Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 7,581 through 7,600 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #198510

    Quote (JustAskin @ June 19 2010,17:23)
    WJ

    Everyday you make yourself more of a jester with your colourful clothing and hats of lies.

    You know full well that 'Mighty God' and 'The Mighty God' are two completely different things.

    All your trinity proofs have fallen around your ears and so now you doing your refresher and using dodger methods.

    WJ, if you need to do that then you have lost it.

    Mind you, you never HAD it, so I supposed you had nothing to lose in the first place.

    You deliberately added the definite article to try to fool naive readers. But you knew exactly why you did it, and that was not to prove God's word but to confuse it.

    WJ, what dies Scriptures say about 'adding or taking away a word from God's word'.

    WJ, do you not fear God? Obviously not…even Satan fears God, and he is a Mighty God!


    HMMM.

    I didn't think you would address the points.

    BTW JA the translators put the definite article there, and if you know anything about translating Greek, you know that is not an unusual practice to make sense of a verse!

    :)

    #198546
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 20 2010,08:47)

    Quote (Arnold @ June 20 2010,07:56)
    W.J. for once I agree with you tht Jesus is the Mighty God, but our Heavenly Father is Jehovah God, the Almighty God.   There is a difference to me and not a trinity like you believe. Also he did not always exsisted.  He was the firstborn of all creation in Rev. 3:14 and in Col. 1:15…..Irene


    Irene, if there's a difference between “Mighty God” and “Almighty God” then why is YHWH called “Mighty God” in Isaiah 10:21 and other passages?

    Why would that be Irene?


    Because our Heavenly Father is greater then all.  John 14:28 and in Ephesians 4:6 it says that He is above all….About Isaiah  I don;t know, because also in Isaiah 10: 16 it says Lord and  in verse 12 it is LORD.  One Lord is Jesus and LORD is Jehovah God the Almighty God.  What I think that the Translator got it mixed up, otherwise it makes no sense…Scriptures usally does not contradict itself….you say and other passages.  Show me….. I do not go by a man's word …..Irene

    #198547
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 20 2010,06:13)
    t8

    Good, then when Isaiah the prophet calls Jesus the “Mighty God” (El Gabor) then you believe that he is “The Mighty God” don't you?

    So again, is he your “Mighty God” or will you continue with your selective process of interpreting the scriptures?  

    WJ


    Yeah no problem with that.

    God is the one true God and he sent Jesus.

    How does this following truth agree with the above truth?

    Isaiah 9:6
    For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”'

    First off, we know that this is Jesus and we both agree that he is not the Father, so we have to assume that Mighty God is not necessarily the Almighty God either.

    The word Father that is used here is “Ab” and this word is the same word that is used when describing  Abraham as our Father and this scripture is just a reference to say that Jesus is our Everlasting Father, in other words he is greater than Abraham, but it certainly doesn't say 'Heavenly Father'.

    Now for the second point which is your focus.

    Jesus is called “Mighty God”. The word in the Hebrew used here is “El” and this word means the following:

    1) god, godlike one, mighty one
    1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes
    1b) angels
    1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)
    1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah
    2) mighty things in nature
    3) strength, power

    “So Jesus is the Mighty El and this can be interpreted to mean that Jesus is the 'Mighty God Like One' or 'mighty in strength and power' and this is consistent with the overwhelming amount of scriptures that clearly teach that there is one God the Father. This interpretation is also in total agreement with the fact that, Jesus is the Image of God, and it must also be stressed that Isaiah 9:6 doesn't say “Almighty God”. (The term Almighty means that there is no one mightier, yet we both know that the Father is mightier than all). The term “Mighty God” in Hebrew is ´El Gib·bohr´ and the term “God Almighty” is translated from the Hebrew words 'El Shad·dai' which applies uniquely to YHWH.

    When a man believes that there is one God the Father as Paul did, then he is not confused about the one God and who Jesus is.

    #198706
    JustAskin
    Participant

    WJ,

    You are beyond lost…

    #198826
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ June 20 2010,12:05)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 20 2010,06:13)
    t8

    Good, then when Isaiah the prophet calls Jesus the “Mighty God” (El Gabor) then you believe that he is “The Mighty God” don't you?

    So again, is he your “Mighty God” or will you continue with your selective process of interpreting the scriptures?  

    WJ


    Yeah no problem with that.

    God is the one true God and he sent Jesus.

    How does this following truth agree with the above truth?

    Isaiah 9:6
    For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”'

    First off, we know that this is Jesus and we both agree that he is not the Father, so we have to assume that Mighty God is not necessarily the Almighty God either.

    The word Father that is used here is “Ab” and this word is the same word that is used when describing  Abraham as our Father and this scripture is just a reference to say that Jesus is our Everlasting Father, in other words he is greater than Abraham, but it certainly doesn't say 'Heavenly Father'.

    Now for the second point which is your focus.

    Jesus is called “Mighty God”. The word in the Hebrew used here is “El” and this word means the following:

    1) god, godlike one, mighty one
    1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes
    1b) angels
    1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)
    1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah
    2) mighty things in nature
    3) strength, power

    “So Jesus is the Mighty El and this can be interpreted to mean that Jesus is the 'Mighty God Like One' or 'mighty in strength and power' and this is consistent with the overwhelming amount of scriptures that clearly teach that there is one God the Father. This interpretation is also in total agreement with the fact that, Jesus is the Image of God, and it must also be stressed that Isaiah 9:6 doesn't say “Almighty God”. (The term Almighty means that there is no one mightier, yet we both know that the Father is mightier than all). The term “Mighty God” in Hebrew is ´El Gib·bohr´ and the term “God Almighty” is translated from the Hebrew words 'El Shad·dai' which applies uniquely to YHWH.

    When a man believes that there is one God the Father as Paul did, then he is not confused about the one God and who Jesus is.


    The word “name” in the Hebrew language is shem and means character or reputation. Now try reading that verse with those words.

    It is a messianic prophecy about the character of Christ not his identity.

    #198828
    martian
    Participant

    This is a general comment and not in response to any particular post.

    What I find most discouraging from my years on these forums is the total lack of understanding or adherence to God’s purposes or plan.
    Most are only concerned with proving their particular doctrine by whatever means possible. Some are more honest then others but very few if any think about what their “doctrines” actually do for the saint and most don’t care. They are caught in the post Constantine philosophical notion of head knowledge Christianity. Ask most who are the church fathers they like and 99% will call upon the philosophers of the third century on. Of course none will admit that it was these very church fathers that led the church down the rabbit hole of creeds and doctrines and away from personal relationship with God in every situation. God is not static that one set of primary rules can fully express his heart and intentions and he certainly is not interested in us attaining more head data if it does not lead to a working gospel that actually changes lives.
    God said he would write the laws on our hearts and not on tablets. Here we debate the aspects of the tablets without taking much notice of what is written on the heart.

    WE ignore the very purposes for our creation in favor of a philosophy that we can defend or prove from the tablets. There is no intrinsic value in truth unless one has the character to implement it and make it work. Work??? Yes Work. How does the truth that we so vehemently defend actually help us live?
    Jesus did not teach doctrine. He taught life immersed in the character and personal knowledge of God’s heart and purposes. He taught a way to live and not a way to prove doctrine. Jesus taught the relationship between the creator and the human creation. He taught relationship between the Father and the human son. There are doctrines/philosophies that teach other things or at least detract from these basic purposes of God and the more they differ the less true value they have to God or man.
    Twenty years ago when I first began asking Trinitarians what purpose their doctrine served or what function it had they could not answer. In the last few years they have made things up like “Oh it shows us the perfect union so that we know how to be unified.” When I ask how that helps me they come up with something else until they finally call me a heretic or tell me it is a divine mystery.
    Is there any example in there for me? No, of course not, However a human Christ shows me the perfect cooperation between God and Man. It shows me the perfect relationship between Father and Son. A son LIKE ME so I can relate,
    The same holds true for the preexistent Christ. What purpose would it serve the plan of God to send us an example to follow that is not like us? How can we ever relate except by speculation and guesswork. It’s almost as if they make God out as a being wanting to give us doubt and leave loopholes for the devil to exploit.
    God is fluid in that he works within every decision man makes. According to our decisions he makes a way for us to grow in him. When man fell he set in motion a plan to redeem us back to the position we lost in his creation. That plan centered around a Messiah with a two fold mission.
    1.To have a Messiah as His representative to his lost children. This Messiah would grow into perfection in the same manner as had been intended for humanity from the start. He would be in perfect harmony with his creator’s intentions and plan. This Messiah would teach by example how to walk with God in perfect harmony. The Messiah taught with authority because as he taught he was in communion with the purposes and character of God.
    2.This perfected man would be tested over and over in every way possible.
    — God will be just even within his own council. A perfect blood sacrifice must be made to open the door for redemption. A covenant must be ratified by the shedding of Blood. —-
    Jesus was tested even unto death. He did not want to die. God required it of him. The test was whether Jesus would use the power he never gave up due to the fall to save himself or would he trust God to the death. He could have called 12 legions of angels to save himself but instead he did what his father required.

    No accuser of the brethren can ever say again that no MAN can live as a true son of God. Christ did it and made it possible for us to follow. No accuser can say that every man would defend himself in opposition to God’s will.
    Stand on Mars Hill all you want and debate philosophy, but if your end conclusions make Christ something less then the man required by God’s plan then you waste the time of all around you. God appointed a mortal man born of a woman, in the line of David to fulfill the role of the Messiah. Anything less then a normal man and you diminish his ability to accomplish that role.
    God appointed a man with God dwelling in him to show how to be men with God dwelling in us. We are to be filled with the breath (spirit) of God so that His character, wisdom and heart are written upon our hearts. (NOT OUR HEADS)
    Show me how your doctrine imprints the character of God in my heart or go teach a philosophy class.
    I am tired of hearing over and over again how important it is to teach the word. What most are teaching is the dead letter. Their teachings do not produce life more abundant in God. They do not produce hope in God’s promises. They do not give us a clear example to follow or relate to. Thy do not give us an example of the proper relationship between God and his human creation/sons. They do not teach us that even as Jesus is we can be also. That is the saddest part because that is the plan of God in a nutshell. Everything that God has done in the past and will do in the future is to make us like Christ. To build within us the same relationship he had with Christ.
    As Jesus himself said speaking to his father, “Even as you and I are one, make them one with us.”
    There is the plan. Does your teaching fit in it?

    PS I really do not expect many on here to get this. What I expect is to have scripture thrown at me and idle philosophy spewed out like the dog’s vomit. I hope that I am wrong but my experience tells me such.

    #198852
    karmarie
    Participant

    Martian, I do get that, good post. I dont know about the pre-existance of Jesus, or any of those details though. But people can be more focused on worshipping Jesus rather than being like Jesus.

    #198860
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (karmarie @ June 21 2010,10:01)
    Martian, I do get that, good post. I dont know about the pre-existance of Jesus, or any of those details though. But people can be more focused on worshipping Jesus rather than being like Jesus.


    My point was not exactly the worshipping Jesus is bad because the definition of worship is to bow in submission before our master, which Jesus is as appointed by God himself.
    However seeking intelectual knowledge about God rather then personal intimate relationship with the person of God is wrong.

    Tell me if you can what purpose a preexistent Christ has in the mission of the Messiah? What is the fruit of such a belief?
    The only fruit I can see is to bring doubt on christ as our example. With a preexistent Christ there will always be questions as to how much his preexistence effected his walk with his father. How can we truly become like christ if he accomplished any portion of is work because of a prior life. We do not have a prior life and cannot follow Christ in that way.
    Would God have us waste out time trying to do something we cannot do because of the handicap of no prior life? Would God (who wants very much for us to succeed) create such huge loopholes that foster doubts in his plan? Does this seem reasonable for the wisest being in the universe?
    –or–
    Does it seem more likely that God would devise a plan in which the devil cannot foster legitimate doubts about our example. I think his plan would be so simple and complete that any simpleton could follow it and that a person would have to harden their heart or choose deception to avoid it.

    #198891
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 20 2010,00:36)
    JA and T8……….I agree with Adam on this brothers , You both deny that Jesus was GOD, and we all agree with that , However you still give him a divine advantage, you still believe He was (NOT) simply a Man as all men are. You both believe He was the word spoken of in John 1:1, and if you do then Adam is right you still are polytheist, because it plainly say the word (was) GOD.  You still move His identity away from our (EXACTNESS), it like you both are (PART) way out of the false teachings of the Trinity but not completely out yet. You both need to remember It was the Trinitarians that gave Jesus his “preexistence” status more then anyone else.  By changing the menacing of what John was saying, The word was not Jesus at all, it was GOD Himself , just as you words are you yourself, so it is with GOD. John know full well how to spell Jesus name, and if he wanted to mean Jesus he simply would have written it their. IMO

    peace and love to you both…………………….gene


    Thanks for such agreement brother Gene. I hope others also will see the truth in your words.

    Love and peace to you
    Adam

    #198894
    karmarie
    Participant

    Hi Martian, I agree with you that seeking a personal relationship with God is what is important and more important than seeking knowledge about God. Things are revealed the closer we become with God without the need to always read everything or search elsewhere.

    The pre-existance of Jesus however is not something we can know for sure, the Bible does say The Word was with God in the beginning, then the Word became flesh. Jesus said “Now, Father, glorify me with your own self with the glory which I had with you before the world existed.

    So if The Word was a Spiritual being alongside God the Father, and the World was created through Him, we shouldnt assume that this wasnt true without knowing for sure. Because its taking away what The pre-existant Word (In the flesh Jesus) created which we are a part of.

    So I would rather assume what the Bible says is correct. It seems The Word was with God and was part of God as a Spirit being, then the Word was made flesh, in the man Jesus.

    If the Word was Gods spoken word and thought, where is the proof of that? It doesnt make sense with how The Word (as you say a part of God, Gods mind word thought) manifested in Jesus spoke to God the Father, its like a Trinitarian saying Jesus as God was talking to himself, somehow.

    Jesus being pre-existant doesnt make anything harder or give him any advantage at all. He is Lord and master, and an example for us. He came to give us life through death. So theres alot more to it than just that.

    But what is important? Romans 10:9
    “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.”

    #198895
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (karmarie @ June 21 2010,19:01)
    its like a Trinitarian saying Jesus as God was talking to himself, somehow.


    That's not what trinitarians believe at all Karmarie. You're confusing trinitarianism with modalism.

    #198896
    karmarie
    Participant

    Hi Is, Ha ok, so what exactly does a Trinitarian believe? Because I cant understand any explanation of it.
    I could understand there being three, those three being as one yes,
    But when a Trinitarian says God became flesh, is it God the Father became flesh or God as the Son became flesh?

    #198897
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Good question. Trinitarians believe that YHWH exists as eternally as three distinct persons – Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Three person within one divine being/substance (Gr. hypostasis). Modalism hold That YHWH is unipersonal, but puts one different masks (i.e manisfestations) at different times.

    Here's a good reference for you, quite long but worth reading if you want to understand the difference between the two:
    http://vintage.aomin.org/CHALC.html

    :)

    #198898
    karmarie
    Participant

    Thanks Is, i'll read that. But who do Trinitarians believe Jehovah is? Do they believe Jehovah in the old Testemant was Jesus in the New, but in both, worked under God the Father? Or that Jehovah is the Father, If that makes sense?

    #198899
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    I won't speak for all trinitarians, but I personally hold that YHWH is the name of the triune God, so The Father, Son and Spirit are YHWH. Yeshua is unmistakably ascribed the name in Zechariah 14, for instance.

    #198900
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    I wrote this document about it a few years ago. It explains the scriptural underpinnings of my view. Let me know by PM if you want to know more and I can send it to you.

    :)

    #198903
    karmarie
    Participant

    Thanks Is, i'll read that link first and see if I can figure it out at all! God bless.

    #198908
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18,
    Then who is the Son of God and Whose Spirit was he filled with???

    #198919
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 21 2010,19:38)
    Good question. Trinitarians believe that YHWH exists as eternally as three distinct persons – Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Three person within one divine being/substance (Gr. hypostasis). Modalism hold That YHWH is unipersonal, but puts one different masks (i.e manisfestations) at different times.

    Here's a good reference for you, quite long but worth reading if you want to understand the difference between the two:
    http://vintage.aomin.org/CHALC.html

    :)


    Yes 3 persons one God, yet how do you justify calling God “Him” and “He”. Your doctrine demands that God is “They” and “Them”. It is deceptive to say “He” while referring to a 3 person God.

    e.g., A man and a woman are said to be one flesh. Yet who would refer to both a husband and wife as a “he”. No, because there are 2 people, you refer to one as he, one as she, and both as “they” or “them”.

    The reason why Tinitarians do not use correct English is because their wording in describing God would blatantly conflict with that which is written. So the way to fix this is to say that God is a trinity of persons, and yet is He and then expect to hear something like, “God is beyond our understanding” when you ask them to explain that.

    But we reply with scripture. Scripure is a type of revelation that is meant to be understood. It reveals much about God and it refers to God as a HE, God is one, and God is the Father. It is simple when you stick to scripture and do not stray into doctrines of men. But it is written that God will make those who pride themselves as wise, to become fools. That even God's foolishness is greater than all the wisdom of man.

    #198923
    SimplyForgiven
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ June 21 2010,15:56)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 21 2010,19:38)
    Good question. Trinitarians believe that YHWH exists as eternally as three distinct persons – Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Three person within one divine being/substance (Gr. hypostasis). Modalism hold That YHWH is unipersonal, but puts one different masks (i.e manisfestations) at different times.

    Here's a good reference for you, quite long but worth reading if you want to understand the difference between the two:
    http://vintage.aomin.org/CHALC.html

    :)


    Yes 3 persons one God, yet how do you justify calling God “Him” and “He”. Your doctrine demands that God is “They” and “Them”. It is deceptive to say “He” while referring to a 3 person God.

    e.g., A man and a woman are said to be one flesh. Yet who would refer to both a husband and wife as a “he”. No, because there are 2 people, you refer to one as he, one as she, and both as “they” or “them”.

    The reason why Tinitarians do not use correct English is because their wording in describing God would blatantly conflict with that which is written. So the way to fix this is to say that God is a trinity of persons, and yet is He and then expect to hear something like, “God is beyond our understanding” when you ask them to explain that.

    But we reply with scripture. Scripure is a type of revelation that is meant to be understood. It reveals much about God and it refers to God as a HE, God is one, and God is the Father. It is simple when you stick to scripture and do not stray into doctrines of men. But it is written that God will make those who pride themselves as wise, to become fools. That even God's foolishness is greater than all the wisdom of man.


    T8,

    So how do you explain when God say in “Our Image”
    Yet Christ according to Philipians 2 was made in the “Likeness of man” but not the very image of man, just like Man was in the likeness of God.
    Yet Christ is the image of the invisble God.

    Yet Christ on the right hand side of the omnipresent God…..
    Yet Christ created the world according to Collassions,
    Christ did nothing but what the father willed,
    so he made no seperate choice,
    and the only difference between Christ and the Father, is the physical limitation, but not by personality.

    I heard once upon a time before i became a member, that You wrote a post, that said something about how God particpated within Time, space, and matter threw Jesus, and that Jesus is Gods will in particpating within this world.
    is that correct? or how did you say it?

Viewing 20 posts - 7,581 through 7,600 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account