Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 8,421 through 8,440 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #205870
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ July 25 2010,14:05)

    Quote (Arnold @ July 25 2010,09:14)

    Quote (martian @ July 25 2010,05:42)
    Other then seeing it as very poor scholarship, I really do not care if Irene, Mike, Ja or others believe in the preexisitance of Christ, as long as they do not claim he had some power or knowledge, in his life on Earth, from that prior life, that could impact the choices Christ made. The choices Christ made developed his character and perfected him in the same manner that we are to be developed and perfected. We are to follow him. We cannot do that (in the same way) if the choices he made were due so some knowledge that we do not have. From the moment of his conception to the moment of his death, he must be exactly like us.
    Of course even if a preexister agrees with Christ being like us while on  Earth, they still have to come up with some non-scriptural mystical theories as to what happened to the memories and experiences of the Christ in the prior life. Those answers can be entertaining like Oh they were stored in some big memory back.    LOL


    So Jesus did not sin even though He was a man and did not know where He came from?  Wow, that is amazing.  Come on, He could have never said what He did in John 17:5.  He knew where He came from…….If He would not be the Son of God, He would have sinned.  If He would not have known where He came from, He would have sinned, just like all other Humans have.  But because He was the Son of God and knew where He  came from, we can now live forever….Don't you get it, God had to send someone like that, all have fallen short of the glory of God.  And Jesus too would have sinned, if He was just a mere man…..And I am forever thankful to God our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ.  There is no Scripture that says that Jesus has to be like us….And He was not….. Irene


    Irene,
    In order to come to your conclusions did you do anything like this?
    I came to my conclusions in the following way.
    1. I read the verses and then developed a hypothesis on their meaning.
    2. I considered the context both immediate and throughout all of scripture.
    3. I studied the words in their original language.
    4. I searched out any impact the Hebrew culture of the time might have.
    5. I looked for any way that my conclusions might negatively impact the character of God or the mission of Christ.
    6. (much like 5) I looked for fruit good or bad from my conclusions.
    —AND FINALLY —
    7.  I researched what teachers and other students have said about these verses. (sometimes I find their words more clear and concise then mine and I use them)

    If you did nothing like this what did you do and why?
    As I stated in the Philipians 2 thread I have never seen you get past step one. You voice an opinion/hypothesis and never back up that statement with good solid bible study. You do this over and over again. The same scriptures over and over again. And never once (that I can recall) backed up your opinion with Good study. I would like to assume it is a lack of education on how to study scripture, however I fear it is just stuborness and indoctrination. This has been the crux of my frustration with your posts and you in particular, and though  I have at times reacted badly and personally to you, my points on proper study still stand.


    Martian! If Jesus who walked this earth said to anyone that He came from Heaven to do the will of His Father, does it matter in what time or to whom He said so? To me no. I believe by Faith in Jesus Christ that He is telling me the truth. And then I go by that truth…. Also since we have received God's Holy Spirit we can understand the truth…. You have not given me any Scripture that tells me that Jesus had to be exactly like us???? That is your doctrine and not of God…I believe that He was not exactly like us. Again that is why God had to send someone like Jesus, so we can now live forever….not only that, there are several Scriptures that prove my point and not just one….Look we have gone around in circles and I am really getting tired of it all. For me Jesus preexisted His birth on earth…. Period…And I have proven it to me….You have to prove it to you, not I……for that matter I do not even have to answer your question, which I did….. Jesus is the truth and the way, walk they in it…. I am……Irene

    #205951
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 26 2010,03:00)
    Hi Martian,

    You said:

    Quote
    If another is born to earth that does not have those memories and experiences or their influence would their decisions have to be different and harder then those of the first.


    Yes, harder.  Fortunately for us, the bar is set much lower.  We don't have to be sinless, because Jesus was.  

    You've said in two threads now:

    Quote
    This is what I do. Did you do anything like this?
    I came to these conclusions in the following way.
    1. I read the verses and then developed a hypothesis on their meaning.
    2. I considered the context both immediate and throughout all of scripture.
    3. I studied the words in their original language.
    4. I searched out any impact the Hebrew culture of the time might have.
    5. I looked for any way that my conclusions might negatively impact the character of God or the mission of Christ.
    6. (much like 5) I looked for fruit good or bad from my conclusions.
    —AND FINALLY —
    7.  I researched what teachers and other students have said about these verses. (sometimes I find their words more clear and concise then mine and I use them)

    If you did nothing like this what did you do and why?

    Yes Martian.  I come armed with more than just my interpretation of scripture in most cases.  And though I applaud your deep research, you must be a little more careful with it, I think.  I have already refuted your understanding of “bara” and “morphe”.  

    The rest of your post I'm responding to is just more of the same:  “I WANT Jesus to have been the exact same as me, therefore I will believe anything written that agrees with me.  And if scipture is NOT one of those things, I will ignore it or try to change what the context means, or what the words meant back then until I “morphe” it into something that makes me feel like I can do anything Jesus did.”

    Let's say the pastor at my church went on missionary trips since he was 8 years old.  Let's say he knew the scriptures by heart start to finish.  Let's say he spoke fluent Hebrew and Koine Greek.

    Can I still let him be an example to me even though I've done none of those things?  Can I learn from him even though he has memories or info that I don't?

    Martian, answer just two questions:  Do YOU have a human father?  Did Jesus?  Enough said……..Jesus was different from you.

    mike


    Sin is not the issue. Character development is the issue. Decisions are the basis for character development. If Christ made decisions on the basis of information not available to us then we cannot make decisions in the like manner or on the same basis. This negates Christ as our example.

    As Far as Morphe is concerned I posted in the Phil 2 thread.
    Bara is another matter. I still hold that the original meaning in the Hebrew is fill up. Most reference works still in use were written in the early 1900s. there was a great deal yet to be learned about the Hebrew culture and culture. For the most part many believed the Hebrew culture was gone in Christ's times. Since the discovery of the Dead Sea scrols and other things it has been shown to be an active culture and language in Christ time.
    Thee is contention in the ranks as to the meaning of Bara. On the one side you have the opinion that has been believed for centuries on the other is new research based on more info and more archeological evidence.
    These are the reasons I believe Bara means filling.
    1. The evidence now surfaced that was not available to the writers of most research books.
    2. The Hebrew cultural mindest has been established by many researchers. There is no abstract concept of creating something from nothing passible within the hebrew mind or culture. Abstract thinking is the product of the Western greek philosophical culture. the Hebrews were concrete thinker.
    3. the context of Genesis. God filled the heavens and the earth. Then all the following is about God filling his creation. He filled the sky with the moon and sun and stars. He filled the oceans with fish. He filled the sky with birds. He filled the land with animals and even man (the body of dust) was filled with the breath of God and he became a living soul. It is all about filling!

    #205953
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Arnold @ July 26 2010,03:38)

    Quote (martian @ July 25 2010,14:05)

    Quote (Arnold @ July 25 2010,09:14)

    Quote (martian @ July 25 2010,05:42)
    Other then seeing it as very poor scholarship, I really do not care if Irene, Mike, Ja or others believe in the preexisitance of Christ, as long as they do not claim he had some power or knowledge, in his life on Earth, from that prior life, that could impact the choices Christ made. The choices Christ made developed his character and perfected him in the same manner that we are to be developed and perfected. We are to follow him. We cannot do that (in the same way) if the choices he made were due so some knowledge that we do not have. From the moment of his conception to the moment of his death, he must be exactly like us.
    Of course even if a preexister agrees with Christ being like us while on  Earth, they still have to come up with some non-scriptural mystical theories as to what happened to the memories and experiences of the Christ in the prior life. Those answers can be entertaining like Oh they were stored in some big memory back.    LOL


    So Jesus did not sin even though He was a man and did not know where He came from?  Wow, that is amazing.  Come on, He could have never said what He did in John 17:5.  He knew where He came from…….If He would not be the Son of God, He would have sinned.  If He would not have known where He came from, He would have sinned, just like all other Humans have.  But because He was the Son of God and knew where He  came from, we can now live forever….Don't you get it, God had to send someone like that, all have fallen short of the glory of God.  And Jesus too would have sinned, if He was just a mere man…..And I am forever thankful to God our Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ.  There is no Scripture that says that Jesus has to be like us….And He was not….. Irene


    Irene,
    In order to come to your conclusions did you do anything like this?
    I came to my conclusions in the following way.
    1. I read the verses and then developed a hypothesis on their meaning.
    2. I considered the context both immediate and throughout all of scripture.
    3. I studied the words in their original language.
    4. I searched out any impact the Hebrew culture of the time might have.
    5. I looked for any way that my conclusions might negatively impact the character of God or the mission of Christ.
    6. (much like 5) I looked for fruit good or bad from my conclusions.
    —AND FINALLY —
    7.  I researched what teachers and other students have said about these verses. (sometimes I find their words more clear and concise then mine and I use them)

    If you did nothing like this what did you do and why?
    As I stated in the Philipians 2 thread I have never seen you get past step one. You voice an opinion/hypothesis and never back up that statement with good solid bible study. You do this over and over again. The same scriptures over and over again. And never once (that I can recall) backed up your opinion with Good study. I would like to assume it is a lack of education on how to study scripture, however I fear it is just stuborness and indoctrination. This has been the crux of my frustration with your posts and you in particular, and though  I have at times reacted badly and personally to you, my points on proper study still stand.


    Martian!  If Jesus who walked this earth said to anyone that He came from Heaven to do the will of His Father, does it matter in what time or to whom He said so?  To me no.  I believe by Faith in Jesus Christ that He is telling me the truth.  And then I go by that truth…. Also since we have received God's Holy Spirit we can understand the truth…. You have not given me any Scripture that tells me that Jesus had to be exactly like us???? That is your doctrine and not of God…I believe that He was not exactly like us.  Again that is why God had to send someone like Jesus, so we can now live forever….not only that, there are several Scriptures that prove my point and not just one….Look we have gone around in circles and I am really getting tired of it all.  For me Jesus preexisted His birth on earth…. Period…And I have proven it to me….You have to prove it to you, not I……for that matter I do not even have to answer your question, which I did….. Jesus is the truth and the way, walk they in it…. I am……Irene


    Irene ,
    I am going to have limited time on here. Dealing with your posts is not going to be part of it.
    Think what you want of it. Your opinion is of little value to me.

    #205955
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 26 2010,03:00)
    Hi Martian,

    You said:

    Quote
    If another is born to earth that does not have those memories and experiences or their influence would their decisions have to be different and harder then those of the first.


    Yes, harder.  Fortunately for us, the bar is set much lower.  We don't have to be sinless, because Jesus was.  

    You've said in two threads now:

    Quote
    This is what I do. Did you do anything like this?
    I came to these conclusions in the following way.
    1. I read the verses and then developed a hypothesis on their meaning.
    2. I considered the context both immediate and throughout all of scripture.
    3. I studied the words in their original language.
    4. I searched out any impact the Hebrew culture of the time might have.
    5. I looked for any way that my conclusions might negatively impact the character of God or the mission of Christ.
    6. (much like 5) I looked for fruit good or bad from my conclusions.
    —AND FINALLY —
    7.  I researched what teachers and other students have said about these verses. (sometimes I find their words more clear and concise then mine and I use them)

    If you did nothing like this what did you do and why?

    Yes Martian.  I come armed with more than just my interpretation of scripture in most cases.  And though I applaud your deep research, you must be a little more careful with it, I think.  I have already refuted your understanding of “bara” and “morphe”.  

    The rest of your post I'm responding to is just more of the same:  “I WANT Jesus to have been the exact same as me, therefore I will believe anything written that agrees with me.  And if scipture is NOT one of those things, I will ignore it or try to change what the context means, or what the words meant back then until I “morphe” it into something that makes me feel like I can do anything Jesus did.”

    Let's say the pastor at my church went on missionary trips since he was 8 years old.  Let's say he knew the scriptures by heart start to finish.  Let's say he spoke fluent Hebrew and Koine Greek.

    Can I still let him be an example to me even though I've done none of those things?  Can I learn from him even though he has memories or info that I don't?

    Martian, answer just two questions:  Do YOU have a human father?  Did Jesus?  Enough said……..Jesus was different from you.

    mike


    FORGOT ONE POINT —–

    COL 1

    15He is the image of the invisible God, the pre-eminent one of all the filling.
    —–WHY——
    19For it was the Father's good pleasure for all the fullness to dwell in Him,

    IT’S ABOUT FILING JUST LIKE GENESIS.

    #205956
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    [quote=martian,July 26 2010,12:04][/quote]
    Hi Martian,

    You said:

    Quote
    If Christ made decisions on the basis of information not available to us then we cannot make decisions in the like manner or on the same basis. This negates Christ as our example.


    That's what my pastor analogy was all about.  Just because he has information I don't does not mean he can't lead me to God or be my example.  Your whole point about Christ having to be exactly like us to be an example to us is utterly ridiculous and unscriptural.  

    You didn't answer my questions:
    Martian, answer just two questions:  Do YOU have a human father?  Did Jesus?  Enough said……..Jesus was different from you.

    And as far as bara, do you think God “filled” Adam in His own image?  Consider Isaiah 45:18,

    For this is what the LORD says—he who created the heavens, he is God; he who fashioned and made the earth, he founded it; he did not create it to be empty, but formed it to be inhabited—he says: “I am the LORD, and there is no other.”

    The first bolded word rendered as “created” is “bara”.  The second bolded word, rendered as “made” is “asah”, which means:  

    `asah 1) to do, fashion, accomplish, make

    The third word rendered “formed” is “yatsar” which means,

    yatsar 1) to form, fashion, frame 1a)

    I think judging by the other verbs the Hebrews associated with “bara” here, there's a good chance it means “create”.

    And I know there is scripture out there that says God created things “out of nothing”, I just can't place my mind on it right now.  I'll keep looking.

    mike

    #205957
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (martian @ July 26 2010,12:31)
    FORGOT ONE POINT —–

    COL 1

    15He is the image of the invisible God, the pre-eminent one of all the filling.
    —–WHY——
    19For it was the Father's good pleasure for all the fullness to dwell in Him,

    IT’S ABOUT FILING JUST LIKE GENESIS.


    :D :laugh: :D

    Well, I gotta admit I haven't seen THAT translation before! :D

    mike

    #205959
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mike………..Actually Martian is right there is no word in Hebrew for create it does not exist, the word is (fatting or filling) Scripture should read God was fatting the earth. Go to Jeff Benners site and see for yourself.

    peace and love…………….gene

    #205961
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 26 2010,12:46)
    Mike………..Actually Martian is right there is no word in Hebrew for create it does not exist, the word is (fatting or filling) Scripture should read God was fatting the earth. Go to Jeff Benners site and see for yourself.

    peace and love…………….gene


    Gene,

    You're becoming like a little puppy dog following your master around saying, “He's right!”.

    Tell me the difference between the Qal and Hiphal form of “bara”, Gene.

    mike

    #205967
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi MB,
    Did Adam have a human father?
    So he was different too?

    #205984
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 26 2010,13:34)
    Hi MB,
    Did Adam have a human father?
    So he was different too?


    Adan was formed out of the dust of the earth, while Jesus came forth from God the Father….He is the literal Son of God. Not like Adam…..Irene

    #205985
    Arnold
    Participant

    Martian I care less of your opinion too, so we are even…Have a good life….Irene

    #205986
    kerwin
    Participant

    To all,

    Nick voiced his concern that I am obsessed by sin and yet scripture instructs us to be “obsessed” with not sinning for one who hungers and thirst for righteousness could certainly be said to be “obsessed” by righteousness.  In fact a person who is “obsessed” by righteousness is like “treasure hidden in a field. When a man found it, he hid it again, and then in his joy went and sold all he had and bought that field”, Matthew 13:44.  Jesus teaches us how to obtain true righteousness so how eager should we be to obtain it?

    Satan does not want us to obtain this gift of God and so he panders to our sinful nature by telling us that it cannot be obtained.  He uses every type of delusion, lie, trick, and snare he can to prevent us from reaching our goal of being like God in true holiness and righteousness.

    One of those tricks is to take Jesus away as an example of a human being.  He is a human being just like each of us who while in this world was able to stand against everything the evil one sent against him and yet not sin, Hebrews 4:15  He thus overcame the world and then assured those that believed that they to can overcome the world; John 16:33 and 1 John 5:4-5.

    Don’t think that he left you alone to bear the struggles but rather he promises that his burden is light and he will give you rest for your souls, Matthew 11:28-30

    This is why believing Jesus is anything but a human being who suffered the same temptation that is common to man is an obstacle endangering your belief in God‘s promise of righteousness.  Jesus chose not to sin because he lives by the spirit of holiness.  He gives that same spirit to you if you choose to obey all his teachings and thus enables you, when fully mature, to also resist the devil at every opportunity so he will flee.

    Your fellow student,

    Kerwin

    #205992
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    1 John 1:1-2
    That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon and touched with our hands, concerning the word of life and the life was manifested, and we saw it, and testify to it, and proclaim to you the eternal life that was with the Father and was made manifest to us

    John 1:1
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was theos.

    Notice that John opens his first epistle in an almost identical manner to the Book of John.

    When you read them together it is obvious that the Word that was manifest is Jesus and that Word was WITH God. He that was from the beginning was WITH the Father and was manifest to the apostles.

    I think that some here are burying their heads in sand and do not want to acknowledge a few things here, including what the word “WITH” means. If Jesus as he was, was not WITH God then how can the Word be WITH God in the beginning?

    I think it is obvious to an honest person that Jesus is not a mere man as some try to make out, nor is he God that others argue toward, rather he is the Word that was WITH God and he came in the flesh. He existed in the form of God or with God's nature as it is written, emptied himself, existed in human nature, died, rose from the dead, and returned to the glory that he had with the Father before the world began as it is written.

    All these scriptures paint a clear picture that Jesus was the Word that was with God and came to earth as a man and returned to the glory he had with the Father.

    I don't buy the “Jesus is God” doctrine, nor the “Jesus is just a man” doctrine. No I buy into John's writings, that Jesus is the Word of God that was with the Father in the beginning and was manifest in the flesh and returned to the glory that he had with God in the beginning.

    I don't care that some think that they can't relate to a Jesus who had such beginnings, and want to think of Jesus as a man no different to us. But surely such people lack true vision and understanding.

    Is it not a great thing for a rich person to live as a poor person in order to teach the poor how to become rich. Or do you prefer that he was created a poor man and made no sacrifice to be with us?

    Whatever our preference, it should be the truth that matters and if John wrote the truth, then why do some argue against him?

    #205999
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    T8………..One simple problem and that is the WORD who is GOD the FATHER was (IN) Jesus, the word it self was (NOT) Jesus. 'THE WORDS I AM TELLING YOU ARE (NOT) (MY) WORDS BUT THE WORD OF HIM WHO (SENT) ME. When are you ever going to get it brother (GOD) was literally (IN) Jesus speaking through Him (HIS) words. That does not make Jesus a GOD or GOD'S Word, but a spokesman of GOD, Who spoke to us God the Fathers words. Can't you see that. If John wanted to say Jesus He would have just written it there. Wake up brother.

    peace and love to you and yours………………………..gene

    #206000
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 26 2010,12:55)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 26 2010,12:46)
    Mike………..Actually Martian is right there is no word in Hebrew for create it does not exist, the word is (fatting or filling) Scripture should read God was fatting the earth. Go to Jeff Benners site and see for yourself.

    peace and love…………….gene


    Gene,

    You're becoming like a little puppy dog following your master around saying, “He's right!”.

    Tell me the difference between the Qal and Hiphal form of “bara”, Gene.

    mike


    The Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible lists Bara as follows.
    Fill- The fattening or filling up of something. The filling of the Earth in Genesis 1 with sun, moon, plants, animals ect. And the filling of man with life and the image of God. [freq, 54]
    (verb form – paal, niphal, hiphal, piel)
    ISBE says concerning Bara –
    “We cannot say that the origin of matter is excluded from the Genesis account of creation and this apart from the use of “bara” as admitting of material and means of creation.”
    In other words the use of the word “bara” does not claim to create from nothing but that the materials already existed prior to the Genesis account. God simply filled them.
    (before someone starts, I do believe that every material in creation is sourced from God. We may only have the story recorded in Genesis after the materials came into being.)
    Again this fits in with the cultural mindset of the Ancient Hebrews. Because of the culture of the Hebrews the concept of something coming from nothing is not in their way of thinking. For this reason the manner in which matter came about is nothing that can be articulated by an ancient Hebrews such as Moses.
    Jeff Benner of the Ancient Hebrew Research Center says this —
    The largest contributing factor in mistranslations of the Biblical text is that the translators and readers of the Bible come from a western philosophy of thought. The original authors of the Biblical text, the Hebrews, are classified as Orientals whose philosophy of thought is eastern. Many times these two philosophies are in opposition of each other. For a more detailed description of the differences between western and eastern thought see my article at the Ancient Hebrew Research Center.
    Most English translations of Genesis 1:1 read something like “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”. Most readers assume that this is an accurate translation of the original Hebrew but, this is not the case. The first word in the Hebrew Bible is “bereshiyt”. The “be” at the beginning is a prefix meaning “in”, “with”, or “within”. The word “reshiyt” means “beginning” and can be the beginning of a space or time. It is derived from the root “rosh” meaning “head”. The word “the” in the English translations is added to text as it does not exist in the Hebrew. Hence, “bereshiyt” literally means “in beginning” or “in a beginning” (the articles “a” and “an” are implied in Hebrew). From this we can conclude that Genesis 1:1 is not specifically speaking of “the” beginning, but may be speaking of “a” beginning.
    The second word in the Hebrew text of Genesis 1:1 is the verb “bara”. This word is always translated as “create” in this verse and is usually theologically understood to mean “to make out of nothing”. If we compare Genesis 1:26 and Genesis 2:7 we will see that this is not possible. In Genesis 2:7 the Bible states that God “made” the man from the ground but in Genesis 1:26 it states that God “created” man. Therefore, the Hebrew word “bar” does not mean “to create out of nothing”. This very same Hebrew word is used in 1 Samuel 2:29 but is translated as “fattening”. The Hebrews language was very concrete oriented meaning its vocabulary is related to something that can be sense by the five senses. Words such as “believe”, “trust” and “create” are all abstract words that are foreign concepts to the Ancient Hebrews. In the Samuel passage we see the original meaning of the verb “bara” which is to be “fat”.
    If you have a source that says Bara in Genesis 1:1 is of the qal tence, I submit it is wrong for the following reasons –
    1.The Hebrew culture of the time could not allow for the rational that something came from nothing.
    2.The entire context of Genesis 1 is the filing of the universe including Earth and man.
    3.The expert testimony of Dr. Jeff Benner and the Ancient Hebrew Lexicon along with ISBE.

    #206005
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 27 2010,01:35)
    T8………..One simple problem and that is the WORD who is GOD the FATHER was (IN) Jesus, the word it self was (NOT) Jesus. 'THE WORDS I AM TELLING YOU ARE (NOT) (MY) WORDS BUT THE WORD OF HIM WHO (SENT) ME. When are you ever going to get it brother (GOD) was literally (IN) Jesus speaking through Him (HIS) words. That does not make Jesus a GOD or GOD'S Word, but a spokesman of GOD, Who spoke to us God the Fathers words. Can't you see that. If John wanted to say Jesus He would have just written it there. Wake up brother.

    peace and love to you and yours………………………..gene


    Gene! And that became flesh. We know that God never walked this earth, and that no one has heard His voice and seen His form….but we do know that Jesus did. Along with Rev, 19:13 and verse 16 it makes it clear that Jesus is the Spoken Word of God, He will come again as The Word of God, as KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. That is what Rev, 19 verses 13and 16 say….. None of the plan of God or intellect…..Nonsense….

    #206010

    Quote (t8 @ July 26 2010,05:24)
    I don't buy the “Jesus is God” doctrine, nor the “Jesus is just a man” doctrine. No I buy into John's writings, that Jesus is the Word of God that was with the Father in the beginning and was manifest in the flesh and returned to the glory that he had with God in the beginning.


    No its obvious you don't buy into Johns writings.

    First of all you quote…

    Quote (t8 @ July 26 2010,05:24)
    John 1:1
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was theos.


    Why “theos” instead of God like the scriptures say? It seems you are trying to obscure the meaning.

    In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. John 1:1

    You say he is not just a man but he is not God either, then what is he t8?

    A demi-god is all you have left.

    I find it interesting that you berate the anti-prexistence crowd for not accepting the literal interpretation of the scrptures you quote and yet you reject the literal interpretation of John 1:1.  

    In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and THE WORD WAS GOD. John 1:1

    What right do you have to claim your view is right when the scripture above is plain and clear!

    WJ

    #206020
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    WJ………….I see the word (Word there) but where is the word (Jesus) Written there? forcing texts is not a good thing but you Trinitarians and Preexistences all have no problem pulling out word and replacing them with your own. Wonder what John will say probably something like this , DO YOU THINK I WAS SO STUPID THAT IF I WANTED TO MEAN JESUS I WOULD NOT HAVE JUST WRITTEN JESUS THERE. Then what will be your answer, Duh, we didn't know that.

    peace and love to you and yours……………………….gene

    #206021

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 26 2010,12:53)
    WJ………….I see the word (Word there) but where is the word (Jesus) Written there? forcing texts is not a good thing but you Trinitarians and Preexistences all have no problem pulling out word and replacing them with your own. Wonder what John will say probably something like this , DO YOU THINK I WAS SO STUPID THAT IF I WANTED TO MEAN JESUS I WOULD NOT HAVE JUST WRITTEN JESUS THERE.  Then what will be your answer, Duh, we didn't know that.

    peace and love to you and yours……………………….gene


    Gene

    Scriptures interpret themselves

    John 1:14 tells us who the Word is!

    1 John 1:1-3 and Rev 19:13 confirms this truth.

    You totally deny the scritpures that says who the “Word” is that was with God and was God.

    You are of the anti-christ spirit for you do not believe Jesus came in the flesh!

    WJ

    #206041
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    WJ………Because his name shall be called the Word of God, does not make him the words He spoke no were those word from Him, they were from GOD the Father, who spoke to us (THROUGH) Christ as He also did the Prophets. If Jesus claimed to be those words he would be a liar and a thief. “THE WORD I AM TELLING YOU ARE (NOT) MY WORD BUT THE WORDS OF HIM WHO SENT ME”. So how could Jesus be the very words he spoke then. Forcing text to say or infer what it does not specifically infer is bad form WJ. IMO

    peace and love………………………..gene

Viewing 20 posts - 8,421 through 8,440 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account