I wasn’t aware such a thing existed.  Please enlighten me.

I have posted many in this topic such as the laser over the lake to large boats going over the curve and bottom disappearing first. I will post more videos as you may have missed them.

Here is another debunk video that probably knocks a couple of points you may be holding onto. I know yo…[Read more]

Nick, where did I say that Jesus came in the flesh?

CHRIST is not just like a surname.

No matter what smoke screen you put up this is a true saying:

Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord.

All this bragging that only you have this spirit that leads to truth, is pointless because you need to accept this scripture. Start there and see where it leads.…[Read more]

Scripture never says that JESUS came in the flesh.

Interesting Nick. Where exactly did I say that? I’m curious now.

Jodi, where did I say that these verses are spin. I didn’t and neither do I preach against them. Jesus emptied himself and came in the flesh, so was made for a time a little lower than the angels because coming in the flesh means he partook of human nature meaning he was a man. Saying that we are not saying he was a man is a mistake at best and…[Read more]

Hi T8,

Of course not.

He lives by the Holy Spirit.

He has the rivers of living water to share.

So he swapped spirits? The Spirit of Jesus is no longer, just the Holy Spirit now?

A lesson in Newton’s first law

That’s interesting. So he doesn’t have his spirit now?

Instead, it’s clear that you only search “flat earth DEBUNKED” videos, and post them without your own comments – as if blindly posting a video fixes everything for you.  Try harder.

I do watch Flat Earth videos as I do watch Hollow Earth videos and even Ancient Aliens. I find them interesting as they ask good questions. Rarely do I post about th…[Read more]

Mike, I often work with JPGs in Photoshop as I’m a keen photographer who owns a photo based website where I post up JPG files with many having been passed through Photoshop first

Sometimes part of the photo is darker than it was when seen with the naked eye, so I select that area and maybe increase brightness, contrast, and/or saturation.

As for…[Read more]

The solution for me was to investigate further, to see if there were any other similarly absurd explanations we’d been given for observations that don’t align with the theory.  I found dozens of them.

But they are being debunked one at a time. And you ignore all experiments that lead to the realisation of globe earth. And that doesn’t even incl…[Read more]

The Father of Spirits is YHWH.

But some seem to teach here that while Angels are spirits and we have a spirit, Jesus didn’t have his own spirit.

Yes, Edj is correct, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into our hearts leading to us calling God our Father because we are sons.

Nick, Nick, Nick, how long must bear you. Avoiding scripture then applying your own understanding of things.

And here ladies and gentlemen is my view again:

Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord.

Yes it is my view, but The Ordinary Jesus Brigade says it is bad because they have a different view.

They clearly do not make sense right?

Yes the time is right for you to do that Nick. But can I suggest giving up on the poisoned jellybeans first.

Some advice for some.

Believe the scriptures and reject the spin.

Only preexisters preach Jesus was that at berth, because they believe he came forth from a Pryor existence of somekind, which they can’t even show what that actually Pryor existence was from any scripture.

False. Now imagine the possibility that other things you perceive could be false.

The Word was in the beginning with God and the Word became f…[Read more]

Jesus the Christ was in fact flesh, he in fact did come in the flesh. The passage is NOT saying a pre-existing son of God came in the flesh.

Jodi, what is your best definition of Jesus. One paragraph please.

According to you, if I am not mistaken, at least others on this forum, the passage according to those who believe Jesus was YHWH in the OT, shouldn’t the passage then read instead YHWH came in the flesh??? Or God came in the flesh?? Or a non flesh son of God came in the flesh??

You are mistaken.

And here ladies and gentlemen is my view again:

Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord.

Yes it is my view, but it is bad somehow.