Mike,You said:Quote It seems this info was put together by a man, who like you, isn't happy with Jesus being divine, but wants Jesus to be the very God he is the Son of.That is your consistent error that is contributing to keeping your intellect blinded. Think of the mitosis single cell example. There is a parent cell with all that makes up its…[Read more]

I am trying to copy something from this link, Mike. Were you able to copy and paste to quote part of this?http://ebookbrowse.com/underst….667985#

Mike, your answer is Yashua.

So Mike show me the definition of EHEYEH in the four dictionaries you have been mentioning and also show me the interlinears that show Exodus 3:14 with EHEYEH as YHWH. When you can show me this, then you will be showing me in a way that you insist that I show you. Also, don't bother replying till you have also read this evidence for MarYah found…[Read more]

Well Bd, mitosis is a reality and it is God's design and it does demonstrate the fact that one living organism becomes two equal living organisms through the development taking place of what was already within it. That is all I set out to demonstrate. I obviously did not set out to say God was a single celled organism. He is the creator of the…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 10 2012,10:43)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,23:02)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,19:00)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,13:14)Mike,I would say that the rays came from within the sun and were always within the sun till the sun began to shine forth.Can you give me an example from nature where the thing begotten was…[Read more]

BD,Mitosis answered these questions from Mike:Quote Can you give me an example from nature where the thing begotten was “ALWAYS” within the thing that begot it?Can you give an example where the one who was begotten wasn't also subject to a time when he did not exist?Would you agree that mitosis shows an example where the thing begotten was always…[Read more]

Mike,you said:Quote So? Read my post above this one. Kathi, if the Hebrews decided to substitute “YHWH” with “Adonay” so they didn't have to use the divine name, and some Hebrews later translated the NT into Hebrew, and used the word “Adonay” ever time “kurios” referred to Jesus, it still would not make the word “Adonay” MEAN “Jehovah”, nor…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 10 2012,18:36)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 10 2012,11:09)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 09 2012,19:13)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,21:10)“In 7,000 Aramaic Tanakh references there is not one instance of MarYah (in its singularform) applying to anyone other than YHWH! Furthermore, the Peshitta New Testamentalways renders Tanakh…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,22:10)Mike,This actually seems the most explanative about the MarYah name in the Aramaic. You should read this one.http://ebookbrowse.com/underst….5667985On page 9, the author says:”In 7,000 Aramaic Tanakh references there is not one instance of MarYah (in its singularform) applying to anyone other than YHWH!…[Read more]

Mike,Quote Is there a particular translation with which you agree on every single word and verse interpretation? Which one?The Aramaic Bible in Plain English looks pretty good so far. Quote And so far, you have mostly used the Aramaic NT only to bolster support of your belief that Jesus IS Jehovah. Well, it has become apparent from dictionaries…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 09 2012,19:13)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,21:10)“In 7,000 Aramaic Tanakh references there is not one instance of MarYah (in its singularform) applying to anyone other than YHWH! Furthermore, the Peshitta New Testamentalways renders Tanakh passages that it quotes from YHWH to MarYah.”Okay Kathi,Let me mess with the…[Read more]

Quote (bodhitharta @ Aug. 09 2012,22:11)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 09 2012,14:29)BD,Perhaps the role of parents in the family would help you understand what I am saying. The husband is the head of the wife, yet they are considered one flesh…right?The husband and wife are equally human…right?The husband and wife are together the supreme human…[Read more]

BD,you said:Quote Brought forth from where? You keep insisting there are two different states or positions of Jesus but yet you keep saying his status is Eternal.You don't say the Father was brought forth, do you? Kathi The Father IS GOD, The One and Only any other god or sons of God is an appointing, anointing or some other God Given designation.…[Read more]

Ahhh, sweet revenge! That's a thought though…aromatic curtain rods. I wonder if I can put potpourri in mine and have it smell real nice all the time?? I could change it for the seasons-Apples n cinnamon for the fall maybe!!Regarding the Purina diet…I think that I would prefer the Kibbles 'n bits diet Thanks for the great ideas…[Read more]

William,Those were funny…that would cure my hiccups too!

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,23:02)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,19:00)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,13:14)Mike,I would say that the rays came from within the sun and were always within the sun till the sun began to shine forth.Can you give me an example from nature where the thing begotten was “ALWAYS” within the thing that begot it?Can…[Read more]

Mike,Jesus is called LORD YHWH in the Aramaic language. Anyway, let's keep this discussion in the Peshitta thread or the discussion with BD thread, ok.

Don't worry about it William. I luv ya, Bro!

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,19:59)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,15:24)Begot means to bring forth into existence that which was in existence within when 'begot' refers to birth.And what thing was ever brought forth into existence which had already existed from eternity?Any examples?Kathi, this grows tiresome after a while.  It is clear that…[Read more]