Mike, I am not convinced these are perfectly level. Even just slightly out and a zoom lense will bring the low point close to the vantage point showing clearly the disparity. Whereas, in normal view the inclination is small enough not to notice.

When I did the marble experiment on a level table at home it showed me clearly how it didn’t…[Read more]

Explain to me why objects dissappear from the ground up and not top down for example. This will be interesting.

That marble on the table example was definitely fake. I tried it myself, and I could see the whole marble the whole time. When I dropped the far side of the table below the near side, which was very easy to do and could be done…[Read more]

He hasn’t.  The only explanation anyone can offer is that the buildings are really behind the curve, but refraction has shot their image back up on top of the curve so we can see them.  Three points…

Read my post again. You can clearly see in your photos that the bottom of the buildings are cut off.  That fits the ball earth model nicely and yo…[Read more]

Could be Nick, if the park is not an important one which it doesn’t look to be.

The local pitch where I live is level and uses small holes punched into the ground and filled with a little sand. It works really well. Outside of the pitch can be sodden in winter, but the pitch itself is great to play on.

I believe this scripture which is what the Spirit would have me do. It is you who does not believe. What Spirit are you offering that disputes this scripture?

…the Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
For in Him all things were created, things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or d…[Read more]

Glad to see you admit it was an historical event. That’s something.

Common sense would tell you that if I believe in God and the scriptures, that I would believe that God created the universe at some time in the past. Why even make that comment?

How are you equating the language not being everyday because the historical event was not e…

[Read more]

Not sure if this is called the selenelion. If it is, then here is an explanation.

When you consider that the sun and the moon are on precisely opposite sides of our planet during a lunar eclipse, it may seem geometrically impossible for an earthly observer to see both celestial bodies at the same time. However, the…

[Read more]

Again, pay attention.  Look at the post (I think third from the top of this page), and tell me if the man walking away is disappearing over the curvature of the earth.  Seriously, tell me if he is, so I know I won’t have to deal with this same crap another hundred times.

Easy to do if there is a slight hill.

T8 “The creation event like prophecy is not the same as a recorded event in history right?”

Dig That may be your conclusion but many who believe in the Word of God do view it as an historical event.

Yes it is historical, but it is not an everyday historical event like Jesus waking up in the morning and climbing a mountain to pray.

There was no s…[Read more]

It looks like this image is using a wide angle lense. The sun and horizon looks too small or far away. Of course, if the earth was flat, you should be able to view the sun over the water or flat land till it appeared as a mere star. It would then become bigger again when it returns. That is from a star size from our perspective to the size of the…[Read more]

T8: “You can clearly see the bottom of the buildings are cut off from view.”

In case you missed the point Mike made it was that all of the buildings should be well under the curve.

Also, it has been explained and demonstrated here that the atmosphere both magnifies and bends the light down thru refraction which explains the missing little bit…

[Read more]

Mike said: Again, pay attention. Look at the post (I think third from the top of this page), and tell me if the man walking away is disappearing over the curvature of the earth. Seriously, tell me if he is, so I know I won’t have to deal with this same crap another hundred times.

1 2 3 is so easy to do. You just need a small hill or a bit of h…[Read more]

Dig. I predicted someone would post a flower video and was right. It is not because it is a flower or that the circles are equal diameters, but has more to do with the spiral pattern or ever decreasing or increasing spiral shape. And yes that is found in flowers, but not in the believed orbit of wandering stars. I likened it to the shape of petals…[Read more]

Now, instead of me answering the same points over and over – how about you address that top-down eclipse video for the FIRST time?

Mike, you can easily simulate the curvature effect using a small distance from yourself. If a field rises slightly then you could walk over it and start to dissappear over the other side and it could easily look flat 5…[Read more]

“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

You hit the nail on the head with that one.

I’d imagine so – with a 52 million dollar a day budget.   And that’s just the Americans.

I would way prefer to spend my 52 million on drilling through the dome than keeping  a conspiracy alive that is suppose to make people not believe in God but doesn’t stop anyone from believing in God. Humans are curious, who wouldn’t want to spend that mon…[Read more]

Sunsets prove the Globe Earth or that the Earth is not flat

T8: And as for bringing the sun back, try putting a powerful scope on it the whole time. Should be possible on a Flat Earth and that would be proof that people could understand and take seriously..

You mean as opposed to top down eclipses and seeing objects that should be miles below the…

[Read more]

Mike, you go on about the Globe Earth photos and composites looking fake, but the Flat Earth ones are the ones that look fake to me.

You mean kind of like the Fibonacci Code?

Explain why the Heliocentric model puts them into much simpler and obvious circular orbits?

A huge coincidence?

I guess when God created the flower orbits, he later discovered that they would align in perfect orbits around the sun if you put the sun at the centre of everything. Wow he thought, what a…[Read more]

Mike said:

That means the very peak of the tallest building in Chicago (Willis Tower at 1729 feet) should be a whopping 437 feet below the curvature – hidden from view.  Yet we can not only see most of the Willis Tower, but most of the Chicago lakefront in general.  This is undeniable proof that the earth can’t be a ball 25,000 miles in circu…

[Read more]