Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 8,521 through 8,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #206552
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    t8 said:

    Quote
    Trinitarians can't help themselves by translating John 1:1c the way they do, but there are actually translations that recognise that the Word was divine, as opposed to the Word was God. Even some Trinitarian scholars agree that John 1:1c used theos in a qualitative sense.


    More double talk from t8. I still can't see how the “qualitative” reading hurts the trinity doctrine.

    the Roo

    #206553

    Quote (t8 @ July 28 2010,04:50)
    The Trinity doctrine is not the conclusion that one should draw from this writing. Belief that Jesus is the Christ and the Son is the foundation of true faith and Jesus built his Church on this truth. The Trinity Doctrine is not the true foundation and is not John's conclusion

    John 20:30-31.
    30 And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book:
    31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. “


    t8

    Then someone should have informed John and Jesus for not rebuking Thomas blasphemy a few sciptures ealier.

    And Thomas answered and said unto him, “My Lord and my God. Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed [are] they that have not seen, and [yet] have believed.

    The claim to be the Son of God and that God was your own personal Father was understood by the Jews and John to be “equal” to God…

    Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, “but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God“. John 5:18

    These are Johns own words and commentary.

    Which is proof of Johns meaning of John 1:1 in the Prologue.

    So it is you that misrepresents Johns meaning of the term “Monogenes” (only of its kind) Son of God.

    If being the “Son of God” was common then why did the demons cry out “thou art the Son of God” and Jesus telling them to hush? Why did it take a supernatural revelation from the Father to Peter?

    Of course it still takes a Revelation from the Father to know who and what the “Monogenes” (Only of its Kind) Son of God is.

    That brother John and his Gospel sure is a big thorn in the flesh for the “Arians” and their heretical doctrines.  :)

    WJ

    #206557
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote
    That brother John and his Gospel sure is a big thorn in the flesh for the “Arians” and their heretical doctrines.

    This kind of statement builds walls, causes divisions…and has proven adversely effective. Tasteless salt is all that is…this should stop.

    Matthew 5:13
    “You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt has become tasteless, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled under foot by men.

    Mark 9:50
    “Salt is good; but if the salt becomes unsalty, with what will you make it salty again? Have salt in yourselves, and be at peace with one another.”

    Colossians 4:6
    Let your speech always be with grace, as though seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should respond to each person.

    A divisive statement spoken, tasteless salt…and then a smiley face, also in poor taste? Why? Has there been anything good coming from this kind of behavior. Many are guilty of this here. Stop, please!

    #206558
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    WorshippingJesus said to t8:

    Quote
    The claim to be the Son of God and that God was your own personal Father was understood by the Jews and John to be “equal” to God…

    Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, “but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God”. John 5:18


    Keith,

    True! The Greek word “idios” is present in the original. John said that Jesus was making God His own Father

    NIV: 18For this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

    NASB: 18For this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God.

    ESV: 18This was why the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.

    This was against the law of Moses:

    John 19:7: 7The Jews answered him, “We have a law, and according to that law he ought to die because he has made himself the Son of God.”

    that law:

    Lev. 24:16: 16Whoever blasphemes the name of the LORD shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death.

    To claim to be the Son of God in the way Jesus did was to blaspheme YHWH's Name. Therefore, when John said that Jesus was making Himself EQUAL with God he meant it.

    Jack

    #206560
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    WorshippingJesus said to Mikeboll:

    Quote
    You expect me to accept the translation of a few “Non Biblical Hebrew or Greek scholars” who could not translate the fuzz off of a peanut when it came to Hebrew or Greek translation.

    the Roo

    #206562

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 28 2010,13:45)

    Quote
    That brother John and his Gospel sure is a big thorn in the flesh for the “Arians” and their heretical doctrines.

    This kind of statement builds walls, causes divisions…and has proven adversely effective. Tasteless salt is all that is…this should stop.

    Matthew 5:13
    “You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt has become tasteless, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled under foot by men.

    Mark 9:50
    “Salt is good; but if the salt becomes unsalty, with what will you make it salty again? Have salt in yourselves, and be at peace with one another.”

    Colossians 4:6
    Let your speech always be with grace, as though seasoned with salt, so that you will know how you should respond to each person.

    A divisive statement spoken, tasteless salt…and then a smiley face, also in poor taste?  Why?  Has there been anything good coming from this kind of behavior.  Many are guilty of this here.  Stop, please!


    Kathi

    You have a right to your opinion.

    Jesus called men vipers and whited sepulchers and children of the Devil. I have never went that far with anyone here.

    My statement is mild compared to the personal attacks that have been made on me by JA and Mike.

    My statement is a statement of facts and is “meant to divide” from the heretical teachings of the Arians.

    This is not an attack on the person like so many here do. It is an attack on false teachings that are not found in the scriptures.

    There is no unity among the gainsayers for Jesus said how can two walk together unless they agree?

    The Church of Jesus Christ is under a constant barrage of attacks from wells without water who teach falsehoods.

    Jesus said my sheep know my voice and follow me!

    Paul said…

    Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; “reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when “they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away [their] ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables”. 2 Tim 4:2-4

    WJ

    #206564
    Lightenup
    Participant

    It is one thing for the Son of God to be equal in nature to God, His Father…another thing to be the God OF God where one is the source/unbegotten and the other is from the source/begotten (before the ages). The two cannot be the same exact being. They are not two in one being but two together as our God (creator and authority) yet each being separate from the other. I am not speaking here as God being one 'being' in this context, I am speaking of God as a kind of being which consists of two united, together serving as our creator and authority each with different roles for our creation and our salvation.

    #206565
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    WJ………..For the hundredth time there is (NO) Such thing as a TRINITY , it is a (FALSE) Teaching. It creates the (IMAGE) of the Man of Sin , by saying Jesus was and is GOD ALMIGHTY. You and Jumping Jack flash are both miserably wrong. You both spend all your time bouncing around and saying nothing that can even begin to disprove this simple scripture. “FOR THO ARE THE (ONLY) TRUE GOD”. LET THAT SINK INTO BOTH YOUR TRINITARIAN HEADS.

    peace and love………………………………gene

    #206567

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 28 2010,14:08)
    It is one thing for the Son of God to be equal in nature to God, His Father…another thing to be the God OF God where one is the source/unbegotten and the other is from the source/begotten (before the ages).

    Kathi, there is no scripture that says the Father is the source of Jesus. They are One.

    Your theory is flawed because you insist that “begotten” always means to be “Born”. It doesn't and there are no scriptures that prove Jesus had a beginning, but it is only conjecture for those who reject Jesus as the “The One True God”.

    WJ

    #206568

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 28 2010,14:09)
    WJ………..For the hundredth time there is (NO) Such thing as a TRINITY , it is a (FALSE) Teaching. It creates the (IMAGE) of the Man of Sin , by saying Jesus was and is GOD ALMIGHTY. You and Jumping Jack flash are both miserably wrong. You both spend all your time bouncing around and saying nothing that can even begin to disprove this simple scripture. “FOR THO ARE THE (ONLY) TRUE GOD”. LET THAT SINK INTO BOTH YOUR  TRINITARIAN HEADS.

    peace and love………………………………gene


    Gene

    Why do you waste your breath? I know in whom I have believed and none of your lame accusations will ever change that.

    WJ

    #206569
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 29 2010,06:08)
    It is one thing for the Son of God to be equal in nature to God, His Father…another thing to be the God OF God where one is the source/unbegotten and the other is from the source/begotten (before the ages).  The two cannot be the same exact being.  They are not two in one being but two together as our God (creator and authority) yet each being separate from the other. I am not speaking here as God being one 'being' in this context, I am speaking of God as a kind of being which consists of two united, together serving as our creator and authority each with different roles for our creation and our salvation.


    The sun generates its rays. Yet there was never a time in the sun's existence that it did not generate its rays. Therefore, there was never a time when the sun was without its radiance.

    Jesus is the “radiance” of the Father's glory (Heb. 1). Was there ever a time when the Father did not have radiance?

    the Roo

    #206570
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 29 2010,06:09)
    WJ………..For the hundredth time there is (NO) Such thing as a TRINITY , it is a (FALSE) Teaching. It creates the (IMAGE) of the Man of Sin , by saying Jesus was and is GOD ALMIGHTY. You and Jumping Jack flash are both miserably wrong. You both spend all your time bouncing around and saying nothing that can even begin to disprove this simple scripture. “FOR THO ARE THE (ONLY) TRUE GOD”. LET THAT SINK INTO BOTH YOUR  TRINITARIAN HEADS.

    peace and love………………………………gene


    Gene,

    Jesus was still a servant when He called His Father the “only true God.” He is exalted and now John calls Jesus the “only true God” (1 John 5:20).

    servant
      exalted
    servant
      exalted
    servant
      exalted

    the Roo

    #206571
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Keith,
    Most people here want to understand rightly. Everyone here is loved by God and He wants them to understand rightly. Everyone has some truth and no one has the whole truth. I think that it would be better to take the stand that other people have value to bring here and be more ambitious to bring out that value instead of continually lessening their value. Don't you? You are right that many are guilty of the degradation of others and it has not been effective towards glorifying God which should be our common goal. Instead of repenting of this, it is justified by the self-righteousness (of many) thinking that they are serving God by degrading others because Jesus called out the vipers. Well, Jesus can do that because He holds all truth, we do not. Jesus wants us to be humble and think of others as better than themselves. Why not try that approach for a while and let God take care of the disciplining of the vipers. You may have better relationships here if you don't view people as false teachers, maybe wrong (and then again, maybe right and you are wrong) in what they understand, but not ravenous wolves seeking to destroy. You have a strong personality here, it could be used to be very much a leader in humility and affect the humility of many.

    Please!

    #206573

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 28 2010,14:32)
    Keith,
    Most people here want to understand rightly.


    Kathi

    I wish that were true. But I think some here do not want to rightly understand.

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 28 2010,14:32)
    You may have better relationships here if you don't view people as false teachers, maybe wrong (and then again, maybe right and you are wrong) in what they understand, but not ravenous wolves seeking to destroy.


    Problem with this is they view me as a false teacher as they do you also for worshipping Jesus.

    As far as ravenous wolves, they are here and Jesus and the Apostles warned us of them.

    I try real hard to stick with scriptures without ad hominems and accusing or belittleing as some do here.

    WJ

    #206574
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 28 2010,14:16)

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 28 2010,14:08)
    It is one thing for the Son of God to be equal in nature to God, His Father…another thing to be the God OF God where one is the source/unbegotten and the other is from the source/begotten (before the ages).

    Kathi, there is no scripture that says the Father is the source of Jesus. They are One.

    Your theory is flawed because you insist that “begotten” always means to be “Born”. It doesn't and there are no scriptures that prove Jesus had a beginning, but it is only conjecture for those who reject Jesus as the “The One True God”.

    WJ


    Keith,
    I do not say what you say I do. Maybe you don't mean to misrepresent my words, I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

    I have agreed that begotten doesn't ALWAYS mean born yet you say that I think that it always means born.

    It is obvious to the early christians that the Father is the source.

    Calvin says this (for example);
    “He says, then, that we subsist in the Father, and that it is by the Son, because the Father is indeed the foundation of all existence; but, as it is by the Son that we are united to him, so he communicates to us through him the reality of existence.”
    found here: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom39.xv.i.html

    I have also shown recently of the many who say that it was the Father who begat and the Son was the begotten. It is obvious to MANY that the Father is the source, not the Son although He brings things into being by the son.

    I'll be gone for a while…

    #206575

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 28 2010,14:54)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 28 2010,14:16)

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 28 2010,14:08)
    It is one thing for the Son of God to be equal in nature to God, His Father…another thing to be the God OF God where one is the source/unbegotten and the other is from the source/begotten (before the ages).

    Kathi, there is no scripture that says the Father is the source of Jesus. They are One.

    Your theory is flawed because you insist that “begotten” always means to be “Born”. It doesn't and there are no scriptures that prove Jesus had a beginning, but it is only conjecture for those who reject Jesus as the “The One True God”.

    WJ


    Keith,
    I do not say what you say I do.  Maybe you don't mean to misrepresent my words, I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

    I have agreed that begotten doesn't ALWAYS mean born yet you say that I think that it always means born.

    It is obvious to the early christians that the Father is the source.

    Calvin says this (for example);
    “He says, then, that we subsist in the Father, and that it is by the Son, because the Father is indeed the foundation of all existence; but, as it is by the Son that we are united to him, so he communicates to us through him the reality of existence.”
    found here: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom39.xv.i.html

    I have also shown recently of the many who say that it was the Father who begat and the Son was the begotten.  It is obvious to MANY that the Father is the source, not the Son although He brings things into being by the son.

    I'll be gone for a while…


    Kathi

    But none of what you are posting implys Jesus had a beginning and again there is no scripture that says the Father is the source of Jesus.

    Why do you use the commentary of “Trinitarians” who obviously believe Jesus is “One God” with the Father, Son and Holy Spirit who always existed?    ???

    I believe you are misrepresenting their views when you do this.

    WJ

    #206577
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    BUMP FOR KATHI:

    Quote (Lightenup @ July 29 2010,06:08)
    It is one thing for the Son of God to be equal in nature to God, His Father…another thing to be the God OF God where one is the source/unbegotten and the other is from the source/begotten (before the ages).  The two cannot be the same exact being.  They are not two in one being but two together as our God (creator and authority) yet each being separate from the other. I am not speaking here as God being one 'being' in this context, I am speaking of God as a kind of being which consists of two united, together serving as our creator and authority each with different roles for our creation and our salvation.


    The sun generates its rays. Yet there was never a time in the sun's existence that it did not generate its rays. Therefore, there was never a time when the sun was without its radiance.

    Jesus is the “radiance” of the Father's glory (Heb. 1). Was there ever a time when the Father did not have radiance?

    WAS THERE EVER A TIME THAT THE FATHER DID NOT HAVE RADIANCE?

    the Roo

    #206579
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Jack just made up that stuff about the sun.

    When last did you listen to a Science program dealing with star formation, Jack?

    It's in that title, 'Star Formation'. Star is Sun. 'A Star is born'… Was THE SUN (God) created?

    A Star/Sun is created from clouds of stellar dust being compressed so much that a nuclear fusion occurs and heat and light are given off in the reaction.

    Therefore, before nuclear fusion took place the 'Sun' did not give off any light but heat only.

    Jack is so desperate to make a link that he didn't check his facts.
    Jack also says that the rays from the Sun are always part of the Sun because he wants to say that Jesus (rays) is part of God (the Sun)….close Jack, close. The rays are from the Sun, yes, but once emitted, the rays are Independent, not supported, unlinked, cut off from the Sun that emitted it.
    Besides, when those who overcome become like Jesus, does this mean that, they too, will become 'God' like you try to imply…the rays of the Sun are the Sun itself, really? The water from the tap is the tap itself; rain from the cloud is the cloud itself, the son of the Father is …of the same essence as the Father, yes, …in a Spiritual sense, that is, Goodness, Righteousness, Truth, Love, power, authority…but those who overcome will also be 'of the same essence as the Father'.
    How is a 'God' created? God is not CREATED.

    God 'IS' and always 'IS'.

    Jesus was 'Spirit' and was then 'Man' and was then 'Spirit' again…so he changed…therefore cannot be 'God' because 'God' does not change, hence His glorious name 'I AM'. Think about it, 'I AM'! What a succint name that perfectly describes the ONE and ONLY, God Amighty, who Is and Was and Always Will Be…the same, never 'changing', complete perfection, there can be nothing better so there is nothing to change to that could be the same or 'better'. Perfection doesn't, WJ, inhabit imperfection.

    #206584
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 29 2010,08:18)
    Jack just made up that stuff about the sun.

    When last did you listen to a Science program dealing with star formation, Jack?

    It's in that title, 'Star Formation'. Star is Sun. 'A Star is born'… Was THE SUN (God) created?

    A Star/Sun is created from clouds of stellar dust being compressed so much that a nuclear fusion occurs and heat and light are given off in the reaction.

    Therefore, before nuclear fusion took place the 'Sun' did not give off any light but heat only.

    Jack is so desperate to make a link that he didn't check his facts.
    Jack also says that the rays from the Sun are always part of the Sun because he wants to say that Jesus (rays) is part of God (the Sun)….close Jack, close. The rays are from the Sun, yes, but once emitted, the rays are Independent, not supported, unlinked, cut off from the Sun that emitted it.
    Besides, when those who overcome become like Jesus, does this mean that, they too, will become 'God' like you try to imply…the rays of the Sun are the Sun itself, really? The water from the tap is the tap itself; rain from the cloud is the cloud itself, the son of the Father is …of the same essence as the Father, yes, …in a Spiritual sense, that is, Goodness, Righteousness, Truth, Love, power, authority…but those who overcome will also be 'of the same essence as the Father'.
    How is a 'God' created? God is not CREATED.

    God 'IS' and always 'IS'.

    Jesus was 'Spirit' and was then 'Man' and was then 'Spirit' again…so he changed…therefore cannot be 'God' because 'God' does not change, hence His glorious name 'I AM'. Think about it, 'I AM'! What a succint name that perfectly describes the ONE and ONLY, God Amighty, who Is and Was and Always Will Be…the same, never 'changing', complete perfection, there can be nothing better so there is nothing to change to that could be the same or 'better'. Perfection doesn't, WJ, inhabit imperfection.


    JA,

    First, when God created the sun it gave light immediately. Therefore, the sun never existed without its rays and radiance. So to hades with your “science.”

    Second, answer the essence of my question. Jesus is called the “radiance” of the Father's glory.

    WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN THE FATHER DID NOT HAVE RADIANCE? OR WAS THERE A POINT IN THE FATHER'S EXISTENCE WHEN HIS FACE WAS COVERED WITH DARKNESS?

    It's a simple question dude!

    KJ

    #206588
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ July 28 2010,15:29)
    Rather it states Jesus’ glory was with God before the world began.  You are inadvertently replacing the word “glory” with “glory I had in your presence” even though it is not written.  I have checked other versions of scripture and they say the same thing with different words.


    Hi Kerwin,

    Your statement that Jesus' “glory” was with God before the world began is simply absurd IMO.  How can an abstract thing like someone else's “glory” be said to be in someone's presence? ???

    About the “in your presence”, this is from NETBible:

    Or “in your presence”; Grk “with yourself.” The use of παρά (para) twice in this verse looks back to the assertion in John 1:1 that the Word (the Λόγος [Logos], who became Jesus of Nazareth in 1:14) was with God (πρὸς τὸν θεόν, pro” ton qeon). Whatever else may be said, the statement in 17:5 strongly asserts the preexistence of Jesus Christ.

    Now I wouldn't ask you to take another mere man's word on whether or not it means pre-existence.  But the word “para” is the word translators render as “in the presence of”, “alongside”, “with”, “beside”, etc.  And that word is in John 17:5 twice.

    NRSV Joh 17:5
    So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence (para seautou) with the glory that I had in your presence (para soi) before the world existed.

    http://net.bible.org/verse.php?book=Joh&chapter=17&verse=5

    You'll notice Jesus says “the glory I HAD in your presence before the world existed”.  It's pretty clear that “THE PERSON” Jesus HAD glory before the world, even if he wasn't know as “Jesus” at that time.

    peace and love,
    mike

Viewing 20 posts - 8,521 through 8,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account