- This topic has 1,981 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 10 months ago by
.
- Posts
Quote (jammin @ April 28 2012,21:28) answer my question boy your nature is not MAN?? what are you? an animal?
Hi Jammin,I have the nature of the New Man;
which is available to you as well!
Don't let pride swallow you upGod bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Kangaroo Jack @ April 28 2012,02:20) Keith said: Quote Mike Lives in th OT and doesn't understand that all the types, shadows, saviours etc pointed to Jesus. Jesus with his own words said the scriptures testified of him. He said that all that came before him were theives and robbers.
Amen brother! Paul said that Christ is the “body.” Even the NWT says “reality.” All the “saviors” in the old testament pointed to Christ ho is the embodiment, that is the reality.
Hi Jack,I agree that many of those anointed by God in the OT were but shadows of the most important Christ, who was still yet to come into the world.
Do you agree with me that Jesus is the most important of all the ones anointed by the only true God, Jehovah?
Quote (jammin @ April 28 2012,02:35) edj, you have the nature of MAN. that's why you are MAN
jammin,Could you not equally say that because Ed has the nature of man, he is a man?
Nick,
Let me rephrase the question since you seem to be having problems with it:
Do you agree that the words in John 1:14 say “the Word BECAME flesh” – not “came to be IN someone who already was flesh“. YES or NO?
Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2012,00:41) Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ April 28 2012,02:20) Keith said: Quote Mike Lives in th OT and doesn't understand that all the types, shadows, saviours etc pointed to Jesus. Jesus with his own words said the scriptures testified of him. He said that all that came before him were theives and robbers.
Amen brother! Paul said that Christ is the “body.” Even the NWT says “reality.” All the “saviors” in the old testament pointed to Christ ho is the embodiment, that is the reality.
Hi Jack,I agree that many of those anointed by God in the OT were but shadows of the most important Christ, who was still yet to come into the world.
Do you agree with me that Jesus is the most important of all the ones anointed by the only true God, Jehovah?
Quote Do you agree with me that Jesus is the most important of all the ones anointed by the only true God, Jehovah? Mike,
PERMIT ME TO SAY:
MORE THAN AGREE FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THAT JESUS WAS NEVER ANOINTED BY ANYONE,BUT HE IS ETERNALLY IN HIMSELF ANIONTED,AND AS YOU SAID ALL THE OTHERS WERE NOT ONLY HIS SHADOW,
BUT ANOINTED BY HIM,IN him,and for him.
Now Mike read hereunder and comment on my ststement please, for the love of JESUS THE ONLY TRUE GOD I AM THE TRUTH
1 Cor. 11:3 ….. the head of Christ is God.
SO:
With reference to the above we could conclude that as a particular man without his head is just a TRUNK, Jesus also without his head would be a TRUNK.
With the same argument a trunk with his head on becomes the complete real person in respect of the head identification, so:
Jesus’ trunk with HIS head ON (WHICH IS GOD) becomes GOD,
So Jesus is God.
PEACE AND LOVE IN JESUS
CHARLES
Charles,
Not only did you begin your post by claiming the unscriptural and untrue – for Jesus is definitely the anointed one OF God, meaning that God anointed him, but then you go on to post a scripture that says GOD is the HEAD of Christ – eliminating any possibility that they are either equals or the same being.
And you end by writing some stuff that apparently only makes any sense on your planet.
Charles
Quote With the same argument a trunk with his head on becomes the complete real person in respect of the head identification, so: Jesus’ trunk with HIS head ON (WHICH IS GOD) becomes GOD,
so Christ could a chicken without head
?????you are out of your mind .
wen Paul says that God is the Head of Christ he means it IN POWER ,JUST AS THE MAN IS THE HEAD OF THE WOMEN BY POWER,TO BE USED WITH GODLY LOVE.
1 Cor 11:3
Now I want you to realise that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.Charles, does your “head/trunk” analogy work equally with the others who are mentioned in this scripture?
Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2012,00:46) Nick, Let me rephrase the question since you seem to be having problems with it:
Do you agree that the words in John 1:14 say “the Word BECAME flesh” – not “came to be IN someone who already was flesh“. YES or NO?
Hi MB,
And you think you know what is means?It is the treasure within [2cor4.7]that is the focus of scripture.
I know what the words actually say, and believe them. You, on the other hand, don't like what the words actually teach, and so have taken it upon yourself to add words into 1:14 so it conforms better around your own imagined doctrine.
The teaching is that the one called “the Word” BECAME flesh. The teaching never was that the thing called “the Word” came to be IN somebody who already was flesh.
Nick, isn't it you who keeps spouting off about how “every word counts” and other such things? Why then would you add your own words into the God-inspired scriptures, thereby changing the entire context and meaning of those scriptures?
Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2012,00:43) Quote (jammin @ April 28 2012,02:35) edj, you have the nature of MAN. that's why you are MAN
jammin,Could you not equally say that because Ed has the nature of man, he is a man?
before i answer your question, do you know what is the nature of MAN?Hi Jammin,
Yes.
He said he was a man in jn 8 and scripture offers more witnesses in acts 2 and 1 Tim 2.
You do accept the testimony of scripture?Quote (jammin @ April 29 2012,00:34) Quote (Ed J @ April 28 2012,22:06) Quote (jammin @ April 28 2012,21:28) answer my question boy your nature is not MAN?? what are you? an animal?
Hi Jammin,I have the nature of the New Man;
which is available to you as well!
Don't let pride swallow you upGod bless
Ed J
so your nature is not MAN?
Hi Jammin,“Put off concerning the former conversation the old man,
which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; And be renewed
in the spirit of your mind; And that ye put on the new man, which after God
is created in righteousness and true holiness. (Ephesians 4:22-24)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ April 30 2012,08:48) Quote (jammin @ April 29 2012,00:34) Quote (Ed J @ April 28 2012,22:06) Quote (jammin @ April 28 2012,21:28) answer my question boy your nature is not MAN?? what are you? an animal?
Hi Jammin,I have the nature of the New Man;
which is available to you as well!
Don't let pride swallow you upGod bless
Ed J
so your nature is not MAN?
Hi Jammin,“Put off concerning the former conversation the old man,
which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; And be renewed
in the spirit of your mind; And that ye put on the new man, which after God
is created in righteousness and true holiness. (Ephesians 4:22-24)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
edjthis does not answer Jammi's question ,try again
Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2012,06:57) I know what the words actually say, and believe them. You, on the other hand, don't like what the words actually teach, and so have taken it upon yourself to add words into 1:14 so it conforms better around your own imagined doctrine. The teaching is that the one called “the Word” BECAME flesh. The teaching never was that the thing called “the Word” came to be IN somebody who already was flesh.
Nick, isn't it you who keeps spouting off about how “every word counts” and other such things? Why then would you add your own words into the God-inspired scriptures, thereby changing the entire context and meaning of those scriptures?
Hi Mike, (you attempt to build doctrine on a misunderstood verse?)Acts 10:38 How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the HolySpirit and with power:
who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil;
for God was with (in more term “IN”) him.2 Cor 5:19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the
world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;
and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.John 14:10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the
Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of
myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.With μετά (met-ah')
with which it is joined;
properly, denoting accompaniment.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
