A lesson in Newton’s first law

That’s interesting. So he doesn’t have his spirit now?

Instead, it’s clear that you only search “flat earth DEBUNKED” videos, and post them without your own comments – as if blindly posting a video fixes everything for you.  Try harder.

I do watch Flat Earth videos as I do watch Hollow Earth videos and even Ancient Aliens. I find them interesting as they ask good questions. Rarely do I post about th…[Read more]

Mike, I often work with JPGs in Photoshop as I’m a keen photographer who owns a photo based website where I post up JPG files with many having been passed through Photoshop first

Sometimes part of the photo is darker than it was when seen with the naked eye, so I select that area and maybe increase brightness, contrast, and/or saturation.

As for…[Read more]

The solution for me was to investigate further, to see if there were any other similarly absurd explanations we’d been given for observations that don’t align with the theory.  I found dozens of them.

But they are being debunked one at a time. And you ignore all experiments that lead to the realisation of globe earth. And that doesn’t even incl…[Read more]

The Father of Spirits is YHWH.

But some seem to teach here that while Angels are spirits and we have a spirit, Jesus didn’t have his own spirit.

Yes, Edj is correct, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into our hearts leading to us calling God our Father because we are sons.

Nick, Nick, Nick, how long must bear you. Avoiding scripture then applying your own understanding of things.

And here ladies and gentlemen is my view again:

Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord.

Yes it is my view, but The Ordinary Jesus Brigade says it is bad because they have a different view.

They clearly do not make sense right?

Yes the time is right for you to do that Nick. But can I suggest giving up on the poisoned jellybeans first.

Some advice for some.

Believe the scriptures and reject the spin.

Only preexisters preach Jesus was that at berth, because they believe he came forth from a Pryor existence of somekind, which they can’t even show what that actually Pryor existence was from any scripture.

False. Now imagine the possibility that other things you perceive could be false.

The Word was in the beginning with God and the Word became f…[Read more]

Jesus the Christ was in fact flesh, he in fact did come in the flesh. The passage is NOT saying a pre-existing son of God came in the flesh.

Jodi, what is your best definition of Jesus. One paragraph please.

According to you, if I am not mistaken, at least others on this forum, the passage according to those who believe Jesus was YHWH in the OT, shouldn’t the passage then read instead YHWH came in the flesh??? Or God came in the flesh?? Or a non flesh son of God came in the flesh??

You are mistaken.

And here ladies and gentlemen is my view again:

Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord.

Yes it is my view, but it is bad somehow.

So much to dissect in your small post Nick.

T8 quotes scripture and Nick gets annoyed because it basically doesn’t support what he believes.

T8 believes what the scriptures are saying as he only needs to quote them.

Nick doesn’t believe them, hence why he gets upset and attacks T8 after T8 quotes scripture.

Nick defends his teaching against…[Read more]

Jodi, who here is denying that Jesus was a man? But I say unto you that some deny that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. In the City of David, one was born that was the Christ. Some deny this however. Focus any corrections there.

The Spirit says that many shall depart the faith in the latter days. Some will deny that Jesus is the Christ. It seems that many do. Some outright while others say he is, but their doctrine subtly denies it.

T8…..Jesus is NOT the anointing, he is the anointed one. Big difference in understanding. You false teachers preach the man Jesus as the anointing HIMSELF, “spirit” or”word” of God himself.

That is false. The Word became flesh. Jesus Christ came in the flesh. Nobody is saying the body he partook of is the anointing. Stop being silly now. Saying th…[Read more]

Seems as if you don’t even have a clue as to what the word Christ (Christos) means, it means anointed which anointed is also used as Chrio “to anoint”.

No matter what you think, Jesus was the Christ in the City of David, because it is written. You are not above scripture are you?

Ad hominem attacks add nothing to your credibility.

Lots of lols with that comment.