Proclaimer………This is the way I see it,  Jesus was proficed to come into his existence  by the prophets along time before his existence came to reality.  The error false on the fact that a word can not actually itself be a real person, no word can, be , because a word is an expression that come from anyone that speaks it,  a word is def…[Read more]

👍

Some manifest demons, but we should manifest God.

Hi to all

Daily Devotional

Christ had to take our fallen nature

“Therefore he had to be made like his brethren in all things, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to make atonement for the sins of the people. (Hebrews 2:17)

The lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, are sinful t…[Read more]

Amen Lightenup!

Christ IS divino/human(Colossians 2:9)

gloire.

1Tim.3:16   And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness:
👉God was manifest in the flesh,👈

👉justified in the Spirit, 

👉seen of angels,

👉preached unto the Gentiles,

👉believed on in the world,

👉received up into glory.  

16
kai omologoumenwV mega estin to thV…[Read more]

Hi Sis Kathi it’s a very good question on how a God can empty his nature and completely replace it with another nature. This can only happen in mythology.

That which is born of flesh is flesh and that which is born of Spirit is spirit.

With a brief skim through your post, I don’t think you can prove that the Son emptied himself of his original nature. I would challenge that. I would say that while being in the form of God, he emptied himself in some undisclosed manner in order to come in the form of man. I don’t believe for one minute that one can empty themselves of their ori…

[Read more]

So he was a God-Man when he walked the earth?

The scriptures are clear that he was a man. Not a God or the God.

There is a such thing as your delusion though.

@mikeboll64

I have banned Google.

Let’s see how this works out.

With a brief skim through your post, I don’t think you can prove that the Son emptied himself of his original nature. I would challenge that. I would say that while being in the form of God, he emptied himself in some undisclosed manner in order to come in the form of man. I don’t believe for one minute that one can empty themselves of their…[Read more]

You are free to believe in two Gods.

I believe that post about John 1c is about two different persons who are both referred to as theos.

Thanks for letting me know. It wouldn’t affect you then.

I usually use Chrome as my browser. I have HN on my toolbar. I don’t need to search for it. Does that mean anything to you?

Do any regular members use Google to find this site?

I will probably turn this into a writing. So post your objections to help eliminate any possible error.

He is defending the translation of  “the Word was God” as in a person with the same essence and nature of the God whom he was with, therefore God with God. In other words, the only begotten God was with God his Father in the beginning.

I quoted it because it make the point that the verse is talking about nature of which I believe and have taug…[Read more]

Proclaimer, you used this link https://www.ntgreek.org/answers/answer-frame-john1_1.htm to defend your understanding of John 1:1c but that link does not defend your position at all. This is what the writer of that’s summation is proclaiming:

“…the word ‘God’ is used first in the sentence actually shows some emphasis that this Logos (Word) was…[Read more]