Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 7,941 through 7,960 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #201883
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Marty………..True , but we must first get the basics right, if we do not then we just keep going down the wrong path and this path distorts the word of God and it's meaning in our lives as martian brought our , it is a major issue that need understanding in order for us to have a right fellowship with Jesus and God the Father. Apostate Churches have greately distorted the truth of God and Jesus. If everyone can get this right they will be going down the right path to GOD The Father and Jesus our brother. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours………………………….gene

    #201886
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,11:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 06 2010,11:02)
    942767…………You have it right brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………….gene


    Hi Gene:

    Hopefully, this will end this debate which has been going on forever with seemly no solution, just like the debate on the trinty.

    Let's move on and teach the Word of God in truth.  That is my interest is that the church be united in the truth.

    Jesus said that “they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    I wish it would end it but knowing a little about human nature I suspect not.
    A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
    Proof,scriptural or otherwise means little to religious people with a dogma to promote.

    #201891
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi,
    The Spirit of Christ is from eternity.

    #201898
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,12:28)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,11:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 06 2010,11:02)
    942767…………You have it right brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………….gene


    Hi Gene:

    Hopefully, this will end this debate which has been going on forever with seemly no solution, just like the debate on the trinty.

    Let's move on and teach the Word of God in truth.  That is my interest is that the church be united in the truth.

    Jesus said that “they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    I wish it would end it but knowing a little about human nature I suspect not.
    A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
    Proof,scriptural or otherwise means little to religious people with a dogma to promote.


    Hi Martian:

    If the Word of God does not convince them, then there is there is no use of my posting any thing more regarding this subject.

    It is not my opinion but the Word of God that matters, and I believe that I have shown by the scriptures that there is no preexistence.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #201900
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,13:07)

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,12:28)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,11:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 06 2010,11:02)
    942767…………You have it right brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………….gene


    Hi Gene:

    Hopefully, this will end this debate which has been going on forever with seemly no solution, just like the debate on the trinty.

    Let's move on and teach the Word of God in truth.  That is my interest is that the church be united in the truth.

    Jesus said that “they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    I wish it would end it but knowing a little about human nature I suspect not.
    A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
    Proof,scriptural or otherwise means little to religious people with a dogma to promote.


    Hi Martian:

    If the Word of God does not convince them, then there is there is no use of my posting any thing more regarding this subject.

    It is not my opinion but the Word of God that matters, and I believe that I have shown by the scriptures that there is no preexistence.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Scripture clearly calls us to follow Jesus as our example. Preexistence calls into question everything that Christ did as to if his preexistence affected his abilities. You cannot have an example that is fundementally different then us. That is both scriptural and reasonable.

    #201970

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 04 2010,03:45)

    Quote (martian @ July 03 2010,11:23)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 04 2010,01:22)
    martian……..Those things WJ quoted were from the old Hebrew texts brother.

    peace and love to you and yours martian………………………gene


    No he is quoting a greek translation in the NT of a Hebrew text. I am more interested in the original hebrew text


    Martian

    The Hebrew word for hardened is “chazaq” which also means “harden”.

    1) to strengthen, prevail, “harden“, be strong, become strong, be courageous, be firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore

    I think the Apostle Paul a Hebrew of the Hebrews knows more about the meaning of the word “harden” when applied to Pharaoh than you do! Rom 9:13-23

    WJ


    Quote (martian @ July 04 2010,08:12)
    WJ
    This is typical of your responses. You are so very very dishonest. You only research as far as you need to prove your doctrine. You are not interested in truth you are only interested in proof of your doctrine. Your scriptural investigations are a joke.
    When ever necessary you will use English translations to prove your points even when the actual Greek or Hebrew says something different.


    Martian

    Before you make such lame accusations you should at least back up what you say. But I understand this is your style. Just puke out all kinds of belittling statements and that makes you look and sound legitimate. But honest people know better.

    First of all as I have shown you the Hebrew word for “hardened” in referring to Pharaoh is “chazaq”.

    And the LORD hardened (chazaq) the heart of Pharaoh, and he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had spoken unto Moses. Exd 9:12

    The Hebrew word “chazaq” means;

    1)to strengthen, prevail, harden, be strong, become strong, be courageous, be firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore

    The Apostle Paul confirms the meaning of the word in referring to the Pharaoh when he uses the Greek word… sklērynō here…

    For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth(sklērynō)
    Rom 9:17, 18

    The Greek word means;

    1) to make hard, harden
    2) metaph.
    a) to render obstinate, stubborn
    b) to be hardened
    c) to become obstinate or stubborn

    I think the Apostle Paul knows a whole lot more than you do. Now show me where I am wrong sir!

    Quote (martian @ July 04 2010,08:12)

    For two years we have discussed the word Spirit as in the Holy Spirit. You use the English word spirit because it indicates an entity which lines up with your theory of a Trinity. You do this because to use the actual Greek definition of the word (breath or wind) would detract from that premise. That is just dishonest.


    It is dishonest for you to make such statements because the Greek word for Spirit is  Strong's G4151 – pneuma which means;

    1) the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
    a) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises his personality and character (the “Holy” Spirit)
    b) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises his work and power (the Spirit of “Truth”)
    c) never referred to as a depersonalised force
    2) the spirit, i.e. the vital principal by which the body is animated
    a) the rational spirit, the power by which the human being feels, thinks, decides
    b) the soul
    3) a spirit, i.e. a simple essence, devoid of all or at least all grosser matter, and possessed of the power of knowing, desiring, deciding, and acting
    a) a life giving spirit
    b) a human soul that has left the body
    c) a spirit higher than man but lower than God, i.e. an angel
    1) used of demons, or evil spirits, who were conceived as inhabiting the bodies of men
    2) the spiritual nature of Christ, higher than the highest angels and equal to God, the divine nature of Christ
    4) the disposition or influence which fills and governs the soul of any one
    a) the efficient source of any power, affection, emotion, desire, etc.
    5) a movement of air (a gentle blast)
    a) of the wind, hence the wind itself
    b) breath of nostrils or mouth

    The Hebrew word is “Strong's H7307 – ruwach which means;

    1) wind, breath, mind, spirit
    a) breath
    b) wind
    1) of heaven
    2) quarter (of wind), side
    3) breath of air
    4) air, gas
    5) vain, empty thing
    c) spirit (as that which breathes quickly in animation or agitation)
    1) spirit, animation, vivacity, vigour
    2) courage
    3) temper, anger
    4) impatience, patience
    5) spirit, disposition (as troubled, bitter, discontented)
    6) disposition (of various kinds), unaccountable or uncontrollable impulse
    7) prophetic spirit
    d) spirit (of the living, breathing being in man and animals)
    1) as gift, preserved by God, God's spirit, departing at death, disembodied being
    e) spirit (as seat of emotion)
    1) desire
    2) sorrow, trouble
    f) spirit
    1) as seat or organ of mental acts
    2) rarely of the will
    3) as seat especially of moral character
    g) Spirit of God, the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
    1) as inspiring ecstatic state of prophecy
    2) as impelling prophet to utter instruction or warning
    3) imparting warlike energy and executive and administrative power
    4) as endowing men with various gifts
    5) as energy of life
    6) as manifest in the Shekinah glory
    7) never referred to as a depersonalised force

    For some reason you think that the word should only mean “Breath” or “wind”.

    But if I ask you is God a “Spirit” being then you would say yes, but when it comes to its application to the Holy Spirit you would say no when Jesus specifically speaks of the Holy Spirit with personal pronouns surrounded with verbs and adjectives that belong to living beings only.

    So unless you can show some credentials that supersede or even equal that of “James Strong”, then why should I or anyone else listen to you?

    Quote (martian @ July 04 2010,08:12)
    If a conclusion of scripture is correct you should be able to plug the Hebrew or Greek definition into the scripture without changing your conclusion. You cannot do that because to replace Spirit with wind or breath would weaken your stand that spirit is an entity in and of itself.


    Obviously you do not know what you are talking about because words have different meanings depending on context. This is true of any language.

    So if you plug in the definition “Breath” or “Wind” to God who is a Spirit and Angels who are also Spirit beings then your conclusion is God and Angels are just “Breath” an “Wind”.

    God is a (breath or wind): and they that worship him must worship him in (breath or wind) and in truth. John 4:24

    Quote (martian @ July 04 2010,08:12)
    You and your red headed step child “Roo” are two peas in a pod. Both dishonest and beyond reason. I find your methods corrupt and your conclusions completely with out merit.


    WJ

    #201972
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    Get to know God and His son.
    Then all your theoretical fuzziness will clarify.

    #201975
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,13:07)

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,12:28)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,11:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 06 2010,11:02)
    942767…………You have it right brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………….gene


    Hi Gene:

    Hopefully, this will end this debate which has been going on forever with seemly no solution, just like the debate on the trinty.

    Let's move on and teach the Word of God in truth.  That is my interest is that the church be united in the truth.

    Jesus said that “they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    I wish it would end it but knowing a little about human nature I suspect not.
    A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
    Proof,scriptural or otherwise means little to religious people with a dogma to promote.


    Hi Martian:

    If the Word of God does not convince them, then there is there is no use of my posting any thing more regarding this subject.

    It is not my opinion but the Word of God that matters, and I believe that I have shown by the scriptures that there is no preexistence.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty! If the Word of Gods will not convince you then there is no reason to go on, right? So what do you do with those Scriptures which are The Word of God, that proved to me that Jesus was created before the World was? If it would only be that one Scripture, I could go with what you and others are saying. However there are many Scriptures where Jesus said I have come down from Heaven. And O Father glorify Me together with Yourself with the glory I had with you before the world was. And Before Abraham I am. He was from Ancient times…. Did you ever read the Article from H.N. it is a very good post…. I get aso frustrated because I see all these Scriptures and so many here just want to either ignore them or interpret them the way they see it. But how can you say to Jesus no you did not come from Heaven….. When I read in 1Corinth. 15 also it explains it so good……I will not debate with Martian and will not say anything further to you either because I said it all…… good luck to you and may God be with you, Irene

    #201977
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Irene,
    Yes the Spirit of Christ was there.
    God sends forth His Spirit and they are created and He renews the face of the earth[from ps104]

    #201978
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Arnold @ July 07 2010,05:59)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,13:07)

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,12:28)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,11:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 06 2010,11:02)
    942767…………You have it right brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………….gene


    Hi Gene:

    Hopefully, this will end this debate which has been going on forever with seemly no solution, just like the debate on the trinty.

    Let's move on and teach the Word of God in truth.  That is my interest is that the church be united in the truth.

    Jesus said that “they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    I wish it would end it but knowing a little about human nature I suspect not.
    A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
    Proof,scriptural or otherwise means little to religious people with a dogma to promote.


    Hi Martian:

    If the Word of God does not convince them, then there is there is no use of my posting any thing more regarding this subject.

    It is not my opinion but the Word of God that matters, and I believe that I have shown by the scriptures that there is no preexistence.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty!  If the Word of Gods will not convince you then there is no reason to go on, right?   So what do you do with those Scriptures which are The Word of God, that proved to me that Jesus was created before the World was?  If it would only be that one Scripture, I could go with what you and others are saying.   However there are many Scriptures where Jesus said I have come down from Heaven.  And O Father glorify Me together with Yourself with the glory I had with you before the world was. And Before Abraham I am.  He was from Ancient times…. Did you ever read the Article from H.N.  it is a very good post…. I get aso frustrated because I see all these Scriptures and so many here just want to either ignore them or interpret them the way they see it.  But how can you say to Jesus no you did not come from Heaven….. When I read in 1Corinth. 15 also it explains it so good……I will not debate with Martian and will not say anything further to you either because I said it all…… good luck to you and may God be with you,  Irene


    Those scriptures have alredy been explained. You just deny them and turn on the old broken record again.

    #201984
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 07 2010,04:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 04 2010,03:45)

    Quote (martian @ July 03 2010,11:23)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 04 2010,01:22)
    martian……..Those things WJ quoted were from the old Hebrew texts brother.

    peace and love to you and yours martian………………………gene


    No he is quoting a greek translation in the NT of a Hebrew text. I am more interested in the original hebrew text


    Martian

    The Hebrew word for hardened is “chazaq” which also means “harden”.

    1) to strengthen, prevail, “harden“, be strong, become strong, be courageous, be firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore

    I think the Apostle Paul a Hebrew of the Hebrews knows more about the meaning of the word “harden” when applied to Pharaoh than you do! Rom 9:13-23

    WJ


    Quote (martian @ July 04 2010,08:12)
    WJ
    This is typical of your responses. You are so very very dishonest. You only research as far as you need to prove your doctrine. You are not interested in truth you are only interested in proof of your doctrine. Your scriptural investigations are a joke.
    When ever necessary you will use English translations to prove your points even when the actual Greek or Hebrew says something different.


    Martian

    Before you make such lame accusations you should at least back up what you say. But I understand this is your style. Just puke out all kinds of belittling statements and that makes you look and sound legitimate. But honest people know better.

    First of all as I have shown you the Hebrew word for “hardened” in referring to Pharaoh is “chazaq”.

    And the LORD hardened (chazaq) the heart of Pharaoh, and he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had spoken unto Moses. Exd 9:12

    The Hebrew word “chazaq” means;

    1)to strengthen, prevail, harden, be strong, become strong, be courageous, be firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore

    The Apostle Paul confirms the meaning of the word in referring to the Pharaoh when he uses the Greek word… sklērynō here…

    For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth(sklērynō)
    Rom 9:17, 18

    The Greek word means;

    1) to make hard, harden
    2) metaph.
    a) to render obstinate, stubborn
    b) to be hardened
    c) to become obstinate or stubborn

    I think the Apostle Paul knows a whole lot more than you do. Now show me where I am wrong sir!

    Quote (martian @ July 04 2010,08:12)

    For two years we have discussed the word Spirit as in the Holy Spirit. You use the English word spirit because it indicates an entity which lines up with your theory of a Trinity. You do this because to use the actual Greek definition of the word (breath or wind) would detract from that premise. That is just dishonest.


    It is dishonest for you to make such statements because the Greek word for Spirit is  Strong's G4151 – pneuma which means;

    1) the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
    a) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises his personality and character (the “Holy” Spirit)
    b) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises his work and power (the Spirit of “Truth”)
    c) never referred to as a depersonalised force
    2) the spirit, i.e. the vital principal by which the body is animated
    a) the rational spirit, the power by which the human being feels, thinks, decides
    b) the soul
    3) a spirit, i.e. a simple essence, devoid of all or at least all grosser matter, and possessed of the power of knowing, desiring, deciding, and acting
    a) a life giving spirit
    b) a human soul that has left the body
    c) a spirit higher than man but lower than God, i.e. an angel
    1) used of demons, or evil spirits, who were conceived as inhabiting the bodies of men
    2) the spiritual nature of Christ, higher than the highest angels and equal to God, the divine nature of Christ
    4) the disposition or influence which fills and governs the soul of any one
    a) the efficient source of any power, affection, emotion, desire, etc.
    5) a movement of air (a gentle blast)
    a) of the wind, hence the wind itself
    b) breath of nostrils or mouth

    The Hebrew word is “Strong's H7307 – ruwach which means;

    1) wind, breath, mind, spirit
    a) breath
    b) wind
    1) of heaven
    2) quarter (of wind), side
    3) breath of air
    4) air, gas
    5) vain, empty thing
    c) spirit (as that which breathes quickly in animation or agitation)
    1) spirit, animation, vivacity, vigour
    2) courage
    3) temper, anger
    4) impatience, patience
    5) spirit, disposition (as troubled, bitter, discontented)
    6) disposition (of various kinds), unaccountable or uncontrollable impulse
    7) prophetic spirit
    d) spirit (of the living, breathing being in man and animals)
    1) as gift, preserved by God, God's spirit, departing at death, disembodied being
    e) spirit (as seat of emotion)
    1) desire
    2) sorrow, trouble
    f) spirit
    1) as seat or organ of mental acts
    2) rarely of the will
    3) as seat especially of moral character
    g) Spirit of God, the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
    1) as inspiring ecstatic state of prophecy
    2) as impelling prophet to utter instruction or warning
    3) imparting warlike energy and executive and administrative power
    4) as endowing men with various gifts
    5) as energy of life
    6) as manifest in the Shekinah glory
    7) never referred to as a depersonalised force

    For some reason you think that the word should only mean “Breath” or “wind”.

    But if I ask you is God a “Spirit” being then you would say yes, but when it comes to its application to the Holy Spirit you would say no when Jesus specifically speaks of the Holy Spirit with personal pronouns surrounded with verbs and adjectives that belong to living beings only.

    So unless you can show some credentials that supersede or even equal that of “James Strong”, then why should I or anyone else listen to you?

    Quote (martian @ July 04 2010,08:12)
    If a conclusion of scripture is correct you should be able to plug th
    e Hebrew or Greek definition into the scripture without changing your conclusion. You cannot do that because to replace Spirit with wind or breath would weaken your stand that spirit is an entity in and of itself.


    Obviously you do not know what you are talking about because words have different meanings depending on context. This is true of any language.

    So if you plug in the definition “Breath” or “Wind” to God who is a Spirit and Angels who are also Spirit beings then your conclusion is God and Angels are just “Breath” an “Wind”.

    God is a (breath or wind): and they that worship him must worship him in (breath or wind) and in truth. John 4:24

    Quote (martian @ July 04 2010,08:12)
    You and your red headed step child “Roo” are two peas in a pod. Both dishonest and beyond reason. I find your methods corrupt and your conclusions completely with out merit.


    WJ


    You say “honest people know better”. How would you know then.

    Then why does Strong’s assign five different numbers to the words?
    7185, 7188, 2388, 3513, and even 553
    Obviously you were not aware of this because you only research as far as needed to find something to prove your doctrine (right or wrong) You are not interested in truth but only what you can use as proof.

    AND –
    You either ignore or missed my point about spirit.
    I find it interesting that the primary meaning of Spirit would change from wind or breath in the OT to third person of the Trinity in the NT. Obviously the definition you use is based on a doctrinal application rather then a pure language study. In fact the Strong’s Concordance does not list any reference for either word, to the third person of the trinity. It simply says wind or breath. So where does that concept come from. Not from the language or words themselves but from a biased writer and those that follow him. The Greeks had a word for Godhead and they had words to say three or third. Why was it not just written third person of godhead instead of wind or breath? Probably because no one could have foreseen such silliness made up about the breath of God.
    I have also explained the verses you use with personal pronouns many times.
    As a Grek thinker you miss the concrete ways in which the Hebrew wrote and thought.
    It is true that these words can have different meanings but to jump to the conclusion that they must mean an entity in and of itself is outside of those meanings.
    One of the meanings of Ruach is character. God is the height of character and those that worship him must do so in that same character and truth. The same truth taught all through scripture.

    I would deal with more of your stuff but need to go for now.

    #201986
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ July 07 2010,06:57)

    Quote (Arnold @ July 07 2010,05:59)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,13:07)

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,12:28)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,11:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 06 2010,11:02)
    942767…………You have it right brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………….gene


    Hi Gene:

    Hopefully, this will end this debate which has been going on forever with seemly no solution, just like the debate on the trinty.

    Let's move on and teach the Word of God in truth.  That is my interest is that the church be united in the truth.

    Jesus said that “they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    I wish it would end it but knowing a little about human nature I suspect not.
    A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
    Proof,scriptural or otherwise means little to religious people with a dogma to promote.


    Hi Martian:

    If the Word of God does not convince them, then there is there is no use of my posting any thing more regarding this subject.

    It is not my opinion but the Word of God that matters, and I believe that I have shown by the scriptures that there is no preexistence.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty!  If the Word of Gods will not convince you then there is no reason to go on, right?   So what do you do with those Scriptures which are The Word of God, that proved to me that Jesus was created before the World was?  If it would only be that one Scripture, I could go with what you and others are saying.   However there are many Scriptures where Jesus said I have come down from Heaven.  And O Father glorify Me together with Yourself with the glory I had with you before the world was. And Before Abraham I am.  He was from Ancient times…. Did you ever read the Article from H.N.  it is a very good post…. I get aso frustrated because I see all these Scriptures and so many here just want to either ignore them or interpret them the way they see it.  But how can you say to Jesus no you did not come from Heaven….. When I read in 1Corinth. 15 also it explains it so good……I will not debate with Martian and will not say anything further to you either because I said it all…… good luck to you and may God be with you,  Irene


    Those scriptures have alredy been explained. You just deny them and turn on the old broken record again.


    Not “explained” but explained AWAY.

    the Roo

    #201989

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,15:18)
    You say “honest people know better”. How would you know then.

    Then why does Strong’s assign five different numbers to the words?
    7185, 7188, 2388, 3513, and even 553
    Obviously you were not aware of this because you only research as far as needed to find something to prove your doctrine (right or wrong) You are not interested in truth but only what you can use as  proof.


    Martian

    And what does that have to do with the Hebrew word used for this scripture…

    And the LORD hardened (chazaq) the heart of Pharaoh, and he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had spoken unto Moses. Exd 9:12

    The Hebrew word “chazaq” means;

    1)to strengthen, prevail, harden, be strong, become strong, be courageous, be firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore

    Nice dance, you ignore the Greek word Paul used also!

    The Apostle Paul confirms the meaning of the word in referring to the Pharaoh when he uses the Greek word… sklērynō here…

    For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth(sklērynō)
    Rom 9:17, 18

    The Greek word means;

    1) to make hard, harden
    2) metaph.
    a) to render obstinate, stubborn
    b) to be hardened
    c) to become obstinate or stubborn

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,15:18)
    AND –
    You either ignore or missed my point about spirit.
    I find it interesting that the primary meaning of Spirit would change from wind or breath in the OT to third person of the Trinity in the NT. Obviously the definition you use is based on a doctrinal application rather then a pure language study.  In fact the Strong’s Concordance does not list any reference for either word, to the third person of the trinity. It simply says wind or breath.


    Wrong, look again…

    the Greek word for Spirit is  Strong's G4151 – pneuma which means;

    1) the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
    a) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises his personality and character (the “Holy” Spirit)
    b) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises his work and power (the Spirit of “Truth”)
    c) never referred to as a depersonalised force
    2) the spirit, i.e. the vital principal by which the body is animated
    a) the rational spirit, the power by which the human being feels, thinks, decides
    b) the soul
    3) a spirit, i.e. a simple essence, devoid of all or at least all grosser matter, and possessed of the power of knowing, desiring, deciding, and acting
    a) a life giving spirit
    b) a human soul that has left the body
    c) a spirit higher than man but lower than God, i.e. an angel
    1) used of demons, or evil spirits, who were conceived as inhabiting the bodies of men
    2) the spiritual nature of Christ, higher than the highest angels and equal to God, the divine nature of Christ
    4) the disposition or influence which fills and governs the soul of any one
    a) the efficient source of any power, affection, emotion, desire, etc.
    5) a movement of air (a gentle blast)
    a) of the wind, hence the wind itself
    b) breath of nostrils or mouth

    Found here…

    The Hebrew word is “Strong's H7307 – ruwach which means;

    1) wind, breath, mind, spirit
    a) breath
    b) wind
    1) of heaven
    2) quarter (of wind), side
    3) breath of air
    4) air, gas
    5) vain, empty thing
    c) spirit (as that which breathes quickly in animation or agitation)
    1) spirit, animation, vivacity, vigour
    2) courage
    3) temper, anger
    4) impatience, patience
    5) spirit, disposition (as troubled, bitter, discontented)
    6) disposition (of various kinds), unaccountable or uncontrollable impulse
    7) prophetic spirit
    d) spirit (of the living, breathing being in man and animals)
    1) as gift, preserved by God, God's spirit, departing at death, disembodied being
    e) spirit (as seat of emotion)
    1) desire
    2) sorrow, trouble
    f) spirit
    1) as seat or organ of mental acts
    2) rarely of the will
    3) as seat especially of moral character
    g) Spirit of God, the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
    1) as inspiring ecstatic state of prophecy
    2) as impelling prophet to utter instruction or warning
    3) imparting warlike energy and executive and administrative power
    4) as endowing men with various gifts
    5) as energy of life
    6) as manifest in the Shekinah glory
    7) never referred to as a depersonalised force

    Found here…

    Its also found here…

    And here…

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,15:18)
    So where does that concept come from. Not from the language or words themselves but from a biased writer and those that follow him. The Greeks had a word for Godhead and they had words to say three or third. Why was it not just written third person of godhead instead of wind or breath? Probably because no one could have foreseen such silliness made up about the breath of God.


    Do you have any Greek or Hebrew credentials? Who made you the final authority?

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,15:18)
    I have also explained the verses you use with personal pronouns many times.
    As a Grek thinker you miss the concrete ways in which the Hebrew wrote and thought.
    It is true that these words can have different meanings but to jump to the conclusion that they must mean an entity in and of itself is outside of those meanings.
    One of the meanings of Ruach is character. God is the height of character and those that worship him must do so in that same character and truth. The same truth taught all through scripture.

    I would deal with more of your stuff but need to go for now.


    You can’t even speak or read Hebrew or Greek and yet you want us to believe you think like the Hebrews!

    Like I said, James Strong and the experts in Biblical Hebrew and Greek translation know far more than you. So continue on with your manmade theories.

    WJ

    .

    #201991
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    Your claimed expertise on greek and hebrew does not bring you any closer to KNOWING the God of Israel

    #201993

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 06 2010,16:08)
    Hi WJ,
    Your claimed expertise on greek and hebrew does not bring you any closer to KNOWING the God of Israel


    Well then I suppose the scriptures are not good for instruction and reproof in righteousness since we don't need Biblical Hebrew and Greek experts to bring us the translations?

    :D

    WJ

    #201996
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Arnold @ July 07 2010,05:59)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,13:07)

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,12:28)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,11:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 06 2010,11:02)
    942767…………You have it right brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………….gene


    Hi Gene:

    Hopefully, this will end this debate which has been going on forever with seemly no solution, just like the debate on the trinty.

    Let's move on and teach the Word of God in truth.  That is my interest is that the church be united in the truth.

    Jesus said that “they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    I wish it would end it but knowing a little about human nature I suspect not.
    A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
    Proof,scriptural or otherwise means little to religious people with a dogma to promote.


    Hi Martian:

    If the Word of God does not convince them, then there is there is no use of my posting any thing more regarding this subject.

    It is not my opinion but the Word of God that matters, and I believe that I have shown by the scriptures that there is no preexistence.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty!  If the Word of Gods will not convince you then there is no reason to go on, right?   So what do you do with those Scriptures which are The Word of God, that proved to me that Jesus was created before the World was?  If it would only be that one Scripture, I could go with what you and others are saying.   However there are many Scriptures where Jesus said I have come down from Heaven.  And O Father glorify Me together with Yourself with the glory I had with you before the world was. And Before Abraham I am.  He was from Ancient times…. Did you ever read the Article from H.N.  it is a very good post…. I get aso frustrated because I see all these Scriptures and so many here just want to either ignore them or interpret them the way they see it.  But how can you say to Jesus no you did not come from Heaven….. When I read in 1Corinth. 15 also it explains it so good……I will not debate with Martian and will not say anything further to you either because I said it all…… good luck to you and may God be with you,  Irene


    Hi Irene:

    The Word of God has convinced me. Jesus was fore-ordained, but no, I have just showed you that the scripture states that Eve is the mother of all living, and the verse in colossians which you have used to support your view of preexistence says that Jesus is the “first born of every creature”.

    If that is the case, that scripture is not speaking of preexistence. He is the first man to be be born of God.

    I have already discussed all the other scriptures that you want to hold onto to support your position, but I do not interpret them in the same way that you do.

    Again, Jesus was foreordained. God made every thing in this world knowing that a particular point in time he would conceive a Son who would be the saviour of all humanity.

    Sorry, My understanding based on the Word of God is that Jesus did not preexist as a sentient being prior to his birth from the virgin Mary.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #201997
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    They are very useful to those in Christ.
    But you must first enter the gate.
    Seek first the kingdom

    #202220
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 07 2010,08:07)

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,15:18)
    You say “honest people know better”. How would you know then.

    Then why does Strong’s assign five different numbers to the words?
    7185, 7188, 2388, 3513, and even 553
    Obviously you were not aware of this because you only research as far as needed to find something to prove your doctrine (right or wrong) You are not interested in truth but only what you can use as  proof.


    Martian

    And what does that have to do with the Hebrew word used for this scripture…

    And the LORD hardened (chazaq) the heart of Pharaoh, and he hearkened not unto them; as the LORD had spoken unto Moses. Exd 9:12

    The Hebrew word “chazaq” means;

    1)to strengthen, prevail, harden, be strong, become strong, be courageous, be firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore

    Nice dance, you ignore the Greek word Paul used also!

    The Apostle Paul confirms the meaning of the word in referring to the Pharaoh when he uses the Greek word… sklērynō here…

    For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth(sklērynō)
    Rom 9:17, 18

    The Greek word means;

    1) to make hard, harden
    2) metaph.
    a) to render obstinate, stubborn
    b) to be hardened
    c) to become obstinate or stubborn

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,15:18)
    AND –
    You either ignore or missed my point about spirit.
    I find it interesting that the primary meaning of Spirit would change from wind or breath in the OT to third person of the Trinity in the NT. Obviously the definition you use is based on a doctrinal application rather then a pure language study.  In fact the Strong’s Concordance does not list any reference for either word, to the third person of the trinity. It simply says wind or breath.


    Wrong, look again…

    the Greek word for Spirit is  Strong's G4151 – pneuma which means;

    1) the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
    a) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises his personality and character (the “Holy” Spirit)
    b) sometimes referred to in a way which emphasises his work and power (the Spirit of “Truth”)
    c) never referred to as a depersonalised force
    2) the spirit, i.e. the vital principal by which the body is animated
    a) the rational spirit, the power by which the human being feels, thinks, decides
    b) the soul
    3) a spirit, i.e. a simple essence, devoid of all or at least all grosser matter, and possessed of the power of knowing, desiring, deciding, and acting
    a) a life giving spirit
    b) a human soul that has left the body
    c) a spirit higher than man but lower than God, i.e. an angel
    1) used of demons, or evil spirits, who were conceived as inhabiting the bodies of men
    2) the spiritual nature of Christ, higher than the highest angels and equal to God, the divine nature of Christ
    4) the disposition or influence which fills and governs the soul of any one
    a) the efficient source of any power, affection, emotion, desire, etc.
    5) a movement of air (a gentle blast)
    a) of the wind, hence the wind itself
    b) breath of nostrils or mouth

    Found here…

    The Hebrew word is “Strong's H7307 – ruwach which means;

    1) wind, breath, mind, spirit
    a) breath
    b) wind
    1) of heaven
    2) quarter (of wind), side
    3) breath of air
    4) air, gas
    5) vain, empty thing
    c) spirit (as that which breathes quickly in animation or agitation)
    1) spirit, animation, vivacity, vigour
    2) courage
    3) temper, anger
    4) impatience, patience
    5) spirit, disposition (as troubled, bitter, discontented)
    6) disposition (of various kinds), unaccountable or uncontrollable impulse
    7) prophetic spirit
    d) spirit (of the living, breathing being in man and animals)
    1) as gift, preserved by God, God's spirit, departing at death, disembodied being
    e) spirit (as seat of emotion)
    1) desire
    2) sorrow, trouble
    f) spirit
    1) as seat or organ of mental acts
    2) rarely of the will
    3) as seat especially of moral character
    g) Spirit of God, the third person of the triune God, the Holy Spirit, coequal, coeternal with the Father and the Son
    1) as inspiring ecstatic state of prophecy
    2) as impelling prophet to utter instruction or warning
    3) imparting warlike energy and executive and administrative power
    4) as endowing men with various gifts
    5) as energy of life
    6) as manifest in the Shekinah glory
    7) never referred to as a depersonalised force

    Found here…

    Its also found here…

    And here…

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,15:18)
    So where does that concept come from. Not from the language or words themselves but from a biased writer and those that follow him. The Greeks had a word for Godhead and they had words to say three or third. Why was it not just written third person of godhead instead of wind or breath? Probably because no one could have foreseen such silliness made up about the breath of God.


    Do you have any Greek or Hebrew credentials? Who made you the final authority?

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,15:18)
    I have also explained the verses you use with personal pronouns many times.
    As a Grek thinker you miss the concrete ways in which the Hebrew wrote and thought.
    It is true that these words can have different meanings but to jump to the conclusion that they must mean an entity in and of itself is outside of those meanings.
    One of the meanings of Ruach is character. God is the height of character and those that worship him must do so in that same character and truth. The same truth taught all through scripture.

    I would deal with more of your stuff but need to go for now.


    You can’t even speak or read Hebrew or Greek and yet you want us to believe you think like the Hebrews!

    Like I said, James Strong and the experts in Biblical Hebrew and Greek translation know far more than you. So continue on with your manmade theories.

    WJ

    .


    This post is not to prove your doctrine wrong, bu
    t to prove your method wrong and dishonest with the scriptures.
    There are fifteen verses concerning the hardening of Pharaoh’s heart. You quote only one because it can be used (in some manner) to prove your doctrine. You don’t investigate any farther and say that is honest research.
    IT’S A SHAM!!!

    1.Exodus 7:13
Yet Pharaoh's heart was hardened, and he did not listen to them, as the LORD had said.
2388
    2.Exodus 7:22
But the magicians of Egypt did the same with their secret arts; and Pharaoh's heart was hardened, and he did not listen to them, as the LORD had said.
2388
    3.Exodus 8:15
But when Pharaoh saw that there was relief, he hardened his heart and did not listen to them, as the LORD had said.
3513
    4.Exodus 8:19
Then the magicians said to Pharaoh, ” This is the finger of God.” But Pharaoh's heart was hardened, and he did not listen to them, as the LORD had said.
2388
    5.Exodus 8:32
But Pharaoh hardened his heart this time also, and he did not let the people go.
3513
    6.Exodus 9:7
Pharaoh sent, and behold, there was not even one of the livestock of Israel dead. But the heart of Pharaoh was hardened, and he did not let the people go.
3513
    7.Exodus 9:12
And the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, and he did not listen to them, just as the LORD had spoken to Moses.
2388
    8.Exodus 9:34
But when Pharaoh saw that the rain and the hail and the thunder had ceased, he sinned again and hardened his heart, he and his servants.
3513
    9.Exodus 9:35
Pharaoh's heart was hardened, and he did not let the sons of Israel go, just as the LORD had spoken through Moses.
2388
    10.Exodus 10:1
[ The Plague of Locusts ] Then the LORD said to Moses, “Go to Pharaoh, for I have hardened his heart and the heart of his servants, that I may perform these signs of Mine among them,
3513
    11.Exodus 10:20
But the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, and he did not let the sons of Israel go.
2388
    12.Exodus 10:27
But the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, and he was not willing to let them go.
2388
    13. Exodus 11:10
Moses and Aaron performed all these wonders before Pharaoh; yet the LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart, and he did not let the sons of Israel go out of his land.
2388
    14. Exodus 14:8
The LORD hardened the heart of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and he chased after the sons of Israel as the sons of Israel were going out boldly.
2388
    2388- To grab hold to refrain or support.
    3513 To be heavy of weight, wealth, or importance.

    As I posted before. God provoked Pharaoh by refraining him from acting. This was done to see what would come out of Pharaoh. What came out was his arrogance. He became heavy with importance. He became lifted up with pride against God.

    Now to spirit –
    Strong’s concordance defines the exact word (pneuma) translation as wind or current of air,breath.
    Now where in that literal translation does the concept come from that makes it mean an individual personality of a triune God? Obviously not from the literal translation. It is based on doctrine and not language.
    This is not my authority. This is Strong.
    In the plan of the book or the preface to the Greek lists, it says, “Immediately after each word is given the exact equivalent words in English letters.” Immediately following Pneuma is wind or breath or current of air. There is no mention of third person of the Trinity because it is not carried in the language itself.

    [quote=martian,July 06 2010,15:18]I have also explained the verses you use with personal pronouns many times.
    As a Grek thinker you miss the concrete ways in which the Hebrew wrote and thought.
    It is true that these words can have different meanings but to jump to the conclusion that they must mean an entity in and of itself is outside of those meanings.
    One of the meanings of Ruach is character. God is the height of character and those that worship him must do so in that same character and truth. The same truth taught all through scripture.

    You say-
    You can’t even speak or read Hebrew or Greek and yet you want us to believe you think like the Hebrews!

    Reply-
    You do not have to speak Hebrew or Greek to understand how they thought.

    You say-
    Like I said, James Strong and the experts in Biblical Hebrew and Greek translation know far more than you. So continue on with your manmade theories.

    Reply-
    I am relying on Strong’s exact translation and not a meaning that is not supported by the language.

    .

    #202224
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,09:54)
    Hi:

    And just to make sure we shut the door on the notion of preexistence based on Colossians 1:15.  That scripture states that Jesus is:

    Quote
    Col 1:15Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

    That is “a creature” and not a “spirit”, and so if Eve is the mother of all living, Jesus did not preexist his birth from the virgin Mary.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Hi Marty,

    Why are not angels and other heavenly beings “creatures”?

    Revelation 5:13
    And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever.

    Apparently there are creatures in heaven.  Was Eve the mother of them?  Could Jesus have been the firstborn of every creature and still be a spirit?  Why do you think creature only applies to fleshly beings?

    peace and love,
    mike

    #202239
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ July 07 2010,08:21)

    Quote (Arnold @ July 07 2010,05:59)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,13:07)

    Quote (martian @ July 06 2010,12:28)

    Quote (942767 @ July 06 2010,11:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 06 2010,11:02)
    942767…………You have it right brother.

    peace and love to you and yours…………………….gene


    Hi Gene:

    Hopefully, this will end this debate which has been going on forever with seemly no solution, just like the debate on the trinty.

    Let's move on and teach the Word of God in truth.  That is my interest is that the church be united in the truth.

    Jesus said that “they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.”

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    I wish it would end it but knowing a little about human nature I suspect not.
    A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
    Proof,scriptural or otherwise means little to religious people with a dogma to promote.


    Hi Martian:

    If the Word of God does not convince them, then there is there is no use of my posting any thing more regarding this subject.

    It is not my opinion but the Word of God that matters, and I believe that I have shown by the scriptures that there is no preexistence.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty!  If the Word of Gods will not convince you then there is no reason to go on, right?   So what do you do with those Scriptures which are The Word of God, that proved to me that Jesus was created before the World was?  If it would only be that one Scripture, I could go with what you and others are saying.   However there are many Scriptures where Jesus said I have come down from Heaven.  And O Father glorify Me together with Yourself with the glory I had with you before the world was. And Before Abraham I am.  He was from Ancient times…. Did you ever read the Article from H.N.  it is a very good post…. I get aso frustrated because I see all these Scriptures and so many here just want to either ignore them or interpret them the way they see it.  But how can you say to Jesus no you did not come from Heaven….. When I read in 1Corinth. 15 also it explains it so good……I will not debate with Martian and will not say anything further to you either because I said it all…… good luck to you and may God be with you,  Irene


    Hi Irene:

    The Word of God has convinced me.  Jesus was fore-ordained, but no, I have just showed you that the scripture states that Eve is the mother of all living, and the verse in colossians which you have used to support your view of preexistence says that Jesus is the “first born of every creature”.

    If that is the case, that scripture is not speaking of preexistence.  He is the first man to be be born of God.

    I have already discussed all the other scriptures that you want to hold onto to support your position, but I do not interpret them in the same way that you do.

    Again, Jesus was foreordained.  God made every thing in this world knowing that a particular point in time he would conceive a Son who would be the saviour of all humanity.  

    Sorry, My understanding based on the Word of God is that Jesus did not preexist as a sentient being prior to his birth from the virgin Mary.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    So Christ did not go back as a Spirit Being???? As what did He become then???? Foreordained????John 17:5 tells us that He did go back as what He was before…. I am not interpreting any Scripture what soever. I am writing them the way they are written. I believe that is what so many are doing with Scriptures…. When it says in John 1:1 that the Word was God and the Word was with God, it is not Jesus to them…Yet in verse 14 it says that the Word became flesh….And also in Rev, 19:13 it says this:” He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called “The Word of God. Go down to verse 16 and it tells us that He will come again as
    :” KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.” We should all know who that is…. At least I do…..I do know how hard it is to change ones mind, I at first said too:” you got to be kidding me.” Fortunately God opened my mind and showed me the truth. It also has nothing to do with the trinity, they believe that Christ always existed, which I don't. The Holy Spirit is not a person and by Jesus own words He said that His Father is greater the He is. And also that He is above all. (Just for those that believe in the trinity) This preexisting doctrine is of God, because it is in Scriptures….. More then one….I also want to say this. Jesus is of God and is the Mighty God while Jehovah God is LORD of all and the Almighty God…. Irene

Viewing 20 posts - 7,941 through 7,960 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account