Still waiting for that “overwhelming evidence”, Gene. I keep asking, and you keep going silent every time I ask. Hmm…

Satellites, rockets, video, photos, mathematics, 100% eclipse predictions based on heliocentric model, Antarctic travel, Southern Hemisphere distances, sunsets, sunrises, Auroras, air travel, etc.

Flat Earth has none of this…[Read more]

God in His infinite, pure, righteous and true nature…

The heavens declare His glory and since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, are clearly seen. Especially now that man has more technology and knowledge. The further we look the more we see God’s handiwork and eternal power. If we create a…[Read more]

Here’s two portals side by side. I took this pic and can tell you it is not fake. Thermal heat rises up from the ground evaporating water in the expected upward direction. Sometimes you see these funnels (portals) dance over the lake.

T8 is (once again) stumped by scripture, because he can’t fit waters that STILL exist above the firmament into his heliocentric model… nor can his model provide a sensible answer as to what those windows are.

We know that the atmosphere contains moisture (water particles) and it is entirely possible that there was a lot more water in the atm…[Read more]

Well, obviously it’s a lie that God told to mankind because mankind was too stupid to understand the truth. You know that whole “created in His image” stuff is fiction also, we have obviously evolved from primates. Of course we were too stupid to grasp that so God had to lie to us again and pretend that we were actually “created” this advanced.…

[Read more]

Wow! I didn’t know that! I played with balloons when I was a kid, who knew I was ahead of my time!
Now when I see those “satellites” at night I know what they are!
Ive go to check out more of this, fascinating! Thanks for that Mike!

Leave them; they are blind guides. If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit.”

T8 is (once again) stumped by scripture, because he can’t fit waters that STILL exist above the firmament into his heliocentric model… nor can his model provide a sensible answer as to what those windows are.

Far from it. If heavenly beings can walk through walls in our physical reality, then why would you think that everything about creation is…[Read more]

Yes, it is interesting how people get deceived. I would argue that a person cannot be totally truthful and be fully deceived. Men can be led into all truth and this is part of the journey that the children of God partake of.

How does your heliocentric view stack up against the “windows of heaven” and “vaulted dome of heaven” scriptures?  And remember… it was GOD who explained to Moses how HE flooded the earth by letting the waters above flow through the windows of heaven.  Was God mistaken?

Real simple. There are heavens. Different layers of the heavens. What consti…[Read more]

In this illustration, you can see the vaulted dome of heaven that many scriptures refer to, and the WINDOWS of heaven that the waters above the firmament poured through when God flooded the earth.  You can also see that this earth is hung on nothing.

Hilarious. So the ancient Jews who didn’t believe that Jesus was the messiah are suddenly correct…[Read more]

Ah… the old “water canopy” theory.  Did you know that was another attempt by self-professed Christians to align the Bible with the lies of scientism?

Pure speculation and nothing wrong with that because we know the earth was different given gigantism in living organisms at one point. After all, while we call this planet Earth, it should be called…[Read more]

It is obvious that Jesus was no ordinary man, but a man nevertheless. While his appearance was ordinary, he obviously had the extraordinary being the firstborn of all creation and being the one who God created all things through, but chose to empty himself. To see that you need eyes to see and ears to hear.

Wouldn’t it be better to spend that 50+ million dollars a day that NASA receives on our own dominion? It doesn’t cost that much to send satellites up on balloons for our communication needs. The rest could be spent to help the poor and needy.

Well money is spent on the poor and needy and money is spent on science which does lead to innovation and…[Read more]

the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. And the rain was on the earth forty days and forty nights.

Some speculate that there was a layer of water or moisture around the whole earth. This would explain why there was a warm climate worldwide and it explains other things too. Regardless, we know that…[Read more]

Here’s a thought, if people are right that the scriptures were written in a way to speak to a people that were ignorant about science then it would be obsolete to a people that did understand science.

Here’s a thought. Scripture is written for man and through man and the output is in a human language. It has nothing to do with a lack of science m…[Read more]

Again… if you had never been taught that you live on a spinning water ball, would you be trying to correct the scriptures with your own philosophies as you’re doing now?

If you lived 2500 years ago, would you believe sun rises and sets? Yes. And from our perspective it does and we use such language to this day. But from a zoomed out per…[Read more]

Again… what does it mean that God opened the windows of the firmament to let the waters above flood the earth?

It might mean exactly what you think it means. Just replace a glass dome for a dome of moisture around the globe.

Neither of us have an issue with a firmament, just that your science is limited to 2 dimensions.

Was Jesus born again according tour teaching?

A message for Mike and Dig
I know that being adept at science is not a prerequisite of salvation, but I think if you are going to teach science and merge it with scripture, you at least have to know about perspective. If you just accept that what you see from your perspective as truth and nothing else, then you are just plain ignorant. Your view…[Read more]

It’s real simple. If an object is not moving, it is not moving from your perspective. On a train, the landscape is moving backwards. Looking at the train and you see it move forward. Whether you are in the train or looking at the train, both can throw a ball in the air and catch it despite the speed.

Simple.

So from either perspective, you will…[Read more]