JOHN 1:1 who is the WORD?

[Ed J]

Quote (kerwin @ May 10 2012,09:19)

Quote (Ed J @ May 09 2012,14:34) Hi Jammin, The N.I.V. is corrupt as well. God bless Ed J Ed. J, The NIV has a note about John 1:14 because early manuscripts disagree.  Jammin does not include the note.

Hi Kerwin,

The manuscripts disagree because both the 'Codex Sinaiticvs' and the 'Codex Vaticanvs' are corrupt Greek texts.
The 'Nestle Test', which is a blending of the two, is what the N.I.V. was translated from.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Quote (jammin @ May 10 2012,11:26)

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 10 2012,06:06) Hi Jammin, Quoting scriptures in greek is no guarantee corruption is excluded. But modern versions like the NIV do not even attempt to remain true to the manuscripts. oh… LOL then make your own bible! no version that says that the WORD in john 1.1 is the HS make your own bible boy! LOL

Hi Jammin,

If you agree altered texts mean nothing, then
why do you bolster these corrupted versions?

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Quote (jammin @ May 10 2012,11:29)

edj, read the context and do not jump to the other verses like a grasshopper LOL the greek also says that the word in john 1.1 is the begotten son! the son of GOD! study hard boy LOL

Hi Jammin,

No, it doesn't.
It instead says…
The Word was GOD.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 10 2012,14:19)

Hi EDE, God looks after His word The KJV gets no mention

Hi Nick,

Where is his word that he is “looking after” it?

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
Not wrapped in a KJV cover.
The Spirit will help you

[NickHassan]

Hi Ed,
If you claim the KJV is the one and only anointed version you say more than God does.

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 10 2012,14:38)

Hi ED, Not wrapped in a KJV cover. The Spirit will help you

Hi Nick,

If not there, then where?

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
Do you really think God has one magic version?
If that was the case you would not need His Spirit.

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 10 2012,14:53)

Quote (Ed J @ May 10 2012,14:44) Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 10 2012,14:38) Quote (Ed J @ May 10 2012,14:34) Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 10 2012,14:19) Hi EDE, God looks after His word The KJV gets no mention Hi Nick, Where is his word that he is “looking after” it? God bless Ed J Hi ED, Not wrapped in a KJV cover. The Spirit will help you Hi Nick, If not there, then where? God bless Ed J Hi ED, Do you really think God has one magic version? If that was the case you would not need His Spirit.

Hi Nick,

Just in case you didn't know, this opinion does not address my question.
Which is: if not there, then where? will you please answer my question?

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[kerwin]

Quote (Ed J @ May 10 2012,09:23)

Quote (kerwin @ May 10 2012,09:19) Quote (Ed J @ May 09 2012,14:34) Hi Jammin, The N.I.V. is corrupt as well. God bless Ed J Ed. J, The NIV has a note about John 1:14 because early manuscripts disagree.  Jammin does not include the note. Hi Kerwin, The manuscripts disagree because both the 'Codex Sinaiticvs' and the 'Codex Vaticanvs' are corrupt Greek texts. The 'Nestle Test', which is a blending of the two, is what the N.I.V. was translated from. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

Ed,

I was mistaken as the NIV does not have a note.

Why should I engage in vain arguments.

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
It is not that easy-one perfect version-problem solved.

[Ed J]

Quote (kerwin @ May 10 2012,17:02)

Quote (Ed J @ May 10 2012,09:23) Quote (kerwin @ May 10 2012,09:19) Quote (Ed J @ May 09 2012,14:34) Hi Jammin, The N.I.V. is corrupt as well. God bless Ed J Ed. J, The NIV has a note about John 1:14 because early manuscripts disagree.  Jammin does not include the note. Hi Kerwin, The manuscripts disagree because both the 'Codex Sinaiticvs' and the 'Codex Vaticanvs' are corrupt Greek texts. The 'Nestle Test', which is a blending of the two, is what the N.I.V. was translated from. God bless Ed J Ed, I was mistaken as the NIV does not have a note. Why should  I engage in vain arguments.

Hi Kerwin,

I'm just merely bringing these facts to your attention.
I have no intention to argue with you, whether
you choose to believe these facts or not.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 10 2012,18:17)

Hi ED, It is not that easy-one perfect version-problem solved.

What?

[jammin]

Quote (Ed J @ May 10 2012,14:31)

Quote (jammin @ May 10 2012,11:29) edj, read the context and do not jump to the other verses like a grasshopper LOL the greek also says that the word in john 1.1 is the begotten son! the son of GOD! study hard boy LOL Hi Jammin, No, it doesn't. It instead says… The Word was GOD. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

LOL

read a greek bible and you will know!

stop fooling people edj.
ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 1:14-18

14 και ο λογος σαρξ εγενετο και εσκηνωσεν εν ημιν και εθεασαμεθα την δοξαν αυτου δοξαν ως μονογενους παρα πατρος πληρης χαριτος και αληθειας

15 ιωαννης μαρτυρει περι αυτου και κεκραγεν λεγων ουτος ην ον ειπον ο οπισω μου ερχομενος εμπροσθεν μου γεγονεν οτι πρωτος μου ην

16 και εκ του πληρωματος αυτου ημεις παντες ελαβομεν και χαριν αντι χαριτος

17 οτι ο νομος δια μωσεως εδοθη η χαρις και η αληθεια δια ιησου χριστου εγενετο

18 θεον ουδεις εωρακεν πωποτε ο μονογενης υιος ο ων εις τον κολπον του πατρος εκεινος εξηγησατο

you need to study greek boy! LOL

no greek scholar would accept your belief. every one who knows how to read greek will accept that the word in john 1.1 is the son of GOD.

study hard boy LOL

[jammin]

nick,

im not a self appointed as you think. im just saying what the bible says.

believe it or not

[Ed J]

Quote (jammin @ May 10 2012,21:34)

nick, im not a self appointed as you think. im just saying what the bible says. believe it or not

No, you're saying what YOU BELIEVE the bible is saying,
which is actually different from what is actually being said.

[Ed J]

Quote (jammin @ May 10 2012,21:33)

Quote (Ed J @ May 10 2012,14:31) Quote (jammin @ May 10 2012,11:29) edj, read the context and do not jump to the other verses like a grasshopper LOL the greek also says that the word in john 1.1 is the begotten son! the son of GOD! study hard boy LOL Hi Jammin, No, it doesn't. It instead says… The Word was GOD. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org LOL read a greek bible and you will know! stop fooling people edj. ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 1:14-18 14 και ο λογος σαρξ εγενετο και εσκηνωσεν εν ημιν και εθεασαμεθα την δοξαν αυτου δοξαν ως μονογενους παρα πατρος πληρης χαριτος και αληθειας 15 ιωαννης μαρτυρει περι αυτου και κεκραγεν λεγων ουτος ην ον ειπον ο οπισω μου ερχομενος εμπροσθεν μου γεγονεν οτι πρωτος μου ην 16 και εκ του πληρωματος αυτου ημεις παντες ελαβομεν και χαριν αντι χαριτος 17 οτι ο νομος δια μωσεως εδοθη η χαρις και η αληθεια δια ιησου χριστου εγενετο 18 θεον ουδεις εωρακεν πωποτε ο μονογενης υιος ο ων εις τον κολπον του πατρος εκεινος εξηγησατο you need to study greek boy! LOL no greek scholar would accept your belief. every one who knows how to read greek will accept that the word in john 1.1 is the son of GOD. study hard boy LOL

Hi Jammin,

John 1:14 is about Jesus becoming “The Christ”,
when he is baptized with God's HolySpirit.
(see Acts 10:38 and 2 Cor 5:19)

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[jammin]

Quote (Ed J @ May 10 2012,22:54)

Quote (jammin @ May 10 2012,21:33) Quote (Ed J @ May 10 2012,14:31) Quote (jammin @ May 10 2012,11:29) edj, read the context and do not jump to the other verses like a grasshopper LOL the greek also says that the word in john 1.1 is the begotten son! the son of GOD! study hard boy LOL Hi Jammin, No, it doesn't. It instead says… The Word was GOD. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org LOL read a greek bible and you will know! stop fooling people edj. ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 1:14-18 14 και ο λογος σαρξ εγενετο και εσκηνωσεν εν ημιν και εθεασαμεθα την δοξαν αυτου δοξαν ως μονογενους παρα πατρος πληρης χαριτος και αληθειας 15 ιωαννης μαρτυρει περι αυτου και κεκραγεν λεγων ουτος ην ον ειπον ο οπισω μου ερχομενος εμπροσθεν μου γεγονεν οτι πρωτος μου ην 16 και εκ του πληρωματος αυτου ημεις παντες ελαβομεν και χαριν αντι χαριτος 17 οτι ο νομος δια μωσεως εδοθη η χαρις και η αληθεια δια ιησου χριστου εγενετο 18 θεον ουδεις εωρακεν πωποτε ο μονογενης υιος ο ων εις τον κολπον του πατρος εκεινος εξηγησατο you need to study greek boy! LOL no greek scholar would accept your belief. every one who knows how to read greek will accept that the word in john 1.1 is the son of GOD. study hard boy LOL   Hi Jammin, John 1:14 is about Jesus becoming “The Christ”, when he is baptized with God's HolySpirit. (see Acts 10:38 and 2 Cor 5:19) God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

oh really??
LOL

no bible scholar will accept your opinion!
study greek boy! LOL

btw, when you read the bible make sure you follow the context and stop jumping to the other verses like a grasshopper.
LOL

[NickHassan]

Hi Jammin,
Bible scholars do not necessarily know God or His son.
Why would you follow them?

[kerwin]

Ed J.

It is written:

Deuteronomy 30:14
New International Version (NIV)

14 No, the word is very near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart so you may obey it.

Deuteronomy 30:14
King James Version (KJV)

14 But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it.

It is faith in the Word that we confess with our mouth and believe in our heart;  Whatever the NIV, KJV, or any  other version speaks that is from God believe;  Whatever it speaks that is not from God do not believe.  God is a living God that draws those that believe unto him; but not those who make Scripture their God.

[Author]

Posts