When God teaches and leads us, he doesn’t draw an opposite conclusion to scripture. Today in the City of David …. He is the Christ and Lord doesn’t suddenly become he is NOT the Christ and Lord as you teach. If the Spirit just taught the opposite meaning, then you wouldn’t need the Spirit to understand the scripture.

I already answered you last question. Here it is again.

Try to ignore Star Trek when Voyager comes under attack and there is a breach and think what zero is doing to almost zero.

Practically nothing Dig.

It’s like saying why doesn’t the cold temperature of the Arctic spread across the earth and cool the tropics right down.

As you know, it goes…[Read more]

that is when the word who is GOD the Father came to be with the Flesh man Jesus.

It is written the the Word was with God in the beginning. I believe that because it is written and it compliments the other scriptures we quote.

You have an almost zero chance of convincing us of your view because it means you need to add words to lots of scriptures…[Read more]

Reading scripture as it is written is forcing nothing Gene. Rather adding words like you and Jodi do is forcing your view. Simple as that.

Some good points being raised here. For me, once the following point is understood, scripture has zero conflicts as other views on Jesus do.

In identity, there is one God the Father, and one Lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. In nature, there are many beings with divine nature or godly nature.

Theos can apply to God or God’s nature. Context will help…[Read more]

kick off those who disagree with your views .

Are you going to be the new false accuser Gene? I hope not.

I know in my own heart I do not kick people off for difference of opinion, never have and probably never will.

People get kicked off here for constant unrepentant false accusations, bearing false witness,  spam, inappropriate contact, and…[Read more]

Gene, I seriously doubt that your motive is truth. A true seeker who believes in Jesus Christ believes scripture and derives doctrine from there. They don’t start with doctrine and add or takeaway from scripture to reinforce their doctrine.

YOU PREEXISTENERS move or try your best to “SEPERATE” Jesus from the rest of his brothers and sister,

That is simply not true. I have no agenda as you appear to have because I accept these scriptures as they are written without adding or taking away. My guess is you are the one with the agenda because you have to add words to derive your und…[Read more]

Well yeah, if you add certain words to these scriptures, then yes they would say that.

But try reading them as they are written. Do not add or takeaway.

He had this glory before the cosmos.

BTW, you live inside the cosmos in case you were not aware.

Say that you are standing on Earth holding a glass bottle. If you attach the bottle to a vacuum pump, pump out all the air and then seal the bottle, the bottle contains a vacuum. If you put a hole in the bottle, air rushes in. The reason it rushes in is because of the air pressure around the bottle. Standing on the ground, we are all standing in a…[Read more]

From what I understand it does strip away at it, but it is a very slow process and would take a huge amount of time before it affected the atmosphere in a big way.

Same thing could have happened to Mars. It’s atmosphere was stripped away.

What you people try so despretly to do,  is make Jesus different then Moses and the prophets by giving him a preexisting status. In that way you sure are “SEPERATING”, Jesus from the rest of humanity, wrether you realize it or not, that is exactly what your doing. IMO

Not so. We quote about 20 scriptures on this subject and learn from them. It s…[Read more]

T8…..let me paraphrase it for you ok. , unto you this day in the town of DAVID, has been “born”, unto you a savior, he is the one who is to be the Messiah.

It isn’t worded that way Gene and it is clear from the wording what is being said. If the angel said it that way, then why do you have a problem when we say it the exact same way. You shoul…[Read more]