Berean…….A most “excellent ” post.

peace and love to you and yours Berean……..gene

 

 

Psalm 22:16

For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.

ISAIAH 53 :5] But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

Zechariah 13:6“

And one shall say unto him, What…

[Read more]

@desiretruth

You: I would recommend you back up your claim with scripture

Me: Isaiah 53:12 …he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

1 Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

DT……You are right about where I said “Jesus was resurrected on Saturday afternoon” , what I meant to say was he was resurrected Saturday evening at sunset, my mistake, but non the less he was not resurrected on Sunday morning,  as you falsely present it.  You very clearly left out the rest of the sentence,  to conceal the fact that,  that sentenc…[Read more]

@Carmel,

You: “when there were no sons to preserve the inheritance, the husband (son-in-law) would become the son upon marriage to keep up the family name.”

Me: I haven’t found this verse that says when marrying the daughter of a son less man the man being married becomes the “son” of that man. The only thing I found was when a man only has…[Read more]

@Berean,

Who do you think the “our” is in verse one and what message are they speaking that is so unbelievable? Who is speaking here? Please don’t stop at one verse, explain them all and what’s happening. Singling out a few verses and saying it’s Jesus is nonsensical and proves nothing but cherry picking, place all the verses in context and expla…[Read more]

Hi DT,

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>You: Me: Lineage ran through the father and NOT the mother.</span>

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>The mother has NOTHING to do with lineage,</span>

Me: NOT QUITE PRECISE:

Luke gives the name Heli (the father of Mary) but then doesn’t list Mary but mentions Joseph. Why?

LET’S SEE HOW VITAL THE WOMAN IS, C…[Read more]

@ DT
…..he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.
 
Who do you think is the “he”?
 

@Danny,

What an intellectual response to questions asked in post# 946186. You really don’t know how to respond; except with what you have been told to believe and even then your grasping at thin air, you believe something you can’t explain.

Still need to know who is speaking where in this dialog and what pronouns reference who. Lead me; bri…[Read more]

SO TRUE DD

@desiretruth

You are a liar.
The Suffering Servant pictured in Isaiah 53 is a Sin-bearer.
Only Jesus the Messiah is ‘the Lamb of God Who takes away the sin of the world.’

@ Gene

DT is right about the day of Christ’s resurrection.
If you want/if anyone wants a complete study on the subject go to:
https://www.wednesdaycrucifixion.com/

God bless

@Gene,

Since Jodi’s post is “most excellent” (Bill, Ted is that you?!?!)

Maybe you can tell me what it means to be “circumcised of the heart” and why in Ezek 44:9 Thus says the Lord Yahweh: “Every foreigner uncircumcised of heart and uncircumcised of flesh shall not come into my sanctuary—not any of the foreigners who are in the midst of the Isr…[Read more]

@Gene,

King James Bible

Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.

Let’s analyze this wording, it won’t take much because all you need is a child like level of understanding to comprehend what is written. It says “when Jesus was risen”; when was Jesus r…[Read more]

Hey there DesireTruth,

YOU: Time to move on; speak on Gal 5:1-12 and how the Jewish male is suppose to accept the Jesus as Paul teaches circumcision doesn’t matter; and relate that to Gen 17:1-14. My assessment of Paul stands; he’s a liar, manipulator, and deceiver; and he’s real good!

ME: How about we relate it to not only Genesis 17 but addit…[Read more]

DT…….First of all it does not say Jesus “rose” on the first day of the week, but it says Jesus was already “risen” and on the first day of the week Mary was the first to see him.  Jesus rose from the dead on Saturday at around 3:00 pm.

peace and love to you and yours DT…….gene

DT…….First of all it does not say Jesus “rose” on the first day of the week, but it says Jesus was already “risen” and on the first day of the week Mary was the first to see him.  Jesus rose from the dead on Saturday at around 3:00 pm.

peace and love to you and yours DT…….gene

@Gene,

Why are you making this so complicated?!!? Because you can’t admit error?

First, it explicitly says “rose early on the first day” and therefore CANNOT be at 3:00pm on the last day. The Jewish day ends and begins at sunset and traditionally today 6:00pm is used, so early on the first day would would put the time of Jesus’ resurre…[Read more]

DT……Mark 16:9…..>“Now “when” Jesus was risen (past tense) early the first day of the week he appeared first to Mary Magdalene”.   That is not saying Jesus “rose” that day , it is saying Jesus was already “risen” , and on the first day of the week he appeared to her.  There should be a comma after risen.

If Mark was saying that Jesus rose on th…[Read more]

@Carmel,

You: DT, that pure CHERRY PICKING, also, what about CONTEXT?

Me: That is a statement of pure desperation! You are utterly clueless on how to respond.

Are you saying the Jewish people don’t associate their tribal lineage to their paternal side? What does verse 2 say, a child could comprehend it. How many women are listed in Jesus’ lin…[Read more]