Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,821 through 4,840 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #121093
    Cindy
    Participant

    I would like to come in here too, because I like unity. I just can't seem to see what Rev. 3:14 could say something else. I have struggled with this after a J.W. told me about it. I also ask myself can we explain John 1:1 when the Word was with God. And the Word made all, the Word that was with God and was God. God the Father also called the Word (Jesus) God in Hebrew. Then the Word became flesh. IMO God had to send somebody like Himself who came from Him, brought forth from the Father, to come to earth to save mankind. Even so Christ was a man, He still had the mind of what He was before. He knew what was at stake. Why do I believe that, by reading in John 17:5 when Jesus said
    give Me back the glory that I had with Yourself before the world was.
    Mandy you are right when you say that the Father created all, why He used His Son to do the work for Him, I do not know. I know you believe that it was not necessary to do so. But we are not God and God does things the way He sits fit. I also know how hard this is to believe it. I have struggled with it a long time. I know I have said all of this before. We might not find unity yet, and for that I am so sorry. But think about a truth which you believe, take the trinity, if another doesn't believe like you do, you can talk to them until you blue in the face. Just an example, IMO no offence, never. If we could remember that God works in diffrent stages with all mankind, should we get so frustrated to the point that we can not love our Brothers and Sisters anymore? Not in my opinion. Disagree in Love and Peace. Maybe I should not bring this up again, I just don't know what to do about this. So, I will let God do the revealing, that is so much better then a mankind like I.
    So I will not debate this again, for unity's and Love Sake.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #121094
    meerkat
    Participant

    Hi Irene,

    I agree with you that if you think something is the truth you need to voice it, and I also think that we need to listen to what people are saying and look at the scriptures with open eyes, minds and hearts – always open to the guiding of the Holy Spirit.

    I agree that getting frustrated with our brothers and sisters is not showing the love that we are instructed to show to ALL.

    #121097
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 11 2009,10:52)
    I would like to come in here too, because I like unity. I just can't seem to see what Rev. 3:14 could say something else. I have struggled with this after a J.W. told me about it. I also ask myself can we explain John 1:1 when the Word was with God. And the Word made all, the Word that was with God and was God. God the Father also called the Word (Jesus) God in Hebrew. Then the Word became flesh. IMO God had to send somebody like Himself who came from Him, brought forth from the Father, to come to earth to save mankind. Even so Christ was a man, He still had the mind of what He was before. He knew what was at stake. Why do I believe that, by reading in John 17:5 when Jesus said
    give Me back the glory that I had with Yourself before the world was.
    Mandy you are right when you say that the Father created all, why He used His Son to do the work for Him, I do not know. I know you believe that it was not necessary to do so. But we are not God and God does things the way He sits fit. I also know how hard this is to believe it. I have struggled with it a long time. I know I have said all of this before. We might not find unity yet, and for that I am so sorry. But think about a truth which you believe, take the trinity, if another doesn't believe like you do, you can talk to them until you blue in the face. Just an example, IMO no offence, never. If we could remember that God works in diffrent stages with all mankind, should we get so frustrated to the point that we can not love our Brothers and Sisters anymore? Not in my opinion. Disagree in Love and Peace. Maybe I should not bring this up again, I just don't know what to do about this. So, I will let God do the revealing, that is so much better then a mankind like I.
    So I will not debate this again, for unity's and Love Sake.
    Peace and Love Irene


    Hi Mrs:

    Revelation 3:14 states:

    Quote
    Rev 3:14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

    KJV

    Young's literal translation states:

    Quote
    Rev 3:14 `And to the messenger of the assembly of the Laodiceans write: These things saith the Amen, the witness — the faithful and true — the chief of the creation of God;

    Colossians states this:

    Quote
    Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.

    I hope this helps to explain what is being said in Rev. 3:14.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #121112
    Adam Pastor
    Participant

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Mar. 25 2007,15:52)
    Greetings ALL

    Concerning Psalms 102 & Heb 1.10

    The short answer is that the writer of Hebrews' quote of Psalms 102:25 is taken from the LXX (Septuagint).

    The LXX text reads different from the Hebrew text (MT).
    Hence, the LXX rendering has a different sense entirely from the Masoretic rendering of Psalms 102:23-25; however both are speaking of the new heavens & earth to come i.e. the restoration of Zion, etc (cp. Acts 1.6, 3.21)

    The writer of Hebrews is using the context of the LXX's rendering of Psalms 102:23ff!
    In the LXX rendering of Psa. 102:23ff, the quote of v. 25 (as quoted in Heb 1.10) is taken from GOD's answer to the suppliant (the Lord Messiah); and the context is about the new heavens & earth to come!
    i.e. the Coming Kingdom of GOD here on earth.

    In the LXX rendering, GOD is addressing the Messianic Lord in connection with the rest of Psalm 102 which speak of “the generation to come” and the set time for YAHWEH to build up Zion and appear in His glory. This is a vision of the coming Kingdom!

    Quote (F.F. Bruce @ New International Commentary on Hebrews)
    In the LXX, Septuagint text, the person to whom these words (‘of old you laid the foundation of the earth’) are spoken is addressed explicitly as ‘lord.’ God bids him acknowledge the shortness of God’s set time for the restoration of Jerusalem (v. 13) and not summon Him [God] to act when that set time has only half expired, while He [God] assures him [the suppliant] that he and his servants’ children will be preserved forever.

    The risen, glorified Jesus is now indeed the agent of the new creation to come!

    Remember, the writer of Hebrews does explain his context:
    (Heb 2:5)  For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

    It is the world to come, the inhabited earth to come, the new heavens & earth to come, the Kingdom to come,
    of which he speaks. Not the Genesis creation.

    For more info see http://www.focusonthekingdom.org/92.htm#1


    Hope this helps to edify!

    #121120
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Feb. 11 2009,14:22)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Mar. 25 2007,15:52)
    Greetings ALL

    Concerning Psalms 102 & Heb 1.10

    The short answer is that the writer of Hebrews' quote of Psalms 102:25 is taken from the LXX (Septuagint).

    The LXX text reads different from the Hebrew text (MT).
    Hence, the LXX rendering has a different sense entirely from the Masoretic rendering of Psalms 102:23-25; however both are speaking of the new heavens & earth to come i.e. the restoration of Zion, etc (cp. Acts 1.6, 3.21)

    The writer of Hebrews is using the context of the LXX's rendering of Psalms 102:23ff!
    In the LXX rendering of Psa. 102:23ff, the quote of v. 25 (as quoted in Heb 1.10) is taken from GOD's answer to the suppliant (the Lord Messiah); and the context is about the new heavens & earth to come!
    i.e. the Coming Kingdom of GOD here on earth.

    In the LXX rendering, GOD is addressing the Messianic Lord in connection with the rest of Psalm 102 which speak of “the generation to come” and the set time for YAHWEH to build up Zion and appear in His glory. This is a vision of the coming Kingdom!

    Quote (F.F. Bruce @ New International Commentary on Hebrews)
    In the LXX, Septuagint text, the person to whom these words (‘of old you laid the foundation of the earth’) are spoken is addressed explicitly as ‘lord.’ God bids him acknowledge the shortness of God’s set time for the restoration of Jerusalem (v. 13) and not summon Him [God] to act when that set time has only half expired, while He [God] assures him [the suppliant] that he and his servants’ children will be preserved forever.

    The risen, glorified Jesus is now indeed the agent of the new creation to come!

    Remember, the writer of Hebrews does explain his context:
    (Heb 2:5)  For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

    It is the world to come, the inhabited earth to come, the new heavens & earth to come, the Kingdom to come,
    of which he speaks. Not the Genesis creation.

    For more info see http://www.focusonthekingdom.org/92.htm#1


    Hope this helps to edify!


    Thanks Adam Pastor, Nice to hear from you.

    Hebrews 2:5 makes it plain that the author was not talking about Jesus laying the foundations of the earth and the heavens being the work of his hands in the Genesis.

    He says:

    Quote
    Hbr 2:5 For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak

    “the world to come, whereof we speak” But it begins with all power over heaven and earth being given unto him when he ascended to the right hand of the Father. I say this because:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
    Hbr 1:11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;

    Verse 1:11 states that the earth and the heavens will perish.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #121122
    Cindy
    Participant

    Marty I am completely sure that Christ did exist before He became to be a Human, as much as I want unity. I just can't explain all the Scripture any other way, then what I have been saying. If preeminence means first in all, He was brought forth by the Father. He is a literal Son of God. The only Son of God while we are adopted Sons of God, born into the Family of God. Born from above. So He was first in all. That then goes with all other scriptures. Hebrew 1:11 has nothing to do with the preexisting of Christ our Lord. notice how Lord is in small letters , while if it is the Father it is in Capital letters.

    IMO We cannot interpret this by either one of us, but by Scripture. By Jesus own words He said in

    John 17:5 ” And now O Father , glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory I had with You BEFORE
                 
                   THE WORLD WAS.”
    One day we will all know, when Christ returns He will reign and will teach all truths. The truth will cover the earth like water covers the sea. There will be a Highway of Holiness where only the redeemed will walk. Until then let us unit even in our differences. Love covers all.

    Peace and Love Irene

    #121131

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Feb. 11 2009,14:22)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Mar. 25 2007,15:52)
    Greetings ALL

    Concerning Psalms 102 & Heb 1.10

    The short answer is that the writer of Hebrews' quote of Psalms 102:25 is taken from the LXX (Septuagint).

    The LXX text reads different from the Hebrew text (MT).
    Hence, the LXX rendering has a different sense entirely from the Masoretic rendering of Psalms 102:23-25; however both are speaking of the new heavens & earth to come i.e. the restoration of Zion, etc (cp. Acts 1.6, 3.21)

    The writer of Hebrews is using the context of the LXX's rendering of Psalms 102:23ff!
    In the LXX rendering of Psa. 102:23ff, the quote of v. 25 (as quoted in Heb 1.10) is taken from GOD's answer to the suppliant (the Lord Messiah); and the context is about the new heavens & earth to come!
    i.e. the Coming Kingdom of GOD here on earth.

    In the LXX rendering, GOD is addressing the Messianic Lord in connection with the rest of Psalm 102 which speak of “the generation to come” and the set time for YAHWEH to build up Zion and appear in His glory. This is a vision of the coming Kingdom!

    Quote (F.F. Bruce @ New International Commentary on Hebrews)
    In the LXX, Septuagint text, the person to whom these words (‘of old you laid the foundation of the earth’) are spoken is addressed explicitly as ‘lord.’ God bids him acknowledge the shortness of God’s set time for the restoration of Jerusalem (v. 13) and not summon Him [God] to act when that set time has only half expired, while He [God] assures him [the suppliant] that he and his servants’ children will be preserved forever.

    The risen, glorified Jesus is now indeed the agent of the new creation to come!

    Remember, the writer of Hebrews does explain his context:
    (Heb 2:5)  For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

    It is the world to come, the inhabited earth to come, the new heavens & earth to come, the Kingdom to come,
    of which he speaks. Not the Genesis creation.

    For more info see http://www.focusonthekingdom.org/92.htm#1


    Hope this helps to edify!


    Hi AP

    Nice try! So let me get this straight…

    The New heavens and earth and the coming kingdom will “WAX OLD AND PERISH LIKE A GARMENT AND BE CHANGED?”.  ???

    And, Thou, Lord, in the “BEGINNING” (not new beginning) hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands”: THEY SHALL PERISH; BUT THOU REMAINEST; AND THEY ALL SHALL WAX OLD AS DOTH A GARMENT; AND AS A VESTURE SHALT THOU FOLD THEM UP, AND “THEY SHALL BE CHANGED“: BUT THOU ART THE SAME, AND THY YEARS SHALL NOT FAIL”. Heb 1:10-12

    How do you jump all the way to chapter 2:5 and skip over the obvious to say the writer of Heb is speaking in context of chapter 2:5?

    It is not to angels that he has subjected the world to come, about which we are speaking. Heb 2:5

    The world to come is simply the inhabited earth when Jesus returns to rule and set up his kingdom in the earth. Hebrews 2:5 gives no indication of the New Heavens and New Earth.

    The Greek word for “world” is oikoumenē which means…

    ‘the inhabited earth’. It is found 15 times in the AV and is translated “world” 14 times and “earth” 1 time.

    In every case it is speaking of this current world and not the New Heavens and New earth which will follow the Lords Millennial rule.

    Blessings! :)

    WJ

    #121132
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 11 2009,10:52)
    If we could remember that God works in diffrent stages with all mankind, should we get so frustrated to the point that we can not love our Brothers and Sisters anymore?


    I don't think anyone is doing this here?

    #121152
    Cindy
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Feb. 11 2009,17:12)

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 11 2009,10:52)
    If we could remember that God works in diffrent stages with all mankind, should we get so frustrated to the point that we can not love our Brothers and Sisters anymore?


    I don't think anyone is doing this here?


    Mandy!  So, we will have to wait, till Christ's return. My life is at the end, I thank God for all, and those here that care.
    Take care, Irene

    #121160
    Adam Pastor
    Participant

    942767 & WJ

    Heb 2.5
    The world/ oikoumenē / '‘the inhabited earth’ to come
    is the millennial world/age which will commence at Christ's Coming.

    And after the 1000 years what happens to that 'inhabited earth'?

    (Rev 20:13-15)  And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. 15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

    (Rev 21:1-5)  And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. 2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. 4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. 5 And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.

    Note: this is after the 1000 years and after the Last Judgement;
    The world that then was is indeed replaced with a new heaven/earth;
    where there is no longer any sea and GOD Himself will dwell upon the earth. Amen!

    #121169
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Feb. 11 2009,14:22)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Mar. 25 2007,15:52)
    Greetings ALL

    Concerning Psalms 102 & Heb 1.10

    The short answer is that the writer of Hebrews' quote of Psalms 102:25 is taken from the LXX (Septuagint).

    The LXX text reads different from the Hebrew text (MT).
    Hence, the LXX rendering has a different sense entirely from the Masoretic rendering of Psalms 102:23-25; however both are speaking of the new heavens & earth to come i.e. the restoration of Zion, etc (cp. Acts 1.6, 3.21)

    The writer of Hebrews is using the context of the LXX's rendering of Psalms 102:23ff!
    In the LXX rendering of Psa. 102:23ff, the quote of v. 25 (as quoted in Heb 1.10) is taken from GOD's answer to the suppliant (the Lord Messiah); and the context is about the new heavens & earth to come!
    i.e. the Coming Kingdom of GOD here on earth.

    In the LXX rendering, GOD is addressing the Messianic Lord in connection with the rest of Psalm 102 which speak of “the generation to come” and the set time for YAHWEH to build up Zion and appear in His glory. This is a vision of the coming Kingdom!

    Quote (F.F. Bruce @ New International Commentary on Hebrews)
    In the LXX, Septuagint text, the person to whom these words (‘of old you laid the foundation of the earth’) are spoken is addressed explicitly as ‘lord.’ God bids him acknowledge the shortness of God’s set time for the restoration of Jerusalem (v. 13) and not summon Him [God] to act when that set time has only half expired, while He [God] assures him [the suppliant] that he and his servants’ children will be preserved forever.

    The risen, glorified Jesus is now indeed the agent of the new creation to come!

    Remember, the writer of Hebrews does explain his context:
    (Heb 2:5)  For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

    It is the world to come, the inhabited earth to come, the new heavens & earth to come, the Kingdom to come,
    of which he speaks. Not the Genesis creation.

    For more info see http://www.focusonthekingdom.org/92.htm#1


    Hope this helps to edify!


    Bingo….. exactly

    #121174
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 11 2009,16:09)
    Marty I am completely sure that Christ did exist before He became to be a Human, as much as I want unity. I just can't explain all the Scripture any other way, then what I have been saying. If preeminence means first in all, He was brought forth by the Father. He is a literal Son of God. The only Son of God while we are adopted Sons of God, born into the Family of God. Born from above. So He was first in all. That then goes with all other scriptures. Hebrew 1:11 has nothing to do with the preexisting of Christ our Lord. notice how Lord is in small letters , while if it is the Father it is in Capital letters.

    IMO We cannot interpret this by either one of us, but by Scripture. By Jesus own words He said in

    John 17:5 ” And now O Father , glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory I had with You BEFORE
                 
                   THE WORLD WAS.”
    One day we will all know, when Christ returns He will reign and will teach all truths. The truth will cover the earth like water covers the sea. There will be a Highway of Holiness where only the redeemed will walk. Until then let us unit even in our differences. Love covers all.

    Peace and Love Irene


    You say –
    notice how Lord is in small letters , while if it is the Father it is in Capital letters.

    Reply-
    What does that have to do with anythng All of the oldest Greek texts were written with all capital letters and no punctuation marks or verse devisions. All of these things were aded later on by translators and are not necessarily indicative of anything other then the translators opinion.

    #121181
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 11 2009,19:29)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Feb. 11 2009,17:12)

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 11 2009,10:52)
    If we could remember that God works in diffrent stages with all mankind, should we get so frustrated to the point that we can not love our Brothers and Sisters anymore?


    I don't think anyone is doing this here?


    Mandy!  So, we will have to wait, till Christ's return. My life is at the end, I thank God for all, and those here that care.
    Take care, Irene


    You could live another 20 years, Irene. You never know!! You could be just a young chicken. :;):

    My grandma lived to be nearly 90!

    #121196
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ Feb. 10 2009,23:17)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Feb. 11 2009,14:22)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Mar. 25 2007,15:52)
    Greetings ALL

    Concerning Psalms 102 & Heb 1.10

    The short answer is that the writer of Hebrews' quote of Psalms 102:25 is taken from the LXX (Septuagint).

    The LXX text reads different from the Hebrew text (MT).
    Hence, the LXX rendering has a different sense entirely from the Masoretic rendering of Psalms 102:23-25; however both are speaking of the new heavens & earth to come i.e. the restoration of Zion, etc (cp. Acts 1.6, 3.21)

    The writer of Hebrews is using the context of the LXX's rendering of Psalms 102:23ff!
    In the LXX rendering of Psa. 102:23ff, the quote of v. 25 (as quoted in Heb 1.10) is taken from GOD's answer to the suppliant (the Lord Messiah); and the context is about the new heavens & earth to come!
    i.e. the Coming Kingdom of GOD here on earth.

    In the LXX rendering, GOD is addressing the Messianic Lord in connection with the rest of Psalm 102 which speak of “the generation to come” and the set time for YAHWEH to build up Zion and appear in His glory. This is a vision of the coming Kingdom!

    Quote (F.F. Bruce @ New International Commentary on Hebrews)
    In the LXX, Septuagint text, the person to whom these words (‘of old you laid the foundation of the earth’) are spoken is addressed explicitly as ‘lord.’ God bids him acknowledge the shortness of God’s set time for the restoration of Jerusalem (v. 13) and not summon Him [God] to act when that set time has only half expired, while He [God] assures him [the suppliant] that he and his servants’ children will be preserved forever.

    The risen, glorified Jesus is now indeed the agent of the new creation to come!

    Remember, the writer of Hebrews does explain his context:
    (Heb 2:5)  For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

    It is the world to come, the inhabited earth to come, the new heavens & earth to come, the Kingdom to come,
    of which he speaks. Not the Genesis creation.

    For more info see http://www.focusonthekingdom.org/92.htm#1


    Hope this helps to edify!


    Thanks Adam Pastor, Nice to hear from you.

    Hebrews 2:5 makes it plain that the author was not talking about Jesus laying the foundations of the earth and the heavens being the work of his hands in the Genesis.

    He says:

    Quote
    Hbr 2:5 For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak

    “the world to come, whereof we speak”  But it begins with all power over heaven and earth being given unto him when he ascended to the right hand of the Father.  I say this because:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
    Hbr 1:11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;

    Verse 1:11 states that the earth and the heavens will perish.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Hello Marty, Adam Pastor and all,
    Maybe I'm not seeing straight but I suggest that some are assuming that the one who “laid the foundation of the earth” whether old or new, has automatically all created things in subjection to the same one-the Son in this case.  

    I believe that the Son laid the foundation of the earth…in the beginning…and yet was not given authority over creation until He came and paid the price for it and abolished death.  Laying the foundation and it being subject to Him (the Son) are two different things.  In the beginning, the creation was not yet subject to the Son even though He was used to lay the foundation of the earth and spread out the heavens.

    Also, as I understand things, the earth  gets destroyed and replaced ONE time…after the 1000 years.  Therefore Hebrews 1:10-12 is speaking of the Son laying the foundation of the earth and heaven that will perish AFTER the 1000 years.  That is this earth on which we live today.  This is the only earth that is going to perish, not a future one.  The Son laid the foundation of the earth we are standing on now.  He has not been put in complete authority over it yet but that does not mean He wasn't used in actively creating it first hand.  The new heaven and earth are not going to perish as far as I know.

    Maybe I do not understand your point completely.

    LU

    #121198
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 12 2009,07:40)

    Quote (942767 @ Feb. 10 2009,23:17)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Feb. 11 2009,14:22)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Mar. 25 2007,15:52)
    Greetings ALL

    Concerning Psalms 102 & Heb 1.10

    The short answer is that the writer of Hebrews' quote of Psalms 102:25 is taken from the LXX (Septuagint).

    The LXX text reads different from the Hebrew text (MT).
    Hence, the LXX rendering has a different sense entirely from the Masoretic rendering of Psalms 102:23-25; however both are speaking of the new heavens & earth to come i.e. the restoration of Zion, etc (cp. Acts 1.6, 3.21)

    The writer of Hebrews is using the context of the LXX's rendering of Psalms 102:23ff!
    In the LXX rendering of Psa. 102:23ff, the quote of v. 25 (as quoted in Heb 1.10) is taken from GOD's answer to the suppliant (the Lord Messiah); and the context is about the new heavens & earth to come!
    i.e. the Coming Kingdom of GOD here on earth.

    In the LXX rendering, GOD is addressing the Messianic Lord in connection with the rest of Psalm 102 which speak of “the generation to come” and the set time for YAHWEH to build up Zion and appear in His glory. This is a vision of the coming Kingdom!

    Quote (F.F. Bruce @ New International Commentary on Hebrews)
    In the LXX, Septuagint text, the person to whom these words (‘of old you laid the foundation of the earth’) are spoken is addressed explicitly as ‘lord.’ God bids him acknowledge the shortness of God’s set time for the restoration of Jerusalem (v. 13) and not summon Him [God] to act when that set time has only half expired, while He [God] assures him [the suppliant] that he and his servants’ children will be preserved forever.

    The risen, glorified Jesus is now indeed the agent of the new creation to come!

    Remember, the writer of Hebrews does explain his context:
    (Heb 2:5)  For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

    It is the world to come, the inhabited earth to come, the new heavens & earth to come, the Kingdom to come,
    of which he speaks. Not the Genesis creation.

    For more info see http://www.focusonthekingdom.org/92.htm#1


    Hope this helps to edify!


    Thanks Adam Pastor, Nice to hear from you.

    Hebrews 2:5 makes it plain that the author was not talking about Jesus laying the foundations of the earth and the heavens being the work of his hands in the Genesis.

    He says:

    Quote
    Hbr 2:5 For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak

    “the world to come, whereof we speak”  But it begins with all power over heaven and earth being given unto him when he ascended to the right hand of the Father.  I say this because:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
    Hbr 1:11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;

    Verse 1:11 states that the earth and the heavens will perish.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Hello Marty, Adam Pastor and all,
    Maybe I'm not seeing straight but I suggest that some are assuming that the one who “laid the foundation of the earth” whether old or new, has automatically all created things in subjection to the same one-the Son in this case.  

    I believe that the Son laid the foundation of the earth…in the beginning…and yet was not given authority over creation until He came and paid the price for it and abolished death.  Laying the foundation and it being subject to Him (the Son) are two different things.  In the beginning, the creation was not yet subject to the Son even though He was used to lay the foundation of the earth and spread out the heavens.

    Also, as I understand things, the earth  gets destroyed and replaced ONE time…after the 1000 years.  Therefore Hebrews 1:10-12 is speaking of the Son laying the foundation of the earth and heaven that will perish AFTER the 1000 years.  That is this earth on which we live today.  This is the only earth that is going to perish, not a future one.  The Son laid the foundation of the earth we are standing on now.  He has not been put in complete authority over it yet but that does not mean He wasn't used in actively creating it first hand.  The new heaven and earth are not going to perish as far as I know.

    Maybe I do not understand your point completely.

    LU


    I would still like to know what happened to the memories and experiances that Jesus had in His pre-existent state. Could you please tell me?

    Secondly – Could you tell me how your doctrine functions to further the plan of God? Did God reveal this pre-existent state just so we would have some philosophy to debate on a rainy day?

    Thirdly – Can you tell me how your doctrine makes Christ a more viable example for us?

    #121200
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Job 38:4
    “Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand.

    Psalm 102:25
    In the beginning you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands.

    Proverbs 3:19
    By wisdom the LORD laid the earth's foundations, by understanding he set the heavens in place;

    Isaiah 48:13
    My own hand laid the foundations of the earth, and my right hand spread out the heavens; when I summon them, they all stand up together.

    Isaiah 51:13
    that you forget the LORD your Maker, who stretched out the heavens and laid the foundations of the earth, that you live in constant terror every day because of the wrath of the oppressor, who is bent on destruction? For where is the wrath of the oppressor?

    Isaiah 51:16
    I have put my words in your mouth and covered you with the shadow of my hand— I who set the heavens in place, who laid the foundations of the earth, and who say to Zion, 'You are my people.' “

    Kathi,
    None of these passages refer to Jesus laying the foundation, OR even being present when they were.

    Love,
    Mandy

    #121205
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 12 2009,07:40)

    Quote (942767 @ Feb. 10 2009,23:17)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Feb. 11 2009,14:22)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ Mar. 25 2007,15:52)
    Greetings ALL

    Concerning Psalms 102 & Heb 1.10

    The short answer is that the writer of Hebrews' quote of Psalms 102:25 is taken from the LXX (Septuagint).

    The LXX text reads different from the Hebrew text (MT).
    Hence, the LXX rendering has a different sense entirely from the Masoretic rendering of Psalms 102:23-25; however both are speaking of the new heavens & earth to come i.e. the restoration of Zion, etc (cp. Acts 1.6, 3.21)

    The writer of Hebrews is using the context of the LXX's rendering of Psalms 102:23ff!
    In the LXX rendering of Psa. 102:23ff, the quote of v. 25 (as quoted in Heb 1.10) is taken from GOD's answer to the suppliant (the Lord Messiah); and the context is about the new heavens & earth to come!
    i.e. the Coming Kingdom of GOD here on earth.

    In the LXX rendering, GOD is addressing the Messianic Lord in connection with the rest of Psalm 102 which speak of “the generation to come” and the set time for YAHWEH to build up Zion and appear in His glory. This is a vision of the coming Kingdom!

    Quote (F.F. Bruce @ New International Commentary on Hebrews)
    In the LXX, Septuagint text, the person to whom these words (‘of old you laid the foundation of the earth’) are spoken is addressed explicitly as ‘lord.’ God bids him acknowledge the shortness of God’s set time for the restoration of Jerusalem (v. 13) and not summon Him [God] to act when that set time has only half expired, while He [God] assures him [the suppliant] that he and his servants’ children will be preserved forever.

    The risen, glorified Jesus is now indeed the agent of the new creation to come!

    Remember, the writer of Hebrews does explain his context:
    (Heb 2:5)  For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

    It is the world to come, the inhabited earth to come, the new heavens & earth to come, the Kingdom to come,
    of which he speaks. Not the Genesis creation.

    For more info see http://www.focusonthekingdom.org/92.htm#1


    Hope this helps to edify!


    Thanks Adam Pastor, Nice to hear from you.

    Hebrews 2:5 makes it plain that the author was not talking about Jesus laying the foundations of the earth and the heavens being the work of his hands in the Genesis.

    He says:

    Quote
    Hbr 2:5 For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak

    “the world to come, whereof we speak”  But it begins with all power over heaven and earth being given unto him when he ascended to the right hand of the Father.  I say this because:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
    Hbr 1:11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;

    Verse 1:11 states that the earth and the heavens will perish.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Hello Marty, Adam Pastor and all,
    Maybe I'm not seeing straight but I suggest that some are assuming that the one who “laid the foundation of the earth” whether old or new, has automatically all created things in subjection to the same one-the Son in this case.  

    I believe that the Son laid the foundation of the earth…in the beginning…and yet was not given authority over creation until He came and paid the price for it and abolished death.  Laying the foundation and it being subject to Him (the Son) are two different things.  In the beginning, the creation was not yet subject to the Son even though He was used to lay the foundation of the earth and spread out the heavens.

    Also, as I understand things, the earth  gets destroyed and replaced ONE time…after the 1000 years.  Therefore Hebrews 1:10-12 is speaking of the Son laying the foundation of the earth and heaven that will perish AFTER the 1000 years.  That is this earth on which we live today.  This is the only earth that is going to perish, not a future one.  The Son laid the foundation of the earth we are standing on now.  He has not been put in complete authority over it yet but that does not mean He wasn't used in actively creating it first hand.  The new heaven and earth are not going to perish as far as I know.

    Maybe I do not understand your point completely.

    LU


    Two more questions if you will please —

    What impact did Christ pre-existance have on his Earthly life? (if any) and how do you know?

    Since the entire overview of Christ is the hope of the saints. Tell me how does a pre-existent Christ give me hope?

    #121228
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Feb. 11 2009,16:05)
    Job 38:4
    “Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand.

    Psalm 102:25
    In the beginning you laid the foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands.

    Proverbs 3:19
    By wisdom the LORD laid the earth's foundations, by understanding he set the heavens in place;

    Isaiah 48:13
    My own hand laid the foundations of the earth, and my right hand spread out the heavens; when I summon them, they all stand up together.

    Isaiah 51:13
    that you forget the LORD your Maker, who stretched out the heavens and laid the foundations of the earth, that you live in constant terror every day because of the wrath of the oppressor, who is bent on destruction? For where is the wrath of the oppressor?

    Isaiah 51:16
    I have put my words in your mouth and covered you with the shadow of my hand— I who set the heavens in place, who laid the foundations of the earth, and who say to Zion, 'You are my people.' “

    Kathi,
    None of these passages refer to Jesus laying the foundation, OR even being present when they were.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    Thank you for all that trouble to put up all those passages. In response, without really digging deeply into each passage, I would suggest that none of them were meant to explain the nuts and bolts of how things were created but instead to demonstrate God's power and creative ability over the other “gods” being worshipped at that time. None of “them” were helping Him or with Him and they didn't exist. He may have been reassuring Israel that He created the world and could indeed take care of them.

    Also, as I have said before, the Son of God was hidden and supposed to be a mystery to be revealed and was but at a later time. Look to the end of the mystery novel and you will understand the beginning of the novel. That is just an analogy, I do not believe that the Bible is a novel of course.

    And one other thing, Jesus wasn't involved in laying the foundation of the earth, etc. It was the Son of God that later became flesh that was called Jesus. Jesus was just a role of the Son of God, an agent used in creation was another role. IMO

    Love, Kathi

    #121255
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Martian,
    When I was confronted with the idea of the Son of God actually being a true firstborn, actually born of God and being His actual Son, His non-adopted Son, I wanted to hear God as He guided me to true understanding. I used nothing but the Bible, no other commentaries or popular, scholarly books. After I heard from Him on this, then I tested it with the Bible and insights from scholars. I suggest that you do the same with your questions. If you have any doubts about what you have been leaning on, now would be a good time to give your understanding to the Lord and with a surrendered heart, ask Him for the answers to your questions.

    I cannot relate to the questions you have presented here. For instance, I never thought about how the Son's past existence gave Him an advantage till I read some posts on here. I think that it is interesting that those that believe in the Son's pre-existence don't seem to concern themselves with that. I never worried about that one bit but more so grateful that He had that past to enrich His abilities to love and know men and rule the world to come. I believe the more skills and variety of experiences under the Father's presence the better.

    LU

    #121267
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 11 2009,02:08)
    t8

    Rev 3:14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

    Jesus himself claims to be “the beginning of God's creation”. I would not say “after” YHWH, God has no beginning.

    Georg


    Thanks Georg.

    I think anyone would have to admit that the first to come from God would not have a mother but would have come directly from God.

    Adam came before Eve and God made Eve through or by Adam. But through Yeshua all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made – John 1:3

    The firstborn of all creation would indeed have to be special because his origins could only be directly from God. So who would this person be?

    Well this might point some in the right direction if they are willing to listen or not be swayed by their bias.

    Colossians 2:9
    For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form,

    Micah 5:2
    “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times. “

    Colossians 1:15
    He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.

Viewing 20 posts - 4,821 through 4,840 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account