Here it is Keith,I went back and fixed it.http://www.gotquestions.org/gossip-Bible.htmlThanks!Kathi

Hi Istari,I know that we do not understand the same way. Perhaps you might enjoy reading this:http://www.reformedreader.org/rbb/gill/eternalsonshipofchrist.htmAs you can see, this disagreement has been going on for centuries. I am certainly not alone in my general understanding.BTW, read John Gill's writings for some help with your…[Read more]

Thanks Keith and William! I agree.

Princess,Have no fear, no one is being run off the board by me,  just asking for accountability, that's all.  I did not instigate this.You said:Quote LU you do have a tendency to do such things, this is not the first time I have heard of this. how you have hurt another person in such a way. Really, have I ever hurt you in anyway, if so how?  If yo…[Read more]

Dennison,

Thanks Dennison-son,I know that you would like the drama, not me Kathi

Hi William and all,I am the one that emailed her in response to a PM that she sent me in regards to this post below and my response to it. And I never said that she shouldn't be here one way or another. I don't know if you read one of her very first posts but it was a railing judgement of many of us, myself included. I will quote it here for…[Read more]

Thanks Mike!When I was shown the truth of the literal Son from eternity, I didn't have to dissect scriptures.  It really wasn't hard once I opened my heart to the possibility, truly opened my heart, and putting my past acceptance of a doctrine on the altar, then the scales figuratively fell from my eyes and I began to see that the Son was God…[Read more]

Jack,I answered you there.Kathi

Istari,I never used the words 'incubated inside God' did I? Let these words reflect my thoughts:He was begotten of the Father in a manner inconceivable and inexpressible by men, before any creatures were in being.I made a comparison to a human pregnancy in the past because that is the closest example of what I was thinking, however I do not know…[Read more]

Thanks Keith, I'm moving on…Kathi

Sorry Jack,I didn't understand you…Can we move on?

Jack,I agree with Gill on this: that formerly God spoke by many persons, by the prophets, but now by one only, “by his Son”; who is so not by creation, nor by adoption, nor by office, but by nature; being his own Son, his proper Son, begotten of him, of the same nature with him, and equal to him; and so infinitely preferable to the prophets: he is…[Read more]

Keith,Keith, it wasn't all Mike's doing to have all this confusion, Jack created an attack thread himself regarding this topic. But like Mike just showed you, you did answer the question with a 'no' and it was the clear question about 'according to these scholars' so I think that you can take 'some' of the blame for the confusion here.…

Quote (Lightenup @ April 04 2011,16:28)Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ April 04 2011,15:15)Quote (Lightenup @ April 05 2011,06:46)You are right Jack, this poll is unnecessary and I'm sure Mike will see that…we all make mistakes.  One thing about polls as you can see with this one, is that you can vote/lie anonymously and no will know who you are and…[Read more]

Oh the drama continues…Ok Mike…I can see that there was confusion and I think that I am catching Dennison's headache, ha. Let Keith clear it up. Maybe he will end up apologizing for adding to the confusion and everyone will go home happy.Kathi

Ok Dennison-son,I hope you feel better soon. Maybe you should spend more time reading “Chicken Soup for the Soul” than message boards.Sorry you are ill.Kathi

Hi Dennison,Just wondering if you have a response to my last post on the previous page. Kathi

Quote (Istari @ April 05 2011,12:50)Kathi,Only asking, not debating:How is it that no one has ever taught that God incubated 'He who was to become Jesus' inside himself before birthing him (Since God is considered to be MALE who gave birth to The Son and who Begot him?)In all the debates that have gone on in this forum how is it it is only in…[Read more]

You are welcome, Keith.Kathi