Have you heard me deny it. You think you have heard it because I believe correctly that he was recognised as Jesus Christ when he was born. That Jesus Christ came in the flesh. If that is a contradiction to you, then ask yourself if Jesus Christ came in the flesh and be honest with yourself.

It was only after the Romans declared him king and he suffered on the cross that God appointed him Lord of all things in heaven and on earth. If the Romans actions were not enough to declare him the anointed king then God’s action that made him King also declared he is the Anointed. It is only when he went through with they choice to give up his l…

[Read more]

It was only after the Romans declared him king and he suffered on the cross that God appointed him Lord of all things in heaven and on earth. If the Romans actions were not enough to declare him the anointed king then God’s action that made him King also declared he is the Anointed. It is only when he went through with they choice to give up his l…

[Read more]

What I mean by that is when he was born, he was rightly recognised as the Christ and the son of God. He was further recognised at John’s baptism. These were all signs that he was and is the Christ. Recognising this does not mean denial of other things. So please do not go down the road that Nick has with me. Speculating on what it means to believe…[Read more]

So I am full of errors Nick?

Are you saying that Jesus origin is as the Word that was with God? Or what is the message you wish to convey here?

Okay, so I can assume then from your post that you truly believe that Jesus Christ came in the flesh.

Then when exactly did he come in the flesh. Was it the Jordan, as a baby in Jerusalem, or what?

BTW, my inquisition if you want to call it that, will not leave you tied to a stake for crucifixion, rather it will be for you to think about and to…[Read more]

It seems to me that you do not really believe and you teach that Jesus Christ did not come in the flesh. Your accusations against me because I teach that Jesus is the Christ at birth and onward coupled with your specific teaching that he was not the Christ from his birth leads me to challenge your teaching. You say that the man became the Christ…[Read more]

Hi T8,

Despite the fact that the infant did nothing to reveal the mighty power of God

and was yet even to be named

you cling to the traditional understanding.

If you understanding of what happened at the Jordan invalidates Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh or if it invalidates that Jesus is the Christ, then you need to reevaluate.

Men…[Read more]

If you understanding of what happened at the Jordan invalidates Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh or if it invalidates that Jesus is the Christ, then you need to reevaluate.

Men honoured him as the Christ and one was even told by God that he would see him before he died and he saw Jesus as a baby.

Some translations call these men, ‘wise men’.…[Read more]

Nick, Jesus Christ came in the flesh. When did he come in the flesh? Was it at the Jordan.

I do not deny all those things you say I do. Rather it appears to be a smoke-screen to the real issue. What is that issue? That you teach that Jesus was not the Christ until Jordan.

They also did not believe that Jesus was the Christ. They denied that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. They denied he was the son of God. They would naturally deny that he was conceived by the Spirit and Mary. They denied his Father was God.

Hi t8,

Jesus is the Christ, the anointed one.

Did Jesus Christ come in the flesh?

When did he come in the flesh. His natural birth as a baby, the Jordan, or what?

Hi t8,

Jesus is the Christ, the anointed one.

Did Jesus Christ come in the flesh?

When did he come in the flesh. His natural birth as a baby or at the Jordan, or what?

That is a more detailed statement than I am completely confident with. I think it is the goal that the human spirits will become unified in order to be like God’s in true righteousness and holiness but at this time I am only confident to say believers are given God’s very Spirit when they first believe. It is this Spirit that unites them with bot…

[Read more]

I haven’ denied anything. If you think that me believing that Jesus Christ came in the flesh is a denial of that, then you are relying on your own understanding. If you think that me believing that men came to honour the Christ at his birth when he came in the flesh, then you are again relying on your own understanding.

Please, yes or no to that other question Nick?

Yes or no to the above Nick?

What we think Nick is Jesus Christ came in the flesh. Ask yourself when he came in the flesh. Was it the Jordan or in a manger in Jerusalem. You seem to teach that Jesus Christ was born at the Jordan. Is that correct?

You taught that the anointing at the Jordan was just some sort of public revelation of a previous event did you not?

I taught the following because it is written:

John testified saying, “I have seen the Spirit descending as a dove out of heaven, and He remained upon Him. “I did not recognize Him, but He who sent me to baptize in water said to me,…[Read more]