- This topic has 18,301 replies, 269 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 5 months ago by
Keith.
- AuthorPosts
- September 11, 2009 at 6:27 pm#145664
Cato
ParticipantWhile I have no problem with using incense or the like, as the sense of smell stimulates certain areas of the brain, and can create unconcious symbolic associations I doubt that Satan had this grand plan of anticipating Christian worship in the future so he spread seeds of similar, but false and misleading practices in the past. There is nothing wrong adapting past practices to meet future needs and being pagan especially in pre-christian times does not equate with evil. The pagan priests knew psychology and their worship techniques showed this understanding. Ceremony, largely eschewed in protestant worship, can be a powerful tool as the Vatican well knows. Though I will admit that many are less about God then about moving hidden levers of the mind.
September 11, 2009 at 10:00 pm#158381
bodhithartaParticipantQuote (thethinker @ Sep. 12 2009,05:14) bodhitharta said: Quote As I have already said she is addressing Jehovah for the message is from Jehovah. The Angel is representing God. I thought I had made that point clear long ago.
bd,
You evaded the point long ago. I had pointed out to you that Hagar called the One she saw “the God who sees me.”“You are the God who sees; for Have I also here seen Him who sees me.”
The One Hagar called “God” is the very One she saw with her own eyes. She saw the Messenger. She said of the Messenger she saw “The God who sees me.”
thinker
You are still not making a point other than to agree with me that a representative may be addressed as the one who sent him but that wouldn't make the messenger “be” the one who sent the message.Your doing good though you seem to be starting to get a monotheistic consciousness.
CA and WJ are much more polytheistic than you and they seem to really be cold in my opinion, you see warmth comes from intimacy.
While we know that polygamy was allowed we saw the greatest intimacy with Monogamy.
September 11, 2009 at 11:13 pm#158382KangarooJack
Participantbodhitharta said:
Quote You are still not making a point other than to agree with me that a representative may be addressed as the one who sent him but that wouldn't make the messenger “be” the one who sent the message.
The Messenger Himself could not say “I am the God of your fathers” unless that Messenger was God (Exodus 3:6). The Messenger Himself could not say “I will multiply your seed” unless that Messenger shared God's name. Get real!Your assertion that a messenger may be addressed as God without being God is nonsense. You are just trying to explain the narrative away. If you really believed this you would have no problem with addressing Jesus as God.
bodhitharta:
Quote Your doing good though you seem to be starting to get a monotheistic consciousness.
You're a hoot!
bodhitharta:
Quote CA and WJ are much more polytheistic than you and they seem to really be cold in my opinion, you see warmth comes from intimacy.

thinker
September 11, 2009 at 11:15 pm#158383NickHassan
ParticipantHi TT,
Such logic has led you to falsely conclude angels are God.
Think again.God can speak though any submitted vessel.
September 12, 2009 at 2:36 am#158384
GeneBalthropParticipantThinker…….So what is Protestants and Catholics excuse for Killing each other of in Ireland because of their “TRUE” belif systems of the TRINITY, seeing they (BOTH) have the “TRUE” teachings of GOD. Athanaus and Ariens are both wrong, but Athanaus More wrong. But two wrongs don't make a right either. At least the Ariens new Jesus was not the GOD of CREATION. 2Ths2..> show that from the (mist) (Athanaus) and (Ariens)…….would come forth the (MAN OF SIN) and it happened when the teaching of the TRINITY turned Jesus from and ordinary man to a GOD. All who teach it are guilty of IDOLATRY. IMO
peace and love…………………..gene
September 12, 2009 at 3:53 am#145725princess of the king
Participantwonder where the origin of bowing down to molden/carved images started?
September 12, 2009 at 6:57 am#158385princess of the king
ParticipantQuote You are correct that Constantine is responsible for the freedom of all religions to worship God as they saw fit. to worship god as they saw fit…………explains alot.
September 12, 2009 at 7:52 am#158386Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote CA and WJ are much more polytheistic than you and they seem to really be cold in my opinion O, boo hoo. Why don't you find a corner and cry in it. I'd be relieved to find out that you're really a girl. Then at least I'd understand.
Can't take the heat of debate, can you. Not very characteristic of Muslim men I've known.
September 12, 2009 at 8:14 am#158387KangarooJack
ParticipantQuote (Gene @ Sep. 12 2009,14:36) Thinker…….So what is Protestants and Catholics excuse for Killing each other of in Ireland because of their “TRUE” belif systems of the TRINITY, seeing they (BOTH) have the “TRUE” teachings of GOD. Athanaus and Ariens are both wrong, but Athanaus More wrong. But two wrongs don't make a right either. At least the Ariens new Jesus was not the GOD of CREATION. 2Ths2..> show that from the (mist) (Athanaus) and (Ariens)…….would come forth the (MAN OF SIN) and it happened when the teaching of the TRINITY turned Jesus from and ordinary man to a GOD. All who teach it are guilty of IDOLATRY. IMO peace and love…………………..gene
Don't forget Muslim extremists who oppress women and kill in the name of Allah. These are anti-trinitarians. Shouldn't you condemn ALL killings?thinker
September 12, 2009 at 8:15 am#158388KangarooJack
ParticipantQuote (princess of the king @ Sep. 12 2009,18:57) Quote You are correct that Constantine is responsible for the freedom of all religions to worship God as they saw fit. to worship god as they saw fit…………explains alot.
Your point being….thinker
September 12, 2009 at 1:31 pm#145768
GeneBalthropParticipantCA………..I don't think Satan did Such a bad Job , the Catholic's and the Protestants , bought into the concept of the TRINITY years later. IMO
gene
September 12, 2009 at 4:53 pm#145777KangarooJack
ParticipantQuote (Gene @ Sep. 13 2009,01:31) CA………..I don't think Satan did Such a bad Job , the Catholic's and the Protestants , bought into the concept of the TRINITY years later. IMO gene
“Looking for that blessed hope the glorious appearing of the great God and Savior Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13)So Paul was a Satan inspired Catholic or Protestant.
thinker
September 12, 2009 at 6:13 pm#145785NickHassan
ParticipantHi TT,
How does this help your trinity idea?
Having several gods does not seem to.September 12, 2009 at 11:59 pm#158389princess of the king
ParticipantQuote (thethinker @ Sep. 12 2009,20:15) Quote (princess of the king @ Sep. 12 2009,18:57) Quote You are correct that Constantine is responsible for the freedom of all religions to worship God as they saw fit. to worship god as they saw fit…………explains alot.
Your point being….thinker
read your statement twice if needed, take some time and think about it…….you will get to the point, if not let me know father willing I'll walk you through it.kol tuv
September 13, 2009 at 12:37 am#158390
bodhithartaParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Sep. 12 2009,19:52) Quote CA and WJ are much more polytheistic than you and they seem to really be cold in my opinion O, boo hoo. Why don't you find a corner and cry in it. I'd be relieved to find out that you're really a girl. Then at least I'd understand.
Can't take the heat of debate, can you. Not very characteristic of Muslim men I've known.
What heat? You don't even believe in what you claim you believe in, it's impossible.Is Christ a mediator or not? Yes or No?
September 13, 2009 at 1:54 am#158391Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote (bodhitharta @ Sep. 13 2009,12:37) Quote (CatholicApologist @ Sep. 12 2009,19:52) Quote CA and WJ are much more polytheistic than you and they seem to really be cold in my opinion O, boo hoo. Why don't you find a corner and cry in it. I'd be relieved to find out that you're really a girl. Then at least I'd understand.
Can't take the heat of debate, can you. Not very characteristic of Muslim men I've known.
What heat? You don't even believe in what you claim you believe in, it's impossible.Is Christ a mediator or not? Yes or No?
Didn't like being talked to like a man, did you?Yes. The man Christ Jesus is the mediator between God and man.
Remember that He assumed our humanity and joined it with His divinity. Great is the mystery of godliness, God was manifest in the flesh…
September 13, 2009 at 5:24 am#158392Worshipping Jesus
ParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Sep. 12 2009,21:54) Quote (bodhitharta @ Sep. 13 2009,12:37) Quote (CatholicApologist @ Sep. 12 2009,19:52) Quote CA and WJ are much more polytheistic than you and they seem to really be cold in my opinion O, boo hoo. Why don't you find a corner and cry in it. I'd be relieved to find out that you're really a girl. Then at least I'd understand.
Can't take the heat of debate, can you. Not very characteristic of Muslim men I've known.
What heat? You don't even believe in what you claim you believe in, it's impossible.Is Christ a mediator or not? Yes or No?
Didn't like being talked to like a man, did you?Yes. The man Christ Jesus is the mediator between God and man.
Remember that He assumed our humanity and joined it with His divinity. Great is the mystery of godliness, God was manifest in the flesh…
HI CAWell said, but it is to simple for the carnal and unregenerate mind of man to recieve, for they stumble over it!
He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them. John 12:40
John quotes Isaiah from Isa chapter 6 when Isaiah saw the Glory of YHWH who the Apostle John attributes to the Glory of Jesus.
The key is when their eyes are opened then they will see that Jesus is YHWH who Isaiah saw, but as it is written this has happened to them…
He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them. John 12:40
WJ
September 13, 2009 at 5:42 am#158393NickHassan
ParticipantHi WJ,
Does it take a spiritual mind to accept what is not in scripture?
Drop the catholic stuff and you will have some credulitySeptember 13, 2009 at 7:38 am#158394Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ Sep. 13 2009,17:42) Hi WJ,
Does it take a spiritual mind to accept what is not in scripture?
Drop the catholic stuff and you will have some credulity
Yeah, I get it…you are all the same. “Drop the Catholic stuff”You can have credulity if you are JW, Muslim, Mormon, snake handler….
You guys disagree with each other on a myriad of points. Yet when it comes to the one Church Jesus established and left behind, you are all like an old boys' club.
You can agree on two things:
1. You don't like the Church
2. You can't afford to re-think Sola Scriptura (even though you can't support it Scripturally)
September 13, 2009 at 8:31 am#158395KangarooJack
ParticipantWorshippingJesus said:
Quote John quotes Isaiah from Isa chapter 6 when Isaiah saw the Glory of YHWH who the Apostle John attributes to the Glory of Jesus. Yes WJ,
The point you made has been made before by us and it has fallen on deaf ears. All anti-trinitarians, the whole Heinz 57 mix of them do not allow the new testament to interpret the old.thinker
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

