Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,841 through 4,860 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #121290

    Hi AP

    So are you saying that the Lord, in the “BEGINNING”  when he laid the foundation of the earth; is the (world to come) in Heb 2:5?

    Then this future world that Jesus creates will be destroyed?

    Or to put it another way….

    Are you meaning the future world when Jesus sets up his kingdom is the “BEGINNING” and at that time Jesus lays the foundation of the earth?

    I do not think so.

    And, Thou, Lord, in the “BEGINNING” (not new beginning) hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands”: THEY SHALL PERISH; BUT THOU REMAINEST; AND THEY ALL SHALL WAX OLD AS DOTH A GARMENT; AND AS A VESTURE SHALT THOU FOLD THEM UP, AND “THEY SHALL BE CHANGED“: BUT THOU ART THE SAME, AND THY YEARS SHALL NOT FAIL”. Heb 1:10-12

    If Jesus is the Creator of the “world to come which is the “then occupied earth” then what of the rest of Hebrews 1:10…?

    ….And The Heavens Are The Works Of Thine Hands

    Does Jesus also “in the beginning” when he returns create a “new heavens” that will pass away?  ???

    I think Kathi puts it very well…

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 12 2009,07:40)

    Also, as I understand things, the earth  gets destroyed and replaced ONE time…after the 1000 years.  Therefore Hebrews 1:10-12 is speaking of the Son laying the foundation of the earth and heaven that will perish AFTER the 1000 years.  That is this earth on which we live today.  This is the only earth that is going to perish, not a future one.  The Son laid the foundation of the earth we are standing on now.

    WJ

    #121291

    Hi AP

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Mar. 25 2007,15:52)

    The writer of Hebrews is using the context of the LXX's rendering of Psalms 102:23ff!
    In the LXX rendering of Psa. 102:23ff, the quote of v. 25 (as quoted in Heb 1.10) is taken from GOD's answer to the suppliant (the Lord Messiah); and the context is about the new heavens & earth to come!
    i.e. the Coming Kingdom of GOD here on earth.
    In the LXX rendering, GOD is addressing the Messianic Lord in connection with the rest of Psalm 102 which speak of “the generation to come” and the set time for YAHWEH to build up Zion and appear in His glory. This is a vision of the coming Kingdom!

    Pss 102 LXX
    16 For the Lord shall build up Sion, and shall appear in his glory. 17 He has had regard to the prayer of the lowly, and has not despised their petition. 18 Let this be written for another generation; and the people that shall be created shall praise the Lord. 19 For he has looked out from the height of his sanctuary; the Lord looked upon the earth from heaven; 20 to hear the groaning of the fettered ones, to loosen the sons of the slain; 21 to proclaim the name of the Lord in Sion, and his praise in Jerusalem; 22 when the people are gathered together, and the kings, to serve the Lord.23 He answered him in the way of his strength: tell me the fewness of my days. 24 Take me not away in the midst of my days: thy years are through all generations. 25 “IN THE BEGINNING THOU, O LORD, DIDST LAY THE FOUNDATION OF THE EARTH; AND THE HEAVENS ARE THE WORKS OF THINE HANDS. 26 They shall perish, but thou remainest: and they all shall wax old as a garment; and as a vesture shalt thou fold them, and they shall be changed.

    Pss 102 NIV
    16 For the Lord will rebuild Zion and appear in his glory. 17   He will respond to the prayer of the destitute; he will not despise their plea. 18 Let this be written for a future generation, that a people not yet created may praise the Lord: 19 “The Lord looked down from his sanctuary on high, from heaven he viewed the earth, 20 to hear the groans of the prisoners and release those condemned to death.” 21 So the name of the Lord will be declared in Zion and his praise in Jerusalem 22 when the peoples and the kingdoms assemble to worship the Lord. 23 In the course of my life he broke my strength; he cut short my days. 24 So I said: “Do not take me away, O my God, in the midst of my days; your years go on through all generations. 25 IN THE BEGINNING YOU LAID THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE EARTH, AND THE HEAVENS ARE THE WORK OF YOUR HANDS. 26 They will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment. Like clothing you will change them and they will be discarded.

    Where is the different sense you speak of in the LXX? There is very little difference in the LXX and the Masoretic rendering!

    The context of PSS 102 shows nothing of the New Heavens and the New Earth, but only the beginning of the current heavens and earth which will pass away. In which the Lord is “now” building up Zion (the Church) and preparing his Bride for the appearing of his Glory! The “building up of Zion” is not the same thing as the New Heavens and New earth.

    You are making inference on the text and I believe are doing violence to it.

    IN THE BEGINNING YOU LAID THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE EARTH, AND THE HEAVENS ARE THE WORK OF YOUR HANDS. 26 They will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment. Like clothing you will change them and they will be discarded.

    Also in all the copys of the LXX I could find “the Lord” in Pss 102 is with the capital letter “L” meaning “YHWH”.

    Of course if this is true then it blows “Unitarianism” out the window.

    The Hebrew writer has elevated this passage where the Psalmist in Pss 102 speaks of YHWH as the Creator, to being Jesus.  

    For more Info on this, Click Here!

    WJ

    #121300
    Cindy
    Participant

    Wj

    Most people believe that when they read Gen. 1:1, that was the beginning of creation.
    Think about it, would God have created the earth in such a chaotic state knowing he was about to create plants, trees, animals, and man on it? Would the earth in that state, be something for the angels to shout about?

    Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
    Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

    Heb. 2:5 is a reference to the millennium, and there after.
    Peter talked about the world that was, and now is.

    2Pe 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

    That was the world before the flood.

    2Pe 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

    That is the world we live in now.
    We have to be careful not to take allegorical description as literal. God is not going to destroy the heavens above, why should he? Heavens on earth are places of religious authority, churches, where men teach us about God; do they not teach with authority?
    Why would God want destroy the earth, did he not say to all of his creation, it is good?
    Earth encompasses all what man has made, and created for himself, his societies, his governments, his way of life, a selfish way of life. All that will be destroyed.

    2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

    Elements, what man has built for himself, what he has gotten used to.
    This day is not a single day either, it is the time when all these things will be destroyed, and man wont even be aware of it taken place.
    Have you noticed, we are not alone in this economic crisis, it is global; do you think that is a coincident?

    Isa 6:3 And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.

    Notice how “LORD” is spelled, that is reference to YHWH.

    Isa 6:8 Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me.

    That “Lord”, could be any one.

    Georg

    #121308
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 12 2009,13:59)
    Martian,
    When I was confronted with the idea of the Son of God actually being a true firstborn, actually born of God and being His actual Son, His non-adopted Son, I wanted to hear God as He guided me to true understanding.  I used nothing but the Bible, no other commentaries or popular, scholarly books.  After I heard from Him on this, then I tested it with the Bible and insights from scholars.  I suggest that you do the same with your questions.  If you have any doubts about what you have been leaning on, now would be a good time to give your understanding to the Lord and with a surrendered heart, ask Him for the answers to your questions.

    I cannot relate to the questions you have presented here.  For instance, I never thought about how the Son's past existence gave Him an advantage till I read some posts on here. I think that it is interesting that those that believe in the Son's pre-existence don't seem to concern themselves with that. I never worried about that one bit but more so grateful that He had that past to enrich His abilities to love and know men and rule the world to come.  I believe the more skills and variety of experiences under the Father's presence the better.

    LU


    Martian,
    When I was confronted with the idea of the Son of God actually being a true firstborn, actually born of God and being His actual Son, His non-adopted Son, I wanted to hear God as He guided me to true understanding. I used nothing but the Bible, no other commentaries or popular, scholarly books. After I heard from Him on this, then I tested it with the Bible and insights from scholars. I suggest that you do the same with your questions. If you have any doubts about what you have been leaning on, now would be a good time to give your understanding to the Lord and with a surrendered heart, ask Him for the answers to your questions.

    Reply –
    Big assumption on your part that I question anything I believe at this time or that I have not done what you suggest many many times.

    You say-
    I cannot relate to the questions you have presented here. For instance, I never thought about how the Son's past existence gave Him an advantage till I read some posts on here. I think that it is interesting that those that believe in the Son's pre-existence don't seem to concern themselves with that.

    Reply-
    No surprise to me. They do not concern themselves with it because to do so puts big holes in their doctrine. Situational ethics. One of the foundational truths of Christianity is the example Christ left for us to follow. To whatever degree you change Christ from a normal human being to that same degree He cannot be our example. If His pre=existence helped him overcome temptation then how can that be an example for me? If His pre-existence helped to know his Father in a more perfect way then how can we be one with the father even as He is one with him?
    Was His healing power dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Was His ability to love dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Was His ability to understand scripture dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Or how about this one —-
    Was His ability/right to be resurected dependent on his Pre-existence?
    If any of thee things depended on His pre-existence then they cannot be perfect examples for us.

    You say-
    I never worried about that one bit ……

    Reply –
    I might suggest that you do worry about that. Instead of telling others that they should examine their beliefs, perhaps you should see that your beliefs line up with the purpose and plan of God.

    I find it very interesting that I just finished posting the following on another thread.

    “It is like the man that owns a bakery. A sales man comes in a says he has a new recepe for bread. The baker looks over the recepe and it contains dirt. Being open minded he whips up a sample batch. Guess what, iy tastes like dirt. The salesman say wel we just have to twink the other ingrediants, so they play with the amounts of flour, sugar, milk and eggs. When the salesman is done they try another batch. It still taste like dirt.

    The point is that if your result is wrong, then there has to be a problem with your ingreiants or your process. It is the same way with teaching. If your conclussion does not work to help a person become more like Christ, build hope or make Christ more of a viable example then the process or ingrediants must be wrong. If the end conclussion depends on changing the character of God then the process or ingrediants must be wrong.

    Most of the time when I ask people on this board these simple questions, I can sense the puzzled looks on the other side. It never seems to occur to most that we actually need to fulfill a purpose or have a proper conclussion to our reams of discourse. A conclussion and purpose that actually moves the body of Christ forward.”

    I once read something about that —
    5holding to a form of godliness, although they have denied its power; Avoid such men as these.
    6For among them are those who enter into households and captivate weak women weighed down with sins, led on by various impulses,
    7always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

    I have heard many on here profess the godliness of their doctrines yet they cannot explain in any way how it empowers a person to walk with God. They cannot show how it functions to do anything except be a philosophy for the purpose of debate.

    Lightenup,
    I ask this without malice of any kind.
    If you cannot tell me how your teaching helps me to become more like Christ, see Him as an example or support the plan of God in my life, then why are you wasting my time with an idle philosophy?

    Perhaps you should consider if your teaching produces any fruit that lines up with the plan of God as brought out by those questions.

    #121319
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Martian,
    It amuses me that you expect me to take my time to answer your concerns after you speak to me like that. If you don't question anything that you believe (see quote) why are you expecting me to give you my time to answer you. I do not have that kind of time to waste. Sorry!

    Quote
    Big assumption on your part that I question anything I believe at this time or that I have not done what you suggest many many times.

    I wish you well,
    LU

    #121320
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 12 2009,07:25)
    Wj

    Most people believe that when they read Gen. 1:1, that was the beginning of creation.
    Think about it, would God have created the earth in such a chaotic state knowing he was about to create plants, trees, animals, and man on it? Would the earth in that state, be something for the angels to shout about?

    Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
    Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

    Heb. 2:5 is a reference to the millennium, and there after.
    Peter talked about the world that was, and now is.

    2Pe 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

    That was the world before the flood.

    2Pe 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.

    That is the world we live in now.
    We have to be careful not to take allegorical description as literal. God is not going to destroy the heavens above, why should he? Heavens on earth are places of religious authority, churches, where men teach us about God; do they not teach with authority?
    Why would God want destroy the earth, did he not say to all of his creation, it is good?
    Earth encompasses all what man has made, and created for himself, his societies, his governments, his way of life, a selfish way of life. All that will be destroyed.

    2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

    Elements, what man has built for himself, what he has gotten used to.
    This day is not a single day either, it is the time when all these things will be destroyed, and man wont even be aware of it taken place.
    Have you noticed, we are not alone in this economic crisis, it is global; do you think that is a coincident?

    Isa 6:3 And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.  

    Notice how “LORD” is spelled, that is reference to YHWH.

    Isa 6:8 Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me.

    That “Lord”, could be any one.

    Georg


    Hi Georg,
    I was wondering why you believe that Gen 1:1 speaks of a chaotic state instead of merely a formless and void state that He wants the Son to take part in to form and fill. Do you have scripture that states the formless and void state means chaotic?

    Also, can you show me scripture that the angels were created before day 1?

    I understand it differently than you. I don't see chaos until after man sinned and fell away from God.

    Kathi

    #121322
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Martian………..You have it right brother, if we see Jesus in anyway not (EXACTLY) like we are then we can not truly relate with him nor really claim he was exactly like us, if we give him preexistence status of any kind , other then in the planned will of God , we then just do not see Jesus as He really was at all. This false teaching of a preexisting Jesus is simply a support doctrine for the False teaching of the Trinity. Without it the Trinity falls also. I personally see Jesus exactly like me and any other human begin, who the FATHER perfected by the power of His Spirit and seeing and understanding that it gives me hope that the FATHER can DO the Same for me also.

    This subject is a Hugh one Martian and it need to be further explained and understood.

    love and peace to you and yours……………………………..gene

    #121323

    Hi George

    You may not want to take those scriptures litterally, but I do.

    But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and “the elements shall melt with fervent heat“, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
    [Seeing] then [that] all these things shall be dissolved, what manner [of persons] ought ye to be in [all] holy conversation and godliness,
    Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein “the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved“, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
    2 Peter 3:10-12

    The Greek word for “Heavens” is 'ouranos' which means;

    1) the vaulted expanse of the sky with all things visible in it

    a) the universe, the world

    b) the aerial heavens or sky, the region where the clouds and the tempests gather, and where thunder and lightning are produced

    c) the sidereal or starry heavens

    2) the region above the sidereal heavens, the seat of order of things eternal and consummately perfect where God dwells and other heavenly beings

    This is not the realm of man.

    Notice the the elements shall melt with fervent heat, and the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved.

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 12 2009,23:25)

    Why would God want destroy the earth, did he not say to all of his creation, it is good?

    The answer is because the “earth” is cursed because of the sin of man.

    And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: “cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life“; Gen 3:17

    Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness. 2 Peter 3:13

    And I saw “a new heaven (ouranos) and a new earth“: for the first heaven (ouranos) and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. Rev 21:1

    The Lord will purge everything by fire.

    Sorry George, but the scriptures teach that the new earth will have no sea!

    WJ

    #121327
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    WJ……..(Sea) in Revelations is symbolic for human beings. I saw a Beast rising out of the SEA , this does not mean the ocean but the sea of Humanity. I am not saying it could not be a literial Sea but it also could be relating to Humanity no longer existing in the earth, and God is recreating man into a different life form. Just a thought to consider. IMO

    love and peace to you and yours…………………….gene

    #121335

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 13 2009,04:58)
    WJ……..(Sea) in Revelations is symbolic for human beings.  I saw a Beast rising out of the SEA , this does not mean the ocean but the sea of Humanity. I am not saying it could not be a literial Sea but it also could be relating to Humanity no longer existing in the earth, and God is recreating man into a different life form. Just a thought to consider. IMO

    love and peace to you and yours…………………….gene


    HI GB

    That is speculation at best. So if the “Sea” here represents humanity then what you are saying is that there is no “humanity” in the new earth?

    Man shall change but he will still be man. Even Jesus is still a man, is he not?

    And “the sea gave up the dead” which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. Rev 20:13

    Who are the dead that were in the sea? ???

    If you check you will see that in most all cases the word “sea” found some 92 times in the Bible is mentioned as the litteral “sea”.

    The Hebrew wod for “sea” is “yam” which means…

    1) sea
    a) Mediterranean Sea
    b) Red Sea
    c) Dead Sea
    d) Sea of Galilee
    e) sea (general)
    f) mighty river (Nile)
    g) the sea (the great basin in the temple court)
    h) seaward, west, westward

    The Greek word is 'thalassa' which means;

    1) the sea
    a) used of the sea in general
    b) used specifically of the Mediterranean Sea or the Red Sea

    Richard C. Trench in “Synonyms of the New Testament” quotes…

    “…it is the sea as contrasted with the land (Gen. 1:10; Matt. 23:15; Acts 4:24); or perhaps more strictly as contrasted with the shore (see Hayman’s Odyssey, vol. 1. p. xxxiii. Appendix).”

    WJ

    #121338
    meerkat
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 13 2009,06:58)
    WJ……..(Sea) in Revelations is symbolic for human beings. I saw a Beast rising out of the SEA , this does not mean the ocean but the sea of Humanity. I am not saying it could not be a literial Sea but it also could be relating to Humanity no longer existing in the earth, and God is recreating man into a different life form. Just a thought to consider. IMO

    love and peace to you and yours…………………….gene


    Gene,

    Not sure that it is human beings as a whole – more like the difference between jews and gentiles – believers and unbelievers – righteous and unrighteous. The earth and the sea are contrasts.

    #121346
    Cindy
    Participant

    Wj

    Isa 66:1 Thus saith the LORD, The heaven is my throne…
    Mat 5:34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:

    What are heavens below?

    Psa 50:4 He shall call to the heavens from above, and to the earth, that he may judge his people.

    OK, Wj, to the rest.

    Georg

    #121348
    Cindy
    Participant

    Kathi

    Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
    Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

    They could not have shouted for joy, if they had not been created before the earth.
    I'm not saying you have to believe what I believe, but in my book I have a whole chapter explaining the earth, what I believe happened.

    Georg

    #121357
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 13 2009,04:09)
    Martian,
    It amuses me that you expect me to take my time to answer your concerns after you speak to me like that.  If you don't question anything that you believe (see quote) why are you expecting me to give you my time to answer you.  I do not have that kind of time to waste.  Sorry!

    Quote
    Big assumption on your part that I question anything I believe at this time or that I have not done what you suggest many many times.

    I wish you well,
    LU


    Bad tactic but a good cop out. I suspect that you cannot answer the questions so you avoid them.
    The truth is that I have not seen a single honest reason from you or your doctrine that would lead me to question what I believe. You show me fruit from your doctrine and I will consider it.
    I simply ask you to show me the fruit of your teaching.  You do not think that is important?
    You are on here claiming that your doctrine is correct. I ask, Does your doctrine hep me become like Christ and if so how?
    I do not know what you desire in life. I desire to become like Christ. Can your doctrine help me do that?  How?

    This is where the old died in the wool evangelical debate forums fall short. It promotes an intelectualized debate rather then living truth that produces change in peoples lives.

    #121374
    SEEKING
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Feb. 12 2009,08:27)


    Martian,

    Before I share some thoughts I wish to be clear I no longer hold to Trinitarian convictions. I will try to respond to your question as to how a Trinitarian can be helped in their walk
    when they hold to those beliefs.

    You asked – and rightly so

    “If His pre=existence helped him overcome temptation then how can that be an example for me? If His pre-existence helped to know his Father in a more perfect way then how can we be one with the father even as He is one with him?
    Was His healing power dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Was His ability to love dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Was His ability to understand scripture dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Or how about this one —-
    Was His ability/right to be resurected dependent on his Pre-existence?
    If any of thee things depended on His pre-existence then they cannot be perfect examples for us.”

    There conviction is that Jesus “Made himself nothiing removing any advantage pre-existence would have afforded him”

    They reference –

    Quote
    PHP 2:6-7 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant,being made in human likeness.

    With that in mind they are encouraged to have a Savior that can sympathize with their struggles because He went through them without any Godly power.

    They glean that from –

    Quote
    Heb.4:15-16 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are–yet was without sin. 16 Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.

    Thus they find encouragement and help in their walk and believe others could also believing what they believe.

    Again, I only submit this because I thought you were seeking clarity as to how a Trinitarian could find hope in Jesus if He was a “super Power” example posessing powers they did not have.

    Seeking

    #121383
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (SEEKING @ Feb. 13 2009,09:13)
    [quote=martian,Feb. 12 2009,08:27][/quote]
    Martian,

    Before I share some thoughts I wish to be clear I no longer hold to Trinitarian convictions.  I will try to respond to your question as to how a Trinitarian can be helped in their walk
    when they hold to those beliefs.  

    You asked – and rightly so

    “If His pre=existence helped him overcome temptation then how can that be an example for me? If His pre-existence helped to know his Father in a more perfect way then how can we be one with the father even as He is one with him?
    Was His healing power dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Was His ability to love dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Was His ability to understand scripture dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Or how about this one —-
    Was His ability/right to be resurected dependent on his Pre-existence?
    If any of thee things depended on His pre-existence then they cannot be perfect examples for us.”

    There conviction is that Jesus “Made himself nothiing removing any advantage pre-existence would have afforded him”

    They reference –

    Quote
    PHP 2:6-7 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant,being made in human likeness.

    With that in mind they are encouraged to have a Savior that can sympathize  with their struggles because He went through them without any Godly power.

    They glean that from –

    Quote
    Heb.4:15-16 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are–yet was without sin. 16 Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.

    Thus they find encouragement and help in their walk and believe others could also believing what they believe.

    Again, I only submit this because I thought you were seeking clarity as to how a Trinitarian could find hope in Jesus if He was a “super Power” example posessing powers they did not have.

    Seeking


    This is under the assumption that your interpretation of Phil 2 is correct. Functionally it is not correct. I invite you to read the post beginning on this page.
    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;t=2211

    Pay particular attention to points 3, 4, and 5

    I could go into scriptural proof that Phil 2 does not mean a pre-existent being emptied himself of his divinity, but again that would serve no purpose.

    #121387
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 12 2009,15:21)
    Kathi

    Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
    Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

    They could not have shouted for joy, if they had not been created before the earth.
    I'm not saying you have to believe what I believe, but in my book I have a whole chapter explaining the earth, what I believe happened.

    Georg


    Hi Georg,
    Thanks for your reply. The question that I do not think the Bible clearly answers is: when was the foundation considered laid? I purpose that it was when it became formed, after day 1 and not before since it was formless. I also purpose that the angels came during the six days of creation. They are called the “Morning Stars” and the concept of “morning” wasn't introduced until day 1. I'll have to read that part of your book again.

    God bless,
    Kathi

    #121388
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote
    I suspect that you cannot answer the questions so you avoid them.

    I have answered your questions time and time again. This has not been a fruitful correspondence so I suppose we have to agree to disagree.
    LU

    #121390
    SEEKING
    Participant

    [quote=martian,Feb. 12 2009,15:50][/quote]
    Martian,

    Recall what I wrote –

    Quote
    Before I share some thoughts I wish to be clear I no longer hold to Trinitarian convictions.  I will try to respond to your question as to how a Trinitarian can be helped in their walkwhen they hold to those beliefs.  

    Quote
    Again, I only submit this because I thought you were seeking clarity as to how a Trinitarian could find hope in Jesus if He was a “super Power” example posessing powers they did not have.

    You offered – I could go into scriptural proof that Phil 2 does not mean a pre-existent being emptied himself of his divinity, but again that would serve no purpose.

    Your right, it would serve no purpose because I already honor that.  I did not offer what I did to encourage debate of meaning but to offer some understanding I was under the impression you were honestly seeking. I said “Again, I only submit this because I thought you were seeking clarity as to how a Trinitarian could find hope in Jesus if He was a “super Power” example posessing powers they did not have.”

    You said, ” This is under the assumption that yourinterpretation of Phil 2 is correct.”  If you had said their I would have thought you honored the intent of my post as I made clear it was not “MY ASSUMPTION.”

    If you are looking for a quarrell with me, I didn't think we had one.

    Blessings,

    Seeking

    #121391
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (SEEKING @ Feb. 13 2009,10:32)
    [quote=martian,Feb. 12 2009,15:50][/quote]
    Martian,

    Recall what I wrote –

    Quote
    Before I share some thoughts I wish to be clear I no longer hold to Trinitarian convictions.  I will try to respond to your question as to how a Trinitarian can be helped in their walkwhen they hold to those beliefs.  

    Quote
    Again, I only submit this because I thought you were seeking clarity as to how a Trinitarian could find hope in Jesus if He was a “super Power” example posessing powers they did not have.

    You offered – I could go into scriptural proof that Phil 2 does not mean a pre-existent being emptied himself of his divinity, but again that would serve no purpose.

    Your right, it would serve no purpose because I already honor that.  I did not offer what I did to encourage debate of meaning but to offer some understanding I was under the impression you were honestly seeking. I said “Again, I only submit this because I thought you were seeking clarity as to how a Trinitarian could find hope in Jesus if He was a “super Power” example posessing powers they did not have.”

    You said, ” This is under the assumption that yourinterpretation of Phil 2 is correct.”  If you had said their
    I would have thought you honored the intent of my post as I made clear it was not “MY ASSUMPTION.”

    If you are looking for a quarrell with me, I didn't think we had one.

    Blessings,

    Seeking


    Nope no quarel. Id lightenup a trinitarian? I did not know. I was adressing the concept of a pre=existent Christ.

Viewing 20 posts - 4,841 through 4,860 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account