Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,861 through 4,880 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #121392
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 13 2009,10:24)

    Quote
    I suspect that you cannot answer the questions so you avoid them.

    I have answered your questions time and time again.  This has not been a fruitful correspondence so I suppose we have to agree to disagree.
    LU


    I recall no answers to my questins. Could you direct me to the post that you answered them in or could you answer them again?

    To refresh your memory here are the questions.
    Did his pre-existence hep his ability to defeat temptation?
    “If His pre=existence helped him overcome temptation then how can that be an example for me?
    If His pre-existence helped to know his Father in a more perfect way then how can we be one with the father even as He is one with him?
    Was His healing power dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Was His ability to love dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Was His ability to understand scripture dependent on his Pre-existence?
    Or how about this one —-
    Was His ability/right to be resurected dependent on his Pre-existence?

    #121394
    theodorej
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Feb. 13 2009,08:15)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 13 2009,04:09)
    Martian,
    It amuses me that you expect me to take my time to answer your concerns after you speak to me like that.  If you don't question anything that you believe (see quote) why are you expecting me to give you my time to answer you.  I do not have that kind of time to waste.  Sorry!

    Quote
    Big assumption on your part that I question anything I believe at this time or that I have not done what you suggest many many times.

    I wish you well,
    LU


    Bad tactic but a good cop out. I suspect that you cannot answer the questions so you avoid them.
    The truth is that I have not seen a single honest reason from you or your doctrine that would lead me to question what I believe. You show me fruit from your doctrine and I will consider it.
    I simply ask you to show me the fruit of your teaching.  You do not think that is important?
    You are on here claiming that your doctrine is correct. I ask, Does your doctrine hep me become like Christ and if so how?
    I do not know what you desire in life. I desire to become like Christ. Can your doctrine help me do that?  How?

    This is where the old died in the wool evangelical debate forums fall short. It promotes an intelectualized debate rather then living truth that produces change in peoples lives.


    Greetings Martian…..There is no one in this forum that is going to be able to full fill your desire to be as christ….Perhaps you may be able to gleen some truth and understanding,however you will never be able to do that with debate as for the very nature of debate is to prevail one over another…Truth comes through faith and a God given understanding that comes from humility….”Blessed are the humble,for they shall be exalted”

    #121395
    theodorej
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Feb. 13 2009,08:15)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 13 2009,04:09)
    Martian,
    It amuses me that you expect me to take my time to answer your concerns after you speak to me like that.  If you don't question anything that you believe (see quote) why are you expecting me to give you my time to answer you.  I do not have that kind of time to waste.  Sorry!

    Quote
    Big assumption on your part that I question anything I believe at this time or that I have not done what you suggest many many times.

    I wish you well,
    LU


    Bad tactic but a good cop out. I suspect that you cannot answer the questions so you avoid them.
    The truth is that I have not seen a single honest reason from you or your doctrine that would lead me to question what I believe. You show me fruit from your doctrine and I will consider it.
    I simply ask you to show me the fruit of your teaching.  You do not think that is important?
    You are on here claiming that your doctrine is correct. I ask, Does your doctrine hep me become like Christ and if so how?
    I do not know what you desire in life. I desire to become like Christ. Can your doctrine help me do that?  How?

    This is where the old died in the wool evangelical debate forums fall short. It promotes an intelectualized debate rather then living truth that produces change in peoples lives.


    Greetings Martian…..There is no one in this forum that is going to be able to full fill your desire to be as christ….Perhaps you may be able to gleen some truth and understanding,however you will never be able to do that with debate as for the very nature of debate is to prevail one over another…Truth comes through faith and a God given understanding that comes from humility….”Blessed are the humble,for they shall be exalted”

    #121397
    theodorej
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 13 2009,10:19)

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 12 2009,15:21)
    Kathi

    Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
    Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

    They could not have shouted for joy, if they had not been created before the earth.
    I'm not saying you have to believe what I believe, but in my book I have a whole chapter explaining the earth, what I believe happened.

    Georg


    Hi Georg,
    Thanks for your reply.  The question that I do not think the Bible clearly answers is: when was the foundation considered laid?  I purpose that it was when it became formed, after day 1 and not before since it was formless.  I also purpose that the angels came during the six days of creation.  They are called the “Morning Stars” and the concept of “morning” wasn't introduced until day 1.  I'll have to read that part of your book again.

    God bless,
    Kathi


    Greetings LU…..The scriptures tell us at the time of creation the earth was dark and without form Toho/Boho…The presentation of this passage suggests a previous existance during which time the angelic realm probably had dominion over the entire universe and they were presided over by none other than the angel of light Lucifer….They destroyed the earth and the universe with their rebellion….God saw fit to move over the surface of the earth and breath life into the oceans and to seperate the darkness with light and so on….Then he created the man….The foundations were laid well before human life… and the sons of God could very well have been the angelic realm….IMO

    #121402
    SEEKING
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Feb. 12 2009,16:37)
    Nope no quarel.  Id lightenup a trinitarian?  I did not know. I was adressing the concept of a pre=existent Christ.


    Martian,

    Glad we're at peace! It seems inherent in Trinitarian convictions has to be the pre-existence of Christ in the sense that a three in one concept would put each member as pre-existent.

    I could be wrong but I think most if not all Trinitarians would also hold to the pre – existence of Jesus.

    Blessings,

    Seeking

    #121419
    942767
    Participant

    Hi you Greek sholars:

    Is there any chance that Hebrews 1:10 is mistranslated. Can it be translated differently? It does not seem to line up with Hebrews 1:2 which states:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
    Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    Verse 2 states: “BY WHOM HE (GOD) MADE THE WORLDS”.

    Thanks for your help
    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #121454
    Cindy
    Participant

    Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds.,

    I find this very interesting another Scripture that shows that Jesus by the power of God made all things.

    It goes really nice with all the other Scriptures,showing the same.
    So why is it then that so many of you want to just want to read something else in this Scriptures.
    Lets see how many
    Rev. 3:14
    John 1:1-3
    Col. 1:15-18
    John 17:5
    And yet…………………..you can finish……….

    And I do not believe in a trinity doctrine.
    Ephesians 4:6 says that the Father is above all,
    by Jesus own words He said ” My Father is greater then I.

    NO,NO,NO TRINITY

    Peace and Love Irene
    I want to bring this up. This syspect is not easy.
    Irene

    #121459
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Hi 942767.

    Quote (942767 @ Feb. 13 2009,14:22)
    Hi you Greek sholars:

    Is there any chance that Hebrews 1:10 is mistranslated.  Can it be translated differently?   It does not seem to line up with Hebrews 1:2 which states:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
    Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    Verse 2 states: “BY WHOM HE (GOD) MADE THE WORLDS”.

    Thanks for your help
    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    To me it just repeats what other scriptures say, that God made all things through Christ. Many scriptures identify Jesus and say that all things were created through him, for him, and without him nothing was made that was made.

    These scriptures are not even talking of the Logos, but Jesus Christ. Yes he is the Logos become flesh. He came in the flesh and he is the Word of God.

    I don't know why people have to buck against these scriptures. What is the point? It says it quite clearly that God made the worlds through him. That is good enough for me and no one to date has shown me proof that these scriptures were translated incorrectly.

    Then there are other scriptures that talk about him before Abraham, from ancient times, and the beginning of the creation of God.

    To me the idea that Christ who was the fullness of the deity in bodily form, emptied himself and came as a man, who then humbled himself to death, and then was glorified with the glory that he had before the world began, i.e., he was seated at the right hand of God.

    To believe this has no bearing on Jesus being God. Jesus is not God/YHWH, he is the son of God. All these scriptures in fact show that he isn't God.

    People try and turn this into a Trinity-preexistence vs no trinity no preexistence debate, but both are actually incorrect in my opinion. It is a scripture debate and we must line up with scripture, not our own understanding.

    #121460
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    942767

    Ask yourself this, who created Eve?

    Was it God?
    Yes

    Was it Eve?
    No

    But Eve was made through Adam, yet Eve was created by God alone.

    So if God can create through Adam, then how much more can he create through the beginning of the creation of God, while still holding to the belief that God creating everything alone?

    Can you see that? To be a vessel by which God does something through, is not a contradiction to say that it was God who did it and only God who did it.

    e.g., I do not claim to be the creator of my son, I am not that ignorant or arrogant. Yet God did create my son through me and my wife. That needs no explanation and really nor does God creating everything alone and yet we know for a fact that God creates through. After all, all animals reproduce after their own kind. Still God isn't it.

    #121462
    SEEKING
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ Feb. 12 2009,20:22)
    Hi you Greek sholars:

    Is there any chance that Hebrews 1:10 is mistranslated.  Can it be translated differently?   It does not seem to line up with Hebrews 1:2 which states:


    While I do not invite the title “Greek Scholar” I do not find any variations among the scholars for that text.

    Cindy and T8 have made some good observations regarding your inquiry.

    Seeking

    #121464

    Quote (t8 @ Feb. 14 2009,01:04)
    942767

    Ask yourself this, who created Eve?

    Was it God?
    Yes

    Was it Eve?
    No

    But Eve was made through Adam, yet Eve was created by God alone.

    So if God can create through Adam, then how much more can he create through the beginning of the creation of God, while still holding to the belief that God creating everything alone?

    Can you see that? To be a vessel by which God does something through, is not a contradiction to say that it was God who did it and only God who did it.

    e.g., I do not claim to be the creator of my son, I am not that ignorant or arrogant. Yet God did create my son through me and my wife. That needs no explanation and really nor does God creating everything alone and yet we know for a fact that God creates through. After all, all animals reproduce after their own kind. Still God isn't it.


    Hi t8

    Yes, but Adam played no “active role” in the creation of Eve.

    Does the Bible anywhere say “by or through Adams hand eve was created by God? ???

    So do you believe Jesus was just there like a funnel with no active part in the creation? Was he asleep? ???

    I don't think so. Hebrews 1:10 clearly shows that Jesus “hand” laid the foundation of the earth.

    Your argument about everything being created “through” (Gr dia) is a red herring, for there is no difference in through or by.

    God also made everything “through” himself and “for” himself yet we see everything was made for Jesus.

    This is one point that you failed to address in the debate thread on Heb 1:10.

    Isa 1:18 puts it very well when he writes…

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ Mar. 24 2007,13:10)

    John 1:3
    All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    The statement “All things were made by him” is an astonishingly high statement to make of the Logos. And just to underscore this sentiment there is a exclusionist reiteration in the second part of the verse. There was nothing in the created order that was not made through Him. John could not have made a stronger distinction between the Creator and the “things” that He “made”

    Paul concurs, writing an even more emphatic statement:

    Colossians 1:16
    For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him

    The language here is unambiguous, according to Paul the Logos created all things, this is an unqualified statement that details precisely what the things were:- “things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities”. Moreover, they were made For Him (Yeshua). Here’s something interesting though, Proverbs 16:4 says that YHWH did it for Himself:

    Proverbs 16:4
    The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.

    If the NT reveals that Christ did it for Himself and the OT reveals that YHWH did it for Himself then, so that basis alone, the logical conclusion is that Yeshua IS Creator YHWH, or else we have a blatant contradiction. And here’s another to consider, in Isaiah 44:24 YHWH declares that He did it “alone”. Job reiterated this in Job 9:8. Does the language in these passages leave any room for the possibility of two independent beings creating “all things”? I don’t think it does. It’s yet another logical dilemma for those that propose that Yeshua is not YHWH, but a lesser being.

    At this point I anticipate you will likely be making this objection, which I’ll also paraphrase:

    'The word “dia” is rightly rendered ‘through’, and this word infers that the Logos was not the first cause of Creation but an agent that His father used to bring it into existence (but the Father is the ultimate power behind it).'

    This rationale, of course, relegates the Logos to the status of a puppet, used in an instrumental way to achieve the creation. If this were true, and “dia” does connote that, then Romans 11:36 and Hebrews 2:10 challenge this dogma. The same language used in John 1:3 and Colossians 1:16 is also used of “God” in Romans 11:36 and Hebrews 2:10.

    Romans 11:32-35
    32For God has shut up all in disobedience so that He may show mercy to all. 33Oh, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are His judgments and unfathomable His ways! 34For WHO HAS KNOWN THE MIND OF THE LORD, OR WHO BECAME HIS COUNSELOR? 35Or WHO HAS FIRST GIVEN TO HIM THAT IT MIGHT BE PAID BACK TO HIM AGAIN? 36For from Him and through (Gr. dia) Him and to Him are all things To Him be the glory forever. Amen.

    cf.

    Hebrews 2:10
    For it was fitting for Him, for whom are all things, and through (Gr. dia) whom are all things, in bringing many sons to glory, to perfect the author of their salvation through sufferings.

    So to be consistent, you must also accept that “God” in the above two scriptures is not credited for doing the aforementioned things in the active and primary senses (i.e. He was not the ‘efficient cause’), but was rather an intermediary between the real first cause and the recipient, which is clearly ludicrous. So, given this, if this language in Romans 11:36 and Hebrews 2:10 is applicable to “God”, and still denotes that He is the ‘primary cause’ then on what grounds can you apply a different rule to Yeshua when “dia” is used in reference to Him? You can’t have it both ways.

    Click here for source…

    The relationship Jesus had with the Father is this…

    But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and ”I WORK”. John 5:17

    Jesus gave them this answer: “I tell you the truth, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because “WHATEVER THE FATHER DOES THE SON ALSO DOES”. John 5:19

    These statements Jesus made were a claim to his deity, so the Jews took up stones to kill him

    Jesus is not, nor ever was some inactive agent that the Father worked through like a “funnel” or a “puppet” or an “empty vessel!!!

    But even so, if he had any part of the creation by being an “empty vessel” then that would leave you with a contradiction for the Bible clearly says….

    Isa 45:18
    For thus saith the *LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it*; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and *there is none else*.

    “Alone” and “by himself” leaves no room for a “lesser being” than himself to play any part in the creation.

    Yet the writers of the NT elevate Jesus as the creator by which all things were made, for they knew who he was.

    There is only one explanation for this.

    Jesus is God, one with the Father, and the Holy Spirit.

    WJ

    #121465

    Hi t8

    Quote (t8 @ Feb. 14 2009,01:04)
    But Eve was made through Adam, yet Eve was created by God alone.

    This is a poor analogy to make by comparing it with the creation of all things.

    First of all the Bible doesn’t state that God made Eve “through” Adam, but in fact Eve was created “from” Adam.

    God took a part of Adam “(a rib) and created Eve.

    WJ

    #121466
    Cindy
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Feb. 14 2009,00:59)
    Hi 942767.

    Quote (942767 @ Feb. 13 2009,14:22)
    Hi you Greek sholars:

    Is there any chance that Hebrews 1:10 is mistranslated.  Can it be translated differently?   It does not seem to line up with Hebrews 1:2 which states:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
    Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    Verse 2 states: “BY WHOM HE (GOD) MADE THE WORLDS”.

    Thanks for your help
    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    To me it just repeats what other scriptures say, that God made all things through Christ. Many scriptures identify Jesus and say that all things were created through him, for him, and without him nothing was made that was made.

    These scriptures are not even talking of the Logos, but Jesus Christ. Yes he is the Logos become flesh. He came in the flesh and he is the Word of God.

    I don't know why people have to buck against these scriptures. What is the point? It says it quite clearly that God made the worlds through him. That is good enough for me and no one to date has shown me proof that these scriptures were translated incorrectly.

    Then there are other scriptures that talk about him before Abraham, from ancient times, and the beginning of the creation of God.

    To me the idea that Christ who was the fullness of the deity in bodily form, emptied himself and came as a man, who then humbled himself to death, and then was glorified with the glory that he had before the world began, i.e., he was seated at the right hand of God.

    To believe this has no bearing on Jesus being God. Jesus is not God/YHWH, he is the son of God. All these scriptures in fact show that he isn't God.

    People try and turn this into a Trinity-preexistence vs no trinity no preexistence debate, but both are actually incorrect in my opinion. It is a scripture debate and we must line up with scripture, not our own understanding.


    Yes, a thousant yes's. I agree with you totally. Tell you neither can I understand why so many of our Brethren do not want to undertand in one way, but then I remember how hard it was for me, when I first heard of it. In fact I called the Guy that He was crazy. Today I have to eat those words.
    Admitting that one is wrong, to humble one selve is not always easy.
    God will not let you believe in your unbelief, if you have an open mind. So ask God are they right, did Jesus preexist?
    Peace and Love Irene

    #121480
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 13 2009,10:50)

    Quote (martian @ Feb. 13 2009,08:15)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 13 2009,04:09)
    Martian,
    It amuses me that you expect me to take my time to answer your concerns after you speak to me like that.  If you don't question anything that you believe (see quote) why are you expecting me to give you my time to answer you.  I do not have that kind of time to waste.  Sorry!

    Quote
    Big assumption on your part that I question anything I believe at this time or that I have not done what you suggest many many times.

    I wish you well,
    LU


    Bad tactic but a good cop out. I suspect that you cannot answer the questions so you avoid them.
    The truth is that I have not seen a single honest reason from you or your doctrine that would lead me to question what I believe. You show me fruit from your doctrine and I will consider it.
    I simply ask you to show me the fruit of your teaching.  You do not think that is important?
    You are on here claiming that your doctrine is correct. I ask, Does your doctrine hep me become like Christ and if so how?
    I do not know what you desire in life. I desire to become like Christ. Can your doctrine help me do that?  How?

    This is where the old died in the wool evangelical debate forums fall short. It promotes an intelectualized debate rather then living truth that produces change in peoples lives.


    Greetings Martian…..There is no one in this forum that is going to be able to full fill your desire to be as christ….Perhaps you may be able to gleen some truth and understanding,however you will never be able to do that with debate as for the very nature of debate is to prevail one over another…Truth comes through faith and a God given understanding that comes from humility….”Blessed are the humble,for they shall be exalted”


    I agree. I have never considered this forum a ministry in any way.
    I do not expect to change anyone's mind on here and so far I have not been offered anyhitng honest enough to change mine.

    #121481
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (SEEKING @ Feb. 13 2009,10:32)
    [quote=martian,Feb. 12 2009,15:50][/quote]
    Martian,

    Recall what I wrote –

    Quote
    Before I share some thoughts I wish to be clear I no longer hold to Trinitarian convictions.  I will try to respond to your question as to how a Trinitarian can be helped in their walkwhen they hold to those beliefs.  

    Quote
    Again, I only submit this because I thought you were seeking clarity as to how a Trinitarian could find hope in Jesus if He was a “super Power” example posessing powers they did not have.

    You offered – I could go into scriptural proof that Phil 2 does not mean a pre-existent being emptied himself of his divinity, but again that would serve no purpose.

    Your right, it would serve no purpose because I already honor that.  I did not offer what I did to encourage debate of meaning but to offer some understanding I was under the impression you were honestly seeking. I said “Again, I only submit this because I thought you were seeking clarity as to how a Trinitarian could find hope in Jesus if He was a “super Power” example posessing powers they did not have.”

    You said, ” This is under the assumption that  yourinterpretation of Phil 2 is correct.”  If you had said  their I would have thought you honored the intent of my post as I made clear it was not “MY ASSUMPTION.”

    If you are looking for a quarrell with me, I didn't think we had one.

    Blessings,

    Seeking


    I seem to be confusing your posts. I apologise. I wish no quarrel with you either.

    #121494
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 12 2009,19:07)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 13 2009,10:19)

    Quote (Cindy @ Feb. 12 2009,15:21)
    Kathi

    Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
    Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

    They could not have shouted for joy, if they had not been created before the earth.
    I'm not saying you have to believe what I believe, but in my book I have a whole chapter explaining the earth, what I believe happened.

    Georg


    Hi Georg,
    Thanks for your reply.  The question that I do not think the Bible clearly answers is: when was the foundation considered laid?  I purpose that it was when it became formed, after day 1 and not before since it was formless.  I also purpose that the angels came during the six days of creation.  They are called the “Morning Stars” and the concept of “morning” wasn't introduced until day 1.  I'll have to read that part of your book again.

    God bless,
    Kathi


    Greetings LU…..The scriptures tell us at the time of creation the earth was dark and without form Toho/Boho…The presentation of this passage suggests a previous existance during which time the angelic realm probably had dominion over the entire universe and they were presided over by none other than the angel of light Lucifer….They destroyed the earth and the universe with their rebellion….God saw fit to move over the surface of the earth and breath life into the oceans and to seperate the darkness with light and so on….Then he created the man….The foundations were laid well before human life… and the sons of God could very well have been the angelic realm….IMO


    Hi Theodore,
    Thanks for your opinion. I have heard that theory before but do not agree with it. I believe that the Son's beginning has something to do with day 1 of creation and then all things were created through Him even the angels. Also, everything was considered “good” even after day six, yet that couldn't have been if the angels had rebelled before or during that time. Just another opinion :)
    LU

    #121497
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ Feb. 12 2009,22:22)
    Hi you Greek sholars:

    Is there any chance that Hebrews 1:10 is mistranslated.  Can it be translated differently?   It does not seem to line up with Hebrews 1:2 which states:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
    Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    Verse 2 states: “BY WHOM HE (GOD) MADE THE WORLDS”.

    Thanks for your help
    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Hi Marty,

    I have a thought to share with you on how God can do something “by” or “through” the Son where the Son and the Father are both actively doing it.

    Quote
    Hbr 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
    Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    You will notice that the second verse in Hebrews says that God hath spoken unto us BY [His] Son. We know that Jesus is that Son and that Jesus spoke to mankind in a living and active way. We also know that what Jesus spoke was God's word…He spoke His Father's word to His disciples. His Father has always been living and actively gave His word to Jesus.
    Both have a part in presenting God the Father's words. In similar fashion, they both actively had a part in preparing this world. The source-the Father, the agent-His Son. IMO

    BTW, I would guess that God didn't speak to us by the Son in the Old Testament because the Son was to be revealed later, He was hidden from us however the plan that a Messiah was coming wasn't hidden from us.

    The Father gave the word to us, the Son gave the word to us. Both are true statements yet two different individuals and not conflicting. One source speaking through His Son.

    The Father laid the foundation, the Son laid the foundation. Both can be true statements also yet two different individuals and not conflicting. One source preparing the world through His Son.

    LU

    #121500
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Feb. 14 2009,09:06)

    Quote (942767 @ Feb. 12 2009,22:22)
    Hi you Greek sholars:

    Is there any chance that Hebrews 1:10 is mistranslated.  Can it be translated differently?   It does not seem to line up with Hebrews 1:2 which states:

    Quote
    Hbr 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
    Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    Verse 2 states: “BY WHOM HE (GOD) MADE THE WORLDS”.

    Thanks for your help
    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Hi Marty,

    I have a thought to share with you on how God can do something “by” or “through” the Son where the Son and the Father are both actively doing it.

    Quote
    Hbr 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
    Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

    You will notice that the second verse in Hebrews says that God hath spoken unto us BY [His] Son.  We know that Jesus is that Son and that Jesus spoke to mankind in a living and active way.  We also know that what Jesus spoke was God's word…He spoke His Father's word to His disciples.  His Father has always been living and actively gave His word to Jesus.
    Both have a part in presenting God the Father's words.  In similar fashion, they both actively had a part in preparing this world.  The source-the Father, the agent-His Son.  IMO

    BTW, I would guess that God didn't speak to us by the Son in the Old Testament because the Son was to be revealed later, He was hidden from us however the plan that a Messiah was coming wasn't hidden from us.

    The Father gave the word to us, the Son gave the word to us.  Both are true statements yet two different individuals and not conflicting.  One source speaking through His Son.

    The Father laid the foundation, the Son laid the foundation.  Both can be true statements also yet two different individuals and not conflicting. One source preparing the world through His Son.

    LU


    Hi LU:

    God made every thing that He made with Jesus in mind, that is the last Adam.

    But no, he did not pre-exist his birth into this world.  He is the first born of God and the first born again from the dead, and he is God's heir, and we are joint heirs with him.

    And so, God made the worlds through him seeing that the first world is temporary, and so, we have John 3:16 stating “For God so loved the world that he gave His Only Begotten Son that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have eternal life”.

    The scriptures show that he was begotten of God through the virgin Mary.  You cannot show me that he was begotten of God anywhere else in the scriptures.  This is the only place that we see this.

    Sorry, LU I am having difficulty understanding Hebrews 1:10 and I am praying to God for understanding, and He has said that if I lack wisdom to ask.  And so, I have asked and I will await the answer.  

    I believe that He did speak to you as I have already stated, but I also believe that you have misunderstood what He has said to you.  However, if He confirms what you have said, then I will have been corrected.

    Any way, I know that both you and I love God and want only to teach His Word in truth.

    My desire is God's very best for you and your family.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #121501
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 14 2009,03:40)
    Hi t8

    Yes, but Adam played no “active role” in the creation of Eve.

    Does the Bible anywhere say “by or through Adams hand eve was created by God?

    So do you believe Jesus was just there like a funnel with no active part in the creation? Was he asleep?

    I don't think so. Hebrews 1:10 clearly shows that Jesus “hand” laid the foundation of the earth.

    Your argument about everything being created “through” (Gr dia) is a red herring, for there is no difference in through or by.

    God also made everything “through” himself and “for” himself yet we see everything was made for Jesus.

    This is one point that you failed to address in the debate thread on Heb 1:10.

    Isa 1:18 puts it very well when he writes…


    Hi WJ.

    God created the universe alone, in other words if he didn't create then nothing would exist as creation. It is his work.

    The word “through” means a channel. Like a camel going 'through' the eye of a needle which is the same word.

    I wasn't there to observe exactly how this works but suffice to say that God created through his Logos that was with him in the beginning. Jesus was that Logos and became flesh and dwelt among us.

    It is written that the head of Christ is God and the head of the woman is the man. All are identifed as being unique. i.e., God > Christ > Man > Woman and we know that creation is sourced through Christ from God and we know that the woman was sourced by man but by God and through Christ.

    To make the argument that Jesus had a hammer and him and God worked together on the universe project is not really taught. It is taught that the source of all is God and that God did things THROUGH his Logos and his son.

    God is even called the Father of Spirits and that all good gifts come from him. Jesus taught repeatedly that he came from God.

    Thanks for listening.

    #121502
    942767
    Participant

    Hi LU:

    You say:

    Quote
    In similar fashion, they both actively had a part in preparing this world. The source-the Father, the agent-His Son. IMO

    As you say, IMO (in my opinion). There is no scripture to support this statement. Therefore, it is speculation.

    God Bless

Viewing 20 posts - 4,861 through 4,880 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account