Quote (david @ Sep. 04 2013,11:48)You could take a swimming pile worth of blue and add in one drop of yellow, and technically, you would have green, or, blue blue blue green, a very blue green.  Yet, despite looking blue, it wouldn't be true blue because the definition of green is: blue+yellow.   Once you've added yellow, you no longer have true b…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 17 2013,18:04)True or False?2 Samuel 7:22″How great you are, Sovereign LORD! There is no one like you, and there is no God (elohim) but you, as we have heard with our own ears.You obviously have a problem with Jesus who said, “ye are gods” which was a quote from the OT that goes, “ye are gods, ye are all sons of the Most…[Read more]

This is really about you defending your belief that these things have passed away. But demons haven't passed away. You either believe scripture on this point or you do not. I cannot force you to believe what scripture says.Examples today of what? Demon possession? Where people act in a devilish way like Judas who Jesus called a devil? Plenty of…[Read more]

I agree that men who claim to know the future (outside of revelation from God) are frauds as are men who heal (outside of God) are frauds).That said, scripture clearly teaches us that there are demons. And they are capable of manifesting themselves in the physical such as taking control of a person. Whether it is my personal view or not, it is…[Read more]

Quote (david @ May 07 2013,03:19)After discussing this at length with him, it reminded me of the bouncing yogis, who believe or say they are flying. Perhaps in their mind. They are clearly bouncing. Where others see magic, psychics, etc, I see self deception, delusion, and fraud.I don't think they were ever claiming to fly, but that given enough…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ June 13 2013,03:11)Quote (t8 @ June 11 2013,12:54)It does. The Comma Johanneum being the most glaring example.The AKJV wasn't translated from the oldest and more relaible texts. The AKJV was also translated before the discovery of the Dea Sea Scrolls.While no translation is perfect, people who believe that the AKJV is, are clearly…[Read more]

Maybe. But hasn't been long enough to officially say that he has left.

Quote (jb2u @ Sep. 02 2013,03:01)1. Why does it not say Jesus was “transformed” or “changed” into a man?2. What does Jesus mean when He says He “came out from” God?3. God only talked to us “in these last days”; so, who/what was Jesus before these last days?4. Why is the word “preexist” not used in the Bible anywhere to explain/describe Jesus?1. It…[Read more]

Cheers Mike. I read this late last night. Will reply soon.

Audio on the Biblical manuscripts including the Textus Receptus.

The 1611 AKJV was translated from the Textus Receptus which is based on manuscripts that date back to the 11 century. Since then over 5800 manuscripts have been discovered including the Dead Sea Scrolls. AKJV Only people would have to conclude that these 5800 manuscripts are unreliable since they are not perfect like the AKJV and Textus…[Read more]

Tatian wrote this back somewhere around 165 AD.And by His simple will the Word sprang forth, and the Word, not coming forth in vain, became the firstbegotten work of the Father . Him we know to be the Beginning of the world (cf. Rev. 3:14). But He came into being by participation, not by cutting off, for what is cut off is separated from the…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 03 2013,06:07)It is written:Matthew 4:4Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.Some believe:Matthew 4:4An interpretation of the Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)4 But he answered and said,…[Read more]

Anybody want a coffee?

Just listening to an audio file. A person states that the Textus Receptus, the manuscript for the AKJV is based on 7 Greek manuscripts. None of them are older than the eleventh century and two of them were primary over the others. This doesn't really help us get back to the original wording of the original documents, but with the myriad of other…[Read more]

Thanx 942767.

@ Devolution.Yes some people are like that, but over the years I have had people say that they thought the writing was revolutionary to them at least. Many times people have said that they knew the Trinity Doctrine was wrong but couldn't articulate why. When they read the writing it was exactly what they needed. Funny thing is that I only ever…[Read more]

Thanks for your PM terraricca.If you cannot post that format, then maybe you could FTP it to the server. Do you know how to do that if I give you that access?Also, I will see if I can allow different formats to post here. If I make any progress on that, I will let you know.