Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 9,301 through 9,320 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #221097
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 23 2010,05:33)
    Hi Mike,

    How do you connect Matt.6:10, which was before “Pentecost”=117
    to Rev.21:2-3 (which is a reference to to God's “Feast of Booths”)?


    Hi Ed,

    Matt 6:10 is a PRAYER we are to make as a SUPPLICATION that eventually (and sooner rather than later) God's will is what will be done by all on earth as it is done by all in heaven (after Satan and his demons were thrown out).

    God's will was by no means being done by any majority of people living when Jesus taught us to pray this way.  It is a prayer indicating our HOPE that it will soon be this way.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221098
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (JustAskin @ Oct. 23 2010,06:25)
    Please don't take it personally but your thoughts on these issues was completely wrong.


    I don't have the answers to this one yet JA. The scripture clearly says the “dwelling of God is with MEN, and He will live with them”. Are these the “men” who will be “changed in a twinkling of the eye” that Paul mentions? Are these the “men” who will be “like angels” that Jesus spoke of?

    I simply don't know the answer right now, so maybe you are right that I'm completely wrong.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221100
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 24 2010,02:01)
    Irene……..And i have told you, your are forcing the text to say what in fact it does not say.

    First of all………..Jesus was no even talking about himself as existing before his berth there , he was talking about the GLORY that Preexisted His earthly existence. THAT GLORY was preexistent and he already had that Glory with the Father before he was ever born or came into existence.


    Gene,

    t8 is right about you – you are “The Great Pretender”. :)  You talk about “forcing text”, yet you are the one who is doing it with this nonsense.

    Jesus said that “HE” – the person, “HAD” glory “IN HIS GOD'S PRESENCE” “BEFORE THE CREATION OF THE WORLD”.

    He did NOT say, “Glorify me with the GLORY that you've had waiting for me since before the world”.  He said HE HAD THAT GLORY AT THE SIDE OF GOD BEFORE THE WORLD WAS CREATED.

    The only “forcing” going on here is yours – and your “forcing” doesn't even bring the scripture to a logical statement.  It's nothing but gibberish by the time you're done “rearranging and explaining” it.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221101
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (JustAskin @ Oct. 24 2010,12:06)
    Everything that is required to understand the Scriptures – is in the Scriptures.


    What does that mean really, JA?  It means that all YOU need is the particular English translation that you have in front of you.  But how do you know that translation has it right?  For example:

    John 1:18 NIV
    No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father's side, has made him known.

    John 1:18 (Contemporary English Version)
    18No one has ever seen God. The only Son, who is truly God and is closest to the Father, has shown us what God is like.

    John 1:18 (King James Version)
    18No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

    NASB John 1:18
    No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.

    These are just four of the MANY different English renderings of the same scripture.  Which one is correct JA?  How do you know? Is the word “God” or “Son”? Again, how do you know?

    Go ahead JA……..take the “WetNanny” leap.  You might find you enjoy the research. :)

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221112
    Baker
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,12:38)

    Quote (Baker @ Oct. 23 2010,04:19)
    Hi Mike!  I have been thinking a lot today.  This is the way I understand what will be in the New Earth and the New Heaven.  Since flesh and blood cannot enter in, only those that are Spirit Beings will be able to do so….. Almighty God is and was always a Spirit Being and divine.  I also believe that since they are divine they are not able to change.  I have no Scripture for that, but to me it makes sense.   I also had asked Georg who will be teaching all truths to those who are Human, He thinks it is the Priests who will do so….
    Peace and Love Irene


    Hi Irene,

    Maybe I posted too soon to Pierre on this subject, because you are correct that flesh and blood cannot enter.  And Jesus is still called a “man”, although Paul says he has be given back his “spiritual” body.

    I better back up and do some thinking and praying on this one before I spout off again.  :)

    Thank God for you and Pierre,

    mike


    Mike, All the thanks go to our Heavenly Father, by His Holy Spirit it is that we understand Scriptures. Georg and I have always searched to know God. Even in the CArholic Church we thought there was something wrong,I was a Song Leader to encourage people to sing. I used to get so upset, because the sat in front of me and fell asleep. And could not wait until the half hour Mass was over, and left before the last song…and then they sinned during the week and went to confession on Saturday and started the cycle all over again……Crazy…..Peace and Love Irene

    #221124
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Baker @ Oct. 24 2010,21:29)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,12:38)

    Quote (Baker @ Oct. 23 2010,04:19)
    Hi Mike!  I have been thinking a lot today.  This is the way I understand what will be in the New Earth and the New Heaven.  Since flesh and blood cannot enter in, only those that are Spirit Beings will be able to do so….. Almighty God is and was always a Spirit Being and divine.  I also believe that since they are divine they are not able to change.  I have no Scripture for that, but to me it makes sense.   I also had asked Georg who will be teaching all truths to those who are Human, He thinks it is the Priests who will do so….
    Peace and Love Irene


    Hi Irene,

    Maybe I posted too soon to Pierre on this subject, because you are correct that flesh and blood cannot enter.  And Jesus is still called a “man”, although Paul says he has be given back his “spiritual” body.

    I better back up and do some thinking and praying on this one before I spout off again.  :)

    Thank God for you and Pierre,

    mike


    Mike, All the thanks go to our Heavenly Father, by His Holy Spirit it is that we understand Scriptures.  Georg and I have always searched to know God.  Even in the CArholic Church we thought there was something wrong,I was a Song Leader to encourage people to sing.  I used to get so upset, because the sat in front of me and fell asleep.  And could not wait until the half hour Mass was over, and left before the last song…and then they sinned during the week and went to confession on Saturday and started the cycle all over again……Crazy…..Peace and Love Irene


    Irene

    the wive and i felled the same way wen we left the organized religion,because wen we joint it was for the truth of God for the company,we were looking to please God not men.

    Pierre

    #221126
    terraricca
    Participant

    correction

    Irene

    the wive and i felled the same way wen we left the organized religion,because wen we joint it was for the truth of God ,not for the company,we were looking to please God not men.

    Pierre

    #221159
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Your four examples all mean the same thing: 'The Son of God'

    Only because some to see the word, or rather, the 'title' of 'God' as being explicitly meaning 'God Almighty, is there confusion.
    Seems many hide their own ignorance behind cognitive ignorance.
    You, yourself, point out that 'God' cannot be 'With God'.
    Therefore, it is clear that 'God' must be seen in a contexual manner, each time interpreted as the context requires.
    You, yiurself, have pointed out that 'God' means 'Mighty One' (Amongst other meanings, such as 'Hero', 'The best of the best', 'The most accomplished', etc.)

    Then, reading again, 'God is with [the] God', it is immistakeable that there is one who is a 'top God' and another who is 'top frim amongst other would-be Gods'.
    In other words, 'God, the Amighty God, is with the one who is senior amongst, or over, the others who would also qualify as Gods'

    Which also translate as, ''Almighty God was with 'the Hero', 'the mighty one' ''.
    Of course, you need to switch things around…'The mighty one was with God' but the context is the same.

    Now, verses such as John 1:1, makes perfect sense, the cunundrum is diffused and trinity 'proof' is broken: 'In the beginning was the Word [of God Almighty]. And the Word of [the Amighty God] was with [the Almighty God]. And the Word [of the Almighty God] was a …a Hero, One invested with Power Might and Authority, a Mighty One amongst and over those others whom might also have been so.

    Why the latter part of that accollade? Because this: How is one a hero, a mighty one, if there was no one over whom that one was mightier, or be a hero to?
    And if mightier, if a hero, then would others not also have had to be 'in the running'. The race is not run by one person else the prize is certain…no matter what the outcome, no matter what the effort. And if so, how is that one 'Mighty'?

    In Revelation, the Lamb is chosen…from…among…those standing around the throne of God, the Almighty.
    The Lamb, is Amomg them, he is not 'set apart', he is chosen because he was the ONLY one who was righteous enough to open the Seal.
    What does Scriptures say elsewhere, 'For God loved him because he Loved Righteousness and hated iniquity MORE THAN THE OTHERS'…who are the 'Others'?, and what if 'the Others' had loved righteousness and hated iniquity as much as 'the lamb', could it have been one of them opening the Seal (the answer is 'no' because it was already purposed but read it in an open 'what if' manner).

    Ok, back to you. I see no problem in the contextual reading of the meaning of 'God' whereever it is written. Only if you don't understand what you are reading, the cognition, would you be confused, as trinitarians are 'forced' to be, 'forced to comply'.

    When God said to Moses, 'You will as God to Aaron', did anyone misunderstand this. What did God mean?
    Trinitarians quickly dismiss this verse because it would means to them that there are now Four Gods…yet it is clear that, in their rendering, God is calling Moses 'God' also.
    In same manner, Jesus says, 'I am the SON of God' and trinitarians rush to say, 'see, Jesus says he is God'…how deluded?
    Jesus says he is 'the SON of God' and why not, because God himself called 'them Gods', unto whom the word of God came (The elders, the Fathers, the Prophets), by which he meant, 'Mighty ones', mighty ones of his word of truth and righteousness.

    And 'Your throne, O God…'. What is the issue. 'O God', does not mean anything to do with 'God Almighty'. It simply means, 'mighty one', 'o mighty one', 'o great one'…Anyone can apply that statement to anyone one else of deserving cause.
    I called WJ, 'Mighty God' of this forum, 'Mighty Trinitatarian God' of this forum, yet am I saying that WJ is 'God…Almighty', no! And yet WJ did not respond to my awarding him this honor, praise and glorification, and he did not seek 'Worship' not even 'Obesiance', for his noble heroic position.
    Why? Perhaps because it was easily discernable that 'Mighty God' was just a title, it does not, in itself, carry any power or authority, except that which is given to it by the one giving it. That is, in this case, JustAskin. And, no, there was no power nor authority in the giving of that title, for the only power and authority in Trinity, is one in deception and delusion, and that comes from Satan, the father of the Abomination.

    So, Mike, how are your wetNanny thousand page debates bringing you closer to what is right in front of you. Have you got any closer?

    See this, at the end of the never ending (?) debate, you will only be back to reading the Scriptures again, as it is written.
    Ok. Enjoy the journey… see you when you come back.

    And may you avoid the God of this system of things and hold to the God of His Word and become a God, yourself, to this forum, for the sake of the God of his God, God the Almighty.

    #221161
    shimmer
    Participant

    Gene, you would have seen these verses, right ?

    “And now, Father, glorify thou me in thy own presence with the glory which I had with thee before the world was made.  

    “I have manifested thy name to the men whom thou gavest me out of the world; thine they were, and thou gavest them to me, and they have kept thy word.  

    Now they know that everything that thou hast given me is from thee;  for I have given them the words which thou gavest me, and they have received them and know in truth that I came from thee; and they have believed that thou didst send me.  

    Gene, the only reason I put them here is because it was shown to me tonight, otherwise I wouldnt have.

    #221169
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Hi JA,

    You said:

    Quote
    Why the latter part of that accollade? Because this: How is one a hero, a mighty one, if there was no one over whom that one was mightier, or be a hero to?
    And if mightier, if a hero, then would others not also have had to be 'in the running'. The race is not run by one person else the prize is certain…no matter what the outcome, no matter what the effort. And if so, how is that one 'Mighty'?

    In Revelation, the Lamb is chosen…from…among…those standing around the throne of God, the Almighty.
    The Lamb, is Amomg them, he is not 'set apart', he is chosen because he was the ONLY one who was righteous enough to open the Seal.
    What does Scriptures say elsewhere, 'For God loved him because he Loved Righteousness and hated iniquity MORE THAN THE OTHERS'…who are the 'Others'?, and what if 'the Others' had loved righteousness and hated iniquity as much as 'the lamb', could it have been one of them opening the Seal (the answer is 'no' because it was already purposed but read it in an open 'what if' manner).


    You've made this claim many times in many threads.  And each time I point out to you that Jesus already WAS something better than those “others”, for each and every one of them came into existence THROUGH Jesus.  And each time I point this out to you, you either ignore that part of my post, or disappear altogether from that thread for a while.  When will you address this scriptural fact?  ???

    Everything, whether visible or invisible, came into being through Jesus.  In fact, nothing that came to be was brought into existence without him.  Those “others” who you think were vying for the esteemed position Jesus attained to were all made through him in the first place.

    JA:

    Quote
    So, Mike, how are your wetNanny thousand page debates bringing you closer to what is right in front of you. Have you got any closer?


    Yes JA.  MUCH closer in MANY different ways.

    JA:

    Quote
    See this, at the end of the never ending (?) debate, you will only be back to reading the Scriptures again, as it is written.
    Ok. Enjoy the journey… see you when you come back.


    And once again, what YOU call “scripture” is merely one Englishman's best INTERPRETATION of what the Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic says.  And in many cases, such as John 1:18 that I listed, those Englishmen are biased toward the trinity, and let that bias clearly show by the way they translate the original words of scripture.

    You are free to base your understanding of scripture on whatever way a certain trinitarian scholar decided to render the Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek words into English in the particular translation you are using at the time.  But don't knock the majority of us on HN for wanting to dig a little deeper.  For by simply comparing translations, it is very easy to see there are many possible ways a certain scripture can be translated into English.  And the difference in those ways can sometimes make that one scripture mean totally different things.  :)

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221170
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,12:32)
    Gene:

    Quote
    Mike……….You are not being truthful with the word there as being among you , look it up in the GREEK text and it is written as (IN) YOU


    Okay Gene…….have it your way.  Now all you have to do is explain to us why Jesus would say the Kingdom of God was IN the Pharisees who were seeking to kill the Son of God.  Because Jesus didn't say the Kingdom of God is “in certain ones of us”, did he?  No, he point blank said TO THE PHARISEES that the Kingdom of God is IN YOU.


    Mike……….The problem we are having here is i have answered these things many times and you simply do not accept those answers, and Keep saying i have not answered them, to present yourself as right by trying to make a case of me or others not really answering them when in fact it is you who do not answer questions and scriptures put to you.

    Here is and example of what i am talking about, You imply i have not answered about Jesus saying the Kingdom of GOD was in the Pharisees when in fact i have. MY answer was Jesus (NEVER SAID THE KINGDOM OF GOD WAS (IN) (THE PHARISEES), You saying that would be the (alternative) Not ME. You fail to understand Jesus was showing them about the FACT that the kingdom of GOD must be IN them and it did not come with outside OBSERVATION. Jesus was showing them (HOW) the Kingdom of GOD exists , and that had nothing to do with the kingdom of God being in them at (that time) , but it certainly was in Jesus and they did not (percieve) it because they like you were looking for and outward existence of that Kingdom of GOD. They wanted signs and wonders and even when those things were given they still did not get it.

    It is non wonder you get so many thing out of context , Mike i think if you would kinda stand back and view scripture from a more overall context of what is being said , instead of looking for some single word that causes you to lose focus on what in being implied by the text as a whole , that would help you brother. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours…………………………gene

    #221174
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (shimmer @ Oct. 24 2010,23:54)
    Gene, you would have seen these verses, right ?

    “And now, Father, glorify thou me in thy own presence with the glory which I had with thee before the world was made.  

    “I have manifested thy name to the men whom thou gavest me out of the world; thine they were, and thou gavest them to me, and they have kept thy word.  

    Now they know that everything that thou hast given me is from thee;  for I have given them the words which thou gavest me, and they have received them and know in truth that I came from thee; and they have believed that thou didst send me.  

    Gene, the only reason I put them here is because it was shown to me tonight, otherwise I wouldnt have.


    Shimmer……….Indeed everything you quoted there is right , but none of that say Jesus Preexisted His berth on earth. That glory was a(foreordained) glory Jesus knew who he was , he was a foreordained Man that was to be the First one BORN into the kingdom of GOD He Knew all the things written about him in the Law and the Prophets , he full well understood those things while he was on earth and He spoke of them. His glory was preordained he never had that GLORY until He recieved it after His resurrection from the dead.

    Shimmer notice >”I have manifested thy name to the men whom thou hast given me (OUT OF THE WORLD) (THINE THEY WERE)” a past tense expression, So when (WERE THEY GODS) was it before they were ever born , can we apply this to the text as they have about Jesus also then, because it does say that right? It appears to say or imply they preexisted also right. And they did, in the Plan and WILL of GOD Just as Jesus did also. But they nor Jesus actually existed as Beings till they were born and this is the same with Jesus.

    Notice Jesus did not say he was in the presents of GOD HIMSELF, they are forcing the text to say that , what Jesus said was the (GLORY) he had in the presents of GOD. Yes GOD had a Preplanned GLORY reserved in Heaven for the MAN JESUS. Jesus full well understood that and all saint also Have that PREPLANNED GLORY also reserved for them in Heaven to.

    Shimmer all who separate Jesus from our (EXACT) LIKENESS are indeed of the ANTICHRIST, that is the Spirit (intellect) of the Antichrist John was addressing in his Gospel. It is this Spirit (intellect) that SEPARATES us from Jesus making Him different from us. WE are brothers and sisters of Jesus in every way he is one of Us Son and Daughters of MAN. And adopted Son and Daughters of the LIVING GOD.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………..gene

    #221176
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 25 2010,10:31)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,12:32)
    Gene:

    Quote
    Mike……….You are not being truthful with the word there as being among you , look it up in the GREEK text and it is written as (IN) YOU


    Okay Gene…….have it your way.  Now all you have to do is explain to us why Jesus would say the Kingdom of God was IN the Pharisees who were seeking to kill the Son of God.  Because Jesus didn't say the Kingdom of God is “in certain ones of us”, did he?  No, he point blank said TO THE PHARISEES that the Kingdom of God is IN YOU.


    Mike……….The problem we are having here is i have answered these things many times and you simply do not accept those answers, and Keep saying i have not answered them, to present yourself as right by trying to make a case of me or others not really answering them when in fact it is you who do not answer questions and scriptures put to you.

    Here is and example of what i am talking about, You imply i have not answered about Jesus saying the Kingdom of GOD was in the Pharisees when in fact i have. MY answer was Jesus (NEVER SAID THE KINGDOM OF GOD WAS (IN) (THE PHARISEES), You saying that would be the (alternative) Not ME. You fail to understand Jesus was showing  them about the FACT that the kingdom of GOD must be IN them and it did not come with outside OBSERVATION. Jesus was showing them (HOW) the Kingdom of GOD exists , and that had nothing to do with the kingdom of God being in them at (that time) , but it certainly was in Jesus and they did not (percieve) it because they like you were looking for and outward existence of that Kingdom of GOD. They wanted signs and wonders and even when those things were given they still did not get it.

    It is non wonder you get so many thing out of context , Mike i think if you would kinda stand back and view scripture from a more overall context of what is being said , instead of looking for some single word that causes you to lose focus on what in being implied by the text as a whole , that would help you brother. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours…………………………gene


    gene

    you still teaching those personnal views.

    “And now, Father, glorify thou me in thy own presence with the glory which I had with thee before the world was made.

    “I have manifested thy name to the men whom thou gavest me out of the world; thine they were, and thou gavest them to me, and they have kept thy word

    WHAT JESUS ACTUAL IS SAYING IS THIS;FATHER I HAVE FINISHED THE JOB YOU HAVE GIVEN ME TO DO,SO COULD YOU NOW BRING ME BACK TO BE WERE I WAS BEFORE YOU CHANGED ME TO DO THIS WORK,

    glory = position
    Pierre

    #221181
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 25 2010,03:31)
    Mike……….The problem we are having here is i have answered these things many times and you simply do not accept those answers, and Keep saying i have not answered them,


    Hi Gene,

    No……..you haven't.  If I'm wrong, and I just missed your answers, then please forgive me and give a quick answer.  I'll just repeat ONE of the questions, okay?

    1.  Can you tell me one thing you've EVER done in your entire lifetime to follow the teachings of Jesus that you couldn't have done if he pre-existed?

    You said:

    Quote
    MY answer was Jesus (NEVER SAID THE KINGDOM OF GOD WAS (IN) (THE PHARISEES), You saying that would be the (alternative) Not ME.


    But what does the scripture say, Gene?

    Luke 17:20-21 NIV
    20Once, having been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation, 21nor will people say, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is,' because the kingdom of God is within you.”

    The NIV adds a footnote that says “or among you”.  But let's work with the “within you”, since that's where your head is no matter how many other scriptures list the Kingdom of God as a physical place.  If the word is correctly translated “within”, then Jesus most definitely says the word “within” DIRECTLY TO THE PHARISEES.  Jesus replied TO THE PHARISEES WHO ASKED THE QUESTION, “the Kingdom of God is within YOU“.

    So, if the word IS “within”, then Jesus was saying the Kingdom of God was “within” the Pharisees.  I am not changing the words here, Gene.  And unlike you, I'm not about to just imagine exact Biblical words “must have MEANT something other than what they said”.  This is how you make scriptures fit into YOUR idea of what they should say.  If the word “black” doesn't fit into YOUR doctrine, you simply “imagine”, that based on the context, the word “black” really means “white” in this verse.  And you don't even care that changing it to “white” not only changes the meaning of God-inspired scripture just to suit YOUR wishes, but often times, your end result is a sentence that makes no logical sense whatsoever.

    But in the case of Luke 17:21, we only have two choices.  Either Jesus said the Kingdom of God was “within” the Pharisees, or Jesus said the Kingdom of God was “in the midst of” the Pharisees.  Which makes more sense?  Which seems more likely to be in line with scriptures as a whole?

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221183
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    JA…………Your are changing words to fit you assumptions…………..first of all it say “THE WORD (WAS) GOD” John 1:1 … In the beginning was the WORD (intelligent utterance) and the WORD (intelligent utterance) was with God and the WORD (intelligent utterance) WAS GOD. And by the way, God told Mosses YOU SHALL BE (AS) GOD TO ARON < You on the other hand say Moses was a GOD to ARON hardly the same thing being (AS),or, (a Representative of) and actually being IT. "For there are many gods, but into us there is ONLY ONE GOD", and there are many Lords but unto Us there is one lord the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus plainly said "THOU ART THE (ONLY) TRUE GOD" but what it appears you are saying Jesus and Moses was TRUE GOD. I might be wrong but that is what is appears you are saying.

    peace and love……………………….gene

    #221185
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Gene,

    So much for “answering” my points.  You skipped right over this one.  Please DIRECTLY answer this post.  At least answer to the bolded part.

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 24 2010,02:01)
    Irene……..And i have told you, your are forcing the text to say what in fact it does not say.

    First of all………..Jesus was no even talking about himself as existing before his berth there , he was talking about the GLORY that Preexisted His earthly existence. THAT GLORY was preexistent and he already had that Glory with the Father before he was ever born or came into existence.


    Gene,

    t8 is right about you – you are “The Great Pretender”. :)  You talk about “forcing text”, yet you are the one who is doing it with this nonsense.

    Jesus said that “HE” – the person, “HAD” glory “IN HIS GOD'S PRESENCE” “BEFORE THE CREATION OF THE WORLD”.

    He did NOT say, “Glorify me with the “PREORDAINED GLORY” that you've had waiting for me since before the world”.  He said HE HAD THAT GLORY AT THE SIDE OF GOD BEFORE THE WORLD WAS CREATED.

    The only “forcing” going on here is yours – and your “forcing” doesn't even bring the scripture to a logical statement.  It's nothing but gibberish by the time you're done “rearranging and explaining” it.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221186
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Gene:

    Quote
    JA…………Your are changing words to fit you assumptions…………..first of all it say “THE WORD (WAS) GOD”

    I just moved my John 1:1 post that you've ignored to one of the John 1:1 threads.  Please address it over there.

    Gene:

    Quote
    but what it appears you are saying Jesus and Moses was TRUE GOD. I might be wrong but that is what is appears you are saying.


    How can you have read anything JA posted and somehow think that HE thinks Jesus is God?  ???  He argues against that trinity lie daily. :)

    mike

    #221190
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 25 2010,04:29)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 25 2010,03:31)
    Mike……….The problem we are having here is i have answered these things many times and you simply do not accept those answers, and Keep saying i have not answered them,


    Hi Gene,

    No……..you haven't.  If I'm wrong, and I just missed your answers, then please forgive me and give a quick answer.  I'll just repeat ONE of the questions, okay?

    1.  Can you tell me one thing you've EVER done in your entire lifetime to follow the teachings of Jesus that you couldn't have done if he pre-existed?

    You said:

    Quote
    MY answer was Jesus (NEVER SAID THE KINGDOM OF GOD WAS (IN) (THE PHARISEES), You saying that would be the (alternative) Not ME.


    But what does the scripture say, Gene?

    Luke 17:20-21 NIV
    20Once, having been asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The kingdom of God does not come with your careful observation, 21nor will people say, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is,' because the kingdom of God is within you.”

    The NIV adds a footnote that says “or among you”.  But let's work with the “within you”, since that's where your head is no matter how many other scriptures list the Kingdom of God as a physical place.  If the word is correctly translated “within”, then Jesus most definitely says the word “within” DIRECTLY TO THE PHARISEES.  Jesus replied TO THE PHARISEES WHO ASKED THE QUESTION, “the Kingdom of God is within YOU“.

    So, if the word IS “within”, then Jesus was saying the Kingdom of God was “within” the Pharisees.  I am not changing the words here, Gene.  And unlike you, I'm not about to just imagine exact Biblical words “must have MEANT something other than what they said”.  This is how you make scriptures fit into YOUR idea of what they should say.  If the word “black” doesn't fit into YOUR doctrine, you simply “imagine”, that based on the context, the word “black” really means “white” in this verse.  And you don't even care that changing it to “white” not only changes the meaning of God-inspired scripture just to suit YOUR wishes, but often times, your end result is a sentence that makes no logical sense whatsoever.

    But in the case of Luke 17:21, we only have two choices.  Either Jesus said the Kingdom of God was “within” the Pharisees, or Jesus said the Kingdom of God was “in the midst of” the Pharisees.  Which makes more sense?  Which seems more likely to be in line with scriptures as a whole?

    peace and love,
    mike


    MIke……….Jesus was telling then that the KINGDOM of GOD is WITHIN A PERSON. It does not come with OBSERVATION> YOU cant see it because it is SPIRITUAL> What do you think it means when it says “THAT GOD MAY BE ALL AND (IN) YOU ALL”. don't you even realize that God was (IN) Jesus and therefore HIs Kingdom was being administered by that present of GOD (IN) HIM.? While He was on the earth. GOD Rules where his Presents is and he ruled (IN) Jesus, GOD was IN HIM. Therefore HIS KINGDOM was IN HIM. Even if you use your false understanding that the Kingdom of GOD was among them , Then HOW WAS IT AMONG THEM, The only way would be it was (IN) Jesus right . Even that should explain it to you that the kingdom of GOD comes without observation. Man i can not believe you cant understand that.

    Mike You said , “can you tell me one thing you've ever done in you entire lifetime to follow the teachings of Jesus that you couldn't have done it he pre-existed?” answer (NO).

    NOW can you tell me One thing you couldn't have done if He had (NOT) Pree-existed. That would be the better question. IMO

    But i can tell you how i relate with Jesus much better by understanding He was (EXACTLY) LIKE ME IN EVER WAY. I feel a sense of Closeness and attachment to him as a fellow Human being who had to go through just what i am going through and gave me answers to my exact same struggles as He had in this life. I Identify with him on a (PERSONAL) level that you can not because you have separated Him from you (exact) likeness. I see Jesus as one of us humans beings who made it into the kingdom of GOD the (SAME) way I Can BY the SAME WAY HE DID> I don;t give him advantages over me so i attach myself to GOD the FATHER the same way He did, because i see him as a (TRUE BROTHER OF MINE)> But you can't see him that way because you have separated Him from you own Identity as a fellow Human Being. A (TRUE) SON OF MAN.

    Preexistences as well as Trinitarians are both in the same boat they are (SEPARATIST) AND THEY BOTH ARE ANTICHRISTS.

    peace and love to you and yours………………………gene

    #221191
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Mikeboll64,
    How can you compare one 'one like God' to 'one created by the one like God'
    How can you say that one thing is earned superiority over another when you say the superior one created the 'inferior' one.
    How could the 'inferior' one ever be called 'Mighty God' in the presence of him?
    No, only if they were equal to start with, could he become superior to them, become the 'hero' among them, 'be better' than them.
    And if he was their creator, why is he standing among them before the throne of God. He would be standing apart from them.

    And…Scriptures is not written for the 'English speaking world' alone. That is incredibly crass of you.

    Where you say that Jesus created 'everything…' it is not speaking of the sentient creatures, the Angels, the animal, Mankind? Again, you mind is slipping…
    To whom is the Animal Sacrifice made, to God or to Jesus? Where is the lifewhih is the blood, which is the spirit, to return to? Is it not God Almighty? Why not Jesus?

    Mike, in whose image is Mankind made? Jesus or God Almighty?
    Are you becoming a trinitarian now? I've seen you sail close to that wind many times in your desparation to prove something, you err and stray into enemy territory.

    Mike, are we called, or to be called, Son's of Jesus? Are the Angels called Son's of Jesus? Do they have the Spirit of Jesus?
    No.
    We are to be 'Sons of God', they are 'Sons of God', they have the Spirit of God.

    So, if it was Jesus who created them…then what?
    But if it was God who created them…what then?
    Mike, you not thinking right…you have the wrong image in your thought.
    Mike, map it out. Draw it out…write it down from end to end and then use Scriptures to validate eah step. You will come across anomalies, unresolvable anomalies. Mike, don't step over them, face the truth when you meet them and say to yourself, 'Ah, hmmm, yeah, ok, hmm…ok…' don't use 'frog dna' or 'charcoal' to fill in the missing links, that way leads to the 'dark side'. Look what happened to the dynasaurs in 'Jurassic Park', and 'Superman' and 'Darth Vader'.
    We would have to start calling you, 'MikeVader, the SuperJurassic Dynasaur man' who messed up simple sctripture verses in a single failed leap of faith in wetNanny, over 65 millions years ago.

    Mikeboll64, JustAskin is not trying to lead you astray. JustAskin is showing you that you put to much faith in your debating, in finite fininicking with words beyond a need. Tweaselling, that gets you nowhere, except back where you started, if seldom ends there for you know not where the end is.
    Has any of your debates ended…no. Why not?
    Because, as easy as you try to prove that this word means this or that word means that, another uses your same 'proofs' to disprove you. What's the point?
    Yes, you learnt something, but what value was it. You 'proved' it to yourself, yes, Thomas….and happier…are those who did not need to stress at the learning if it but believed from the start.

    Seriously, map out your belief, then match the cartesian coordinate points against the database of correct orientations and you will see where your points don't match up…don't force them…and yes, i do work on maps, too! and no, i'm not googling for the analogical text information.

    #221197
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Gene:

    Quote
    MIke……….Jesus was telling then that the KINGDOM of GOD is WITHIN A PERSON.


    Yes Gene, we all understand that is what you IMAGINE the scripture to be saying.  But that is NOT what the scripture ACTUALLY SAYS, is it?  The scripture has Jesus telling the Pharisees “within/among YOU”, not “within/among A PERSON”.

    Gene, just answer this:  Where do YOU hope to spend eternity?  I hope to spend it IN the physical Kingdom of God.  While this Kingdom is “within you”, where will you physically be?  What will your eyes see?  What will your ears hear?

    Gene:

    Quote
    Mike You said , “can you tell me one thing you've ever done in you entire lifetime to follow the teachings of Jesus that you couldn't have done it he pre-existed?”     answer  (NO).


    Thank you Gene……..it only took two months of asking. :)  Now it should be clear to you that Jesus didn't have to be “EXACTLY LIKE US” in order for us to follow his teachings, right?

    Gene:

    Quote
    NOW can you tell me One thing you couldn't have done if He had (NOT) Pree-existed.  That would be the better question. IMO


    NO!  First time asked, first time answered.  I have told all of you non-preexisters that I have no axe to grind here.  I've told you all that whether or not Jesus pre-existed would not change one single thing about the way I follow his teachings.  Unlike you, I'm not trying to fit Jesus into my “WISHES”…………I'm only believing what the scriptures teach.

    Gene:

    Quote
    But i can tell you how i relate with Jesus much better by understanding He was (EXACTLY) LIKE ME IN EVER WAY.


    And I have heard this same exact “reasoning” from you, Jodi Lee, Martian, barley and Kerwin.  Unfortunately for all of you, God's will does NOT revolve around how your WISHES for a closer relationship with Jesus are better served.

    Gene:

    Quote
    Preexistences as well as Trinitarians are both in the same boat they are (SEPARATIST) AND THEY BOTH ARE ANTICHRISTS.


    No Gene, it is those who refuse to believe that Jesus CAME – as in “from somewhere else” – in the flesh that have the spirit of the antichrist.  No one would say, “Gene Balthrop CAME in the flesh”, for you have never been anything other than flesh.  The “CAME in the flesh” wording should be enough for you to be able to understand it Gene.

    I'll look for you in the “John 1:1-3” thread, okay?

    peace and love,
    mike

Viewing 20 posts - 9,301 through 9,320 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account