Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 8,481 through 8,500 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #206392
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 28 2010,02:02)
    Kerwin……….Good point, God gave glory to Cyrus before he was ever born , that also provers your point on preexisting (glory) without the person even existing.


    Hi Gene,

    I've heard you say this about Cyrus before. Can you give me the scripture?

    peace and love,
    mike

    ps the John 6:62 thread is waiting for all you “non-existers”.

    #206401
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Hi WJ,

    You said:

    Quote
    All the major translations render the verse the same.


    OH!  All major translations render it that way?  I didn't know that.  Of course now I'll change my mind because the trinitarian sponsored translations all render it that way!   :D  :laugh:  :D

    You said:

    Quote
    It not only says He was with the Father God, but also says he was God or literrally “God was the Word”.


    I didn't know it said “Father” God.  I thought it said the Word was with THE God and was a god who was obviously not THE God.  How can one being be “WITH” itself?  And why did John say one was THE God and the other was simply god?

    You said:

    Quote
    You are the one wanting to add to the text.

    We take it just like it reads.

    So put your money where your mouth is.  Read it without the capital Gs that the translators add.  Organized for English, but without the caps it reads:

    in beginning was the word and the word was with the god and the word was god

    The word was with THE god.  If the word was THE god, then it couldn't be with THE god.

    I would go more into this, but we are off topic.

    mike

    #206402
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ July 28 2010,08:38)
    Total misunderstanding of the words “firstborn” and “beginning.”


    Of course it is Jack. Yet somehow the early church fathers who actually spoke the Koine Greek language very close to the time the NT was written agree with me and Irene, not you and WJ. ???

    That's an interesting conundrum, no?

    mike

    #206403
    JustAskin
    Participant

    Mike,
    Has anyone ever responded with and answer to how 'the Word' was (why WAS?) God … And also 'WITH' God?

    Seems the question keeps getting asked but no disputarians, or is it 'desperarians'? ever answer.

    #206406

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 27 2010,19:55)
    in beginning was the word and the word was with the god and the word was god


    Do you see any difference with the 2nd “Theos”? Was John an idiot? You must think so when he could have used other words.

    In what way was John saying John 1:1c was less theos than John 1:1b? Prove it Mike!

    But you can't.

    We have already been over this and proven that the lack of the definite article doesn't matter for the translators many times translated “theos” without the article when it was refering to the Father or God!

    So you once again need to put your money where your mouth is and show us one scripture in the NT that puts an “a” before theos like the corrupted version the NWT.

    You expect me to accept the translation of a few “Non Biblical Hebrew or Greek scholars” who could not translate the fuzz off of a peanut when it came to Hebrew or Greek translation.

    We believe what the scriptures say literrally, while you on the other hand have to make all kinds of inferences and conjectures and reject the scriptures.

    WJ

    #206409

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 27 2010,19:57)

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ July 28 2010,08:38)
    Total misunderstanding of the words “firstborn” and “beginning.”


    Of course it is Jack.  Yet somehow the early church fathers who actually spoke the Koine Greek language very close to the time the NT was written agree with me and Irene, not you and WJ.   ???

    That's an interesting conundrum, no?

    mike


    Lies.

    For the Forefathers did not believe what you believe when it comes to Jesus having a beginning does it Mike?

    This has been shown to you over and over but you keep making these false claims.

    Most of the Forefathers were Trinitarian Mike.

    So you and Kathi are not in agreement with the way the Forefathers understood the words “firstborn” and “begotten”.

    WJ

    #206411

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 27 2010,20:00)
    Mike,
    Has anyone ever responded with and answer to how 'the Word' was (why WAS?) God … And also 'WITH' God?

    Seems the question keeps getting asked but no disputarians, or is it 'desperarians'? ever answer.


    Ja

    It is because the title “Theos” does not classify identity but it clasifys the nature of a being that is in a metaphysical class of his own.

    Jesus is the Monogenes (only of its kind) Son of God (John 1:14). He is of the same kind as the Father which is “God”.

    Just as man is of the same kind which is human or man.

    WJ

    #206414
    JustAskin
    Participant

    WJ,

    So when Scriptures says that everone of mankind who overcomes will be a 'Son of God', what does that then make that one?

    I asked elewhere, the same, is 'Jesus, Son of God' different to 'He who overcomes, Son of God'?

    #206421

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 27 2010,20:22)
    WJ,

    So when Scriptures says that everone of mankind who overcomes will be a 'Son of God', what does that then make that one?

    I asked elewhere, the same, is 'Jesus, Son of God' different to 'He who overcomes, Son of God'?


    JA

    The scriptures say Jesus is the “Only (begotten) Son of God.

    There is no other that will be the “Only Begotten Son”.

    The word begottten is “Monogenes” which means “only of its kind”.

    Jesus alone shares this title and that is because he is the Word that was with God and was/is God in nature just like the Father.

    WJ

    #206423
    JustAskin
    Participant

    WJ,

    Is 'Jesus, Son of God' different from 'he who overcomes, Son of God'?

    #206427

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 27 2010,20:41)
    WJ,

    Is 'Jesus, Son of God' different from 'he who overcomes, Son of God'?


    Since he is the “Only Begotten Son” then I would say yes, wouldn't you? For “Only” means no other right?

    Or do you not believe he is the “Monogenes” (only of its kind) Son of God?

    WJ

    #206430
    JustAskin
    Participant

    ha ha, WJ, you are a joker aren't you?

    You can't answer…ha ha, why, did i believe you would? Of course not.
    Scriptures says that he who overcomes will become, 'begotten of God', 'A Son of God, as a Son, then brother to Christ, and as such, HEIR to the inheritence WITH him.

    Son of God. And Godwill be his Father, just as God is Father to Christ.
    Brother to Jesus, being Son also to the same Father.
    Heir to God, as Christ is Heir (But, yes, Jesus Christ is 'firstborn' Heir)

    So, WJ, try again.

    Ok, let me say, different, Jesus is Senior 'brother'. How else is Jesus different to the other 'Begotten of God Sons of God'?

    #206441
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    We are in the monogenes son by baptism and his Spirit is born into us.[Gal].

    #206443
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 28 2010,12:09)
    So you once again need to put your money where your mouth is and show us one scripture in the NT that puts an “a” before theos like the corrupted version the NWT.

    We believe what the scriptures say literrally, while you on the other hand have to make all kinds of inferences and conjectures and reject the scriptures.


    Why does the example have to be of the word “theos”?  I have showed examples of other words where the “a” is added by English translators.  They do it twice in John 8:44.  The Greek says Satan was manslayer and liar.  But we add the “a” to make it say “a manslayer” and “a liar”.  Why add it here, but not in John 1:1?

    Second, I've just showed you what the scripture literally says.  Why do you think that the “god” who was WITH “THE god” would also BE “THE god”?

    How do you come up with this?  If they were both “THE god”, then first, why didn't John say that, and second, how can “THE god” be WITH “THE god”?

    mike

    #206444
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 28 2010,12:12)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 27 2010,19:57)

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ July 28 2010,08:38)
    Total misunderstanding of the words “firstborn” and “beginning.”


    Of course it is Jack.  Yet somehow the early church fathers who actually spoke the Koine Greek language very close to the time the NT was written agree with me and Irene, not you and WJ.   ???

    That's an interesting conundrum, no?

    mike


    Lies.

    For the Forefathers did not believe what you believe when it comes to Jesus having a beginning does it Mike?

    WJ


    Don't make me post the Eusebius and Ignatius quotes along with the questions you ran from for a month.   :D  :laugh:  :D

    mike

    #206445
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (JustAskin @ July 28 2010,12:00)
    Mike,
    Has anyone ever responded with and answer to how 'the Word' was (why WAS?) God … And also 'WITH' God?

    Seems the question keeps getting asked but no disputarians, or is it 'desperarians'? ever answer.


    Hi JA,

    WJ tried to explain his conjecture that the first “god” was the Father, so therefore the Son could easily be “with” Him. But I haven't ever heard the “was” part brought up that I remember.

    But that will be a great point to nail them down on in t8's proposed “BIG BOY” forum.  Make sure you all go and vote “yes” for that puppy.  :)

    I look forward to a forum where you either answer the questions or get booted.  And belive me, I will do some bootin' if questions aren't answered.  :D

    peace and love,
    mike

    #206446
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 28 2010,12:38)
    The word begottten is “Monogenes” which means “only of its kind”.


    Oh brother! ANOTHER definition?

    They started off saying “only one AFTER it's own kind”, but I nailed Jack on that by saying that means Jesus is still AFTER God. So here's the new fangled definition that resulted, I guess. :D

    mike

    #206461
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    I pointed out that these scriptures are vague and thus would fall into the category of what Peter referred to as hard to understand.  One thing that we have to watch out for is that Satan will use our mind to play mental tricks on us when interpreting scripture.   This is the scripture and as you can clearly see it does not state that Jesus was in the presence of God before the word began.  Rather it states Jesus’ glory was with God before the world began.  You are inadvertently replacing the word “glory” with “glory I had in your presence” even though it is not written.  I have checked other versions of scripture and they say the same thing with different words.  

    John 17:5 (NIV) reads:

    Quote

    And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

    Jesus was teaching how God was revealing the mystery that he had hidden for long ages, Romans 16:25, Ephesians 6:19, Ephesians 3:6.  That mystery is that God had predestined Jesus to be King of everything in heaven and earth and so the mediator of the new covenant.   That glory God did bestow on Jesus in his presence and thus the new covenant became binding and Jesus its mediator.

    That is hardly a stretch as I merely show how Jesus was saying the same thing that Paul did in Romans 16:25 and elsewhere.   I am certain that like Paul, Jesus believed that God knew in advance all that would happen and Jesus was speaking from that faith.

    I am also myself confident that God knew beforehand all that would happen as he is all knowing.   You can debate that it is the proper interpretation of a vague scripture but it does fit the context of that passage and what Jesus obviously believed.

    Your fellow student,

    Kerwin

    #206468
    kerwin
    Participant

    T8,

    I was short on time this morning and so stopped after pointing out that you make assumptions about hard to understand scriptures but before I addressed all the scriptures you quoted.   I did point out that the authors of these scriptures assume their readers are aware of what they are speaking about and thus do not clarify them.  Sometimes it is also the difference between our own and the Greek/Jewish culture of the First Century.  Word in John 1 for instance could simply be the Holy Spirit because that is how Philo of Alexandria the Jew philosopher of the First Century used the word translated to “Word” and it is consistent with the Jewish way of using words that describe their meaning.  For my purposes I am going to assume Word means God’s Word because even if John was speaking of the Holy Spirit it is in that case a representative of God’s Word.

    John 1:3 is speaking about God’s Word which is also the subject of verse 1 and 2 of the same chapter of John.   Jesus is addressed as flesh in verse 14 because the Jews are prone to use descriptive words and flesh describes a human being as in Psalms 78:39 or a living creature as in Genesis 6:12.

    So even though these words appear to be figurative to us of this day and age they may well have been literal, or at least easy to understand, to those who were the original recipients of these Scriptures.

    I already mentioned that you are assuming John 1:3 is speaking of Jesus though it does not actually say it is.  It is certainly reasonable to believe it is speaking of the spirit of Christ but the spirit is not the soul but rather the guiding force of the soul.   Jesus’ spirit pre-existed his existence.

    Now about John 1:14 you seem to believe that the Word of God shape changed into a human being and that the Word of God is a spiritual being that you speculate is the pre-existent Jesus.   Have you also considered that in the beginning God said “let there be light” and thus his Word was transformed into light, Genesis 1:3.

    So in conclusion if you were to argue Jesus’ spirit pre-existed his conception then I not only will not disagree but would instead agree that is so.   On the other hand Jesus is a human being just like you and me and was never, and is not, a spiritual being except in the context that he is a citizen of the spiritual realm.

    Your fellow student,

    Kerwin

    PS: For your convenience I attached my earlier post this post is continued from.

    Quote (kerwin @ July 27 2010,17:34)
    T8,

    I will point out that you are making assumptions about a number of the scriptures you choose to quote.

    In Colossians 1:17 you assume that it is speaking of the old creation.   What evidence do you actually have to back that up especially as Scripture declares Jesus is the mediator of the new creation?

    In John 17:5 you assume that just because God gave glory to Jesus that Jesus existed at that time.    You are speaking of God who knows all things and can give glory to a person because beforehand that person will exist.

    I have not got the time to cover the other ones but I will mention that appearances can be deceptive and sometimes a writer or speaker uses vague words because they are certain their hearers know what they are speaking of.  This may be true of those who the various books of the New Testament were addressed to but not necessary true of us.

    Your fellow student,

    Kerwin

    #206470
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (kerwin @ July 28 2010,16:19)
    T8,

    Word in John 1 for instance could simply be the Holy Spirit because that is how Philo of Alexandria the Jew philosopher of the First Century used the word translated to “Word” and it is consistent with the Jewish way of using words that describe their meaning.  For my purposes I am going to assume Word means God’s Word because even if John was speaking of the Holy Spirit it is in that case a representative of God’s Word.

    Your fellow student,

    Kerwin


    Hi Kerwin,

    I'm glad God has revealed this to you, Kerwin! (Click Here)

    Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH (Psalm 45:17)
    יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm!
    Ed J (AKJV Joshua 22:34 / Isaiah 60:13-15)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

Viewing 20 posts - 8,481 through 8,500 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account