- This topic has 25,959 replies, 116 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by Keith.
- AuthorPosts
- July 4, 2012 at 6:35 pm#304982mikeboll64Blocked
Kerwin, is there at least one time in scripture when the phrase “the word of God” does NOT refer to that which comes out of the mouth of God, but to the PERSON Jesus Christ? YES or NO?
July 4, 2012 at 8:09 pm#304991942767ParticipantHi Kerwin:
How did John the baptist recognize the Word of God in Jesus?
Sin is defined as “the transgression of the Law”, and an infant has not transgressed the Law, and therefore, I disagree with you that infants have a sin nature. The scripture states that all of humanity born of the sperm of man have sinned, and that is true. An infants parents are responsible for a child, and so if the parents are not Christians, the child is said to be unclean. Not beca.use the child has sinned, but because the parents do not have a personal relationship with Him. Children of Christian parents are part of the body of Christ as children who are under the law of God through their parents. Of course, once they can make a decision for themselves as to whether or not they want to serve God, they will also have to make that decision.
And so, my understanding is that all infants including Jesus were born in innocence, but the scripture states this:
Quote Isa 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all Quote Gen 8:21 And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart [is] evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done The scripture states that Jesus was born of the seed of David according to the flesh, but no, David was not his biological Father, God was his Father, but in a sense Jesus did have two fathers in that Joseph was his step-father and raised him under the Law of Moses. Jesus asks the Pharisees:
Quote Mat 22:41 ¶ While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, Mat 22:42 Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, [The Son] of David.
Mat 22:43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,
Mat 22:44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?
Mat 22:45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?
Of course, all men born of the sperm man cannot be a part of the kingdom of God unless they are born again, because all men have sinned. And yes, we are saved by faith believing the Word of God, and coming to him with a repentant heart.
You say:
Quote When a person of flesh is born by the Word; the Word becomes flesh and makes a home among them for they become the temple of God’s Spirit. Jesus stated the following:
Quote Jhn 6:63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life. And so, no, the Word of God does not become flesh. If you obey the Word of God, it becomes part of your spirit. But John 1:14 the Logos became flesh, that is, what God had stated concerning his Son into this world became flesh or a reality. Do you see the difference?
Love in Christ,
MartyJuly 4, 2012 at 8:14 pm#304992942767ParticipantQuote (Ed J @ July 04 2012,03:56) Quote (942767 @ July 03 2012,12:52) Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 03 2012,08:48)
And is it scriptural that, WHILE JESUS WAS ON EARTH, he was the only begotten Son of God? YES or NO?
No.
No?
Hi Ed:I said no, because of the following scripture:
Quote Jhn 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: Jhn 1:13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God
But since the disciples did not receive the Holy Ghost until the day of Pentecost, perphaps I should have answered yes instead of no.
Thanks for keeping me honest.
Love in Christ,
MartyJuly 4, 2012 at 8:17 pm#304993942767ParticipantQuote (terraricca @ July 03 2012,15:23) Marty Quote No, the first verse states: In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth.
And, so this had to happen before he tells us about transforming the heavens and the earth and creating the host of them thereof.
what is your NO means you are quoting what I have quoted ??????
Quote The following verse that you posted verifies this: Quote
Heb 11:3 By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visiblethis you muddy it up ,so please clear it up.
Quote The problem is that you want to post scriptures out of context and trying to justify what you believe, and so you post the following scriptures: COL 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
COL 1:16 For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible,But the scriptures in context are as follows:
Quote
Col 1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:Col 1:13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated [us] into the kingdom of his dear Son:
Col 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, [even] the forgiveness of sins:
Col 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
Col 1:16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
Col 1:17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.
Col 1:19 ¶ For it pleased [the Father] that in him should all fulness dwell;
Col 1:20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, , whether [they be] things in earth, or things in heaven.
Col 1:21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in [your] mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled
Col 1:22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:
Col 1:23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and [be] not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, [and] which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
sorry but this “all the verses that Paul talks about his definitively Christ after and before his resurrection and so ;RO 16:25 Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery which has been kept secret for long ages past,
now ;
Col 1:15 Who is (not become )the image of the invisible God, the firstborn ( not of men)of every creature:Col 1:16 For by him were all things created(no exceptions), that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
Col 1:17 And he is before all things(not after all things), and by him all things consist.
those verses are now saying who he his and what has happen ;PAUL UNDER NO CONDITION TALK ABOUT CHRIST ACCOMPLISHMENT AS A MAN ;BUT SHOW HOW GOD DID RECONCILED ALL THING AND BY WHOM GOD DID IT ” HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON THAT HE SEND FROM HEAVEN TO BE BORN OF A WOMEN SO HE COULD BE VESTED LIKE HIS FUTURE BROTHERS,
NOW WEN PAUL SAYS “ALL THINGS WERE CREATED BY HIM “WOULD THAT NOT INCLUDED MARY THE WOMAN THAT GIVE HIM BIRTH AS A HUMAN?? OR ALL THINGS ARE WITH EXCLUSIVES SO WHAT WOULD BE NOT INCLUDED IN THE “IN ALL THINGS”
NOW THIS ;
Heb 1:2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things(things not yet done as well), and through whom he made the universe.
Heb 1:3 The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful Word(Christ). After he( the Word of God ,Christ) had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.(so went back to heaven)are not the words of Paul the same in Col;15-20 than in Hebrew 1;as quoted why is it said ???and through whom he made the universe.??? in Col it says this ; For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible,TELL ME WITCH IS A LIE ?
Quote And this one which states that he was foreordained, and he was, but he did not literally exist until he was born into this world of the virgin Mary which the scripture confirms because the scripture again makes reference to his blood. Rev 22:6 The angel said to me, “These words are trustworthy and true. The Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent his angel to show his servants the things that must soon take place.”
Rev 21:14 The wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
Jn 17:6 “I have revealed you to those whom you gave me out of the world. They were yours; you gave them to me and they have obeyed your word.
according to your definition of preordained we have to include THE TWELVE APOSTLES,ALL THE PROPHETS ,AND ALL THE PROPHECIES GIVEN BY GOD ,
NOTICE THAT ALL HAVE PLAY A ROLE IN THE FINAL PLAN OF GOD AND STILL WILL ;TO BRING IT TO ITS END .
Quote In John 6: Jesus makes the statement that he came down from heaven, and he speaks of eating his flesh and drinking his blood, and so he was speaking about himself as a man, and we know that he did not exist as a man until he was born of the virgin Mary. But when he speaks of eating his flesh and drinking his blood, he is actually speaking of what he did for us in the body giving his life through obeying God even unto death on the cross so that we could be saved. He said, in explaining what he meant by eating his flesh and drinking his blood,
YOU are quick to point out what you do not accept with what you do not understand ,and so nullify the words that Christ said ,AND YOU ARE LIVING IN THE TRUTH WITCH ONE ? YOURS OF CAUSE ,NOT GODS TRUTH.
Quote and we know that he did not exist as a man until he was born of the virgin Mary. WE KNOW THAT HE EXISTED IN HEAVEN AND THAT HE WAS SEN BY HIS FATHER TO COME ON EARTH TO FULFILL ALL WHAT WAS SAID ABOUT HIM (THE CHRIST)THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD,MARY WAS PART OF THAT FULFILLMENT AS IT SAYS ;THE MAIDEN WILL GIVE BIRTH OF A SON ;…..JOHN THE BAPTIST TESTIFY TO THIS BY SAYING ; Jn 1:15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’ ”
SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVEN TO ME AND OTHERS THAT YOU DO NOT BELIEVE IN SCRIPTURES UNLESS IT IS WORKED OUT THE WAY YOU SEE IT AND UNDERSTAND IT THAT IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD BY YOU AND SO BY ALL OTHERS ,
SORRY BUT THIS IS NOT THE WAY THAT SCRIPTURES ARE TEACHING THE WORDS OF GOD AND IT NOT THE WAY CHRIST HAS TEACHES ,SO I STICK WITH SCRIPTURES ,AND YOU CAN STICK TO YOUR OWN MEN MADE CONCEPT.
ThesaurusLegend: Synonyms Related Words Antonyms
Adj.1.foreordained – established or prearranged unalterably; “his place in history was foreordained”; “a sense of predestinate inevitability about it”; “it seemed predestined since the beginning of the world”
predestinate, predestined
sure, certain – certain to occur; destined or inevitable; “he was certain to fail”; “his fate is certain”; “In this life nothing is certain but death and taxes”- Benjamin Franklin; “he faced certain death”; “sudden but sure regret”; “he is sure to win”
Based on WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. © 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc.UNDERSTAND THAT THE WORDS OF GOD NEVER FAILS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED ,BUT THE TRUTH HIS THE TRUTH ,ALL THINGS HAVE BEEN CREATED THROUGH HIM ..ALL THINGS ..ALL THINGS
COL 1:26 that is, the mystery which has been hidden from the past ages and generations, but has now been manifested to His saints,
COL 1:27 to whom God willed to make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.
Hi Pierre:There is no use continuing this converstation with you, I will just pray that God will correct me if I am wrong in my understanding of His Word, and that He will correct you if you are wrong.
Love in Christ,
MartyJuly 4, 2012 at 9:19 pm#305000terrariccaParticipantQuote (942767 @ July 05 2012,14:17) Quote (terraricca @ July 03 2012,15:23) Marty Quote No, the first verse states: In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth.
And, so this had to happen before he tells us about transforming the heavens and the earth and creating the host of them thereof.
what is your NO means you are quoting what I have quoted ??????
Quote The following verse that you posted verifies this: Quote
Heb 11:3 By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visiblethis you muddy it up ,so please clear it up.
Quote The problem is that you want to post scriptures out of context and trying to justify what you believe, and so you post the following scriptures: COL 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
COL 1:16 For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible,But the scriptures in context are as follows:
Quote
Col 1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:Col 1:13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated [us] into the kingdom of his dear Son:
Col 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, [even] the forgiveness of sins:
Col 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
Col 1:16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
Col 1:17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all [things] he might have the preeminence.
Col 1:19 ¶ For it pleased [the Father] that in him should all fulness dwell;
Col 1:20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, , whether [they be] things in earth, or things in heaven.
Col 1:21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in [your] mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled
Col 1:22 In the body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight:
Col 1:23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and [be] not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, [and] which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
sorry but this “all the verses that Paul talks about his definitively Christ after and before his resurrection and so ;RO 16:25 Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery which has been kept secret for long ages past,
now ;
Col 1:15 Who is (not become )the image of the invisible God, the firstborn ( not of men)of every creature:Col 1:16 For by him were all things created(no exceptions), that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
Col 1:17 And he is before all things(not after all things), and by him all things consist.
those verses are now saying who he his and what has happen ;PAUL UNDER NO CONDITION TALK ABOUT CHRIST ACCOMPLISHMENT AS A MAN ;BUT SHOW HOW GOD DID RECONCILED ALL THING AND BY WHOM GOD DID IT ” HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON THAT HE SEND FROM HEAVEN TO BE BORN OF A WOMEN SO HE COULD BE VESTED LIKE HIS FUTURE BROTHERS,
NOW WEN PAUL SAYS “ALL THINGS WERE CREATED BY HIM “WOULD THAT NOT INCLUDED MARY THE WOMAN THAT GIVE HIM BIRTH AS A HUMAN?? OR ALL THINGS ARE WITH EXCLUSIVES SO WHAT WOULD BE NOT INCLUDED IN THE “IN ALL THINGS”
NOW THIS ;
Heb 1:2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things(things not yet done as well), and through whom he made the universe.
Heb 1:3 The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful Word(Christ). After he( the Word of God ,Christ) had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.(so went back to heaven)are not the words of Paul the same in Col;15-20 than in Hebrew 1;as quoted why is it said ???and through whom he made the universe.??? in Col it says this ; For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible,TELL ME WITCH IS A LIE ?
Quote And this one which states that he was foreordained, and he was, but he did not literally exist until he was born into this world of the virgin Mary which the scripture confirms because the scripture again makes reference to his blood. Rev 22:6 The angel said to me, “These words are trustworthy and true. The Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent his angel to show his servants the things that must soon take place.”
Rev 21:14 The wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
Jn 17:6 “I have revealed you to those whom you gave me out of the world. They were yours; you gave them to me and they have obeyed your word.
according to your definition of preordained we have to include THE TWELVE APOSTLES,ALL THE PROPHETS ,AND ALL THE PROPHECIES GIVEN BY GOD ,
NOTICE THAT ALL HAVE PLAY A ROLE IN THE FINAL P
LAN OF GOD AND STILL WILL ;TO BRING IT TO ITS END .Quote In John 6: Jesus makes the statement that he came down from heaven, and he speaks of eating his flesh and drinking his blood, and so he was speaking about himself as a man, and we know that he did not exist as a man until he was born of the virgin Mary. But when he speaks of eating his flesh and drinking his blood, he is actually speaking of what he did for us in the body giving his life through obeying God even unto death on the cross so that we could be saved. He said, in explaining what he meant by eating his flesh and drinking his blood,
YOU are quick to point out what you do not accept with what you do not understand ,and so nullify the words that Christ said ,AND YOU ARE LIVING IN THE TRUTH WITCH ONE ? YOURS OF CAUSE ,NOT GODS TRUTH.
Quote and we know that he did not exist as a man until he was born of the virgin Mary. WE KNOW THAT HE EXISTED IN HEAVEN AND THAT HE WAS SEN BY HIS FATHER TO COME ON EARTH TO FULFILL ALL WHAT WAS SAID ABOUT HIM (THE CHRIST)THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD,MARY WAS PART OF THAT FULFILLMENT AS IT SAYS ;THE MAIDEN WILL GIVE BIRTH OF A SON ;…..JOHN THE BAPTIST TESTIFY TO THIS BY SAYING ; Jn 1:15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’ ”
SO FAR YOU HAVE PROVEN TO ME AND OTHERS THAT YOU DO NOT BELIEVE IN SCRIPTURES UNLESS IT IS WORKED OUT THE WAY YOU SEE IT AND UNDERSTAND IT THAT IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD BY YOU AND SO BY ALL OTHERS ,
SORRY BUT THIS IS NOT THE WAY THAT SCRIPTURES ARE TEACHING THE WORDS OF GOD AND IT NOT THE WAY CHRIST HAS TEACHES ,SO I STICK WITH SCRIPTURES ,AND YOU CAN STICK TO YOUR OWN MEN MADE CONCEPT.
ThesaurusLegend: Synonyms Related Words Antonyms
Adj.1.foreordained – established or prearranged unalterably; “his place in history was foreordained”; “a sense of predestinate inevitability about it”; “it seemed predestined since the beginning of the world”
predestinate, predestined
sure, certain – certain to occur; destined or inevitable; “he was certain to fail”; “his fate is certain”; “In this life nothing is certain but death and taxes”- Benjamin Franklin; “he faced certain death”; “sudden but sure regret”; “he is sure to win”
Based on WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. © 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc.UNDERSTAND THAT THE WORDS OF GOD NEVER FAILS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED ,BUT THE TRUTH HIS THE TRUTH ,ALL THINGS HAVE BEEN CREATED THROUGH HIM ..ALL THINGS ..ALL THINGS
COL 1:26 that is, the mystery which has been hidden from the past ages and generations, but has now been manifested to His saints,
COL 1:27 to whom God willed to make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.
Hi Pierre:There is no use continuing this converstation with you, I will just pray that God will correct me if I am wrong in my understanding of His Word, and that He will correct you if you are wrong.
Love in Christ,
Marty
July 4, 2012 at 9:23 pm#305002terrariccaParticipantQuote (942767 @ July 05 2012,14:14) Quote (Ed J @ July 04 2012,03:56) Quote (942767 @ July 03 2012,12:52) Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 03 2012,08:48)
And is it scriptural that, WHILE JESUS WAS ON EARTH, he was the only begotten Son of God? YES or NO?
No.
No?
Hi Ed:I said no, because of the following scripture:
Quote Jhn 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: Jhn 1:13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God
But since the disciples did not receive the Holy Ghost until the day of Pentecost, perphaps I should have answered yes instead of no.
Thanks for keeping me honest.
Love in Christ,
Marty
MartyJn 20:22 And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit.
this was 50 days before the high room
July 4, 2012 at 11:33 pm#305008kerwinParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ July 05 2012,00:35) Kerwin, is there at least one time in scripture when the phrase “the word of God” does NOT refer to that which comes out of the mouth of God, but to the PERSON Jesus Christ? YES or NO?
Mike;I know of no Scriptures where Jesus is explicitly called the Word of God even as he is called Faithful and True. I do of know one that states by the name of the Word just as he is called by the name of Faithful and True.
So do the names Faithful and True loose their meaning when Jesus called by them? I hold they do not but rather they make up who Jesus is; the same is true of the Word of God.
July 4, 2012 at 11:51 pm#305012mikeboll64BlockedQuote (kerwin @ July 04 2012,17:33) Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 05 2012,00:35) Kerwin, is there at least one time in scripture when the phrase “the word of God” does NOT refer to that which comes out of the mouth of God, but to the PERSON Jesus Christ? YES or NO?
Mike;I know of no Scriptures where Jesus is explicitly called the Word of God even as he is called Faithful and True.
Kerwin, you have just said to me: Mike;You are claiming Jesus has the title utterance of God. I am saying he bears that title because his shape and words are the utterance of God.
So I ask you: Does Jesus have as one of his many titles “the Word of God”? YES or NO?
July 5, 2012 at 12:22 am#305018kerwinParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ July 05 2012,05:51) Quote (kerwin @ July 04 2012,17:33) Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 05 2012,00:35) Kerwin, is there at least one time in scripture when the phrase “the word of God” does NOT refer to that which comes out of the mouth of God, but to the PERSON Jesus Christ? YES or NO?
Mike;I know of no Scriptures where Jesus is explicitly called the Word of God even as he is called Faithful and True.
Kerwin, you have just said to me: Mike;You are claiming Jesus has the title utterance of God. I am saying he bears that title because his shape and words are the utterance of God.
So I ask you: Does Jesus have as one of his many titles “the Word of God”? YES or NO?
Mike;You are correct that I have already answered that question; though not with the yes or no you seem to prefer. I prefer essay answers in attempt to remove ambiguity and correct context. In this case we both seem to agree that Jesus has been given the title of the Word and so I am going into what that title means and why he was given it.
>Jesus bears the title Faithful because his actions are faithful.
>Jesus bears the title True because his actions are true.
>Jesus bears the title Word because his actions are the same as the Word.
July 5, 2012 at 12:29 am#305019terrariccaParticipantQuote (kerwin @ July 05 2012,18:22) Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 05 2012,05:51) Quote (kerwin @ July 04 2012,17:33) Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 05 2012,00:35) Kerwin, is there at least one time in scripture when the phrase “the word of God” does NOT refer to that which comes out of the mouth of God, but to the PERSON Jesus Christ? YES or NO?
Mike;I know of no Scriptures where Jesus is explicitly called the Word of God even as he is called Faithful and True.
Kerwin, you have just said to me: Mike;You are claiming Jesus has the title utterance of God. I am saying he bears that title because his shape and words are the utterance of God.
So I ask you: Does Jesus have as one of his many titles “the Word of God”? YES or NO?
Mike;You are correct that I have already answered that question; though not with the yes or no you seem to prefer. I prefer essay answers in attempt to remove ambiguity and correct context. In this case we both seem to agree that Jesus has been given the title of the Word and so I am going into what that title means and why he was given it.
>Jesus bears the title Faithful because his actions are faithful.
>Jesus bears the title True because his actions are true.
>Jesus bears the title Word because his actions are the same as the Word.
kQuote so I am going into what that title means and why he was given it. so you can read Gods mind this is extraordinary ,you are a first man after Christ ;hmm hmm
July 5, 2012 at 12:40 am#305020mikeboll64BlockedQuote (kerwin @ July 04 2012,18:22) I prefer essay answers in attempt to remove ambiguity and correct context.
I personally think you prefer essay answers to CREATE ambiguity.But since we agree that THE PERSON Jesus Christ is KNOWN to have as one of his titles “the Word of God”,
and we agree that Jesus is KNOWN to have been the only begotten of the Father,
and we agree that Jesus was “made by Jehovah in the likeness of humanity” (your words),
then it makes perfect logical AND scriptural sense that the Word of God who was with the Father in the beginning, but was then made into a human being, and dwelled as a human being on earth with the glory of the only begotten of the Father, is one and the same person as the one who bears the title “the Word of God” in Rev 19:13.
Can you scripturally refute any of these points, Kerwin?
Kerwin, who alone dwelled on earth with the glory of God's only begotten?
July 5, 2012 at 4:11 am#305026kerwinParticipantMarty,
Quote How did John the Baptist recognize the Word of God in Jesus? I am not sure it is written but it seems reasonable that he listened to the Spirit that spoke through him. It is clear he did from the words of John 1:15 and Matthew 3:14.
Quote Sin is defined as “the transgression of the Law”, and an infant has not transgressed the Law, and therefore, I disagree with you that infants have a sin nature. All human beings have the nature of sin as a result of the Fall; infants being humans are no exception. But Scripture declares that those who sin due to a true lack of knowledge receive fewer stripes than those that have knowledge, Luke 12:48. Infants do not have a righteousness and holiness that is like God’s but Jesus did as an infant and still does.
Quote The scripture states that Jesus was born of the seed of David according to the flesh, but no, David was not his biological Father, God was his Father. Unlike the Pharisees, you answer Jesus’ “how” question in Matthew 22:45 when you state “Jesus was born of the seed of David”. I am confused how you believe someone can be the father of the flesh but not the biological father as genes are part of the flesh. Scripture declares Jesus a human and not a hybrid.
July 5, 2012 at 9:10 am#305030ProclaimerParticipantQuote (Ed J @ June 13 2012,06:53) Quote (t8 @ June 12 2012,22:04) Nick, the Word was not THE God.
Hi T8, opinions are NOT EVIDENCE. Scripture please?Three big logic fallacies that I see presented here:
1. Opinions: opinions are presented as evidence.
2. Scenarios: scenarios are presented as proof.
3. Consensus: consensus is seen as conformationGod bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Wrong EdJ.Read the Greek. It is not saying that THE Word was THE God. The definite article is absent in John 1:1c. This is understood by all and can be checked by anyone.
I didn't make it up. It is a verifiable fact. Check it out for yourself if you don't believe us.
Why try and create a stumbling block here. You are wasting your stumbling block time because it is easy to check.
July 5, 2012 at 9:15 am#305031ProclaimerParticipantThere are a number of people in this thread that clearly disagree with these words.
That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched —this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ. We write this to make our joy complete.
I happen to agree with it and I am guessing that Mike and Terricca agree according to what I have read of their posts on this subject.
But I am pretty sure that some others have a problem with it. And I am guessing that these same people will say they don't have a problem with it, even though they do.
July 5, 2012 at 1:13 pm#305034terrariccaParticipantt8
Quote That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched —this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ. We write this to make our joy complete. I happen to agree with it and I am guessing that Mike and Terricca agree according to what I have read of their posts on this subject.
you guessed right ,I do agree with those scriptures the way they have been written,
LK 6:46 “ Why do you call Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?(or believe what I say )
Jn 3:11 I tell you the truth, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony.
Jn 3:12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?I WANDER
July 5, 2012 at 3:50 pm#305037Frank4YAHWEHParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ June 20 2012,10:25) I'm not sure “peculiar” is the word I would use. But you're not all bad, Frank. I have learned from your posts about the Trinity Doctrine and God's Name, etc.
I still consider you a brother in that we both worship and serve only one God, Yahweh, and hold His only begotten Son in the highest esteem as our Lord, whom Yahweh set up over us and the church.
Mike,I do not consider you as “a brother” and I do serve “YOUR one God”.
July 5, 2012 at 5:20 pm#305040kerwinParticipantMike;
Quote then it makes perfect logical AND scriptural sense that the Word of God who was with the Father in the beginning, but was then made into a human being, and dwelled as a human being on earth with the glory of the only begotten of the Father, is one and the same person as the one who bears the title “the Word of God” in Rev 19:13. Where did you get person?
Jesus did not come to be called by the name of the Word until the Word was made flesh; except in God’s mind and through his prophecy.
Where did you get “made into” as I find that instead he was “made in the likeness of men” and “made like unto his brethren”.
>How is Jesus the Son of David?
>How is Jesus the Son of God?
Both these questions are answered by Scripture; the second when John speaks of the Word and the life therein.
July 5, 2012 at 5:51 pm#305042Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ July 05 2012,20:10) Quote (Ed J @ June 13 2012,06:53) Quote (t8 @ June 12 2012,22:04) Nick, the Word was not THE God.
Hi T8, opinions are NOT EVIDENCE. Scripture please?Three big logic fallacies that I see presented here:
1. Opinions: opinions are presented as evidence.
2. Scenarios: scenarios are presented as proof.
3. Consensus: consensus is seen as conformationGod bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Wrong EdJ.Read the Greek. It is not saying that THE Word was THE God. The definite article is absent in John 1:1c. This is understood by all and can be checked by anyone.
I didn't make it up. It is a verifiable fact. Check it out for yourself if you don't believe us.
Why try and create a stumbling block here. You are wasting your stumbling block time because it is easy to check.
Hi T8,Having the definite article or leaving it out makes no difference.
Do you have any evidence to suggest otherwise? …if you do, please produce it?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgJuly 5, 2012 at 5:55 pm#305043Frank4YAHWEHParticipantJuly 5, 2012 at 8:03 pm#305047terrariccaParticipantQuote (kerwin @ July 06 2012,11:20) Mike; Quote then it makes perfect logical AND scriptural sense that the Word of God who was with the Father in the beginning, but was then made into a human being, and dwelled as a human being on earth with the glory of the only begotten of the Father, is one and the same person as the one who bears the title “the Word of God” in Rev 19:13. Where did you get person?
Jesus did not come to be called by the name of the Word until the Word was made flesh; except in God’s mind and through his prophecy.
Where did you get “made into” as I find that instead he was “made in the likeness of men” and “made like unto his brethren”.
>How is Jesus the Son of David?
>How is Jesus the Son of God?
Both these questions are answered by Scripture; the second when John speaks of the Word and the life therein.
Jesus did not come to be called by the name of the Word until the Word was made flesh; except in God’s mind and through his prophecy.SO KERWIN YOU ARE A MIND READER
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.