Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 8,661 through 8,680 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #207578

    Quote (Arnold @ Aug. 03 2010,15:03)
    Again and in Proverbs 8:22-30 also explains it how God brought forth His Son,and He was called the master craftsman.  Wisdom is an essence of God and it simple does not make sense that God would bring forth Wisdom, when He was wise from eternity….I never heard wisdom called a master craftsman either.


    So what does that mean Irene? Was there ever a time God did not have is “Word” or was there ever a time God was  without “Wisdom”, the scriptures say Jesus is the “Wisdom” of God and he is the “Word” that was with God and was God in the beginning before all things which would include time.

    WJ

    #207580
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 04 2010,07:19)

    Quote (Arnold @ Aug. 03 2010,15:03)
    Again and in Proverbs 8:22-30 also explains it how God brought forth His Son,and He was called the master craftsman.  Wisdom is an essence of God and it simple does not make sense that God would bring forth Wisdom, when He was wise from eternity….I never heard wisdom called a master craftsman either.


    So what does that mean Irene? Was there ever a time God did not have is “Word” or was there ever a time God was  without “Wisdom”, the scriptures say Jesus is the “Wisdom” of God and he is the “Word” that was with God and was God in the beginning before all things which would include time.

    WJ


    W.J. You believe that The Word who became Jesus always existed. It says that He is the firstborn of all creation in all the Scriptures I quoted…. Not from all eternity…. Only Jehovah God had immortality then…. Now Jesus too has immortality….. He could have not died for us if He would have immortality……I just can't just ignore 3 Scriptures that state that He was the firstborn of all creation. And then He created all by the power of Jehovah….Col. 1:16 Irene

    #207588
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 03 2010,09:07)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2010,21:02)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 02 2010,15:42)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2010,15:30)
    Keith,
    I think that we use trinitarian's comments because we are trying to help you see some things that they saw and you argue against over and over, like the meaning of 'monogenes' in John, for example.

    I don't think that earlier trinitarians have as much of a difference with me as you, Jack and I do.  I'm trying to get you to realize that so that we can get a bridge built instead of keep building a wall and digging the moat larger and larger.  Do you want to build bridges or build walls and dig moats?

    The earlier trinitarians are different than today's trinitarians, imo.


    kathi

    There is no bridge or gap to a Jesus that was created or “literrally born” before time.

    The Forefathers didn't believe that and especially the Trinitarian Forefathers.

    They believed in the co-eternal, co-equal nature of the Father Son and the Holy Spirit.

    You are trying to twist their words to fit your doctrine. Your recent claim concerning Calvin is proff of this for Calvins own words are…

    …WHEN IT IS EVIDENT THAT THREE PERSONS HAVE SUBSISTED IN ONE GOD FROM ETERNITY…

    And that isn't even close to what you believe about the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is it Kathi?

    WJ


    Actually, Keith, the early Christians did believe in a literal begetting of a Son from the Father before the ages.  That which was co-eternal, co-equal was the NATURE.  That is what their point is.  The nature which they both share always existed, the Son does not contain a new and different nature from the Father but a nature that ALWAYS EXISTED from the Father.  The separate person of the Son did not always exist, but his nature did always exist within the Father.  That is what these early Christians are saying.

    Your nature, common to man, existed since God created man and did not always exist before that.  The Son's nature, common to God, existed always.  The nature common to God did not have a beginning and thus, the nature of God and the Son of God is co-eternal and co-equal.  Perfect came FROM Perfect.  Less than perfect DID NOT come from Perfect.  The Son's nature is not less than the Father's.  That is the message.

    The Christians who think that the Son is not a literal offspring of the Father before the ages are not in agreement with the early Christians!

    The perfect nature always existed and was not made within time or just before time.


    Kathi

    Its real simple. The words “begotten” and “firstborn” have different meanings in scripture.

    So lets go at it in a different way. Show me where the Forefathers like “Ignatius” specifically states Jesus was “literrally born” from the Father or where they state “he had a beginning before time”. Because since the words  “begotten” and “firstborn” according to the scrtiptures can mean something different, then it is merely “conjecture” to say he had a beginnig especially since he was the in the beginning with the Father before time which is “Eternity”. Why don't you addres that point?

    WJ


    Quote
    ; He said to the Son, “From the womb before the day-star I begat Thee.” What is from the womb? Had God a womb? Shall we imagine that God was fashioned with bodily members? God forbid! And why said He, “From the womb,” but that it might be understood that He begat Him of His Own Substance? So then froth the womb came forth That which Himself was who begat. For if He who begat was one thing, and another came forth out of the womb; it were a monster, not a Son.

    from here: http://www.clerus.org/bibliaclerusonline/en/b2a.htm

    This quote was from Augustine. He acknowledges that the Son was truly a Son and not something other that was begotten having a different nature as the Father.

    #207589
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Keith,
    in the beginning was…shows that during eternity, or at least in the beginning-before time, the word existed and by the time came to create the world, the word existed and was with God as a separate person and was God, the begotten God, and didn't become God at sometime after the beginning. It is telling us that the Son didn't become the begotten God in Mary but that He was the begotten God even in the beginning of the world.

    #207592
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Arnold @ Aug. 04 2010,07:31)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 04 2010,07:19)

    Quote (Arnold @ Aug. 03 2010,15:03)
    Again and in Proverbs 8:22-30 also explains it how God brought forth His Son,and He was called the master craftsman.  Wisdom is an essence of God and it simple does not make sense that God would bring forth Wisdom, when He was wise from eternity….I never heard wisdom called a master craftsman either.


    So what does that mean Irene? Was there ever a time God did not have is “Word” or was there ever a time God was  without “Wisdom”, the scriptures say Jesus is the “Wisdom” of God and he is the “Word” that was with God and was God in the beginning before all things which would include time.

    WJ


    W.J.  You believe that The Word who became Jesus always existed.  It says that He is the firstborn of all creation  in all the Scriptures I quoted…. Not from all eternity…. Only Jehovah God had immortality then…. Now Jesus too has immortality….. He could have not died for us if He would have immortality……I just can't just ignore 3 Scriptures that state  that He was the firstborn of all creation.  And then He created all by the power of Jehovah….Col. 1:16    Irene


    But you misinterpret the word “firstborn.”

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;t=3247

    the Roo

    #207595
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    WorshippingJesus said:

    Quote
    I love it when you guys use Trinitarian quotes to support your conclusions even though the conclusions of the Trinitarian Scholars disagree with yours. For instance this part of the NET's commentary…

    Several things should be noted: μονογενής alone, without υἱός, can mean “only son,” “unique son,” “unique one,” etc. (see 1:14). “Furthermore, θεός is anarthrous. As such it carries qualitative force much like it does in 1:1c, where θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος (qeo” hn Jo logo”) means “the Word was fully God” or “the Word was fully of the essence of deity.”” Finally, ὁ ὤν occurs in Rev 1:4, 8; 4:8, 11:17; and 16:5, but even more significantly in the LXX of Exod 3:14. Putting all of this together leads to the translation given in the text.


    Keith,

    People like Kathi and Mike cannot be honest about what the father's said. They have lost the scriptural argument on “monogenes” and “protokos” and “gennao” and “yalad.” All they have left is to find FRAGMENTED quotes from the fathers that they think can help them. In other words, Kathi and Mike cannot overcome our scriptural arguments. So they have to make it appear as if we are out of accord with the fathers saying, “The fathers did not interpret scripture as you do.”

    But from fragmented quotes one can make a person say what he wants. We see this in political campaign ads all the time. Everyone here knows what Kathi and Mike are doing because they were not born yesterday as Kathi and Mike think.
    Jack

    #207598
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Aug. 04 2010,09:58)
    People like Kathi and Mike cannot be honest about what the father's said. They have lost the scriptural argument on “monogenes” and “protokos” and “gennao” and “yalad.” All they have left is to find FRAGMENTED quotes from the fathers that they think can help them.


    Who has “lost” on those words?  And who has shown solid proof of their understanding?

    Let's see, Kathi and I are using the fathers for one reason, and one reason only………THEY AGREE WITH US, NOT YOU TWO!
    :D  :laugh:  :D

    Where is your PROOF that “yalad”, “prototokos pasa ktisis”, “monogenes” and “gennao” support YOUR views?

    Just in case you didn't know, going thread to thread declaring it does not constitute PROOF!    :D

    The only proof you guys offer is the “proof” of “I said so”.

    mike

    #207599
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Aug. 04 2010,09:44)

    Quote (Arnold @ Aug. 04 2010,07:31)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 04 2010,07:19)

    Quote (Arnold @ Aug. 03 2010,15:03)
    Again and in Proverbs 8:22-30 also explains it how God brought forth His Son,and He was called the master craftsman.  Wisdom is an essence of God and it simple does not make sense that God would bring forth Wisdom, when He was wise from eternity….I never heard wisdom called a master craftsman either.


    So what does that mean Irene? Was there ever a time God did not have is “Word” or was there ever a time God was  without “Wisdom”, the scriptures say Jesus is the “Wisdom” of God and he is the “Word” that was with God and was God in the beginning before all things which would include time.

    WJ


    W.J.  You believe that The Word who became Jesus always existed.  It says that He is the firstborn of all creation  in all the Scriptures I quoted…. Not from all eternity…. Only Jehovah God had immortality then…. Now Jesus too has immortality….. He could have not died for us if He would have immortality……I just can't just ignore 3 Scriptures that state  that He was the firstborn of all creation.  And then He created all by the power of Jehovah….Col. 1:16    Irene


    But you misinterpret the word “firstborn.”

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;t=3247

    the Roo


    Jack! There is a Scripture that tells us that the Head of Man is Christ and the head of Christ is God, which does not mean firstborn….1 Corinth. 11:3.. Firstborn is the first of the Children in a Family…. like our Son David is. Most who have more then one child will have a firstborn….. Since there are more then one Scripture that state that Christ is the firstborn, I believe it means firstborn and not first in rank….Even The Word had a beginning. Also in Col. 1:15-18 it says that He was first in all, that He may have preeminence. verse 18. firstborn of all creation and firstborn of the death…..
    Irene

    #207658
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi all,
    Pre-existence of Jesus is another mythology which christianity incorporated into its religion from its pagan neighbours. If Jesus was pre-existing as some being prior to his birth as human he could not be a true human at all but an alien who visited our planet from another celestial abode and after his mission he had flown back to his celestial abode. This is nothing but mythology for which there is no historical proof.
    Be realistic in your approach.
    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam

    #207661
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 04 2010,23:10)
    Hi all,
    Pre-existence of Jesus is another mythology which christianity incorporated into its religion from its pagan neighbours. If Jesus was pre-existing as some being prior to his birth as human he could not be a true human at all but an alien who visited our planet from another celestial abode and after his mission he had flown back to his celestial abode. This is nothing but mythology for which there is no historical proof.
    Be realistic in your approach.
    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam


    Adam! You are ignoring clear Scriptures, and even calling Jesus a liar. He said that He came down from Heaven to do the will of His Father, Also That He wants His glory back which He had before the world was. He is now sitting at the right hand of His Father as The Word of God. He will come back as The Word of God and KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. REV . 19:13AND VERSE 16.
    He was the firstborn of all creation Col. 1:15-17 through Him all was created for Him. Col 1:18 shows us that He is also the firstborn of the death, so He may have preeminence…. Meaning He was first in all.
    H.N. has a good article on this subject, and you need to study it, before you call Jesus a liar.
    Peace Irene

    #207667
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 04 2010,23:10)
    Hi all,
    Pre-existence of Jesus is another mythology which christianity incorporated into its religion from its pagan neighbours. If Jesus was pre-existing as some being prior to his birth as human he could not be a true human at all but an alien who visited our planet from another celestial abode and after his mission he had flown back to his celestial abode. This is nothing but mythology for which there is no historical proof.
    Be realistic in your approach.
    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam


    Adam………Right on brother. Jesus was the (FIRST) of the Human race to become a real son of GOD at the Jordan River , He is of pure (HUMAN) Stock and no from Heavenly STOCK as a Preexistent Morphed Being would be. God was not trying to save a preexisting being who was already perfect , but a (PURE) Human Being He was Perfecting and creating him into his dear son. Scripture plainly say Jesus was son of man, Jesus even said when the SON OF MAN COMES WILL HE FIND FAITH ON THE EARTH. Notice he did not say the son of GOD come but Son of Man. Jesus was (BEGOTTEN) as a SON BY GOD AT the JORDAN. “this day (I) have (begotten) you” God said not some time in the Past. And again (I) shall be a Farther unto him and He shall Be a son unto me. ( this also shows (future tense)> not Past tense.

    peace and love to you and yours Adam………………..gene

    #207680
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Jesus existed in the form of God. Other translations say that he existed with divine nature. Of course this is easily understood in that it says that he emptied himself and was found in the flesh.

    It is written and what is the point in trying to nullify what is written?

    #207682
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 05 2010,02:13)
    He is of pure (HUMAN) Stock and no from Heavenly STOCK


    That is your testimony Gene.

    But I believe this testimony.

    Philippians 2:6-11 (New International Version)
    6 Who, being in very nature[a] God,
    did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
    7 but made himself nothing,
    taking the very nature[b] of a servant,
    being made in human likeness.
    8 And being found in appearance as a man,
    he humbled himself
    and became obedient to death—
    even death on a cross!
    9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place
    and gave him the name that is above every name,
    10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
    in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
    11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,
    to the glory of God the Father.

    You are against this Gene.

    Notice how the first sentence in particular completely exposes your quoted statement for what it is. I am not sure what you think you might gain from denying his origins.

    Are you that hard-hearted that such words have no impact on you?

    #207683
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 04 2010,23:10)
    Hi all,
    Pre-existence of Jesus is another mythology which christianity incorporated into its religion from its pagan neighbours. If Jesus was pre-existing as some being prior to his birth as human he could not be a true human at all but an alien who visited our planet from another celestial abode and after his mission he had flown back to his celestial abode. This is nothing but mythology for which there is no historical proof.
    Be realistic in your approach.
    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam


    To Gol.

    We should believe Jesus own testimony when he said, “before Abraham I am”.

    Just because you do not believe his testimony, doesn't mean that we all should. It might make you feel better if we all followed your view here, but that is not the point is it.

    We all have to stand before him and give an account. And Jesus said, “My sheep hear my voice”. And then he said something like “and the voice of another they will not hear”.

    Maybe now you can understand why it is that it appears that we cannot hear you.

    Of course we do hear you, but we do not believe your testimony regarding Jesus origins.

    Rather we believe that his origins are ancient. Not from 2000 or so years ago, as you teach.

    #207690

    To Kathi and Mike and all.

    My business has picked up which is good but requires me to spend less time here on HN.

    I have every intent to continue the debate with Mike in the debates thread, and Kathi I have every intent of answering both yours and Mikes claim that the Early Church Fathers supports your and Mike's views more than Jack and myself.

    Briefly I might mention the theology of the Athanasian Creed is firmly rooted in the Augustinian tradition, using exact terminology of “Augustine's On the Trinity” (published 415 AD).

    A close study of Augustine’s writings on the Trinity shows that his theology as well as the other Fathers lines up with Jacks belief and mine and not with the views of Kathi and especially Mike.

    The Fathers view is there is “One God” consisting of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit, not one God who brought birth to a separate being who is another God, not to mention their view of the Holy Spirit is totally alien to Kathi's and Mike's views.

    It will sure be interesting to see how they can prove that the Early Church Fathers views line up with theirs and not ours. :)

    WJ

    #207699
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 03 2010,16:40)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 03 2010,09:07)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2010,21:02)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 02 2010,15:42)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2010,15:30)
    Keith,
    I think that we use trinitarian's comments because we are trying to help you see some things that they saw and you argue against over and over, like the meaning of 'monogenes' in John, for example.

    I don't think that earlier trinitarians have as much of a difference with me as you, Jack and I do.  I'm trying to get you to realize that so that we can get a bridge built instead of keep building a wall and digging the moat larger and larger.  Do you want to build bridges or build walls and dig moats?

    The earlier trinitarians are different than today's trinitarians, imo.


    kathi

    There is no bridge or gap to a Jesus that was created or “literrally born” before time.

    The Forefathers didn't believe that and especially the Trinitarian Forefathers.

    They believed in the co-eternal, co-equal nature of the Father Son and the Holy Spirit.

    You are trying to twist their words to fit your doctrine. Your recent claim concerning Calvin is proff of this for Calvins own words are…

    …WHEN IT IS EVIDENT THAT THREE PERSONS HAVE SUBSISTED IN ONE GOD FROM ETERNITY…

    And that isn't even close to what you believe about the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is it Kathi?

    WJ


    Actually, Keith, the early Christians did believe in a literal begetting of a Son from the Father before the ages.  That which was co-eternal, co-equal was the NATURE.  That is what their point is.  The nature which they both share always existed, the Son does not contain a new and different nature from the Father but a nature that ALWAYS EXISTED from the Father.  The separate person of the Son did not always exist, but his nature did always exist within the Father.  That is what these early Christians are saying.

    Your nature, common to man, existed since God created man and did not always exist before that.  The Son's nature, common to God, existed always.  The nature common to God did not have a beginning and thus, the nature of God and the Son of God is co-eternal and co-equal.  Perfect came FROM Perfect.  Less than perfect DID NOT come from Perfect.  The Son's nature is not less than the Father's.  That is the message.

    The Christians who think that the Son is not a literal offspring of the Father before the ages are not in agreement with the early Christians!

    The perfect nature always existed and was not made within time or just before time.


    Kathi

    Its real simple. The words “begotten” and “firstborn” have different meanings in scripture.

    So lets go at it in a different way. Show me where the Forefathers like “Ignatius” specifically states Jesus was “literrally born” from the Father or where they state “he had a beginning before time”. Because since the words  “begotten” and “firstborn” according to the scrtiptures can mean something different, then it is merely “conjecture” to say he had a beginnig especially since he was the in the beginning with the Father before time which is “Eternity”. Why don't you addres that point?

    WJ


    Quote
    ; He said to the Son, “From the womb before the day-star I begat Thee.” What is from the womb? Had God a womb? Shall we imagine that God was fashioned with bodily members? God forbid! And why said He, “From the womb,” but that it might be understood that He begat Him of His Own Substance? So then froth the womb came forth That which Himself was who begat. For if He who begat was one thing, and another came forth out of the womb; it were a monster, not a Son.

    from here: http://www.clerus.org/bibliaclerusonline/en/b2a.htm

    This quote was from Augustine.  He acknowledges that the Son was truly a Son and not something other that was begotten having a different nature as the Father.


    Keith,
    You need to re-read what Augustine says in the quote.

    You said:

    Quote
    They believed in the co-eternal, co-equal nature of the Father Son and the Holy Spirit.

    You are right, they did believe and so do I. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit all have the same NATURE. My kids and I and our inner-spirits all have the same mankind nature as well. My kids and I are co-equal in nature, and our nature has been around since God gave it to mankind.

    The statement, “they believed in the co-eternal, co-equal nature” just means that they all had the SAME type of nature, the nature of deity. This nature wasn't made anew and different for each person, like man's nature was new and not eternal, or the nature of animals was new and not eternal, their nature has always existed. The Son's nature has always existed, He, as a separate person, has not…but instead, He was brought forth/begotten before the ages, during eternity from the eternal substance within the Father. That is what the early Christians are saying.

    This has been shown by Mike and I already.

    #207700
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Aug. 04 2010,09:44)

    Quote (Arnold @ Aug. 04 2010,07:31)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 04 2010,07:19)

    Quote (Arnold @ Aug. 03 2010,15:03)
    Again and in Proverbs 8:22-30 also explains it how God brought forth His Son,and He was called the master craftsman.  Wisdom is an essence of God and it simple does not make sense that God would bring forth Wisdom, when He was wise from eternity….I never heard wisdom called a master craftsman either.


    So what does that mean Irene? Was there ever a time God did not have is “Word” or was there ever a time God was  without “Wisdom”, the scriptures say Jesus is the “Wisdom” of God and he is the “Word” that was with God and was God in the beginning before all things which would include time.

    WJ


    W.J.  You believe that The Word who became Jesus always existed.  It says that He is the firstborn of all creation  in all the Scriptures I quoted…. Not from all eternity…. Only Jehovah God had immortality then…. Now Jesus too has immortality….. He could have not died for us if He would have immortality……I just can't just ignore 3 Scriptures that state  that He was the firstborn of all creation.  And then He created all by the power of Jehovah….Col. 1:16    Irene


    But you misinterpret the word “firstborn.”

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;t=3247

    the Roo


    That is your opinion only, Scripture says that He was the firstborn of all creation and that He was The Word of God and it says in John 1:1 IN THE BEGINNING. So which beginning was it!!!! It was the beginning of The Word of God…… And then that Word became flesh……verse 14. All of that is not MY INTERPETATION, BUT IT IS SCRIPTURE. And I go by Scripture….Not what men like you will want to teach me……No thank you!!!! W.J.ALSO IS ADDING WHEN HE SAID AND TIME, AS FAR AS THE BEGINNING GOES…John 1:1-14 says nothing of time only the beginning…..He came forth from the Father……and also wisdom was born… read it again my friend……ARE YOU W.J.
    Peace Irene

    #207704

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2010,15:30)
    Keith,
    I think that we use trinitarian's comments because we are trying to help you see some things that they saw and you argue against over and over, like the meaning of 'monogenes' in John, for example.


    Kathi

    The word “Monogenes” was not found referring to Jesus until John 1:14, it is not in John 1:1 and follows after the word “ginomai” (genes) the second half of Monogenes which means “came into existence. Jesus came into existence in the flesh and became the “Monogenes” ((1) single of its kind, only which is the first definition of “Monogenes”. A close study of Phil 2:6-8 shows “ginomai” being used by Paul in reference to Jesus coming in the likeness of sinful flesh (coming into existence) and is found in fashion as a man.

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 02 2010,15:30)
    I don't think that earlier trinitarians have as much of a difference with me as you, Jack and I do.  I'm trying to get you to realize that so that we can get a bridge built instead of keep building a wall and digging the moat larger and larger.  Do you want to build bridges or build walls and dig moats?

    The earlier trinitarians are different than today's trinitarians, imo.


    And I am trying to get you to realize that the Trinitarian Fathers are miles apart from you and Mike in their differences as opposed to Jack and I.

    You and Mike insist that the Early Church Fathers believed Jesus had a beginning and when asked to show where this is so you give a quote from Augustine which in context is ambiguous especially seeing that Augustine believed in One Divine being consisting of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit

    Why have you and Mike ignored Ignatius quote below?…

    There is one Physician
    who is possessed both of flesh and spirit;
    **BOTH BORN AND UNBORN**;
    GOD EXISTING IN FLESH;
    true life in death;
    both of Mary and of God;
    first passible and then impassible,
    –Jesus Christ our Lord (Letter to the Ephesians VII).

    **BOTH BORN AND UNBORN**   **BOTH BORN AND UNBORN**   **BOTH BORN AND UNBORN**

    What does “BORN AND UNBORN” mean Kathi?

    Not to mention the Early Church Fathers believed in the “One God” consisting of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. Not a “Binity” where there are 2 divine beings, one being who is literally born from the other.

    I think I might create a thread on the Trinity and the Early Church Fathers.

    WJ

    #207708

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 04 2010,15:28)
    Keith,
    You need to re-read what Augustine says in the quote.


    Kathi

    Why not read a little more of the context….

    Augustine…

    Now take for the present, as you thus take two men, the Father commanding, the Son obeying, yet God and God. “But the first two together are two men, the Latter together is but One God; this is a divine miracle”. Meanwhile if you would that with you I acknowledge the obedience, do you first with me acknowledge the Nature. The Father begat That which Himself is. If the Father begat ought else than what Himself is, He did not beget a true Son. The Father saith to the Son, “From the womb before the day-star, I begat Thee.”8 What is, “before the day-star “? By the day-star times are signified. So then before times, before all that is called “before;” before all that is not, or before all that is. “For the Gospel does not say, “In the beginning God made the Word;” as it is said, “In the beginning God made the Heaven and the earth;”9 or, “In the beginning was the Word born;” or, “In the beginning God begat the Word.” But what says it? “He was, He was, He was.” You hear, “He was;” believe. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”10 So often do ye hear, “Was:” seek not for thee, for that He always “was.” He then who always was, and was always with the Son, for that God is able to beget without thee; He said to the Son, “From the womb before the day-star I begat Thee.” What is from the womb? Had God a womb? Shall we imagine that God was fashioned with bodily members? God forbid! And why said He, “From the womb,” but that it might be understood that He begat Him of His Own Substance? So then froth the womb came forth That which Himself was who begat. For if He who begat was one thing, and another came forth out of the womb; it were a monster, not a Son.

    Again, The theology of the creed is firmly rooted in the Augustinian tradition, using exact terminology of Augustine's On the Trinity (published 415 AD).

    This is the Athanasian Creed…

    Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
    And the catholic faith is this, “that we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; Neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the Substance. FOR THERE IS ONE PERSON OF THE FATHER, ANOTHER OF THE SON, AND ANOTHER OF THE HOLY GHOST. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost is all one: the glory equal, the majesty coeternal. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Ghost. The Father uncreate, the Son uncreate, and the Holy Ghost uncreate. The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the Holy Ghost incomprehensible. The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Ghost eternal. AND YET THEY ARE NOT THREE ETERNALS, BUT ONE ETERNAL. As there are not three Uncreated nor three Incomprehensibles, but one Uncreated and one Incomprehensible. SO LIKEWISE THE FATHER IS ALMIGHTY, THE SON ALMIGHTY, AND THE HOLY GHOST ALMIGHTY. And yet they are not three Almighties, but one Almighty. So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God. So likewise the Father is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Ghost Lord. And yet not three Lords, but one Lord. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by Himself to be God and Lord, So are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say, There be three Gods, or three Lords.
    The Father is made of none: neither created nor begotten. The Son is of the Father alone; not made, nor created, but begotten. The Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son: neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding. So there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Ghost, not three Holy Ghosts. AND IN THIS TRINITY NONE IS BEFORE OR AFTER OTHER; NONE IS GREATER OR LESS THAN ANOTHER; BUT THE WHOLE THREE PERSONS ARE COETERNAL TOGETHER, AND COEQUAL: SO THAT IN ALL THINGS, AS IS AFORESAID, THE UNITY IN TRINITY AND THE TRINITY IN UNITY IS TO BE WORSHIPED. HE, THEREFORE, THAT WILL BE SAVED MUST THUS THINK OF THE TRINITY.
    Furthermore, it is necessary to everlasting salvation that he also believe faithfully the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ. For the right faith is, that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and Man; God of the Substance of the Father, begotten before the worlds; and Man of the substance of His mother, born in the world; Perfect God and perfect Man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting. Equal to the Father as touching His Godhead, and inferior to the Father as touching His manhood; Who, although He be God and Man, yet He is not two, but one Christ: One, not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh, but by taking the manhood into God; One altogether; not by confusion of Substance, but by unity of Person. For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and Man is one Christ; Who suffered for our salvation; descended into hell, rose again the third day from the dead; He ascended into heaven; He sitteth on the right hand of the Father, God Almighty; from whence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies, and shall give an account of their own works. And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting; and they that have done evil, into everlasting fire.
    This is the catholic faith; which except a man believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.

    As you can see there are several things that the creed disagrees with you on which are critical to the faith.

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 04 2010,15:28)
    You are right, they did believe and so do I.  The Father, Son and Holy Spirit all have the same NATURE. My kids and I and our inner-spirits all have the same mankind nature as well.  My kids and I are co-equal in nature, and our nature has been around since God gave it to mankind.


    Why are you misrepresenting what they believe by coming across like you agree with them when in fact you are miles from their belief.

    AND YET THEY ARE NOT THREE ETERNALS, BUT ONE ETERNAL. As there are not three Uncreated nor three Incomprehensibles, but one Uncreated and one Incomprehensible. SO LIKEWISE THE FATHER IS ALMIGHTY, THE SON ALMIGHTY, AND THE HOLY GHOST ALMIGHTY.

    Kathi you do not believe the Holy Spirit is a separate person than the Father and Jesus and you also do not believe that Jesus is the Almighty or the “Most High God”. You also believe there are 2 eternals an 2 incomprehensibles and 2 uncreateds don’t you?

    BUT THE WHOLE THREE PERSONS ARE COETERNAL TOGETHER, AND COEQUAL: SO THAT IN ALL THINGS, AS IS AFORESAID, THE UNITY IN TRINITY AND THE TRINITY IN UNITY IS TO BE WORSHIPED. HE, THEREFORE, THAT WILL BE SAVED MUST THUS THINK OF THE TRINITY.

    The above is not at all what you and Mike believes, is it? Yet that is what Jack and I believe.

    WJ

    #207715
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 05 2010,08:41)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 04 2010,15:28)
    Keith,
    You need to re-read what Augustine says in the quote.


    Kathi

    Why not read a little more of the context….

    Augustine…

    Now take for the present, as you thus take two men, the Father commanding, the Son obeying, yet God and God. “But the first two together are two men, the Latter together is but One God; this is a divine miracle”. Meanwhile if you would that with you I acknowledge the obedience, do you first with me acknowledge the Nature. The Father begat That which Himself is. If the Father begat ought else than what Himself is, He did not beget a true Son. The Father saith to the Son, “From the womb before the day-star, I begat Thee.”8 What is, “before the day-star “? By the day-star times are signified. So then before times, before all that is called “before;” before all that is not, or before all that is. “For the Gospel does not say, “In the beginning God made the Word;” as it is said, “In the beginning God made the Heaven and the earth;”9 or, “In the beginning was the Word born;” or, “In the beginning God begat the Word.” But what says it? “He was, He was, He was.” You hear, “He was;” believe. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”10 So often do ye hear, “Was:” seek not for thee, for that He always “was.” He then who always was, and was always with the Son, for that God is able to beget without thee; He said to the Son, “From the womb before the day-star I begat Thee.” What is from the womb? Had God a womb? Shall we imagine that God was fashioned with bodily members? God forbid! And why said He, “From the womb,” but that it might be understood that He begat Him of His Own Substance? So then froth the womb came forth That which Himself was who begat. For if He who begat was one thing, and another came forth out of the womb; it were a monster, not a Son.

    Again, The theology of the creed is firmly rooted in the Augustinian tradition, using exact terminology of Augustine's On the Trinity (published 415 AD).

    This is the Athanasian Creed…

    Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.
    And the catholic faith is this, “that we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; Neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the Substance. FOR THERE IS ONE PERSON OF THE FATHER, ANOTHER OF THE SON, AND ANOTHER OF THE HOLY GHOST. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost is all one: the glory equal, the majesty coeternal. Such as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Ghost. The Father uncreate, the Son uncreate, and the Holy Ghost uncreate. The Father incomprehensible, the Son incomprehensible, and the Holy Ghost incomprehensible. The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Ghost eternal. AND YET THEY ARE NOT THREE ETERNALS, BUT ONE ETERNAL. As there are not three Uncreated nor three Incomprehensibles, but one Uncreated and one Incomprehensible. SO LIKEWISE THE FATHER IS ALMIGHTY, THE SON ALMIGHTY, AND THE HOLY GHOST ALMIGHTY. And yet they are not three Almighties, but one Almighty. So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God. So likewise the Father is Lord, the Son Lord, and the Holy Ghost Lord. And yet not three Lords, but one Lord. For like as we are compelled by the Christian verity to acknowledge every Person by Himself to be God and Lord, So are we forbidden by the catholic religion to say, There be three Gods, or three Lords.
    The Father is made of none: neither created nor begotten. The Son is of the Father alone; not made, nor created, but begotten. The Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son: neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding. So there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy Ghost, not three Holy Ghosts. AND IN THIS TRINITY NONE IS BEFORE OR AFTER OTHER; NONE IS GREATER OR LESS THAN ANOTHER; BUT THE WHOLE THREE PERSONS ARE COETERNAL TOGETHER, AND COEQUAL: SO THAT IN ALL THINGS, AS IS AFORESAID, THE UNITY IN TRINITY AND THE TRINITY IN UNITY IS TO BE WORSHIPED. HE, THEREFORE, THAT WILL BE SAVED MUST THUS THINK OF THE TRINITY.
    Furthermore, it is necessary to everlasting salvation that he also believe faithfully the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ. For the right faith is, that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is God and Man; God of the Substance of the Father, begotten before the worlds; and Man of the substance of His mother, born in the world; Perfect God and perfect Man, of a reasonable soul and human flesh subsisting. Equal to the Father as touching His Godhead, and inferior to the Father as touching His manhood; Who, although He be God and Man, yet He is not two, but one Christ: One, not by conversion of the Godhead into flesh, but by taking the manhood into God; One altogether; not by confusion of Substance, but by unity of Person. For as the reasonable soul and flesh is one man, so God and Man is one Christ; Who suffered for our salvation; descended into hell, rose again the third day from the dead; He ascended into heaven; He sitteth on the right hand of the Father, God Almighty; from whence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies, and shall give an account of their own works. And they that have done good shall go into life everlasting; and they that have done evil, into everlasting fire.
    This is the catholic faith; which except a man believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.

    As you can see there are several things that the creed disagrees with you on which are critical to the faith.

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 04 2010,15:28)
    You are right, they did believe and so do I.  The Father, Son and Holy Spirit all have the same NATURE. My kids and I and our inner-spirits all have the same mankind nature as well.  My kids and I are co-equal in nature, and our nature has been around since God gave it to mankind.


    Why are you misrepresenting what they believe by coming across like you agree with them when in fact you are miles from their belief.

    AND YET THEY ARE NOT THREE ETERNALS, BUT ONE ETERNAL. As there are not three Uncreated nor three Incomprehensibles, but one Uncreated and one Incomprehensible. SO LIKEWISE THE FATHER IS ALMIGHTY, THE SON ALMIGHTY, AND THE HOLY GHOST ALMIGHTY.

    Kathi you do not believe the Holy Spirit is a separate person than the Father and Jesus and you also do not believe that Jesus is the Almighty or the “Most High God”. You also believe there are 2 eternals an 2 incomprehensibles and 2 uncreateds don’t you?

    BUT THE WHOLE THREE PERSONS ARE COETERNAL TOGETHER, AND COEQUAL: SO THAT IN ALL THINGS, AS IS AFORESAID, THE UNITY IN TRINITY AND THE TRINITY IN UNITY IS TO BE WORSHIPED. HE, THEREFORE, THAT WILL BE SAVED MUST THUS THINK OF THE TRINITY.

    The above is not at all what you and Mike believes, is it? Yet that is what Jack and I believe.

    WJ


    Keith,

    Augustine said that those who misrepresent his writings (Kathi) are “dull of understanding.”

    Quote
    I expect, indeed, that some, who are more dull of understanding, will imagine that in some parts of my books I have held sentiments which I have not held, or have not held those which I have. But their error, as none can be ignorant, ought not to be attributed to me, if they have deviated into false doctrine through following my steps without apprehending me, while I am compelled to pick my way through a hard and obscure subject: seeing that neither can any one, in any way, rightly ascribe the numerous and various errors of heretics to the holy testimonies themselves of the divine books; although all of them endeavor to defend out of those same Scriptures their own false and erroneous opinions. The law of Christ, that is, charity, admonishes me clearly, and commands me with a sweet constraint, that when men think that I have held in my books something false which I have not held, and that same falsehood displeases one and pleases another, I should prefer to be blamed by him who reprehends the falsehood, rather than praised by him who praises it. For although I, who never held the error, am not rightly blamed by the former, yet the error itself is rightly censured; while by the latter neither am I rightly praised, who am thought to have held that which the truth censures, nor the sentiment itself, which the truth also censures. Let us therefore essay the work which we have undertaken in the name of the Lord.


    http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/130101.htm

    Jack

Viewing 20 posts - 8,661 through 8,680 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account