Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 9,381 through 9,400 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #221681
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 28 2010,10:31)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 27 2010,17:15)
    Mike,
    You have nerve!

    Quote
    I see the results of people who want their imagined version of the scriptures to be the real thing so badly that they are willing to actually ignore plain scriptures in order to acheive that goal.  I see it all the time with Kathi and her never-ending “wish” for Jesus to hold a higher position than what is actually taught in scripture.  She LOVES Jesus SO MUCH that she “wills” him to actually BE the God she worships.  And she makes all kinds of non-sensical statements to support her own imagined “reality”.

    He is a part of the God I worship.  And if it were my imagination and not Spirit led, why do so many agree with me that I can find Church Father's quotes saying the same thing and I don't even find them till after I have written them???  Think Mike!  I am not so alone and 'out there' as you SLANDER me to be.

    Were you wishing that I didn't read that?


    Think about it Kathi.

    Did I say anything in that post that I haven't repeatedly told you in posts directed to you and in pm's?  

    And I'm sorry that you feel all “vindicated” to know there are many others out there that equally willingly disobey the direct commands of our God. :(

    peace and love,
    mike


    Hi Mike,

    I'm glad you see that Kathi has an imagined set of by-laws.
    There was a time in her past when she has accused others
    of wrong doing for not quoting her entire post, claiming she
    was even entitled to an apology for such willful wrong doing.

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #221683
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 28 2010,00:23)
    Anyone can force a text to draw certain conclusions. Why do textual words have to be add to to get a clear meaning , why force the text at all, or move completely away from the context of what is being talked about


    Hi Gene,

    I couldn't agree more. Let's put our agreed upon practice of not forcing the text to the test, okay?

    Philippians 2:6-7 NIV
    6Who, being in the form of God,
    did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
    7but made himself nothing,
    taking the form of a servant,
    being made in human likeness.

    I THINK: This passage says that Jesus was “in the form of God”, which means he was a spiritual being like his God. But then he emptied himself, and took on the form of a servant by being made as a human being.

    YOU THINK: This passage says that Jesus, as a human being, was doing miracles and such, so the common folk started to hold him in high esteem. They considered him “as God” to them. But instead of letting them go on thinking this, he humbly emptied himself of this grandeur, let the people know that he was not God, and then ???

    I'm still waiting for a reasonable explanation as to why it says he was made in human likeness. How can someone who already is a human being be made in the likeness of a human being?

    Okay Gene, who's forcing and twisting here? Here's another one:

    John 17:5 NRSV
    So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had in your presence before the world existed.

    I THINK: Jesus is asking his Father to glorify him in His own presence with the glory Jesus had in his Father's presence before the world existed.

    YOU THINK: Jesus is asking his Father to give him the foreordained glory that God has had just sitting around just waiting for him ever since he was a thought in God's head before the world was created.

    Which makes more grammatical sense, based on the words used? And who is forcing the text?

    That's just two scriptures Gene. Would you like to keep playing this game?

    mike

    #221686
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 28 2010,11:27)
    Hi Mike,

    I'm glad you see that Kathi has an imagined set of by-laws.
    There was a time in her past when she has accused others
    of wrong doing for not quoting her entire post, claiming she
    was even entitled to an apology for such willful wrong doing.


    One thing has nothing to do with the other Ed.  I like Kathi and respect her.  I'm talking scriptural disagreements, and you are bringing up personal ones.  I won't comment on the dispute you two had……because I wasn't a moderator then, and it's none of my business.

    I will say that I was very happy to see you return to HN. :)

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221693
    shimmer
    Participant

    Mike,  I'm not ok with whatever people believe, my point was 'when it comes to the end, to judgment day, does it matter ?' If the world ended tomorrow and you were wrong in what you had come to believe, would it matter, God judges the intentions of the heart, thank goodness we arent the judge ! God knows more than us, God knows EXACTLY what we think and feel, good or bad, not just what the public see, which is often very different.

    When it comes to beliefs today, far from it. Why dont i go to church ? I dont like what they do. Who is the Father ? The Father hardly even mentioned. It seems more like entertainment,   laughing at the jokes told. They stand around afterwards talking about… themself, their lives, their possesions, sport, do I accept 'whatever' No.

    I could write alot about that.

    #221694
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 28 2010,00:23)
    Like John 1:1 , where the word Jesus does not even appear there But preexistences and Trinitarian force the text and replace the Word , “WORD” there a (descriptor) of an attribute of GOD HIMSELF with Jesus a complete different being ,begin talked about there.  Why cant people understand if John wanted to say Jesus there He simply would Have written his name in there.


    And when he is called “the Word of God” in Rev, the name “Jesus” is not used either.  But don't you agree that particular “Word of God” was Jesus?

    This whole post of yours is just a diversion from answering to the scriptures JA, Irene and I have just posted.  In fact, I asked simple questions after each scripture I posted.  Instead of another tired diatribe containing the “Scriptures According to Gene”, why don't you answer the DIRECT questions I asked in that last post?

    Like, if Jesus wasn't the Word of John 1:1 and 1:14, then WHO was it that became flesh and dwelled among us and had the glory of an only begotten from the Father?  WHO GENE?  WHO?  WHO?  WHO?

    John 1:14-17 NWT
    14 So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an only-begotten son from a father; and he was full of undeserved kindness and truth. 15 (John bore witness about him, yes, he actually cried out—this was the one who said [it]—saying: “The one coming behind me has advanced in front of me, because he existed before me.”) 16 For we all received from out of his fullness, even undeserved kindness upon undeserved kindness. 17 Because the Law was given through Moses, the undeserved kindness and the truth came to be through Jesus Christ.

    Let's break this down Gene.

    14.  This “Word” became flesh, dwelled among us, and had the glory of an only begotten son from a father.  And he was full of undeserved kindness.

    15.  John the Baptist bore witness about this “Word”, saying, “he existed before me”.

    16.  We all received undeserved kindness out of this “Word's” fullness.

    17.  The Law was given through Moses, but this undeserved kindness was given through JESUS CHRIST.

    I know you can connect the dots Gene.  Just follow the words “undeserved kindness” and see who they lead you to.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221695
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 27 2010,19:27)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 28 2010,10:31)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 27 2010,17:15)
    Mike,
    You have nerve!

    Quote
    I see the results of people who want their imagined version of the scriptures to be the real thing so badly that they are willing to actually ignore plain scriptures in order to acheive that goal.  I see it all the time with Kathi and her never-ending “wish” for Jesus to hold a higher position than what is actually taught in scripture.  She LOVES Jesus SO MUCH that she “wills” him to actually BE the God she worships.  And she makes all kinds of non-sensical statements to support her own imagined “reality”.

    He is a part of the God I worship.  And if it were my imagination and not Spirit led, why do so many agree with me that I can find Church Father's quotes saying the same thing and I don't even find them till after I have written them???  Think Mike!  I am not so alone and 'out there' as you SLANDER me to be.

    Were you wishing that I didn't read that?


    Think about it Kathi.

    Did I say anything in that post that I haven't repeatedly told you in posts directed to you and in pm's?  

    And I'm sorry that you feel all “vindicated” to know there are many others out there that equally willingly disobey the direct commands of our God. :(

    peace and love,
    mike


    Hi Mike,

    I'm glad you see that Kathi has an imagined set of by-laws.
    There was a time in her past when she has accused others
    of wrong doing for not quoting her entire post, claiming she
    was even entitled to an apology for such willful wrong doing.

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Actually, the wrong doing Edj was by YOU who hacked up my post by changing my NUMBERS and half of my list of choices and adding your own words and even asked to not do that, you continued. Two others also gave a strong witness to this that you had been handling their quotes improperly PLUS you DID get a warning from a moderator who obviously thought you earned it. After that you did not apologize but sent me very nasty PM's calling me all sorts of demon names of which I did not respond to. You 'threatened' to not respond to any of my posts in the future of which I am entirely thankful for.

    Since you brought it up, I thought the facts should be presented.

    #221697
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 27 2010,18:31)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 27 2010,17:15)
    Mike,
    You have nerve!

    Quote
    I see the results of people who want their imagined version of the scriptures to be the real thing so badly that they are willing to actually ignore plain scriptures in order to acheive that goal.  I see it all the time with Kathi and her never-ending “wish” for Jesus to hold a higher position than what is actually taught in scripture.  She LOVES Jesus SO MUCH that she “wills” him to actually BE the God she worships.  And she makes all kinds of non-sensical statements to support her own imagined “reality”.

    He is a part of the God I worship.  And if it were my imagination and not Spirit led, why do so many agree with me that I can find Church Father's quotes saying the same thing and I don't even find them till after I have written them???  Think Mike!  I am not so alone and 'out there' as you SLANDER me to be.

    Were you wishing that I didn't read that?


    Think about it Kathi.

    Did I say anything in that post that I haven't repeatedly told you in posts directed to you and in pm's?  

    And I'm sorry that you feel all “vindicated” to know there are many others out there that equally willingly disobey the direct commands of our God. :(

    peace and love,
    mike


    Mike,
    I thought you would have a little more discretion than humiliating a friend but if not, I thought that you should have gotten your facts right. Also, how can what I believe be my imagination if several others believe the same thing??? It may be wrong but not my imagination unless I share the imagination with people that lived hundreds of years ago.

    Did you see how your comment stirred up another nasty note from Edj? It was a careless post, imo.

    Peace and love?

    #221699
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (shimmer @ Oct. 28 2010,12:00)
    Mike,  I'm not ok with whatever people believe, my point was 'when it comes to the end, to judgment day, does it matter ?'


    Shimmer:

    Quote
    Mike,  I'm not ok with whatever people believe, my point was 'when it comes to the end, to judgment day, does it matter ?'


    And I'm telling you that it DOES matter to God and His Son who will judge us.  What do you think Jesus was talking about when he said these words?

    15″Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16By their fruit you will recognize them.

    21″Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 23Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'

    Does that sound like Jesus is going to be okay with a “does it really matter” attitude?  And you seem to think that the one showing “good fruit” is the one who says the nicest things to others.  You just told JA that Gene had you believing against the scriptures for a moment on this pre-existence thing, yet you still support him because he “talks niceties to others”.  What do you think “wolf in sheep's clothing” implies?  Paul adds to Jesus' point,

    14And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. 15It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.

    No one is going to try to teach you the trinity by shouting at you.  They will take you under their wing.  They will put their arm around your shoulders and politely and kindly mislead you.  Although they are speaking the Devil's words, they will do it soothingly and from a place of “perceived” righteousness.  The “good fruits” are not about how nice someone speaks, they are about how scripturally true someone speaks.  You can think and do what you want, and I will continue to try my best to have the strength and conviction that Paul had when he said:

    12And I will keep on doing what I am doing in order to cut the ground from under those who want an opportunity to be considered equal with us in the things they boast about. 13For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, masquerading as apostles of Christ.

    Like Paul, I will keep on doing what I'm doing in an effort to cut the ground out from under Gene and anyone else who promotes unscriptural doctrines.  And I will do it the same way I have been doing it – by using the very words of scripture.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221700
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 28 2010,12:28)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 27 2010,18:31)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 27 2010,17:15)
    Mike,
    You have nerve!

    Quote
    I see the results of people who want their imagined version of the scriptures to be the real thing so badly that they are willing to actually ignore plain scriptures in order to acheive that goal.  I see it all the time with Kathi and her never-ending “wish” for Jesus to hold a higher position than what is actually taught in scripture.  She LOVES Jesus SO MUCH that she “wills” him to actually BE the God she worships.  And she makes all kinds of non-sensical statements to support her own imagined “reality”.

    He is a part of the God I worship.  And if it were my imagination and not Spirit led, why do so many agree with me that I can find Church Father's quotes saying the same thing and I don't even find them till after I have written them???  Think Mike!  I am not so alone and 'out there' as you SLANDER me to be.

    Were you wishing that I didn't read that?


    Think about it Kathi.

    Did I say anything in that post that I haven't repeatedly told you in posts directed to you and in pm's?  

    And I'm sorry that you feel all “vindicated” to know there are many others out there that equally willingly disobey the direct commands of our God. :(

    peace and love,
    mike


    Mike,
    I thought you would have a little more discretion than humiliating a friend but if not, I thought that you should have gotten your facts right.  Also, how can what I believe be my imagination if several others believe the same thing???  It may be wrong but not my imagination unless I share the imagination with people that lived hundreds of years ago.

    Did you see how your comment stirred up another nasty note from Edj?  It was a careless post, imo.

    Peace and love?


    Hi Kathi,

    My intention was not to humiliate you.  In fact, why would me mentioning what you so strongly argue in favor of be “humiliating”?  Aren't you “proud” of your understanding – even though I've showed you it isn't scriptural?

    I used you as an example of how hard it is to get someone who already has their mind set on an unscriptural doctrine to change their mind – even in the face of direct scriptural quotes. And I used YOU because I knew Gene would get the point.  

    And, to be accurate, Ed posted to my response of YOUR post.  And to be even more accurate, Ed is his own person.  I did not “lead” or “encourage” him to post anything at all.  And for you to assert that Ed's post was somehow “my fault”, is frankly unfair and inaccurate.

    And I hope you took note of my answer to his post.  

    And there are millions of scientist who IMAGINE there is no God……..does that make them right?  Does the fact that there are so many mean they aren't IMAGINING this lie?

    I don't want to fight with you, but I didn't “kick you when you were down or something like that. I've done nothing but speak the truth here.  And I refuse to be put on trial by you for doing that. But if you must be mad, then be mad.  I work toward the praise of God, not men.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221702
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Mike you didn't mention anything about me saying the the Son was a PART of God, did you? There was a missing 'part' to what you said was my beliefs. That is the problem. And you say “I've done nothing but speak the truth here.” You wouldn't be 'on trial' if you had represented my beliefs truthfully…if you had spoken the truth.

    #221704
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Do you or do you not believe that Jesus is the “God” that you worship? Is he “God” in your mind? Do you worship him? Do you worship him because you think you can't fully worship God without this “part of God”?

    So, tell me again what I said wrong so I don't make the same mistake again.

    mike

    #221705
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 28 2010,12:02)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 28 2010,00:23)
    Like John 1:1 , where the word Jesus does not even appear there But preexistences and Trinitarian force the text and replace the Word , “WORD” there a (descriptor) of an attribute of GOD HIMSELF with Jesus a complete different being ,begin talked about there.  Why cant people understand if John wanted to say Jesus there He simply would Have written his name in there.


    And when he is called “the Word of God” in Rev, the name “Jesus” is not used either.  But don't you agree that particular “Word of God” was Jesus?

    This whole post of yours is just a diversion from answering to the scriptures JA, Irene and I have just posted.  In fact, I asked simple questions after each scripture I posted.  Instead of another tired diatribe containing the “Scriptures According to Gene”, why don't you answer the DIRECT questions I asked in that last post?

    Like, if Jesus wasn't the Word of John 1:1 and 1:14, then WHO was it that became flesh and dwelled among us and had the glory of an only begotten from the Father?  WHO GENE?  WHO?  WHO?  WHO?

    John 1:14-17 NWT
    14 So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an only-begotten son from a father; and he was full of undeserved kindness and truth. 15 (John bore witness about him, yes, he actually cried out—this was the one who said [it]—saying: “The one coming behind me has advanced in front of me, because he existed before me.”) 16 For we all received from out of his fullness, even undeserved kindness upon undeserved kindness. 17 Because the Law was given through Moses, the undeserved kindness and the truth came to be through Jesus Christ.

    Let's break this down Gene.

    14.  This “Word” became flesh, dwelled among us, and had the glory of an only begotten son from a father.  And he was full of undeserved kindness.

    15.  John the Baptist bore witness about this “Word”, saying, “he existed before me”.

    16.  We all received undeserved kindness out of this “Word's” fullness.

    17.  The Law was given through Moses, but this undeserved kindness was given through JESUS CHRIST.

    I know you can connect the dots Gene.  Just follow the words “undeserved kindness” and see who they lead you to.

    peace and love,
    mike


    Hi Mike,

    I answered these points of yours.
    Didn't you like the answers I gave?

    God bless
    Ed J
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #221706
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Mike,
    I have told you that you worship the Father in part if you don't include the Son and the Spirit as being inseparable parts of His fullness that deserves our utmost worship and highest regard. To worship the Father apart from the Son and the Spirit is like appreciating a distant twinkling star compared to appreciating our sun in its fullness with its light rays and warmth that we benefit from so much. You are missing a great part of God the Father, imo.

    #221709
    david
    Participant

    Does this mean that people like Noah, Moses, Abraham, etc, were only worshiping God in part? (I don't think they were including the Son in their worship of God.)

    #221724
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 28 2010,13:26)
    Mike,
    I have told you that you worship the Father in part if you don't include the Son and the Spirit as being inseparable parts of His fullness that deserves our utmost worship and highest regard.


    Hi Kathi,

    I worship and serve Jehovah God Almighty.  His Holy Spirit is not another entity to be “included” in the worship of Him.

    His Son, on the other hand IS a separate entity who is NOT Jehovah God Almighty.  And that same Son confirms what many scriptures tell us……….that we are to worship Jehovah our God, and serve Him ONLY.

    HIM Kathi, not US.

    You ADD the Son to the Father, and at the same time SEPARATE God's Holy Spirit FROM God. ??? I don't know what scriptures you misunderstand as telling us this is the way it is.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #221725
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 28 2010,13:26)
    Hi Mike,

    I answered these points of yours.
    Didn't you like the answers I gave?


    I'm sorry Ed. Have I neglected our discussion? :) I'll be there in a minute.

    mike

    #221745
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 27 2010,23:33)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 28 2010,13:26)
    Mike,
    I have told you that you worship the Father in part if you don't include the Son and the Spirit as being inseparable parts of His fullness that deserves our utmost worship and highest regard.


    Hi Kathi,

    I worship and serve Jehovah God Almighty.  His Holy Spirit is not another entity to be “included” in the worship of Him.

    His Son, on the other hand IS a separate entity who is NOT Jehovah God Almighty.  And that same Son confirms what many scriptures tell us……….that we are to worship Jehovah our God, and serve Him ONLY.

    HIM Kathi, not US.

    You ADD the Son to the Father, and at the same time SEPARATE God's Holy Spirit FROM God. ???  I don't know what scriptures you misunderstand as telling us this is the way it is.

    peace and love,
    mike


    There you go again. When have I ever said the Holy Spirit is a separate entity from God the Father?

    His Son is a distinct person from the Father but wasn't always. I believe that He was always within the Father until He was begotten as a distinct person coming forth as a part of God.

    #221755
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (shimmer @ Oct. 27 2010,20:26)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Oct. 27 2010,18:05)

    Quote (shimmer @ Oct. 26 2010,22:22)
    Adam, what are you saying ? What made you feel like this ? (karmarie


    Hi Sis Karmarie,
    Thanks for your concern about me. Infact I have been doing lot of research on Christian scriptures these days. I noticed lot of human bias and contradictions in the Bible both in O.T and N.T. It can not be an inspired book authorized by God. It seems to me as a mere human book like any other religious book with full bias towards regional and racism. Christianity made it universal religion which Jesus himself never meant that way. I still believe there may be a true God in this universe but He could not have commissioned this so called contradictory religion.

    I love all brothers and sisters who care for me in this forum especially brothers like Gene, Kerwin, Nick, T8 etc. and Sisters like Mandy, Irene, you and others. This is the forum that led me to unlearn my old inhibitions and helped me to be frank in my research.

    Love and peace to you and others
    Adam


    Hi Adam.

    I wish I could say the right thing to help you, we all have to have our own journey, in life, it hurts to see people become as you feel,

    I think, for me, scripture I became addicted to, couldnt stop reading it, annoyed the heck out of everyone, but there came a time when I put it down, there came a time where I followed God, in spirit, in prayer, I stopped reading and remembered all that I needed, I do still read but only if I feel I have to, as shown in prayer.

    Maybe Adam, you have read too much ? Adam, I pray now and hope you will be ok.


    Hi Sis Karmarie,
    Thanks again for your loving response to frustrating post. Yes you may be right in saying “I have read too much”. That is the problem with me once I started reading Bible with critical aspect.

    If you prayers are answered by the unknown God I may be Ok soon.

    With love and peace
    Adam

    #221756
    JustAskin
    Participant

    LU,
    You are right in your last post.

    Jesus was indeed part of God before he was created.

    But then so was EVERYTHING until tney were created.

    And once again, the great, ''All does not mean 'all' '' point has to be made… Not ''All, but excepting that through which the 'all' was created,  the Holy Spirit of God''

    God created 'all' through His Holy Spirit, but It being 'part' of Him, it need not be continually said. It will be eternally assumed, so that no one comes to devise the Holy Spirit as a seperate 'God' and presume to Worship it.

    And, for this same reason also, I state that 'Jesus' was not exposed as 'the Angel of God' in the OT, namely, so the people, the Hebrews, the Israelites, the Jews…, would not come to see the 'Angel of God' as a God, and presume to Worship him.

    But, and also…Mike is right: Scriptures tell us to:
                   'Worship the Father'
                                   but
                       'Praise the Son'.

    LU, if you had been in former days, you would have sought to worship Angels, strictly against the command of God.

    Today, LU, Jesus is 'Man'.
    “For [he is] Man, not God”

    LU, you seek to Worship a Man, even a Man in the spirit.

    But even saying that, I have told you before that what you are doing is not 'Worship' in any case. So be comforted that you have not sinned in act, only in thoughtful desire (ok, Scriptures says it's the samething but can be forgiven).

    So, stop calling it 'Worship' and you will go through.

    Call it, 'Praising'
    Call it, 'Glorifying'
    Call it, 'Honoring'

    Call it, 'Being in Obeisance' to the Father And the Son.

    'Praise the Son, Worship [only] God'.

    #221757
    Baker
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 28 2010,13:26)
    Mike,
    I have told you that you worship the Father in part if you don't include the Son and the Spirit as being inseparable parts of His fullness that deserves our utmost worship and highest regard.  To worship the Father apart from the Son and the Spirit is like appreciating a distant twinkling star compared to appreciating our sun in its fullness with its light rays and warmth that we benefit from so much.  You are missing a great part of God the Father, imo.


    Wow, that is a half of a trinity. There is only one Almighty God and He deserves all the worship ONLY.

    Deu 4:35 Unto thee it was shewed, that thou mightest know that the LORD he [is] God; [there is] none else beside him.

    Deu 6:4 ¶ Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God [is] one LORD:

    Deu 6:5 And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.

    1Cr 8:4 As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol [is] nothing in the world, and that [there is] none other God but one.

    Eph 4:6 One God and Father of all, who [is] above all, and through all, and in you all.

    and by Jesus own words in

    Jhn 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come [again] unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.

    This is why I worship God only…… You my dear are worship in vain….

    Mat 15:9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching [for] doctrines the commandments of men.

    That is what you did, according to you and not what Scriptures teach us……
    Peace Irene

Viewing 20 posts - 9,381 through 9,400 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account