Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 8,281 through 8,300 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #205260
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 21 2010,01:33)
    T8……….Lets take one thing at a time…..OK…..Phil 2:6..> Who, (being) My Greek translates it the as (EXISTING) a present tense expression. Lets stay there first what do you with some research think about that. Lets be honest with each other here brother. That is to me the Key of understand that scripture. Now if we decide it is indeed Present tense then that can greately change our perceptions there. Because it would not add any credibility to a past tense.


    Hi Gene,

    If it was present tense, then how did Jesus empty himself and come as a man and die AFTER Paul said these things?

    mike

    #205262
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 21 2010,01:33)
    T8……….Lets take one thing at a time…..OK…..Phil 2:6..> Who, (being) My Greek translates it the as (EXISTING) a present tense expression. Lets stay there first what do you with some research think about that. Lets be honest with each other here brother. That is to me the Key of understand that scripture. Now if we decide it is indeed Present tense then that can greately change our perceptions there. Because it would not add any credibility to a past tense.


    Perhaps we could have a debate about it, so that we cover every point. That is if you can handle a slow debate. I don't have much time these days.

    In case not, I want to point out that although he existed in the form of God, he then emptied himself and partook of flesh.

    It sounds easy to follow until we take your view.

    Although he presently exists in the form of God, he emptied himself and took on flesh. And are the other 2 points also in the present, because that even throws it more out of whack.

    The way to understand your view would be to adopt an eternal doctrine like Jesus as a dual being. i.e., he is divine and flesh at the same time (present). Two natures one being. Now we are back to the Trinity Doctrine which we both know is incorrect.

    #205263
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ July 21 2010,10:41)
    I am off here for a while. You that have apposed my posts have at it. Declare your victory. It matters very little just like this site matters little. Have you victory in your 4 square inch kingdom.
    This site is an entertainment venue only. Lately it has been entertaining like visiting a nut house. you can laugh at the nuts for a while and then it gets old.
    Continue please in the irrational ward. At least here you are having little or no impact on real Christianity.
    Like 4 year olds you play house and think it really matters.
    Many on here are religious and not relational. Dectrinal and not scriptural. Traditional and not functional.
    I'm disgusted with it.


    I hope you enjoyed the 4 inch kingdom while you were here. I have to say that with 1000 members divided by 4 inches, that makes each person including yourself very insignificant. And yes we know that people get upset when people don't follow their way.

    But surely we should be espousing truth and if people do not follow truth, then why should we be upset? It is not a pride thing because it is not about us, but truth. And we know that a percentage of people will reject truth. What is the problem? Why get upset?

    The only reason for being upset is that you want people to follow you and they are not. Or is it something else?

    #205277
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ July 21 2010,15:38)

    Quote (martian @ July 21 2010,10:41)
    I am off here for a while. You that have apposed my posts have at it. Declare your victory. It matters very little just like this site matters little. Have you victory in your 4 square inch kingdom.
    This site is an entertainment venue only. Lately it has been entertaining like visiting a nut house. you can laugh at the nuts for a while and then it gets old.
    Continue please in the irrational ward. At least here you are having little or no impact on real Christianity.
    Like 4 year olds you play house and think it really matters.
    Many on here are religious and not relational. Dectrinal and not scriptural. Traditional and not functional.
    I'm disgusted with it.


    I hope you enjoyed the 4 inch kingdom while you were here. I have to say that with 1000 members divided by 4 inches, that makes each person including yourself very insignificant. And yes we know that people get upset when people don't follow their way.

    But surely we should be espousing truth and if people do not follow truth, then why should we be upset? It is not a pride thing because it is not about us, but truth. And we know that a percentage of people will reject truth. What is the problem? Why get upset?

    The only reason for being upset is that you want people to follow you and they are not. Or is it something else?


    It is not about following me. Believe me if some of the people here were following me I would run to the nearest police station for help.
    It is completely frustrating to deal with totally irrational people that cannot think clearly. But as I know to be true you would need those attributes to not see the simple truth I have been posting.

    #205278
    martian
    Participant

    Frustration is not entertaining. Entertainment is the best anyone can reasonably claim to gather here.
    My statement is still true – Many on here are religious and not relational. Dectrinal and not scriptural. Traditional and not functional.

    #205281
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    It is true that there are all sorts here.

    I think the point is that all views are able to be compared to scripture.

    However, not all are able to be taught by scripture. Some use scripture only to back up their already pre-defined beliefs. Others let scripture teach them. First there was the Trinitarians, then the Oneness movement, and now it seems the assault is from the “Jesus was created 2000 years ago and never existed before” group.

    One by one, they are all challenged by scripture and found wanting.

    That is not to say that truth is not discovered by others here. It is discovered by those who have ears to hear because many views are placed against the backdrop of scripture to see what doesn't line up.

    Like I have said before, if you or anyone else is of the truth, then you won't take it personally when men reject the truth or you because you are a servant of that truth and not the truth itself. When you are offended, it is your pride that is offended and if there is pride, then that means that you might be of the attitude that you are the truth and people need to listen to you.

    That is why many here stick to scripture and BTW, contrary to your comment, doctrine is very important, just as relationship is important.

    2 John 1:9
    Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son.

    #205282
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 21 2010,11:25)
    t8,

    Yes, I thought of that but quickly realised it would be childish, Circular, and besides, it was not that important.

    There was scope for plenty more but I limited it to just what I posted.


    Contrary to popular belief, answering a question with a question can be a good answer because it can show up the original question for what it is and may render that original question non-important in the mind of the hearer thereafter.

    e.g., when people ask you if you believe that Jesus is God or Jesus is just a man, responding to that with, “Can I ask you a question first. Have you stopped stealing from your employer?” shows the hearer that a yes and no response doesn't work with a question that is not relevant. If you answer yes, it means that you were stealing from your employer before-hand and no, is even worse. In the case of is Jesus God or Man, it doesn't allow you to answer that he is the Word of God for example.

    But sure, I respect the way you handled it, although a man is entitled to ask by what authority we speak in. Wasn't Jesus asked that same question?

    Anyway in our case, in the authority (name) of Jesus Christ is a good answer if it is true.

    :)

    #205284
    shimmer
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ July 21 2010,21:23)
    Like I have said before, if you or anyone else is of the truth, then you won't take it personally when men reject the truth or you because you are a servant of that truth and not the truth itself.


    The Lord came from the highest place, and lowered Himself to be the laughingstock of humanity. Degraded to the point of being unrecognisable; despised; rejected; reviled; spat on; loathed; mocked; spurned; and detested; walking the lowest path—– the path of utter humility—–but He overcame.

    #205286
    kerwin
    Participant

    Shimmer,

    Jesus did overcome but what he overcame was the temptations of the world and through him each of us can overcome if we choose to obey all his teachings.

    God did test him in many ways just as he test each of us and his faith enabled him to allways trust in God and deny his own will. In this and many ways he served as our example as well as the prototype of what we will be if we persist in believing.

    Your fellow student,

    Kerwin

    #205289
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Hi t8,
    Q&A,
    Answering Q with Q as Answer. True. Especially if the q's own answer will answer his proffered, seemingly 'clever' q!

    By the way (And Edj, who asked me about my Math ..we say Maths.. ability) Martians said '4 Square inch kingdom'. This equates to only 4000th inch square, or 2inch length by 2000th inch width strip, per person

    #205290
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Can I ask everyone, anyone,…

    What is 'the form of God'?

    #205291
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    JA………..Form of God is the Nature of GOD, because God Has No Form, IMO.

    Peace and love………………….gene

    #205292
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Did I forget to state: Can I Ask someone 'sensible';

    What is the 'Form of God'?

    #205293
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 21 2010,14:55)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 21 2010,01:33)
    T8……….Lets take one thing at a time…..OK…..Phil 2:6..> Who, (being) My Greek translates it the as (EXISTING) a present tense expression. Lets stay there first what do you with some research think about that. Lets be honest with each other here brother. That is to me the Key of understand that scripture. Now if we decide it is indeed  Present tense then that can greately change our perceptions there. Because it would not add any credibility to a past tense.


    Hi Gene,

    If it was present tense, then how did Jesus empty himself and come as a man and die AFTER Paul said these things?

    mike


    Mike ……..It does not say Hr emptied Himself and (CAME) as a Man. It say He existing with the nature of GOD (on earth) He was anointed with God's Spirit, this gave Him God's Nature, But he did think (mindset) having that nature to try to rob GOD of any Glory by presenting himself equal with GOD. But he even though he had God's nature, the fullness of His spirit (IN) him He did not (THINK) HIMSELF BETTER THEN US AND TRY TO BE EQUAL WITH GOD. This whole thing has nothing to do with any Preexistent state of Jesus , but is the state of mind he was in when as a human being possessing God's Nature as a man. Using this as a true representing of Preexistence is (NOT) what Paul had in mind at all. Read the context and understand what Paul was driving at. He was taking about a state of Mind a mindset that Jesus as a MAN possessed.

    #205294
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Specifically for Gene:

    What is the 'Nature of God'?

    #205297
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ July 21 2010,15:33)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 21 2010,01:33)
    T8……….Lets take one thing at a time…..OK…..Phil 2:6..> Who, (being) My Greek translates it the as (EXISTING) a present tense expression. Lets stay there first what do you with some research think about that. Lets be honest with each other here brother. That is to me the Key of understand that scripture. Now if we decide it is indeed  Present tense then that can greately change our perceptions there. Because it would not add any credibility to a past tense.


    Perhaps we could have a debate about it, so that we cover every point. That is if you can handle a slow debate. I don't have much time these days.

    In case not, I want to point out that although he existed in the form of God, he then emptied himself and partook of flesh.

    It sounds easy to follow until we take your view.

    Although he presently exists in the form of God, he emptied himself and took on flesh. And are the other 2 points also in the present, because that even throws it more out of whack.

    The way to understand your view would be to adopt an eternal doctrine like Jesus as a dual being. i.e., he is divine and flesh at the same time (present). Two natures one being. Now we are back to the Trinity Doctrine which we both know is incorrect.


    T8………..I do believe God the Father was indeed (IN) Jesus literally at the time of his earthly existence so i guess from that stand point you could say i do believe in dual nature. Remember Jesus said the Father (IN) me (He) does the works. And again it was The Father that spoke through Jesus literally when Jesus uttered, “destory this temple and in three days (I) God will raise it up”. Jesus was dead he sure couldn't raise himself up. Don't you believe God literally does exists in all who have his spirit in them. The difference between me and the trinitarians is that i believe God can exist in all his creation (literally exist in ALL of it) not just three essences of beings.

    T8…………trying to make Phil to mean what in fact Paul was not even talking about is forcing the text , Paul was showing that Jesus who was existing in a human body with the very nature of God (IN) him did not try to rob God and makes himself equal with him but knew he was fashioned as a Human being and worked with in those human nature conditions as a servant of God , he wasn't trying to grasp for the glory afforded him as a Son of God. that is all Paul's point was there. Why try to force the text to mean more them Paul intended is that not what trinitarians do?.

    peace and love to you and yours brother………………..gene

    #205302
    theodorej
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 21 2010,03:13)
    TheodoreJ,

    Does it seem that way to you?

    Did it seem wrong to you?

    Was it wrong what was said?

    Did the post contain truth?

    Are you making a criticism, positive or negative?

    Answer these questions and the answer you seek will be within.


    Greetings JA…..We will take the last question first ,if you don't mind….The answer is..I was making an observation niether critical nor supportive…..The truth you speak of is according to your belief system and not necessarily mine or even the forums'….This is not to say there is no truth in what you say..
    What you said was not wrong in its entirety but is was self serving..to reiterate my early statment with respect to right or wrong this was an observation….if you view it as criticism than Iam sorry….Now Will You Answer The Question?

    #205304
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Theodorej………..The nature is the way we exist it is what we reflect or give off our personality you might say. It comes from the Spirit within us. That is the way i see it anyway.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………gene

    #205305
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ July 21 2010,20:23)
    It is true that there are all sorts here.

    I think the point is that all views are able to be compared to scripture.

    However, not all are able to be taught by scripture. Some use scripture only to back up their already pre-defined beliefs. Others let scripture teach them. First there was the Trinitarians, then the Oneness movement, and now it seems the assault is from the “Jesus was created 2000 years ago and never existed before” group.

    One by one, they are all challenged by scripture and found wanting.

    That is not to say that truth is not discovered by others here. It is discovered by those who have ears to hear because many views are placed against the backdrop of scripture to see what doesn't line up.

    Like I have said before, if you or anyone else is of the truth, then you won't take it personally when men reject the truth or you because you are a servant of that truth and not the truth itself. When you are offended, it is your pride that is offended and if there is pride, then that means that you might be of the attitude that you are the truth and people need to listen to you.

    That is why many here stick to scripture and BTW, contrary to your comment, doctrine is very important, just as relationship is important.

    2 John 1:9
    Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son.


    Actually being frustrated has nothing to do with being right or wrong. It may very well be a flesh reaction to the uselessness of debating those that are unwilling to discover anything outside of their preconceived ideas. I learned a long time ago that it was useless to debate with JW's, WW Church of God, Catholics, Moonies, or Hari chrishnas. Those groups use indoctrination techniques that make it near impossible even in person to deprogram them let alone on a forum. You can show proofs all day long and they will just give you the plastic smile and repeat the same stuff over and over again. They will just spill out the same scriptures over again with no explaination as to why they think it means as they say. Nor will they seriously look at any explanations I say.
    This board has been the same way. I post a web site that clearly states why I believe what I do and I am told they will not look at it. I post understanding from the cultural mindset of those that wrote the Bible and it is ignored. I post paralel scriptures forming a precedent in scripture and it is ignored. Few if any are here to learn. At least not among the common posters. Among those 1000 members you boast there cannot be more then 40 or 50 that actively post on here. For the most part no one wants to honestly study scripture. No one is willing to hash out a set of simple rules of hermaneutics for the debaters to agree on. Several times I have listed a set of simple widely accepted principles for determining truth from scripture. I have stated I am willing to discuss any subtractions or additions to those rules. No one is interested.No one is really interested in honest bible study. Everyone is here to spout off there beliefs without proof derived in an honest way.
    that is the source of my frustration. I could give a wit if anyone follows me or not. I do care about them following the truth as found in scripture through honest study. I do care about people being able to complete God's plans and purpose for their lives without being crippled by false doctrines and concepts.

    You say-
    I think the point is that all views are able to be compared to scripture.
    Reply-
    That is true but the results can only be trusted if the principles used to discern that truth are honest to begin with.

    You say –
    However, not all are able to be taught by scripture. Some use scripture only to back up their already pre-defined beliefs. Others let scripture teach them. First there was the Trinitarians, then the Oneness movement, and now it seems the assault is from the “Jesus was created 2000 years ago and never existed before” group.
    Reply-
    As a moderator you show your own bias. I noticed that you did not include the preexisters in your group that is unteachable or that preexisters ever use sciptures to back up their predefined beliefs.

    If you are so unbiased and open to truth then you and I will debate the subject. First you list your principles for studying scripture. If you disagree we will discuss alternatives. Are you willing to do that?

    #205306
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Theodorej,

    By the authority of TRUTH.

    By the authority that IS Truth.

    Virtually no one in this forum has changed their view nor admitted that another ha taught them anything in this forum.

    When a truthfulness is spoken, it is either ignored (Ok, you spoke truth but i ain't gonna give you the satisfaction of knowing it)
    Or it is refuted by subtefuge argument (Nah, nah, nah, Scripture may say so but Isbeal, in his second sermon on plesbian sectarianism didn't think so. It 's all in 'WickedPedia')

    All that is required to prove the Scriptures is IN the Scriptures.

    The mass majority in this forum are here to push their theory and not to learn. Hence obstancy is the order of the day.
    How many times has the same person posted the same false post irrespective of being proved wrong each time?

    Is it believed that a new audience will bring concurrence or by repeating a false statement it will become truth by subliminal reading by others.

    JustAskin just uses the Scriptures…and who has refuted his expisitions with honesty?

    I ask, show me one place.

    I ask many times and not ONCE has a single poster posted a rebuttal.

    But, as t8, says, and JustAskin has written, Truth is for the individual. If truth is spoken or written, but ignored by the many, but even one person reads, or hears and takes it on board, even without openly admitting it, and embodies it in their own belief, then that one, and the one through whom the Holy Spirit revealed it, will be blessed.

    But if the revealer takes the revelation as his own, then he denies the Holy Spirit. That one will get upset that others do not agree with him.
    This is not to be taken that exhorting is wrong because Jesus himself exhorted his Disciples and was exasperated by the lack of understanding of the Jews, Pharasees, Scribes, Sadducees, Priest and others.
    It is the taking of the revelation as ones own, possibly embellishing it in an attempt to make it seem more pallitable (This is possibly how the Trinity came about, being easier to teach to nations of tri-Gods)

Viewing 20 posts - 8,281 through 8,300 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account