Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 7,601 through 7,620 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #198941

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 19 2010,17:23)
    WJ, what dies Scriptures say about 'adding or taking away a word from God's word'.

    WJ, do you not fear God? Obviously not…even Satan fears God, and he is a Mighty God!


    JA

    Its also interesting that you would say that satan is “a Mighty God” (capitol G) yet you can't even say Jesus is your “Mighy God”.

    BTW, did you just add to the text by calling satan a “Mighty God”?

    And you ask me if I fear God? HMMM?  

    WJ

    #198942
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (karmarie @ June 21 2010,19:01)
    Hi Martian, I agree with you that seeking a personal relationship with God is what is important and more important than seeking knowledge about God. Things are revealed the closer we become with God without the need to always read everything or search elsewhere.

    The pre-existance of Jesus however is not something we can know for sure, the Bible does say The Word was with God in the beginning, then the Word became flesh. Jesus said “Now, Father, glorify me with your own self with the glory which I had with you before the world existed.

    So if The Word was a Spiritual being alongside God the Father, and the World was created through Him, we shouldnt assume that this wasnt true without knowing for sure. Because its taking away what The pre-existant Word (In the flesh Jesus) created which we are a part of.

    So I would rather assume what the Bible says is correct. It seems The Word was with God and was part of God as a Spirit being, then the Word was made flesh, in the man Jesus.

    If the Word was Gods spoken word and thought, where is the proof of that? It doesnt make sense with how The Word (as you say a part of God, Gods mind word thought) manifested in Jesus spoke to God the Father, its like a Trinitarian saying Jesus as God was talking to himself, somehow.

    Jesus being pre-existant doesnt make anything harder or give him any advantage at all. He is Lord and master, and an example for us. He came to give us life through death. So theres alot more to it than just that.

    But what is important? Romans 10:9
    “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.”


    Let me deal with your points one at a time. —

    “The pre-existance of Jesus however is not something we can know for sure, the Bible does say The Word was with God in the beginning, then the Word became flesh. Jesus said “Now, Father, glorify me with your own self with the glory which I had with you before the world existed.”

    Reply –
    Firstly you assume that the English translations are accurate to a point that these verses can be understood as they appear. It is abundantly clear throughout history that men (some with good intentions) have attempted to clarify/change scriptural translations in order to make particular doctrines stand out or to protect currently believed doctrines from disruption. I can give clear examples if you desire.

    “So if The Word was a Spiritual being alongside God the Father, and the World was created through Him, we shouldnt assume that this wasnt true without knowing for sure. Because its taking away what The pre-existant Word (In the flesh Jesus) created which we are a part of.”

    Reply –
    Again this is if your interpretation or the interpretation of the translator are accurate. Those truths can always be in question.

    “So I would rather assume what the Bible says is correct. It seems The Word was with God and was part of God as a Spirit being, then the Word was made flesh, in the man Jesus. “

    “If the Word was Gods spoken word and thought, where is the proof of that? It doesnt make sense with how The Word (as you say a part of God, Gods mind word thought) manifested in Jesus spoke to God the Father, its like a Trinitarian saying Jesus as God was talking to himself, somehow.”

    Reply –
    The proof is in the word itself. The term “word” is used over 350 times in the NT and in all but a half a dozen Trinitarian and oneness translate it to be a statement speech and idea. Every Bible dictionary I have ever seen says it’s primary meaning to be that. Yet in this one sequence some translate it to be literally Jesus with no proof from the words themselves. The only proof is based on a doctrine they attempting to prove.
    The word is the blueprint and Jesus is the building built from it. The blueprint was with God from the beginning and represented God’s character and intent.

    “Jesus being pre-existant doesnt make anything harder or give him any advantage at all.”

    Reply –
    How do you know this? What happened to the memories and experiences of Christ in his prior life? If he created the world what happened to those memories? Did Christ know of his preexistence? Let me ask you – If you had existed in Heaven in communion with God for perhaps thousands of years prior to being born on Earth, and you at some time in your life on Earth remembered that life, Would you find it easier to walk in a way that would get you back there? Would that not be an advantage? With a preexistence Christ you have two choices
    1.God erased the memories or killed the persona that was Christ in heaven in order to have a new Christ born of Mary.
    2.Christ at some point in his Earthly life was well aware of his prior life in heaven which gave him a trememdous advantage over humanity. This of course would deny our ability to walk with God as he did or use him as our perfect and exact example.

    AS you say this is doctrine and what is important is to be saved, however it is not enough to just be saved. One must endeavor to know the heart and character of God in order to become like him. For this we were given that perfect example of a normal Human son of God.

    #198945
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    martian………Exactly , Jesus did (NOT) exist as a Person before his Berth , He was only in the plan and will of God for all of Humanity, the one spoken of as the seed of the women, in Genesis , He was the (FIRST) from the Human race to reach perfection, a Perfect example to all of Us Human beings as He himself was (EXACTLY) in every way one of US. The false teaching of the preexistent Jesus only moves His (exact) Identity away from Us, giving him superior advantage over us, and how could He expect us to overcome (EVEN AS HE HAS) when we would be existing without his advantage. GOD'S plan was and is to save man kind and Jesus was the (FIRST) From mankind to achieve that goal. He was no more foreordained in the plan of GOD then Cyrus or Jeremiah was. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours martian…………………………gene

    #198946

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 20 2010,06:13)
    t8

    Good, then when Isaiah the prophet calls Jesus the “Mighty God” (El Gabor) then you believe that he is “The Mighty God” don't you?

    So again, is he your “Mighty God” or will you continue with your selective process of interpreting the scriptures?  

    WJ


    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)

    Yeah no problem with that.

    God is the one true God and he sent Jesus.


    T8

    No problem with what?

    I have never heard you say with your lips “Jesus is my Mighty God”, and  I have been here almost four years.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)

    How does this following truth agree with the above truth?

    Isaiah 9:6
    For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”'

    First off, we know that this is Jesus and we both agree that he is not the Father, so we have to assume that Mighty God is not necessarily the Almighty God either.


    No t8, actually contextually you would have to assume that Jesus is the Almighty God unless Isaiah had some sort of memory lapse, for in chapter 10:21 Isaiah writes…

    And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob, shall no more again stay upon him that smote them; but shall stay upon the “LORD, (YHWH)”the Holy One of Israel, in truth. “The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto THE MIGHTY GOD”. Isa 10:20, 21

    So we see that the Mighty God here is “YHWH”. If that isn’t enough lets look at the other 2 times “El Gibbowr” is mentioned.

    Thou shewest lovingkindness unto thousands, and recompensest the iniquity of the fathers into the bosom of their children after them: the Great, The “MIGHTY GOD, (El Gibbowr”) the LORD of hosts, is his name, Jer 32:17

    Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die. O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O MIGHTY GOD (El Gibbowr)”, thou hast established them for correction. Hab 1:12

    But you want us to believe that Isaiah is saying that “Mighty God” in Isaiah 9:6 somehow is meaning that the one spoken of is a lesser God.

    Your interpretation would  also fly in the prophet Isaiah’s face because it is Isaiah that over and over claims that YHWH alone is God and there is no other.

    “You alone, Lord, are God.” Isaiah 37:20

    “Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me.” Isaiah 43:10

    “I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God besides Me.” Isaiah 44:6

    “Is there any God besides Me, Or is there any other Rock? I know of none.” Isaiah 44:8

    “I am Yahweh, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God.” Isaiah 45:5

    “Surely, God is with you, and there is none else, No other God.” Isaiah 45:14

    “I am Yahweh, and there is none else.” Isaiah 45:18

    “Is it not I, Yahweh? And there is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; There is none except Me.” Isaiah 45:21

    “I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is no one like Me” Isaiah 46:9
    ……………………………………….Thank you for this list Paul, (Isa 1:18)!  :)

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    The word Father that is used here is “Ab” and this word is the same word that is used when describing  Abraham as our Father and this scripture is just a reference to say that Jesus is our Everlasting Father, in other words he is greater than Abraham, but it certainly doesn't say 'Heavenly Father'.


    Agreed, but we do know that Jesus is “Heavenly” don’t we? The contention is not that Jesus is the “Heavenly Father” for the word “Heavenly” is not in the text as you say, but the contention is that Jesus is the “Mighty God” spoken of in Isa 9:6, and 10:21 and if the term “Mighty God” (El Gibbowr) in the scriptures means “a lesser god” than YHWH as you assert!

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    Now for the second point which is your focus.

    Jesus is called “Mighty God”. The word in the Hebrew used here is “El” and this word means the following:

    1) god, godlike one, mighty one
    1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes
    1b) angels
    1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)
    1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah
    2) mighty things in nature
    3) strength, power

    “So Jesus is the Mighty El and this can be interpreted to mean that Jesus is the 'Mighty God Like One' or 'mighty in strength and power' and this is consistent with the overwhelming amount of scriptures that clearly teach that there is one God the Father.


    This is double talk t8, for you say the scriptures “clearly teach that there is one God the Father” yet you say… “So Jesus is the Mighty El”, (God).

    You simply make the word of God of none effect. Isaiah is not saying that “Mighty God” is a “god like one” for in the next chapter he says…

    The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto THE MIGHTY GOD”. Isa 10:21

    Contextually this is YHWH.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    This interpretation is also in total agreement with the fact that, Jesus is the Image of God, and it must also be stressed that Isaiah 9:6 doesn't say “Almighty God”. (The term Almighty means that there is no one mightier, yet we both know that the Father is mightier than all). The term “Mighty God” in Hebrew is ´El Gib•bohr´ and the term “God Almighty” is translated from the Hebrew words 'El Shad•dai' which applies uniquely to YHWH.


    Isaiah 10:21 and the other 3 times (El Gibbowr) Mighty God is mentioned also applies uniquely to YHWH.

    There are several exegetical problems you have with your assumption t8. Not to mention that Isaiah in the same breath mentions YHWH as being the “Mighty God”, but also the fact that there is no other being found to be called “Mighty God” in the Hebrew scriptures other than YHWH!

    Not only that, the burden of proof is on you to prove that somehow Isaiah was implying the definition of a lesser “god” to Isaiah 9:6 when in fact he specifically speaks agains
    t there being any other Gods.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    When a man believes that there is one God the Father as Paul did, then he is not confused about the one God and who Jesus is.


    When a man believes that the word “God” is exclusive to the Father then he has to deny many passages that say Jesus is God (John 1:1 – Heb 1:8), Mighty God (Isa 9:6 – Isa 10:21), Almighty (Rev 1:8), just to mention a few.

    You say Jesus is a “mighty God” but Paul says “So then, about eating food sacrificed to idols: We know that an idol is nothing at all in the world and that “THERE IS NO GOD BUT ONE. I Cor 8:4

    How do you reconcile this t8? Both Isaiah and Paul say there are no other “gods” (el, elohim, theos) but one. Yet we know they call Jesus “Mighty God” or “God”. This cannot be reconciled unless you see them as “One God”. That’s right Jesus did say that he and the Father was One, and that is why they wanted to kill him, because he made himself equal to the Father!

    WJ

    #198960
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    You would not be so confused if you were one Spirit with the author of 1 Cor 8.
    It is not about theory but knowing God and His Son

    #198980
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 22 2010,04:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 20 2010,06:13)
    t8

    Good, then when Isaiah the prophet calls Jesus the “Mighty God” (El Gabor) then you believe that he is “The Mighty God” don't you?

    So again, is he your “Mighty God” or will you continue with your selective process of interpreting the scriptures?  

    WJ


    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)

    Yeah no problem with that.

    God is the one true God and he sent Jesus.


    T8

    No problem with what?

    I have never heard you say with your lips “Jesus is my Mighty God”, and  I have been here almost four years.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)

    How does this following truth agree with the above truth?

    Isaiah 9:6
    For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”'

    First off, we know that this is Jesus and we both agree that he is not the Father, so we have to assume that Mighty God is not necessarily the Almighty God either.


    No t8, actually contextually you would have to assume that Jesus is the Almighty God unless Isaiah had some sort of memory lapse, for in chapter 10:21 Isaiah writes…

    And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob, shall no more again stay upon him that smote them; but shall stay upon the “LORD, (YHWH)”the Holy One of Israel, in truth. “The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto THE MIGHTY GOD”. Isa 10:20, 21

    So we see that the Mighty God here is “YHWH”. If that isn’t enough lets look at the other 2 times “El Gibbowr” is mentioned.

    Thou shewest lovingkindness unto thousands, and recompensest the iniquity of the fathers into the bosom of their children after them: the Great, The “MIGHTY GOD, (El Gibbowr”) the LORD of hosts, is his name, Jer 32:17

    Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die. O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O MIGHTY GOD (El Gibbowr)”, thou hast established them for correction. Hab 1:12

    But you want us to believe that Isaiah is saying that “Mighty God” in Isaiah 9:6 somehow is meaning that the one spoken of is a lesser God.

    Your interpretation would  also fly in the prophet Isaiah’s face because it is Isaiah that over and over claims that YHWH alone is God and there is no other.

    “You alone, Lord, are God.” Isaiah 37:20

    “Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me.” Isaiah 43:10

    “I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God besides Me.” Isaiah 44:6

    “Is there any God besides Me, Or is there any other Rock? I know of none.” Isaiah 44:8

    “I am Yahweh, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God.” Isaiah 45:5

    “Surely, God is with you, and there is none else, No other God.” Isaiah 45:14

    “I am Yahweh, and there is none else.” Isaiah 45:18

    “Is it not I, Yahweh? And there is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; There is none except Me.” Isaiah 45:21

    “I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is no one like Me” Isaiah 46:9
    ……………………………………….Thank you for this list Paul, (Isa 1:18)!  :)

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    The word Father that is used here is “Ab” and this word is the same word that is used when describing  Abraham as our Father and this scripture is just a reference to say that Jesus is our Everlasting Father, in other words he is greater than Abraham, but it certainly doesn't say 'Heavenly Father'.


    Agreed, but we do know that Jesus is “Heavenly” don’t we? The contention is not that Jesus is the “Heavenly Father” for the word “Heavenly” is not in the text as you say, but the contention is that Jesus is the “Mighty God” spoken of in Isa 9:6, and 10:21 and if the term “Mighty God” (El Gibbowr) in the scriptures means “a lesser god” than YHWH as you assert!

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    Now for the second point which is your focus.

    Jesus is called “Mighty God”. The word in the Hebrew used here is “El” and this word means the following:

    1) god, godlike one, mighty one
    1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes
    1b) angels
    1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)
    1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah
    2) mighty things in nature
    3) strength, power

    “So Jesus is the Mighty El and this can be interpreted to mean that Jesus is the 'Mighty God Like One' or 'mighty in strength and power' and this is consistent with the overwhelming amount of scriptures that clearly teach that there is one God the Father.


    This is double talk t8, for you say the scriptures “clearly teach that there is one God the Father” yet you say… “So Jesus is the Mighty El”, (God).

    You simply make the word of God of none effect. Isaiah is not saying that “Mighty God” is a “god like one” for in the next chapter he says…

    The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto THE MIGHTY GOD”. Isa 10:21

    Contextually this is YHWH.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    This interpretation is also in total agreement with the fact that, Jesus is the Image of God, and it must also be stressed that Isaiah 9:6 doesn't say “Almighty God”. (The term Almighty means that there is no one mightier, yet we both know that the Father is mightier than all). The term “Mighty God” in Hebrew is ´El Gib•bohr´ and the term “God Almighty” is translated from the Hebrew words 'El Shad•dai' which applies uniquely to YHWH.


    Isaiah 10:21 and the other 3 times (El Gibbowr) Mighty God is mentioned also applies uniquely to YHWH.

    There are several exegetical problems you have with your assumption t8. Not to mention that Isaiah in the same breath mentions YHWH as being the “Mighty God”, but also the fact that there is no other being found to be called “Mighty Go
    d” in the Hebrew scriptures other than YHWH!

    Not only that, the burden of proof is on you to prove that somehow Isaiah was implying the definition of a lesser “god” to Isaiah 9:6 when in fact he specifically speaks against there being any other Gods.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    When a man believes that there is one God the Father as Paul did, then he is not confused about the one God and who Jesus is.


    When a man believes that the word “God” is exclusive to the Father then he has to deny many passages that say Jesus is God (John 1:1 – Heb 1:8), Mighty God (Isa 9:6 – Isa 10:21), Almighty (Rev 1:8), just to mention a few.

    You say Jesus is a “mighty God” but Paul says “So then, about eating food sacrificed to idols: We know that an idol is nothing at all in the world and that “THERE IS NO GOD BUT ONE. I Cor 8:4

    How do you reconcile this t8? Both Isaiah and Paul say there are no other “gods” (el, elohim, theos) but one. Yet we know they call Jesus “Mighty God” or “God”. This cannot be reconciled unless you see them as “One God”. That’s right Jesus did say that he and the Father was One, and that is why they wanted to kill him, because he made himself equal to the Father!

    WJ


    WJ,
    I am saddened to see you have gone down hill so badly since you joined the forum. It used to be you were a sticker on using the actual meanings of words from the original languages.
    Isa 9:6 You replace “name” with “identity” It cannot be done within the Hebrew. The term name or Shem in Hebrew means character or reputation. This verse is not identifying Christ as the mighty God it is simply pointing out that Christ will have the character of the mighty God ect.
    I am going to assume you have forgotten this, although I have posted it several times. My only other conclusion is that you are purposely deceptive in your interpretation.
    Now you look it up in a Hebrew Lexicon and prove me wrong.

    #198985

    Quote (martian @ June 21 2010,17:00)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 22 2010,04:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 20 2010,06:13)
    t8

    Good, then when Isaiah the prophet calls Jesus the “Mighty God” (El Gabor) then you believe that he is “The Mighty God” don't you?

    So again, is he your “Mighty God” or will you continue with your selective process of interpreting the scriptures?  

    WJ


    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)

    Yeah no problem with that.

    God is the one true God and he sent Jesus.


    T8

    No problem with what?

    I have never heard you say with your lips “Jesus is my Mighty God”, and  I have been here almost four years.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)

    How does this following truth agree with the above truth?

    Isaiah 9:6
    For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”'

    First off, we know that this is Jesus and we both agree that he is not the Father, so we have to assume that Mighty God is not necessarily the Almighty God either.


    No t8, actually contextually you would have to assume that Jesus is the Almighty God unless Isaiah had some sort of memory lapse, for in chapter 10:21 Isaiah writes…

    And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob, shall no more again stay upon him that smote them; but shall stay upon the “LORD, (YHWH)”the Holy One of Israel, in truth. “The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto THE MIGHTY GOD”. Isa 10:20, 21

    So we see that the Mighty God here is “YHWH”. If that isn’t enough lets look at the other 2 times “El Gibbowr” is mentioned.

    Thou shewest lovingkindness unto thousands, and recompensest the iniquity of the fathers into the bosom of their children after them: the Great, The “MIGHTY GOD, (El Gibbowr”) the LORD of hosts, is his name, Jer 32:17

    Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die. O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O MIGHTY GOD (El Gibbowr)”, thou hast established them for correction. Hab 1:12

    But you want us to believe that Isaiah is saying that “Mighty God” in Isaiah 9:6 somehow is meaning that the one spoken of is a lesser God.

    Your interpretation would  also fly in the prophet Isaiah’s face because it is Isaiah that over and over claims that YHWH alone is God and there is no other.

    “You alone, Lord, are God.” Isaiah 37:20

    “Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me.” Isaiah 43:10

    “I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God besides Me.” Isaiah 44:6

    “Is there any God besides Me, Or is there any other Rock? I know of none.” Isaiah 44:8

    “I am Yahweh, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God.” Isaiah 45:5

    “Surely, God is with you, and there is none else, No other God.” Isaiah 45:14

    “I am Yahweh, and there is none else.” Isaiah 45:18

    “Is it not I, Yahweh? And there is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; There is none except Me.” Isaiah 45:21

    “I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is no one like Me” Isaiah 46:9
    ……………………………………….Thank you for this list Paul, (Isa 1:18)!  :)

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    The word Father that is used here is “Ab” and this word is the same word that is used when describing  Abraham as our Father and this scripture is just a reference to say that Jesus is our Everlasting Father, in other words he is greater than Abraham, but it certainly doesn't say 'Heavenly Father'.


    Agreed, but we do know that Jesus is “Heavenly” don’t we? The contention is not that Jesus is the “Heavenly Father” for the word “Heavenly” is not in the text as you say, but the contention is that Jesus is the “Mighty God” spoken of in Isa 9:6, and 10:21 and if the term “Mighty God” (El Gibbowr) in the scriptures means “a lesser god” than YHWH as you assert!

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    Now for the second point which is your focus.

    Jesus is called “Mighty God”. The word in the Hebrew used here is “El” and this word means the following:

    1) god, godlike one, mighty one
    1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes
    1b) angels
    1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)
    1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah
    2) mighty things in nature
    3) strength, power

    “So Jesus is the Mighty El and this can be interpreted to mean that Jesus is the 'Mighty God Like One' or 'mighty in strength and power' and this is consistent with the overwhelming amount of scriptures that clearly teach that there is one God the Father.


    This is double talk t8, for you say the scriptures “clearly teach that there is one God the Father” yet you say… “So Jesus is the Mighty El”, (God).

    You simply make the word of God of none effect. Isaiah is not saying that “Mighty God” is a “god like one” for in the next chapter he says…

    The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto THE MIGHTY GOD”. Isa 10:21

    Contextually this is YHWH.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    This interpretation is also in total agreement with the fact that, Jesus is the Image of God, and it must also be stressed that Isaiah 9:6 doesn't say “Almighty God”. (The term Almighty means that there is no one mightier, yet we both know that the Father is mightier than all). The term “Mighty God” in Hebrew is ´El Gib•bohr´ and the term “God Almighty” is translated from the Hebrew words 'El Shad•dai' which applies uniquely to YHWH.


    Isaiah 10:21 and the other 3 times (El Gibbowr) Mighty God is mentioned also applies uniquely to YHWH.

    There are several exe
    getical problems you have with your assumption t8. Not to mention that Isaiah in the same breath mentions YHWH as being the “Mighty God”, but also the fact that there is no other being found to be called “Mighty God” in the Hebrew scriptures other than YHWH!

    Not only that, the burden of proof is on you to prove that somehow Isaiah was implying the definition of a lesser “god” to Isaiah 9:6 when in fact he specifically speaks against there being any other Gods.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    When a man believes that there is one God the Father as Paul did, then he is not confused about the one God and who Jesus is.


    When a man believes that the word “God” is exclusive to the Father then he has to deny many passages that say Jesus is God (John 1:1 – Heb 1:8), Mighty God (Isa 9:6 – Isa 10:21), Almighty (Rev 1:8), just to mention a few.

    You say Jesus is a “mighty God” but Paul says “So then, about eating food sacrificed to idols: We know that an idol is nothing at all in the world and that “THERE IS NO GOD BUT ONE. I Cor 8:4

    How do you reconcile this t8? Both Isaiah and Paul say there are no other “gods” (el, elohim, theos) but one. Yet we know they call Jesus “Mighty God” or “God”. This cannot be reconciled unless you see them as “One God”. That’s right Jesus did say that he and the Father was One, and that is why they wanted to kill him, because he made himself equal to the Father!

    WJ


    WJ,
    I am saddened to see you have gone down hill so badly since you joined the forum. It used to be you were a sticker on using the actual meanings of words from the original languages.
    Isa 9:6 You replace “name” with “identity” It cannot be done within the Hebrew. The term name or Shem in Hebrew means character or reputation. This verse is not identifying Christ as the mighty God it is simply pointing out that Christ will have the character of the mighty God ect.
    I am going to assume you have forgotten this, although I have posted it several times. My only other conclusion is that you are purposely deceptive in your interpretation.
    Now you look it up in a Hebrew Lexicon and prove me wrong.


    Martian

    Your ad hominems mean nothing to me.

    The Hebrew structure of Isa 9:6 is exactly the same as Isa 10:21, which is speaking of YWHW, so you are creating another smokescreen because the same title “Mighty God” is the same in the four verses mentioned.

    Try again!

    WJ

    #198990
    JustAskin
    Participant

    WJ,
    You ability to lack wisdom and understanding…'is extra-ordinary' (Emperor Han to Bruce Lee, Enter the Dragon)

    “Mighty God” is not 'God Almighty'. That is what you want to believe so that you can say that Jesus is God… Ha! If Jesus is God, why the need to make a special statement to say that 'ONLY ONCE'.

    Never the less, You know full well that someone who IS 'The Mighty God' and someone who 'Will Be called' 'Mighty God' are not the same person nor means one will become the other.

    A Son cannot becomea Father, no matter what, until he himself acquires a Son to himself.

    A God does not 'become'…A God 'IS'.

    God does not change, God cannot change… If God could change then He would not be God. If God changes, to what could He change? Only into something LESS than what He IS, and anything LESS than GOD cannot be God.

    WJ… Where are yoy going to, and from where did you come from?

    #198991
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    When you know God and His son it will get easier for you.

    #198994

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 21 2010,17:26)
    Never the less, You know full well that someone who IS 'The Mighty God' and someone who 'Will Be called' 'Mighty God' are not the same person nor means one will become the other.


    You mean like satan is called “Mighty God”?  :D

    There is no difference in one BEING the Mighty God and the one who has the name Mighty God in Isa 9:6 and 10:21.

    Isaiah must have been an idiot according to your logic.

    Show me where any being at all is prophesied to be called “Mighty God” other than Jesus.

    Show me an example of any other being having the “name” or title “Mighty God”.

    Jesus is the Mighty God and you don't like that, ha.

    Since it is a name, then why do you not call him by that name? Why do you not say he is the Mighty God? Why do you not say he is my “Mighty God”?

    Is having the name meaningless?

    Now go ahead with more of your imature and weak ad hominems!

    WJ

    #198995
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 22 2010,09:12)
    Martian

    Your ad hominems mean nothing to me.

    The Hebrew structure of Isa 9:6 is exactly the same as Isa 10:21, which is speaking of YWHW, so you are creating another smokescreen because the same title “Mighty God” is the same in the four verses mentioned.

    Try again!

    WJ


    Hi WJ,

    Are you so confused about God that you do NOT even know his name?
    [יהוה] translates into English as “YHVH”! (Psalm 45:17)

    Psalm 45:17 I will make thy name (Hă-shəm) to be remembered in all generations:
    therefore shall the people praise thee (YHVH) for ever and ever.

    Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH (Psalm 45:17)
    117=יהוה האלהים(JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm!
    Ed J (AKJV Joshua 22:34 / Isaiah 60:13-15)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #198998
    JustAskin
    Participant

    WJ,

    You are a Satan… You desire is try and cause me to sin.

    You are not a good person.

    You have fallen from an ignorant false believer, a trinitarian, down even more, to that of outright opposer.

    You have repeatedly failed against me with your false belief, so much so that your ownly resort is to try and get me to trip myself up.

    Why, WJ? If what you believe is true, if you are of God, if God is with you, if you speak truth, WJ, why does nothing prevail with you? Why does most of what you say prove to be false and yet for over x years you have been in this forum and I hear things that you do outside the forum which supposedly putss you in a higher position, one of a leader, a shepherd, a teacher…but you are blind…a blind leader, shepherd and an ignorant teacher… Not very good qualifications, eh?

    WJ, what have you learnt over the years…'spiritually'?nothing… Why?….because Trinity only teaches you how to lie, how to cover up for it's deceit.

    It is using you, and making you 'successful' for it's own purpose, like the 'Ring' in 'Lord of the Rings'…
    WJ, take it off, and you will see the plain Wor[l]d of God, truth.
    Take it off, WJ, and free yourself from its power and rule over you.

    WJ, pray to Go Almighty, through the spirit man, Jesus Christ, the one and only one who is the mediator between God Almighty and Mankind, having known firsthand the weakness of flesh and also the power of spirit, and therefore can empathise with man and yet be authorative in spirit.

    #199000
    JustAskin
    Participant

    WJ,

    Every single trinity point had been refuted wholly.

    Yet you continue the chirade. What holds you?

    SHAME

    And yet we love you enough to still try to lead you to truth. yet, even so, like a trapped and wounded wild beast, you tear into the flesh of the very ones who are trying to rescue you from your inevitable disaster.

    Ok, tell us how we can help to rescue you?
    Should we turn our backs to you and approach backwards to cover your shame like Noah's two good sons, while you lie naked in your trinitarian drunkenness?

    Maybe you will think to strike us while our backs are turned, eh!?

    #199005
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ June 22 2010,02:38)

    Quote (karmarie @ June 21 2010,19:01)
    Hi Martian, I agree with you that seeking a personal relationship with God is what is important and more important than seeking knowledge about God. Things are revealed the closer we become with God without the need to always read everything or search elsewhere.

    The pre-existance of Jesus however is not something we can know for sure, the Bible does say The Word was with God in the beginning, then the Word became flesh. Jesus said “Now, Father, glorify me with your own self with the glory which I had with you before the world existed.

    So if The Word was a Spiritual being alongside God the Father, and the World was created through Him, we shouldnt assume that this wasnt true without knowing for sure. Because its taking away what The pre-existant Word (In the flesh Jesus) created which we are a part of.

    So I would rather assume what the Bible says is correct. It seems The Word was with God and was part of God as a Spirit being, then the Word was made flesh, in the man Jesus.

    If the Word was Gods spoken word and thought, where is the proof of that? It doesnt make sense with how The Word (as you say a part of God, Gods mind word thought) manifested in Jesus spoke to God the Father, its like a Trinitarian saying Jesus as God was talking to himself, somehow.

    Jesus being pre-existant doesnt make anything harder or give him any advantage at all. He is Lord and master, and an example for us. He came to give us life through death. So theres alot more to it than just that.

    But what is important? Romans 10:9
    “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.”


    Let me deal with your points one at a time. —

    “The pre-existance of Jesus however is not something we can know for sure, the Bible does say The Word was with God in the beginning, then the Word became flesh. Jesus said “Now, Father, glorify me with your own self with the glory which I had with you before the world existed.”

    Reply –
    Firstly you assume that the English translations are accurate to a point that these verses can be understood as they appear. It is abundantly clear throughout history that men (some with good intentions) have attempted to clarify/change scriptural translations in order to make particular doctrines stand out or to protect currently believed doctrines from disruption. I can give clear examples if you desire.

    “So if The Word was a Spiritual being alongside God the Father, and the World was created through Him, we shouldnt assume that this wasnt true without knowing for sure. Because its taking away what The pre-existant Word (In the flesh Jesus) created which we are a part of.”

    Reply –
    Again this is if your interpretation or the interpretation of the translator are accurate. Those truths can always be in question.

    “So I would rather assume what the Bible says is correct. It seems The Word was with God and was part of God as a Spirit being, then the Word was made flesh, in the man Jesus. “

    “If the Word was Gods spoken word and thought, where is the proof of that? It doesnt make sense with how The Word (as you say a part of God, Gods mind word thought) manifested in Jesus spoke to God the Father, its like a Trinitarian saying Jesus as God was talking to himself, somehow.”

    Reply –
    The proof is in the word itself. The term “word” is used over 350 times in the NT and in all but a half a dozen Trinitarian and oneness translate it to be a statement speech and idea. Every Bible dictionary I have ever seen says it’s primary meaning to be that. Yet in this one sequence some translate it to be literally Jesus with no proof from the words themselves. The only proof is based on a doctrine they attempting to prove.
    The word is the blueprint and Jesus is the building built from it. The blueprint was with God from the beginning and represented God’s character and intent.

    “Jesus being pre-existant doesnt make anything harder or give him any advantage at all.”

    Reply –
    How do you know this?  What happened to the memories and experiences of Christ in his prior life? If he created the world what happened to those memories? Did Christ know of his preexistence? Let me ask you – If you had existed in Heaven in communion with God for perhaps thousands of years prior to being born on Earth, and you at some time in your life on Earth remembered that life, Would you find it easier to walk in a way that would get you back there? Would that not be an advantage? With a preexistence Christ you have two choices
    1.God erased the memories or killed the persona that was Christ in heaven in order to have a new Christ born of Mary.
    2.Christ at some point in his Earthly life was well aware of his prior life in heaven which gave him a trememdous advantage over humanity. This of course would deny our ability to walk with God as he did or use him as our perfect and exact example.

    AS you say this is doctrine and what is important is to be saved, however it is not enough to just be saved. One must endeavor to know the heart and character of God in order to become like him. For this we were given that perfect example of a normal Human son of God.


    Martian! If there were only one Scripture that states that Jesus was the Word I could even understand that. However there is this Scripture also in Rev. 19:13 “He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is The Word of God and
    verse 16 And He has on His robe and on His thigh a name written:” KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.” We should all know that it is the Son of God Jesus Christ…. So your theory that it was mistranslated is B. We have several Scriptures that tell us that Jesus was with His Father, before the world was. Col. 1:15-17 the firstborn of all creation and in
    Rev; 3:14 …These things says the Amen, the True and Faithful Witness, the beginning of the creation of God.”
    John 6:38-40 “For I have come down from Heaven, not to do My will, but the will of Him that send me.” Read the rest…
    This is what Jesus said and also in
    John 17:5 He said this:” And now O Father glorify Me together with Yourself with the glory I had with You before the world was..” Now again, if it would only be one Scripture, then maybe you would have a case, but this way No way Sir…. Calling Jesus a liar is a hard thing to do…
    That in essence what you are doing when you deny those Scriptures….. Plain and simple… and I have given you these before just like Gene you both are ignoring these same Scriptures given over and over again….. not to wise to do…..Also question who is us and our in Genesis???? It was Jesus by the power of God's Holy Spirit that He created all. He is also the firstborn of the dead so that in all He may have preeminence…..Col 1:18…meaning He was first in all…..
    When I read that you think that an ordinary man could not sin, you re totally wrong….. Scriptures say that all have fallen short of the glory of God…. So that means all Human Beings….. And if Jesus would have been just a mere man He too would have sinned. However God had to send someone like Jesus who knew what was at stake and did not sin…..There is no Scriptures that tell me that Jesus had to be a mere man to qualify to die for us….
    He was Human in every other way. He hurt just like us in every way. But His mind was not like us…. He was not a mere man. He was the Son of God, for pete's sake…..
    also check out
    John 1:15, 8:58, 3:17 all related to Jesus……. Irene

    #199009
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Wj,
    Why are you such a laughable character, caracature of a jester?

    You and KJ are always trying this, 'is he YOUR xxxx'

    What on earth or in Heaven does, 'Is he Your ''Mighty God''' supposed to mean?

    The Scriptures says 'He WILL be called Mighty God', it doesn't say, 'You will call him THE Mighty God'', nor does it say, 'He will become The Mighty God'.

    I notice that you didn't comment on my explanation that 'Mighty God' and 'The Mighty God' are not the same things, nor on my points concerning thr FACT that God 'becoming' anything other than God means He cannot be God… Pretty fundamental it seems to me!

    #199013
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 22 2010,10:25)
    WJ,

    Every single trinity point had been refuted wholly.

    Yet you continue the chirade. What holds you?

       SHAME

    And yet we love you enough to still try to lead you to truth.  yet, even so, like a trapped and wounded wild beast, you tear into the flesh of the very ones who are trying to rescue you from your inevitable disaster.

    Ok, tell us how we can help to rescue you?
    Should we turn our backs to you and approach backwards to cover your shame like Noah's two good sons, while you lie naked in your trinitarian drunkenness?

    Maybe you will think to strike us while our backs are turned, eh!?


    Just Askin!!!! There is a Scriptures that says this in
    Math. 15:9 And in vain they do worship Me, teaching us doctrines commandments of men.” That is what the trinity is a man made doctrine and not of God… It was Quintus Septimius Florence Tertullian who first came up with it…. He was born to Pagan Parents in A.D. 155 and it is said that the doctrine of the trinity is His best achievement to Christianty….and look around you most Churches do teach that….Also in order to make the trinity true to them they believe that Jesus always existed and not that He had a beginning like Scriptures say……my post to Martian has all the Scriptures to show how wrong that is….Irene

    #199029
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 22 2010,09:12)

    Quote (martian @ June 21 2010,17:00)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 22 2010,04:06)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 20 2010,06:13)
    t8

    Good, then when Isaiah the prophet calls Jesus the “Mighty God” (El Gabor) then you believe that he is “The Mighty God” don't you?

    So again, is he your “Mighty God” or will you continue with your selective process of interpreting the scriptures?  

    WJ


    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)

    Yeah no problem with that.

    God is the one true God and he sent Jesus.


    T8

    No problem with what?

    I have never heard you say with your lips “Jesus is my Mighty God”, and  I have been here almost four years.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)

    How does this following truth agree with the above truth?

    Isaiah 9:6
    For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”'

    First off, we know that this is Jesus and we both agree that he is not the Father, so we have to assume that Mighty God is not necessarily the Almighty God either.


    No t8, actually contextually you would have to assume that Jesus is the Almighty God unless Isaiah had some sort of memory lapse, for in chapter 10:21 Isaiah writes…

    And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob, shall no more again stay upon him that smote them; but shall stay upon the “LORD, (YHWH)”the Holy One of Israel, in truth. “The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto THE MIGHTY GOD”. Isa 10:20, 21

    So we see that the Mighty God here is “YHWH”. If that isn’t enough lets look at the other 2 times “El Gibbowr” is mentioned.

    Thou shewest lovingkindness unto thousands, and recompensest the iniquity of the fathers into the bosom of their children after them: the Great, The “MIGHTY GOD, (El Gibbowr”) the LORD of hosts, is his name, Jer 32:17

    Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die. O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O MIGHTY GOD (El Gibbowr)”, thou hast established them for correction. Hab 1:12

    But you want us to believe that Isaiah is saying that “Mighty God” in Isaiah 9:6 somehow is meaning that the one spoken of is a lesser God.

    Your interpretation would  also fly in the prophet Isaiah’s face because it is Isaiah that over and over claims that YHWH alone is God and there is no other.

    “You alone, Lord, are God.” Isaiah 37:20

    “Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me.” Isaiah 43:10

    “I am the first and I am the last, And there is no God besides Me.” Isaiah 44:6

    “Is there any God besides Me, Or is there any other Rock? I know of none.” Isaiah 44:8

    “I am Yahweh, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God.” Isaiah 45:5

    “Surely, God is with you, and there is none else, No other God.” Isaiah 45:14

    “I am Yahweh, and there is none else.” Isaiah 45:18

    “Is it not I, Yahweh? And there is no other God besides Me, A righteous God and a Savior; There is none except Me.” Isaiah 45:21

    “I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is no one like Me” Isaiah 46:9
    ……………………………………….Thank you for this list Paul, (Isa 1:18)!  :)

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    The word Father that is used here is “Ab” and this word is the same word that is used when describing  Abraham as our Father and this scripture is just a reference to say that Jesus is our Everlasting Father, in other words he is greater than Abraham, but it certainly doesn't say 'Heavenly Father'.


    Agreed, but we do know that Jesus is “Heavenly” don’t we? The contention is not that Jesus is the “Heavenly Father” for the word “Heavenly” is not in the text as you say, but the contention is that Jesus is the “Mighty God” spoken of in Isa 9:6, and 10:21 and if the term “Mighty God” (El Gibbowr) in the scriptures means “a lesser god” than YHWH as you assert!

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    Now for the second point which is your focus.

    Jesus is called “Mighty God”. The word in the Hebrew used here is “El” and this word means the following:

    1) god, godlike one, mighty one
    1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes
    1b) angels
    1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)
    1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah
    2) mighty things in nature
    3) strength, power

    “So Jesus is the Mighty El and this can be interpreted to mean that Jesus is the 'Mighty God Like One' or 'mighty in strength and power' and this is consistent with the overwhelming amount of scriptures that clearly teach that there is one God the Father.


    This is double talk t8, for you say the scriptures “clearly teach that there is one God the Father” yet you say… “So Jesus is the Mighty El”, (God).

    You simply make the word of God of none effect. Isaiah is not saying that “Mighty God” is a “god like one” for in the next chapter he says…

    The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto THE MIGHTY GOD”. Isa 10:21

    Contextually this is YHWH.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    This interpretation is also in total agreement with the fact that, Jesus is the Image of God, and it must also be stressed that Isaiah 9:6 doesn't say “Almighty God”. (The term Almighty means that there is no one mightier, yet we both know that the Father is mightier than all). The term “Mighty God” in Hebrew is ´El Gib•bohr´ and the term “God Almighty” is translated from the Hebrew words &#
    39;El Shad•dai' which applies uniquely to YHWH.


    Isaiah 10:21 and the other 3 times (El Gibbowr) Mighty God is mentioned also applies uniquely to YHWH.

    There are several exegetical problems you have with your assumption t8. Not to mention that Isaiah in the same breath mentions YHWH as being the “Mighty God”, but also the fact that there is no other being found to be called “Mighty God” in the Hebrew scriptures other than YHWH!

    Not only that, the burden of proof is on you to prove that somehow Isaiah was implying the definition of a lesser “god” to Isaiah 9:6 when in fact he specifically speaks against there being any other Gods.

    Quote (t8 @ June 19 2010,20:05)
    When a man believes that there is one God the Father as Paul did, then he is not confused about the one God and who Jesus is.


    When a man believes that the word “God” is exclusive to the Father then he has to deny many passages that say Jesus is God (John 1:1 – Heb 1:8), Mighty God (Isa 9:6 – Isa 10:21), Almighty (Rev 1:8), just to mention a few.

    You say Jesus is a “mighty God” but Paul says “So then, about eating food sacrificed to idols: We know that an idol is nothing at all in the world and that “THERE IS NO GOD BUT ONE. I Cor 8:4

    How do you reconcile this t8? Both Isaiah and Paul say there are no other “gods” (el, elohim, theos) but one. Yet we know they call Jesus “Mighty God” or “God”. This cannot be reconciled unless you see them as “One God”. That’s right Jesus did say that he and the Father was One, and that is why they wanted to kill him, because he made himself equal to the Father!

    WJ


    WJ,
    I am saddened to see you have gone down hill so badly since you joined the forum. It used to be you were a sticker on using the actual meanings of words from the original languages.
    Isa 9:6 You replace “name” with “identity” It cannot be done within the Hebrew. The term name or Shem in Hebrew means character or reputation. This verse is not identifying Christ as the mighty God it is simply pointing out that Christ will have the character of the mighty God ect.
    I am going to assume you have forgotten this, although I have posted it several times. My only other conclusion is that you are purposely deceptive in your interpretation.
    Now you look it up in a Hebrew Lexicon and prove me wrong.


    Martian

    Your ad hominems mean nothing to me.

    The Hebrew structure of Isa 9:6 is exactly the same as Isa 10:21, which is speaking of YWHW, so you are creating another smokescreen because the same title “Mighty God” is the same in the four verses mentioned.

    Try again!

    WJ


    I made it easy for you. I ask you to look the word up. I gather sense you will not admit the real meaning of the word that you are purposely and willingly deceived.

    #199030
    karmarie
    Participant

    Hi Martian thanks for your reply, one point..

    Quote

    Quote
    “Jesus being pre-existant doesnt make anything harder or give him any advantage at all.”

    Quote
    Reply –
    How do you know this? What happened to the memories and experiences of Christ in his prior life? If he created the world what happened to those memories? Did Christ know of his preexistence? Let me ask you – If you had existed in Heaven in communion with God for perhaps thousands of years prior to being born on Earth, and you at some time in your life on Earth remembered that life, Would you find it easier to walk in a way that would get you back there? Would that not be an advantage? With a preexistence Christ you have two choices
    1. God erased the memories or killed the persona that was Christ in heaven in order to have a new Christ born of Mary.
    2. Christ at some point in his Earthly life was well aware of his prior life in heaven which gave him a trememdous advantage over humanity. This of course would deny our ability to walk with God as he did or use him as our perfect and exact example.

    I have read parts of Origen, He was called a Saint or Early Church Father but was later considered a heretic, however He explained pre-existance. (He also believed all of us pre-existed and we are here, minus the memory of our pre-existance, to learn lessons or something) but pre-existance of Jesus alone, God can do anything. A Spirit became a Man.The first was from the Earth, the second was from above. So we also could become as He was. The penalty of sin was death, the gift to those who overcome through Jesus is eternal life.

    For God so loved the world that He gave His only Begotten Son so whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but shall have eternal life.

    The bible makes it clear through Him all things were created.

    #199031
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi KM,
    Speculations are always more popular than truth.

    #199032
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Arnold @ June 22 2010,10:32)

    Quote (martian @ June 22 2010,02:38)

    Quote (karmarie @ June 21 2010,19:01)
    Hi Martian, I agree with you that seeking a personal relationship with God is what is important and more important than seeking knowledge about God. Things are revealed the closer we become with God without the need to always read everything or search elsewhere.

    The pre-existance of Jesus however is not something we can know for sure, the Bible does say The Word was with God in the beginning, then the Word became flesh. Jesus said “Now, Father, glorify me with your own self with the glory which I had with you before the world existed.

    So if The Word was a Spiritual being alongside God the Father, and the World was created through Him, we shouldnt assume that this wasnt true without knowing for sure. Because its taking away what The pre-existant Word (In the flesh Jesus) created which we are a part of.

    So I would rather assume what the Bible says is correct. It seems The Word was with God and was part of God as a Spirit being, then the Word was made flesh, in the man Jesus.

    If the Word was Gods spoken word and thought, where is the proof of that? It doesnt make sense with how The Word (as you say a part of God, Gods mind word thought) manifested in Jesus spoke to God the Father, its like a Trinitarian saying Jesus as God was talking to himself, somehow.

    Jesus being pre-existant doesnt make anything harder or give him any advantage at all. He is Lord and master, and an example for us. He came to give us life through death. So theres alot more to it than just that.

    But what is important? Romans 10:9
    “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.”


    Let me deal with your points one at a time. —

    “The pre-existance of Jesus however is not something we can know for sure, the Bible does say The Word was with God in the beginning, then the Word became flesh. Jesus said “Now, Father, glorify me with your own self with the glory which I had with you before the world existed.”

    Reply –
    Firstly you assume that the English translations are accurate to a point that these verses can be understood as they appear. It is abundantly clear throughout history that men (some with good intentions) have attempted to clarify/change scriptural translations in order to make particular doctrines stand out or to protect currently believed doctrines from disruption. I can give clear examples if you desire.

    “So if The Word was a Spiritual being alongside God the Father, and the World was created through Him, we shouldnt assume that this wasnt true without knowing for sure. Because its taking away what The pre-existant Word (In the flesh Jesus) created which we are a part of.”

    Reply –
    Again this is if your interpretation or the interpretation of the translator are accurate. Those truths can always be in question.

    “So I would rather assume what the Bible says is correct. It seems The Word was with God and was part of God as a Spirit being, then the Word was made flesh, in the man Jesus. “

    “If the Word was Gods spoken word and thought, where is the proof of that? It doesnt make sense with how The Word (as you say a part of God, Gods mind word thought) manifested in Jesus spoke to God the Father, its like a Trinitarian saying Jesus as God was talking to himself, somehow.”

    Reply –
    The proof is in the word itself. The term “word” is used over 350 times in the NT and in all but a half a dozen Trinitarian and oneness translate it to be a statement speech and idea. Every Bible dictionary I have ever seen says it’s primary meaning to be that. Yet in this one sequence some translate it to be literally Jesus with no proof from the words themselves. The only proof is based on a doctrine they attempting to prove.
    The word is the blueprint and Jesus is the building built from it. The blueprint was with God from the beginning and represented God’s character and intent.

    “Jesus being pre-existant doesnt make anything harder or give him any advantage at all.”

    Reply –
    How do you know this?  What happened to the memories and experiences of Christ in his prior life? If he created the world what happened to those memories? Did Christ know of his preexistence? Let me ask you – If you had existed in Heaven in communion with God for perhaps thousands of years prior to being born on Earth, and you at some time in your life on Earth remembered that life, Would you find it easier to walk in a way that would get you back there? Would that not be an advantage? With a preexistence Christ you have two choices
    1.God erased the memories or killed the persona that was Christ in heaven in order to have a new Christ born of Mary.
    2.Christ at some point in his Earthly life was well aware of his prior life in heaven which gave him a trememdous advantage over humanity. This of course would deny our ability to walk with God as he did or use him as our perfect and exact example.

    AS you say this is doctrine and what is important is to be saved, however it is not enough to just be saved. One must endeavor to know the heart and character of God in order to become like him. For this we were given that perfect example of a normal Human son of God.


    Martian!   If there were only one Scripture that states that Jesus was the Word I could even understand that.  However there is this Scripture also in Rev. 19:13 “He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is The Word of God and
    verse 16 And He has on His robe and on His thigh a name written:” KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.”  We should all know that it is the Son of God Jesus Christ…. So your theory that it was mistranslated is B.  We have several Scriptures that tell us that Jesus was with His Father, before the world was.  Col. 1:15-17 the firstborn of all creation and in
    Rev; 3:14 …These things says the Amen, the True and Faithful Witness, the beginning of the creation of God.”
    John 6:38-40  “For I have come down from Heaven, not to do My will, but the will of Him that send me.” Read the rest…
    This is what Jesus said and also in
    John 17:5 He said this:” And now O Father glorify Me together with Yourself with the glory I had with You before the world was..” Now again, if it would only be one Scripture, then maybe you would have a case, but this way No way Sir…. Calling Jesus a liar is a hard thing to do…
     That in essence what you are doing when you deny those Scriptures….. Plain and simple… and I have given you these before just like Gene you both are ignoring these same Scriptures given over and over again….. not to wise to do…..Also question who is us and our in Genesis????  It was Jesus by the power of God's Holy Spirit that He created all.  He is also the firstborn of the dead so that in all He may have preeminence…..Col 1:18…meaning He was first in all…..
    When I read that you think that an ordinary man could not sin, you re totally wrong….. Scriptures say that all have fallen short of the glory of God…. So that means all Human Beings….. And if Jesus would have been just a mere man He too would ha
    ve sinned.  However God had to send someone like Jesus who knew what was at stake and did not sin…..There is no Scriptures that tell me that Jesus had to be a mere man to qualify to die for us…. He was Human in every other way.  He hurt just like us in every way.  But His mind was not like us…. He was not a mere man.  He was the Son of God, for pete's sake…..
    also check out
    John 1:15, 8:58, 3:17 all related to Jesus…….  Irene


    OK let's do it your way. Since Jesus is not like us in every way then he cannot be tempted in all ways like us. We cannot use him as our example because he is not like us. We cannot use his resurrection as a hope that we will be resurrected because it was not a human in all ways.

    Wait that means we must tear out dozens of pages of scriptures.

    It makes no sense, according to the character of God, to send an example that we can not use as such.
    Your conclusion make void half of the mission of the Messiah. It cast doubt on it. If you want to live with that, have at it.
    If you are contradicting part of the mission of the Messiah, then either the mission is wrong or your conclusions are wrong. Which do you prefer?

Viewing 20 posts - 7,601 through 7,620 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account