrines. I can not blame Sis Irene, brothers like Pierre, Mike or Gene for arguing here for years together. It is the fate of my religion. I am sorry my brothers and sisters to say that.
    Please be human and compassionate what even Jesus taught us.

    Love and peace to all
    Adam


    Sorry Adam, but I don't share your confusion of Scriptures.  There is no contradiction.  It all explains itself if you search for it.  Show me one Scripture that you say contradicts…
    And which doctrine are you talking about.  The Trinity is very well not shown in Scriptures and that the doctrine is wrong.  The Preexisting of Jesus has more then 30 Scriptures that explains it.  What else????? The problem comes in when some just want to ignore those Scripture and start to get very personal.  That I don't like at all, and it has no place on a Christian website…There are Brethren that just can't understand and by their frustration start to get nasty….. …

    .Peace Irene

    #224300
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    To All………….The ideology of preexistence had an origin, maybe if we can look into that origin we can better see its fallacy, The origin of a preexisting Christ in the beginning of Christianity ,was by the teaching of the GNOSTIC'S, This teaching was believed to come from the Greek and Egypt and Roman pagan mindset, they believe in Man GODS and Gods Cohabiting with Women and Coming to earth in all kind of forms, The also believe that there was a place these Gods came from and would come to earth and perform various activities. A Christanoty varius pagan practices began to work its way into the church and the apostles had to deal with these false teachings.

    The main pagan teachings that began to infect the church was that of the Gnostic's this teaching is what the apostle Paul and John had to deal with , its basic teachings were of a Christ who truly was not a Human being but a Person who was sent to earth from a place where the GOD'S lived , he was sent to straighten out the earth which another GOD messed up. This God was Jesus and He came disguised as a Man, but really was not a true Human but only appeared as a human being, but truly was a God. He performed Miracles and Heals the people and went about straightening out what the First God messed up.

    These false teachings were held back by the Apostle when they were alive and even though it was a very strong influencing force because of all the pagans Gentiles coming into the Church who had been exposed to these false teaching and ideologies most of there lives the apostle like Paul and John held it back. When the Apostles died these teaching of Iniquity began to influence and take over and take root in the church it took about 300 years for them to completely take over the teachings of the true church of GOD, and became complete at the council of Nacia in 325 AD under the control of the Pagan Emperor Constantine Who forced all pagan to become Christian and caused these completely changed religion to be the religion of Roman Empire.

    Concepts like PREEXISTENCE OF JESUS as a GOD or Demigod or morphed Angel of some kind infected the Church . Worship days wee changed Like Passover to Esthar the (pagan Goddess of Sex and Fertility) took its place , Christmas was introduced as the Berth pf Jesus On the 25th of Dec, ties in with the pagan worshipers of the Solace of the sun God worshipers, and the Sabbath was changed to the Sun God day or Sunday worship. The whole line of concepts of Demon going around taking control of People and Spook and demons all originated from these mindsets derived from pagan teachings had completely infected the true Church as it is today, a Complete APOSTATE CHURCH, full of false teaching of various kinds , but the Worst teaching of all is the teachings that (SEPARATES) JESUS FROM OUR OWN IDENTITY, AS A HUMAN BEING COMING INTO EXISTENCE (EXACTLY) AS WE DID. This teaching Moves Jesus away from us human and places Him in another realm of existence apart from us . It destroys the work of GOD and Jesus in Humanity by distorting the Truth of GODS WORK (IN) HUMANITY> It obscures the Plan and Purpose of GOD for all human beings that he had in the begining before he ever started His creation on earth.

    I have noticed and others also that people who hold to these Pagan teaching have a form of MYSTERY to their reasonings they can force scripture to make them say what in FACT they DO NOT ACTUALLY SAY. In 2 Ths2… Paul says that GOD sends to them this deluding SPIRIT (INTELLECT) IN ORDER FOR THEM TO BELIEVE (THE LIE). I have been convinced that all who are under this deluding influence can not be changed by any sound debates as Proof of Here. Because as it say they have NOT RECEIVED THE LOVE OF THE TRUTH, GOD SENDS TO THE THIS DELUDING SPIRIT, What God has Done no one can change, so to argue with them is futile at best. The best thing those who can see the Truth can do is encourage those who do love the truth and have eyes to see it, but debate with the blind and ignorant is futile at best, as has been proven here many many times over and over. IMO

    peace and love to you all………………………………………gene

    #224301
    Baker
    Participant

    Hi Pierre, I did call the Church that we belonged to, but could not get someone on the Phone. I did not want to leave my name with them. I will try again later…I think that since they believe in the Trinity they will say that Christ always existed. But that is a far cry of in believing that Christ first had a beginning and was the firstborn of all creation…. So I believe their teaching is only what I used to do with our Children, is the trinity, and that BTW is wrong. We don't believe in the trinity… So to put both under one roof is ridiculous to say the least…Peace Irene

    #224304
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Irene………..It is truly amazing to me how you and Pierre deny that the Catholics and Protestants don't believe that Jesus preexisted his berth on earth and it is one of there main tenet teachings. Amazing simply amazing and then you two proceed to call me a lier also. Did i not say the trinity proves they do and that there belief in the (WORD) (WAS) God found in John 1:1 is proof of that , and it is the same proofs you preexistences use also to try to prove Jesus' preexistence. And yet you two call me a LIER.

    peace and love……………………………gene

    #224307
    Baker
    Participant

    Pierre! I got an answer when I called again.  The Lady could not answer my questing.  She left word with the Priest and He will call me back.  I really stunt Her.  Most Catholics do not believe in the preexisting of Jesus, I know because we belonged to the Catholic Church all of our lives, until 1984-85, and Gene who was not a Catholic wants to tell me what we taught at the time? Since they do believe in the trinity, what I do think,but they do not teach it, unknown to them, that Jesus always existed, like WJ believes.  That view I don't share. And that is a far cry of believing that Christ had a beginning.  I also remember Her asking me, if that was after Christs being here on earth.  So that might be a possibility too…We'll see….  I believe that Christ did have a beginning, He was the firstborn of all creation.
    Col. 1:15 and Rev. 3:14 teach me that….but I will get back  to you when the priest calls… that might be tomorrow…
    That is not the same then the trinity, and I was right they do not teach the preexisting of Jesus.  In fact I had to explain to the Lady what I was talking about….
    Peace Irene

    #224308
    Baker
    Participant

    I looked up Gnostics on the Internet and this is what it says

    Christ: The role of the redeemer in Gnostic belief is heavily debated at this time. Gnostics seem to have looked upon Christ as a revealer or liberator, rather than a savior or judge. His purpose was to spread knowledge which would free individuals from the Demiurge's control and allow them to return to their spiritual home with the Supreme God at death. Some Gnostic groups promoted Docetism, the belief that Christ was pure spirit and only had a phantom body; Jesus just appeared to be human to his followers. They reasoned that a true emissary from the Supreme God could not have been overcome by the evil of the world, and to have suffered and died. These beliefs were considered heresy by many non-Gnostic Christians. Some Gnostics believed that Christ's resurrection occurred at or before Jesus' death on the cross. They defined his resurrection as occurring when his spirit was liberated from his body. Many Gnostics believed that Jesus had both male and female disciples.

    #224363
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    TO All………… Here is something a person wrote to me and I will pass it oN.

    THE FOLLOWING THINGS I FIND INCREDIBLE.

    That anyone could accept a doctrine that would have been abhorrent to all of the monotheistic Jews of Christ time.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine who's prime doctrinal statement was imposed (by the threat of banishment or death) on the church by sun-worshiping priest of the Roman Emperor.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that requires non-scriptural words to describe it.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that causes a separation between God and Man or his chosen example for man.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that requires the Charater of God to change from non -temptable to temptable or not capable of sin to capable of sin.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that requires humanity to use a hybrid, and therefore a non-human, as an example.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that must be explained or defined by calling it a mystery.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that cannot be proven by honest Biblical interpretation processes.

    That any rational person or especially a Bible Teacher would support a doctrine they can neither explain honestly through scripture or define outside of implication, innuendo and Mystery.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that is filled with Greek Philosophical thinking.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that denies and ignores hundreds of clear scriptures that define Jesus as a MAN, not an augmented or hybrid Man but simply human.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that denies the hope we recieve from seeing a normal human being raised from the dead.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that denies us the perfect example of a human being becoming one with GOD.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that denies us the fellowship of an older brother from which we can recieve advice based on his own totally normal experience as a human being made Just like us.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that requires that Mary, a Human women, could believe conceived anything other than a human being or that she was the mother of a GOD or morphed angel of some-kind.

    That anyone would accept a doctrine that a pre-existent being with memories and experiences can lose all that and be born human infant> What happened to those experiences and memories? TOTALLY IRRATIONAL!

    This was sent to me by my dear brother Martian.

    peace and love to you all……………………………….gene

    #224375
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Nov. 13 2010,00:42)
    Thanks for your agreement brother Pierre. There lies the problem. Every one of us claim for her or himself that he or she is led by the spirit of Christ. But at the same time they argue negatively and can not give proper reasons for their convictions. This I am seeing here from the beginnin. But the sad thing is God is silent on these issues He never interferes our debates and discussion. His silence is killing me. What to do brother there is my frustration.

    Sorry once again
    Adam


    Adam

    yea you right this is the way with men,who fallow religion views,

    any one who fallows the scriptures and so look to the true interpretation ,by proving that it is so and show the related scripture ,because after all who are we to interpret the word of God ? this would mean that God depend en us for our intervention?? not so.

    if someone thinks he as the spirit let him prove it by his understanding of the word of God and by is truthfulness to it.

    wen ask we should always answer,not like some here always commenting but no scriptures produced those and the likes to me are people not versed in scriptures ,or as Christ says they have not come to the light because there deeds are no good,so they like darkness,

    Pierre

    #224376
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Baker @ Nov. 13 2010,08:40)
    Pierre! I got an answer when I called again.  The Lady could not answer my questing.  She left word with the Priest and He will call me back.  I really stunt Her.  Most Catholics do not believe in the preexisting of Jesus, I know because we belonged to the Catholic Church all of our lives, until 1984-85, and Gene who was not a Catholic wants to tell me what we taught at the time? Since they do believe in the trinity, what I do think,but they do not teach it, unknown to them,  that Jesus always existed, like WJ believes.  That view I don't share. And that is a far cry of believing that Christ had a beginning.  I also remember Her asking me, if that was after Christs being here on earth.  So that might be a possibility too…We'll see….  I believe that Christ did have a beginning, He was the firstborn of all creation.
    Col. 1:15 and Rev. 3:14 teach me that….but I will get back  to you when the priest calls… that might be tomorrow…
    That is not the same then the trinity, and I was right they do not teach the preexisting of Jesus.  In fact I had to explain to the Lady what I was talking about….
    Peace Irene


    Irene
    all religion are corporation,and any corporation has to have discipline ,and order,and above all ,policies that rule the church,
    this what they believe and how to address it,how to see the bible ,and how not to see it,accept it as they believe in it,
    soon power sits in and friends are made ,practices are done ,
    and all things humans do ,(parties,coral,singing,diners,ect)

    and so your are hooked to the practice and habits of that corporation ,and thats all you care about.

    very wrong you have lost your search for truth.

    Pierre

    #224379
    Baker
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Nov. 13 2010,12:27)

    Quote (Baker @ Nov. 13 2010,08:40)
    Pierre! I got an answer when I called again.  The Lady could not answer my questing.  She left word with the Priest and He will call me back.  I really stunt Her.  Most Catholics do not believe in the preexisting of Jesus, I know because we belonged to the Catholic Church all of our lives, until 1984-85, and Gene who was not a Catholic wants to tell me what we taught at the time? Since they do believe in the trinity, what I do think,but they do not teach it, unknown to them,  that Jesus always existed, like WJ believes.  That view I don't share. And that is a far cry of believing that Christ had a beginning.  I also remember Her asking me, if that was after Christs being here on earth.  So that might be a possibility too…We'll see….  I believe that Christ did have a beginning, He was the firstborn of all creation.
    Col. 1:15 and Rev. 3:14 teach me that….but I will get back  to you when the priest calls… that might be tomorrow…
    That is not the same then the trinity, and I was right they do not teach the preexisting of Jesus.  In fact I had to explain to the Lady what I was talking about….
    Peace Irene


    Irene
    all religion are corporation,and any corporation has to have discipline ,and order,and above all ,policies that rule the church,
    this what they believe and how to address it,how to see the bible ,and how not to see it,accept it as they believe in it,
    soon power sits in and friends are made ,practices are done ,
    and all things humans do ,(parties,coral,singing,diners,ect)

    and so your are hooked to the practice and habits of that corporation ,and thats all you care about.

    very wrong you have lost your search for truth.

    Pierre


    Pierre! You are dead wrong. We have not belonged to any kind of Church for over 26 years. We have come out of that Church in 1984 and the Church we joined was the W.W.Church of God were we learned how to read the Bible. Unfortunate they too went back to believing in the trinity. Since 1994 we have not belonged to any Church because of that. What Gene is trying to do is saying something against the Church which we belonged all of our lives until 1984. I know what they believe in, and they do not teach any preexisting of Jesus….. to even think that you thought that makes me want to never say anything to you again, it has upset me so much, when I have stood up for you before….I thought by now every one here should know what I and my Husband believe, and most do..Maybe you need to rethink what you said, and I grant you will find out that what I believe is not what any organized religion believes, we have not bought into their ways either, no sir not at all, and you owe me an apology……and BTW we never even read the Bible in the Catholic Church that I would even have wrong understanding of it……Irene

Viewing 20 posts - 9,821 through 9,840 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account